Statute of Enrolments

Last updated

Statute of Enrolments
Act of Parliament
Coat of Arms of Henry VIII of England (1509-1547).svg
Long title An Act concerning Inrollments of Bargains and Contracts of Lands and Tenements.
Citation 27 Hen. 8. c. 16
Dates
Royal assent 14 April 1536
Other legislation
Repealed by Law of Property (Amendment) Act 1924
Relates to Statute of Uses
Status: Repealed

The Statute of Enrolments or Enrolment of Bargains of Lands, etc. Act 1535 was a 1536 Act of the Parliament of England that regulated the sale and transfer of land. The Statute is commonly considered an addition to the Statute of Uses, which was passed within the same Parliament, probably due to an omission in the Statute of Uses. It is thought to have been intended to prevent secret conveyancing, although modern academics instead assert that it was so Henry VIII could keep an accurate record of who his freeholders were. The Statute, which only provided for estates "of inheritance and freehold", was easily evaded through the sale of an estate for a limited time period as leasehold, followed by subsequent "release", confirmed in 1621 by Lutwich v Mitton. [1]

Contents

Statute

The statute was intended as an addition to the Statute of Uses, and was passed in the same session of Parliament. Francis Bacon, for example, referred to it as "but a Proviso" to the Statute of Uses. [2] It provided that after 31 July 1536, no estates of inheritance or freehold was to be transferred based on a bargain and sale unless the sealed and indented deed of the bargain and sale had been enrolled by the courts in Westminster or before the custos rotulorum, two Justices of the Peace and the clerk of the peace of the county, unless it was in those cities or boroughs where this was already required. [3]

It is thought by Charles Isaac Elton that the Statute was drafted "as some sort of emergency legislation", which Kaye supports, saying that it was most likely due to some omission in the Statute of Uses. However, it is noted by Holdsworth that a draft Henrician bill on Enrolments already existed and was more elaborate that the Statute of Enrolments which was passed instead. [4] He insists that it was "certainly not, as is sometimes stated, [5] a statute passed in a hurry to supply an unforeseen defect in the Statute of Uses", [6] referring to Bacon, who suggests that it was passed as a Proviso in order to prevent the foreseen consequence of the execution of uses leading to the passing of freeholds by parol contract. [7] The common impression, however, is that the Statute was intended to prevent secret conveyancing; [8] Oxland instead interprets it as being a way for Henry VIII to keep an accurate record of who his freeholders were at any one time. [9]

The Statute was evaded through simply leasing the land for a period of years, rather than freehold. [10] This worked because the statute only applied to estates "of inheritance and freehold", not of leasehold. [11] By leasing the land by bargain and sale for a nominal period (creating a use which is executed in favour of the bargainor immediately by the Statute of Uses), and then granting a "release" relinquishing the lessor's reversionary rights to the lessee, no transfer of freehold land took place and no enrolment was therefore necessary. [12] The so-called "lease and release" is said to have been invented by Sir Francis Moore and came into general use in the early 17th century, confirmed in the case of Lutwich v Mitton in 1621. [13]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copyhold</span> Customary land tenure in a manorial estate

Copyhold was a form of customary land ownership common from the Late Middle Ages into modern times in England. The name for this type of land tenure is derived from the act of giving a copy of the relevant title deed that is recorded in the manorial court roll to the tenant, rather than the actual land deed itself. The legal owner of the manor land remained the mesne lord, who was legally the copyholder, according to the titles and customs written down in the manorial roll. In return for being given land, a copyhold tenant was required to carry out specific manorial duties or services. The specific rights and duties of copyhold tenants varied greatly from one manor to another and many were established by custom. By the 19th century, many customary duties had been replaced with the payment of rent.

In English law, a fee simple or fee simple absolute is an estate in land, a form of freehold ownership. A "fee" is a vested, inheritable, present possessory interest in land. A "fee simple" is real property held without limit of time under common law, whereas the highest possible form of ownership is a "fee simple absolute", which is without limitations on the land's use.

This aims to be a complete list of the articles on real estate.

An estate in land is, in the law of England and Wales, an interest in real property that is or may become possessory. It is a type of personal property and encompasses land ownership, rental and other arrangements that give people the right to use land. This is distinct from sovereignty over the land, which includes the right to government and taxation.

A leasehold estate is an ownership of a temporary right to hold land or property in which a lessee or a tenant has rights of real property by some form of title from a lessor or landlord. Although a tenant does hold rights to real property, a leasehold estate is typically considered personal property.

As a legal term, ground rent specifically refers to regular payments made by a holder of a leasehold property to the freeholder or a superior leaseholder, as required under a lease. In this sense, a ground rent is created when a freehold piece of land is sold on a long lease or leases. The ground rent provides an income for the landowner. In economics, ground rent is a form of economic rent meaning all value accruing to titleholders as a result of the exclusive ownership of title privilege to location.

<i>Quia Emptores</i> English statute of 1290

Quia Emptores is a statute passed by the Parliament of England in 1290 during the reign of Edward I that prevented tenants from alienating their lands to others by subinfeudation, instead requiring all tenants who wished to alienate their land to do so by substitution. The statute, along with its companion statute Quo Warranto also passed in 1290, was intended to remedy land ownership disputes and consequent financial difficulties that had resulted from the decline of the traditional feudal system in England during the High Middle Ages. The name Quia Emptores derives from the first two words of the statute in its original mediaeval Latin, which can be translated as "because the buyers". Its long title is A Statute of our Lord The King, concerning the Selling and Buying of Land. It is also cited as the Statute of Westminster III, one of many English and British statutes with that title.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Statute of Uses</span> Repealed legislation of the Parliament of England

The Statute of Uses was an Act of the Parliament of England that restricted the application of uses in English property law. The Statute ended the practice of creating uses in real property by changing the purely equitable title of beneficiaries of a use into absolute ownership with the right of seisin (possession).

