Tamarisk and Palm

Last updated

Tamarisk and Palm is an Akkadian disputation poem written on clay tablets and dates to the 18th century BC from the reign of Hammurabi. The poem features an argument between a tamarisk and a date palm; the Tamarisk leads in the name of the poem because it presents the first speech during the debate, followed by a reply from Palm. [1] The text is fragmentary but appears to have followed the typical structure of Sumerian disputation poems. [2] It was the most famous Akkadian disputation poem of antiquity, with its manuscripts ranging from the 18th to 12th centuries BC, and it continues to be the best-known Akkadian disputation today. [3]

Contents

Some have classified Tamarisk and Palm as a Sumerian disputation, but this is on the basis of a Sumerian fragment that turns out to have been translated from an Akkadian original. [4] There is one Sumerian topos and loanword from the Akkadian text that occurs during its cosmogonic prologue, rendered as "in those days", which refers to a primeval and mythical time outside of history. [5]

In Mesopotamian disputation literature, debates between trees is a recurring theme. In Sumerian disputations, there is the Debate between tree and reed. In other Akkadian poems, there is also both the Palm and Vine and the Series of the Poplar . [6] A much later example from Aesop's fables is The Oak and the Reed . [7]

Synopsis

The cosmogonical prologue of the text traces from the beginning of creation to the occasion that led to the rivalry between the two plants, when a king decides to plant a tamarisk and a date palm into his garden. It reads as follows according to the Emar recension: [8] [lower-alpha 1]

In those distant days, in those distant nights, in those far-away years, When the gods established the land, They built the cities for the far-away people, When they piled up the mountains And excavated the rivers, the (grantor) of life for the land, The gods of the land held a counsel, The god[s …] (5) were pondering with each other. Šamaš was sitting among them, And [the great Lady of the Gods] took a seat. Before then, there had been no monarchy in the land, And [sovereignty] had remained [with the god]s (alone). (But) the gods had mercy on the black-headed people (And) gave a king to the people of the land of Kiš, [The king planted a palm in his palace,] And grew a tamarisk nearby. In the shade of the tamari[sk banquets were laid out,] (…) (10) In the shade of the palm [the drum] res[ounded]. (…) Both trees were enemies, and would constantly vie with each other.

In the poem, they both seek to establish their superiority by describing their utility to and the commodities that they provide humans. Palm cites the inability of Tamarisk to produce fruit, whereas it produces fruits served to royalty. Tamarisk by contrast cites its high-quality wood which is used to build divine statues. Provoked further, Tamarisk proceeds to list many appliances found in palaces that are made of its wood. Tamarisk argues [10] :

Tamarisk answered and spake unto Palm, / "Consider what is yours among the palace equipment! / "On my table the king eats, / "And from my basket, the warriors eat. / "[I am a we]aver—I warp the threads, / I clothe the troops and brighten [the king]. / "I am an exorcist—I purify the temple, / "[I am truly superior]—I have no rival!"

Palm cites the ignoble use of Tamarisk by beer brewers; Tamarisk counters with its use by smiths and then cites the ignoble use of Palm by butchers. The back-and-forths continue, as Palm rebuts by mentioning that the woodworkers who fashion wood from Tamarisk rely on Palm for shade, but Tamarisk begins to describe its agricultural utility. Palm is infuriated by this argument: Palm lists the abundant manner of uses that rope fashioned from it is put to work by farmers. The last speech by Tamarisk and Palm is too fragmentary to reconstruct, and after that, the remaining text breaks off. The winner of the dispute is not recorded by extant manuscripts. One suggestion holds that Palm may have won because in later Babylonian literature, it receives the epithet šar iṣṣī, "king of the trees". [11]

Manuscripts

The first critical edition and translation of the text was published by Wilfred Lambert in 1996. [12] Lambert knew the work from three recensions (versions): one from Old Babylonian manuscripts discovered from Šaduppûm (Tell Harmal), a second from Middle Assyrian tablets, and a third (and lowest quality) manuscript that dates one or two centuries after the Middle Assyrian period. [13] In addition, another manuscript from Emar was published and edited in 1989, but as it is not accessible to researchers, a new edition after Lambert's has not been produced. [14]

Although manuscripts of the text are not known from the 1st millennium BC, it may have been mentioned in a catalogue of texts from Kuyunjik. [15]

