Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea

Last updated

The Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea has been the highest court of Papua New Guinea since 16 September 1975, replacing the pre-Independence Supreme Court (corresponding to the post-Independence National Court) and the overseas appellate tribunals from 1902 to 1975 of the High Court of Australia and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. Judges of the pre-Independence Supreme Court automatically became the first justices of the National Court and accordingly among the pool of judges that were available to be empanelled as a Supreme Court bench.

Contents

Establishment and composition

The Supreme Court was established as a superior court of record under Papua New Guinea's Constitution. [1] The Chief Justice of Papua New Guinea, Deputy Chief Justice and the judges of the National Court (excluding acting judges) comprise the Court. [2]

Not separately constituted, the Supreme Court is an appellate committee or "full court" of the National Court, which is the superior-level trial court. Judges of the National Court form panels of the Supreme Court on an ad hoc basis to hear appeals from the National Court, appeals from assorted administrative tribunals, and to hear references in the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction.

Reference jurisdiction and the separation of powers

In the latter case the Court is, strictly speaking, not exercising a judicial function but rather, pursuant to the ruling of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Attorney-General of Ontario v Attorney-General of Canada (Reference Appeal) [1912] AC 571, one of advising the executive branch of government, a jurisdiction expressly conferred on the Supreme Court by Papua New Guinea's Constitution. Other jurisdictions, notably the USA (federally, though not in all states) and Australia, eschew the reference function for their courts on the grounds that it violates the principle of the separation of powers as among the legislative, executive and judiciary; in Canada, it is held that the principle is inapplicable in a parliamentary democracy.

The constitutional convention which deliberated on the drafting of Papua New Guinea's Constitution immediately prior to Independence took counsel from Canadian academics and the reference procedure was readily adopted. In Papua New Guinean jurisprudence, as in Australia, the formula "separation of powers" is frequently referred to. However, as in Australia (and unlike in the USA where the principle was enunciated and where the executive is not responsible to the legislature) it has a special limited application, being confined to describing the well-established convention of an independent judiciary, dating from the English Bill of Rights1689 : the executive is, of course, responsible to the legislature in Papua New Guinea's Parliament.

Developing the underlying law

The Supreme Court (together with the National Court) has a special responsibility for developing the underlying law , i.e. the common law of Papua New Guinea, having resort to those rules of local custom in various regions of the country which may be taken to be common to the whole country. The responsibility has been given additional express warrant in the Underlying Law Act2000 which purports to mandate greater attention by the courts to custom and the development of customary law as an important component of the underlying law. In practice the courts have found great difficulty in applying the vastly differing custom of the many traditional societies of the country in a modern legal system and the development of the customary law according to indigenous Melanesian conceptions of justice and equity has been less thorough than may have been anticipated in 1975; the Underlying Law Act does not yet appear to have had significant effect. An ardent proponent of the underlying law, David Gonol in his book titled The Underlying Law of Papua New Guinea: An inquiry into adoption and application of customary law expounded at length on these issues. [3] Further, in the 2017 Third National Underlying Law Conference, many notable speakers expressed similar sentiments that the underlying law is not being developed at sufficient pace.

Hierarchy of precedent

The hierarchy of case law precedent is that while the Supreme Court has authority to overrule any case authority, its own decisions are binding on the lower courts as are the decisions of the English superior courts prior to Papua New Guinea's independence, which are deemed to be part of Papua New Guinea's underlying law. Decisions of the pre-Independence Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea are deemed to be foreign law, equivalent in authority to decisions by any foreign court with a similar legal system, and of persuasive value only. The principle of the mere persuasiveness of overseas (and pre-Independence Papua New Guinea) authority vis-à-vis the binding authority of pre-1975 English authority has been applied many times in, for example, Toglai Apa and Bomai Siune v The State [1995] PNGLR 43 that it is bound to follow the English House of Lords case of Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 [4] on the ineligibility of plaintiffs to an award of exemplary damages against ministers of the state or public servants other than in strictly limited circumstances, notwithstanding its having been decisively overruled by both the High Court of Australia and the Supreme Court of Canada.