Use, as a term in the property law of common law countries, amounts to a recognition of the duty of a person to whom property has been conveyed for certain purposes, to carry out those purposes. In this context "use" is equivalent to "benefit".

A profit, in the law of real property, is a nonpossessory interest in land similar to the better-known easement, which gives the holder the right to take natural resources such as petroleum, minerals, timber, and wild game from the land of another. Indeed, because of the necessity of allowing access to the land so that resources may be gathered, every profit contains an implied easement for the owner of the profit to enter the other party's land for the purpose of collecting the resources permitted by the profit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Land Registration Act 2002</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Land Registration Act 2002 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which repealed and replaced previous legislation governing land registration, in particular the Land Registration Act 1925, which governed an earlier, though similar, system. The Act, together with the Land Registration Rules, regulates the role and practice of HM Land Registry.

<span title="Anglo-Norman-language text"><i lang="xno">Cestui que</i></span> Concept in English law regarding beneficiaries

Cestui que is a shortened version of "cestui a que use le feoffment fuit fait", lit.'the person for whose use/benefit the feoffment was made'; in modern terms, it corresponds to a beneficiary. It is a Law French phrase of medieval English invention, which appears in the legal phrases cestui que trust, cestui que use, or cestui que vie. In contemporary English the phrase is also commonly pronounced SET-ee-kay or SEST-ee-kay. According to Roebuck, Cestui que use is pronounced SET-ik-ee-YOOSS. Cestui que use and cestui que trust are often interchangeable. In some medieval documents it is seen as cestui a que. In formal legal discourse it is often used to refer to the relative novelty of a trust itself, before that English term became acceptable.

A leasehold valuation tribunal (LVT) was a statutory tribunal in England which determined various types of landlord and tenant dispute involving residential property in the private sector. An LVT consisted of a panel of three; one with a background in property law ; one with a background in property valuation generally a qualified surveyor; and a layman, although some decisions of an LVT were decided by a single member. LVTs were non-departmental public bodies.

In English land law, a rentcharge is an annual sum paid by the owner of freehold land (terre-tenant) to the owner of the rentcharge (rentcharger), a person who need have no other legal interest in the land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Representation of the People (Ireland) Act 1832</span> United Kingdom law reforming the electoral system in Ireland

The Representation of the People (Ireland) Act 1832, commonly called the Irish Reform Act 1832, was an Act of Parliament that introduced wide-ranging changes to the election laws of Ireland. The act was passed at approximately the same time as the Reform Act 1832, which applied to England and Wales.

A lease and release is a form of conveyance of real property involving the lease of land by its owner to a tenant, followed by a release (relinquishment) of the landlord's interest in the property to the tenant. This sequence of transactions was commonly used to transfer full freehold title to real estate under real property law. The lease and release was a mode of conveyance of freehold estates formerly common in England and in New York. Between its parties it achieves the same outcome as a deed of grant/transfer/conveyance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of Property Act 1925</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Law of Property Act 1925 is a statute of the United Kingdom Parliament. It forms part of an interrelated programme of legislation introduced by Lord Chancellor Lord Birkenhead between 1922 and 1925. The programme was intended to modernise the English law of real property. The Act deals principally with the transfer of freehold or leasehold land by deed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freehold (law)</span> Legal term

A freehold, in common law jurisdictions such as England and Wales, Australia, Canada, Ireland, and twenty states in the United States, is the common mode of ownership of real property, or land, and all immovable structures attached to such land.

The history of English land law can be traced back to Roman times. Throughout the Early Middle Ages, where England came under rule of post-Roman chieftains and Anglo-Saxon monarchs, land was the dominant source of personal wealth. English land law transformed further from the Anglo-Saxon days, particularly during the post-Norman Invasion feudal encastellation and the Industrial Revolution. As the political power of the landed aristocracy diminished and modern legislation increasingly made land a social form of wealth, subject to extensive social regulation such as for housing, national parks and agriculture.

In English and Irish law, a fee farm grant is a hybrid type of land ownership typical in cities and towns. The word fee is derived from fief or fiefdom, meaning a feudal landholding, and a fee farm grant is similar to a fee simple in the sense that it gives the grantee the right to hold a freehold estate, the only difference being the payment of an annual rent and covenants, thus putting the parties in a landlord-tenant relationship.

References

  1. Lutwich v. Mitton (1621) Cro. Jac. 604.
  2. Spedding (ed.) (1859) at p. 432.
  3. Statute of Enrolments, 1536, 27 Hen. VIII, c. 16.
  4. Holdsworth (1923) at p. 457.
  5. E. g., Jenks, Short History of English Law, 121
  6. Holdsworth (1923) at p. 455.
  7. Spedding (ed.) (1859) at p. 432.
  8. Kaye (1988) at p. 618
  9. Oxland (1985) at p. 63
  10. Holdsworth (2004) p.159
  11. Oxland (1985) p.64
  12. Yale (1957) at 75.
  13. Lutwich v. Mitton (1621) Cro. Jac. 604; Holdsworth (2004) p. 160

Bibliography