In 2019, the Iraqi-American artist Michael Rakowitz put together an exhibition at the Green Art Gallery in Los Angeles titled Dispute Between the Tamarisk and the Date Palm, in inspiration by the Akkadian disputation. The duration of the exhibition was from March 9 – September 1, 2019. [16]

Notes

  1. ↑ For the versions of the prologue as found in the other two recensions of the text, see George 2020. [9]

Related Research Articles

Akkadian literature is the ancient literature written in the Akkadian language in Mesopotamia during the period spanning the Middle Bronze Age to the Iron Age.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ziusudra</span> King of Shuruppak (c. 2900 BC)

Ziusudra of Shuruppak is listed in the WB-62 Sumerian King List recension as the last king of Sumer prior to the Great Flood. He is subsequently recorded as the hero of the Eridu Genesis and appears in the writings of Berossus as Xisuthros.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disputation</span> Formalized method of debate designed to uncover and establish truths in theology and in sciences

Disputation is a genre of literate involving two contenders who seek to establish a resolution to a problem or establish the superiority of something. An example of the latter is in Sumerian disputation poems.

Anshar was a Mesopotamian god regarded as a primordial king of the gods. He was not actively worshiped. He was regarded as the father of Anu. In the first millennium BCE his name came to be used as a logographic representation of the head god in the Assyrian state pantheon, Ashur. He is attested in a number of god lists, such as An = Anum, and in literary compositions, including the Enūma Eliš.

Enkimdu (𒀭𒂗𒆠𒅎𒁺) was a Mesopotamian god associated with agriculture and irrigation. He is best known from the poem Dumuzi and Enkimdu, but in laments he was instead connected with the god Martu, who like Dumuzi could be described and depicted as a shepherd.

Enmesharra was a Mesopotamian god associated with the underworld. He was regarded as a member of an inactive old generation of deities, and as such was commonly described as a ghost or resident of the underworld. He is best known from various lists of primordial deities, such as the so-called "theogony of Enlil," which lists many generations of ancestral deities.

Shullat (Šûllat) and Hanish (Ḫaniš) were a pair of Mesopotamian gods. They were usually treated as inseparable, and appear together in various works of literature. Their character was regarded as warlike and destructive, and they were associated with the weather.

Tishpak (Tišpak) was a Mesopotamian god associated with the ancient city Eshnunna and its sphere of influence, located in the Diyala area of Iraq. He was primarily a war deity, but he was also associated with snakes, including the mythical mushussu and bashmu, and with kingship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sumerian literature</span> 18th–17th century BCE writings

Sumerian literature constitutes the earliest known corpus of recorded literature, including the religious writings and other traditional stories maintained by the Sumerian civilization and largely preserved by the later Akkadian and Babylonian empires. These records were written in the Sumerian language in the 3rd and 2nd millennia BC during the Middle Bronze Age.

Eridu Genesis, also called the Sumerian Creation Myth, Sumerian Flood Story and the Sumerian Deluge Myth, offers a description of the story surrounding how humanity was created by the gods, how the office of kingship entered human civilization, the circumstances leading to the origins of the first cities, and the global flood.

<i>Instructions of Shuruppak</i> Sumerian wisdom literature

The Instructions of Shuruppak are a significant example of Sumerian wisdom literature. Wisdom literature, intended to teach proper piety, inculcate virtue, and preserve community standards, was common throughout the ancient Near East. Its incipit sets the text in great antiquity by : "In those days, in those far remote times, in those nights, in those faraway nights, in those years, in those far remote years." The precepts are placed in the mouth of a king Šuruppak (SU.KUR.RUki), son of Ubara-Tutu. Ubara-Tutu is recorded in most extant copies of the Sumerian king list as being the final king of Sumer prior to the deluge. Ubara-tutu is briefly mentioned in tablet XI of the Epic of Gilgamesh, where he is identified as the father of Utnapishtim, a character who is instructed by the god Ea to build a boat in order to survive the coming flood. Grouped with the other cuneiform tablets from Abu Salabikh, the Instructions date to the early third millennium BCE, being among the oldest surviving literature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sumerian disputations</span> Sumerian genre of debate poems

The Sumerian disputation poem or Sumerian debate is a genre of Sumerian literature in the form of a disputation. Extant compositions from this genre date to the middle-to-late 3rd millennium BC. There are six primary poems belonging to this genre. The genre of Sumerian disputations also differs from Aesopic disputations as the former contain only dialogue without narration. In their own language, the texts are described as adamin in the doxologies at the end of the poem, which literally means "contests (between) two".