Appeals from some of the various Supreme Courts within the Commonwealth to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council were abolished by Ireland in 1933, Canada in 1949, India in 1950, Guyana in 1970, Sri Lanka in 1972, Australia federally in 1968, [5] and from Australian States in 1975. [6] They accordingly did not exist from the High Court of Australia when Papua New Guinea was granted independence, and consideration of appeals to London from Papua New Guinea did not arise. Canadian appeals to the Privy Council were often heard by an Australian judge and vice versa; admirable cases decided in the other country are occasionally followed as are parliamentary statutes adopted even yet though seldom expressly acknowledged.

Chief Justice

The Chief Justice of Papua New Guinea, appointed under Papua New Guinea's Constitution by the Governor-General of Papua New Guinea on behalf of King Charles III in his capacity as King of Papua New Guinea, [7] presides over the Supreme Court and the National Court. [8]

The independence of the Bench was tested in 1979 during the Rooney Affair (see Law of Papua New Guinea), whose outcome was the resignation of Sir William Prentice, the second (and expatriate) Chief Justice of Papua New Guinea together with three other expatriate judges.

Sir Buri Kidu then became the first native-born Chief Justice (1980–1993). At the end of his ten-year term, Kidu was succeeded by Sir Arnold Amet (1993–2003). Amet was succeeded by Sir Mari Kapi, who served as Chief Justice from August 16, 2003 until his resignation in 2008 for health reasons. [9] Kapi was succeeded the same year by Sir Salamo Injia. [10] In 2018, Sir Gibbs Salika [11] [ circular reference ] succeeded Injia in becoming the fifth national Chief Justice of Papua New Guinea.

Judges

As of 13 April 2020, the following judges, in order of seniority, comprise the Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea: [12]

  1. Chief Justice Sir Gibuna Gibbs Salika (Port Moresby)
  2. Deputy Chief Justice Ambeng Kandakasi (Port Moresby)
  3. Justice Nicholas Kirriwom (Wewak)
  4. Justice Les Gavara-Nanu (Port Moresby)
  5. Justice Ellenas V Batari (Kimbe)
  6. Justice Panuel Mogish (Port Moresby)
  7. Justice David Cannings (Madang)
  8. Justice George Manuhu (Port Moresby)
  9. Justice Allen Kingsley David (Port Moresby)
  10. Justice Derek Hartshorn (Port Moresby)
  11. Justice Collin Makail (Port Moresby)
  12. Justice Joseph Yagi (Goroka)
  13. Justice Ere Kariko (Port Moresby)
  14. Justice Stephen Kassman (Kokopo)
  15. Justice Jacinta Murray (Lae)
  16. Justice Berna Joan Collier (Port Moresby)
  17. Justice John Alexander Logan (Port Moresby)
  18. Justice Iova Geita (Madang)
  19. Justice Lawrence Kangwia (Alotau)
  20. Justice Peter Toliken (Kavieng)
  21. Justice Sir Kina Bona (Buka)
  22. Justice Hitelai Polume-Kiele (Port Moresby)
  23. Justice Kenneth Frank (Mt. Hagen)
  24. Justice Frazer Pitpit (Lae)
  25. Justice Robert Lee Lindsay (Mt. Hagen)
  26. Justice William Neil (Goroka)
  27. Justice Jeffrey Shephard (Port Moresby)
  28. Justice Danajo Koeget (Daru)
  29. Justice Daniel Liosi (Kundiawa)
  30. Justice Ravunama Auka (Wabag)
  31. Justice Thomas Anis (Port Moresby)
  32. Justice Jim Wala Tamate (Port Moresby)
  33. Justice Oagile Bethuel Dingake (Port Moresby)
  34. Justice Royale Thompson (Port Moresby)
  35. Justice Teresa Berrigan (Port Moresby)
  36. Justice Nicholas Miviri (Port Moresby)
  37. Justice John Kaumi (Tari)
  38. Justice Sinclair Gora (Wewak)
  39. Justice Vergil Narakobi (Madang)
  40. Justice John Numapo (Kimbe)

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial Committee of the Privy Council</span> Judicial body in the United Kingdom