Latarak (Lātarāk) was a Mesopotamian god. He was most likely depicted as a figure clad in a lion's skin, or perhaps as a lion-like monster. He was regarded as a protective deity, invoked to defend doorways and ward off diseases. He was closely associated with Lulal, though the relationship between them varies between available primary sources, with some equating them and other treating them as a pair of similar, but not identical deities. He was worshiped in Mesopotamian cities such as Uruk, Nippur and Assur. It is also possible that a city named after him, Bāb-Lātarāk, existed, but the reading of this toponym is not certain. Outside Mesopotamia, he is attested in religious texts from Emar and in a trilingual god list from Ugarit.

Bazi was a legendary king of Mari. He is mentioned in the recension of the Sumerian King List from Tell Leilan and in a version of the Ballad of Early Rulers known from Emar. The former of these two texts indicates he was deified. The god Bazi known only from the Old Babylonian Song of Bazi is presumed to be the same figure.

The "Series of the Poplar" is an Akkadian disputation poem containing a discussion between a Poplar, an Ash, and probably other trees, who each tries to establish his preeminence in the vegetal kingdom by listing their many uses and excellent qualities. Most of the surviving examples of the work are from the library of King Assurbanipal of Nineveh, "one of the most important repositories of texts from the entire ancient world".

Palm and Vine is an Akkadian disputation poem. It contains a disputation poem between two litigants, Palm and Vine, each of which praises its own merits and many uses, and discredits those of its rival. The text may have been composed in the second-millennium BCE, but only first-millennium manuscripts of it are known. Fifty-four lines from the middle section of the text are preserved, which begin in medias res with a long speech of Palm, immediately followed by Vine's rejoinder. Three library manuscripts of the poem are known, as well as an excerpt on a peculiar school tablet.

The Debate between tree and reed is a work of Sumerian literature belonging to the genre of disputations poem. It was written on clay tablets and dates to the Third Dynasty of Ur. The text was reconstructed by M. Civil in the 1960s from 24 manuscripts but it is currently the least studied of the disputation poems and a full translation has not yet been published. Some other Sumerian disputations include the dispute between bird and fish, cattle and grain, and Summer and Winter.

The Debate between the hoe and the plough is a work of Sumerian literature and one of the six extant works belonging to this literature's genre of disputations poem. It was written on clay tablets and dates to the Third Dynasty of Ur and runs 196 lines in length. The text was reconstructed by M. Civil in the 1960s. The two protagonists, as in other disputation poems, are two inarticulate things: in this case, two pieces of agricultural equipment, the hoe and the plough. The debate is about which is the better tool.

The Debate between silver and copper is a work of Sumerian literature and one of the six extant works belonging to this literature's genre of disputations poem. It was written on clay tablets and dates to the Third Dynasty of Ur and runs 196 lines in length. The text was reconstructed by M. Civil in the 1960s. Like other Sumerian disputation poems, it features two typically inarticulate things debating over which one is superior.

The Akkadian disputation poem or Akkadian debate, also known as the Babylonian disputation poem, is a genre of Akkadian literature in the form of a disputation. They feature a dialogue or a debate involving two contenders, usually cast as inarticulate beings such as particular objects, plants, animals, and so forth. Extant compositions from this genre date from the early 2nd millennium BC, the earliest example being the Tamarisk and Palm, to the late 1st millennium BC. These poems occur in verse and follow a type of meter called 2||2 or Vierheber, which is the same meter found in some other Akkadian texts like the Enuma Elish.

References

  1. ↑ Lambert 1996, p. 151.
  2. ↑ Lambert 1996, p. 154.
  3. ↑ Jimenez 1997, p. 28.
  4. ↑ Jimenez 1997, p. 23.
  5. ↑ Jimenez 1997, p. 25.
  6. ↑ Otero 2020, p. 152.
  7. ↑ West 2013, p. 421, 421n16.
  8. ↑ Jimenez 1997, p. 70.
  9. ↑ George 2020, p. 77–82.
  10. ↑ Jimenez 1997, p. 36–37.
  11. ↑ Jimenez 1997, p. 37.
  12. ↑ Jimenez 1997, p. 5.
  13. ↑ Lambert 1996, p. 151–152.
  14. ↑ Jimenez 1997, p. 5–6.
  15. ↑ Jimenez 1997, p. 34.
  16. ↑ "Michael Rakowitz: Dispute Between the Tamarisk and the Date Palm". Green Art Gallery.

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.