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) is the highest court of appeal for certain British territories, some Commonwealth countries and a few UK bodies. Established on 13 August 1833 to hear appeals formerly heard by the King-in-Council, the Privy Council formerly acted as the court of last resort for the entire British Empire, and continues to act as the highest court of appeal for several independent Commonwealth nations, the Crown Dependencies, and the British Overseas Territories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Papua New Guinea</span> Country in Oceania

Papua New Guinea, officially the Independent State of Papua New Guinea, is a country in Oceania that comprises the eastern half of the island of New Guinea and its offshore islands in Melanesia. Its capital, located along its southeastern coast, is Port Moresby. The country is the world's third largest island country with an area of 462,840 km2 (178,700 sq mi).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High Court of Australia</span> Highest court in Australia

The High Court of Australia is Australia's apex court. It exercises original and appellate jurisdiction on matters specified within Australia's Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Territory of Papua</span> British and Australian colony in Oceania from 1883 to 1975

The Territory of Papua comprised the southeastern quarter of the island of New Guinea from 1883 to 1975. In 1883, the Government of Queensland annexed this territory for the British Empire. The United Kingdom Government refused to ratify the annexation but in 1884 a protectorate was proclaimed over the territory, then called "British New Guinea". There is a certain ambiguity about the exact date on which the entire territory was annexed by the British. The Papua Act 1905 recites that this happened "on or about" 4 September 1888. On 18 March 1902, the Territory was placed under the authority of the Commonwealth of Australia. Resolutions of acceptance were passed by the Commonwealth Parliament, which accepted the territory under the name of Papua.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">University of Papua New Guinea</span> University

The University of Papua New Guinea (UPNG) is a university located in Port Moresby, capital of Papua New Guinea. It was established by ordinance of the Australian administration in 1965. This followed the Currie Commission which had enquired into higher education in Papua New Guinea. The University of Papua New Guinea Act No. 18, 1983 bill repealing the old Ordinance was passed by the National Parliament in August 1983.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of Papua New Guinea</span>

The law of Papua New Guinea consists of the Constitution, ordinary statutes enacted by Parliament or adopted at independence from overseas and judge-made law.

Chief Justice Sir Mari Kapi was a Papua New Guinean judge who served as the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea from 16 August 2003 until his retirement in 2008 due to health reasons. Kapi was the first Papua New Guinean citizen to be appointed as a judge and only the third PNG national to be appointed Chief Justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme court</span> Highest court in a jurisdiction

A supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts in many legal jurisdictions. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts.

Sir Buri Kidu, KBE was the first national Chief Justice of Papua New Guinea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aboriginal title</span> Concept in common law of indigenous land rights persisting after colonization

Aboriginal title is a common law doctrine that the land rights of indigenous peoples to customary tenure persist after the assumption of sovereignty under settler colonialism. The requirements of proof for the recognition of aboriginal title, the content of aboriginal title, the methods of extinguishing aboriginal title, and the availability of compensation in the case of extinguishment vary significantly by jurisdiction. Nearly all jurisdictions are in agreement that aboriginal title is inalienable, and that it may be held either individually or collectively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Len Roberts-Smith</span>

Major General Leonard William Roberts-Smith, is a former Justice of the Supreme Court of Western Australia. From February 2005, he was one of the inaugural Judges of the Court of Appeal Division, having been first appointed to the Supreme Court on 6 November 2000. From May 2007, he served as Commissioner of the Corruption and Crime Commission of Western Australia, having been appointed for a five-year term. He retired on 31 January 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monarchy of Papua New Guinea</span>

The monarchy of Papua New Guinea is a system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign and head of state of Papua New Guinea. The current monarch and head of state, since 9 September 2022, is King Charles III. Although the person of the sovereign is equally shared with 14 other independent countries within the Commonwealth of Nations, each country's monarchy is separate and legally distinct. As a result, the current monarch is officially titled the King of Papua New Guinea and, in this capacity, he and other members of the Royal Family undertake public and private functions domestically and abroad as representatives of the Papua New Guinean state. However, the King is the only member of the Royal Family with any constitutional role. The monarch lives predominantly in the United Kingdom and, while several powers are the sovereign's alone, most of the royal governmental and ceremonial duties in Papua New Guinea are carried out by the monarch's representative, the governor-general.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arnold Amet</span> Papua New Guinean politician and judge

Sir Arnold Amet is a Papua New Guinean former politician and judge. He was a member of the National Parliament of Papua New Guinea from 2007 to 2012, representing the Madang Provincial seat. He was Minister for Justice and Attorney-General from 2010 to 2011. Prior to entering politics, he was Chief Justice of Papua New Guinea. In February 2021 he was nominated as the Allegiance Party candidate for the seat of Moresby North West District but was unsuccessful in securing the seat. He was awarded Knight Bachelor for service to the judiciary, law and justice in 1993.

Sir Salamo Injia is a retired Judge and former Chief Justice of Papua New Guinea. Injia was knighted in 2006 and appointed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea in 2008, succeeding Mari Kapi. In 2018, Sir Gibbs Salika replaced him as the Chief Justice of Papua New Guinea. In August 2019, Injia was appointed chair of a commission of inquiry into a controversial state loan of US$1,200,000,000 from the Swiss bank UBS used by the PNG government to buy a stake in the resource company Oil Search.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of New South Wales for the District of Port Phillip</span>

The Supreme Court of New South Wales for the District of Port Phillip was an historical division of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, exercising the jurisdiction of that court within the Port Phillip District of New South Wales. It consisted of a single Resident Judge. It existed from 1840 until 1852, when, following the separation of the Port Phillip District to form the Colony of Victoria, it was replaced by the Supreme Court of Victoria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nahau Rooney</span> Papua New Guinean politician (1945–2020)

Nahau Rooney was a Papua New Guinean politician. From 1977 to 1987 she was a member of the newly founded post-independence National Parliament of Papua New Guinea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 Papua New Guinean general election</span>

General elections were held in Papua New Guinea from 23 June until around 13 July 2012, after being postponed by a further week to allow for security personnel to criss-cross the country, particularly the highland provinces. The elections followed controversy over incomplete electoral rolls and a constitutional crisis caused by a dispute over the office of prime minister between Michael Somare and Peter O'Neill.

Bryan Alan Beaumont was a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia from May 1983 until February 2005. He also held positions in the legal systems of Pacific countries including Papua New Guinea, Tonga, Fiji and Vanuatu.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Solomon Islands</span>

The judiciary of Solomon Islands is a branch of the Government of Solomon Islands that interprets and applies the laws of Solomon Islands, to ensure equal justice under law, and to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution. The legal system is derived from chapter VII, part II of the Constitution, adopted when the country became independent from the United Kingdom in 1978. The Constitution provided for the creation of a High Court, with original jurisdiction in civil and criminal cases, and a Court of Appeal. It also provided for the possibility of "subordinate courts", with no further specification (art.84).

Sir Gibuna Gibbs Salika is the current Chief Justice of Papua New Guinea. He is currently the longest serving judge of the National and Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea.

References

  1. ↑ Constitution of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea s 160, available via http://www.paclii.org/pg/legis/consol_act/cotisopng534/
  2. ↑ Constitution s 161(1)
  3. ↑ D Gonol, The Underlying Law of Papua New Guinea : an inquiry into adoption and application of customary law (2016, UPNG Press and Bookshop)
  4. ↑ Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129, available via http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1964/1.html
  5. ↑ Privy Council (Limitation of Appeals) Act, 1968 (Cth)
  6. ↑ Privy Council (Appeals from the High Court) Act, 1975 (Cth)
  7. ↑ Constitution s 169(2)
  8. ↑ Constitution ss 161(1) and 164(a)
  9. ↑ "Former PNG chief justice Sir Mari Kapi dies". The National (Papua New Guinea) . PACNEWS. 2009-03-26. Retrieved 2009-04-13.
  10. ↑ Nanol, Firmin (2009-03-26). "Former PNG Chief Justice dies". Radio Australia . Retrieved 2009-04-13.
  11. ↑ Gibbs Salika
  12. ↑ "Judges", Supreme and National Courts of Papua New Guinea, http://www.pngjudiciary.gov.pg/index.php/about-the-courts/judges 13 April 2020
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.