Sumerian disputations

Last updated

The Sumerian disputation poem or Sumerian debate is a genre of Sumerian literature in the form of a disputation. Extant compositions from this genre date to the middle-to-late 3rd millennium BC. There are six primary poems belonging to this genre. The genre of Sumerian disputations also differs from Aesopic disputations as the former contain only dialogue without narration. In their own language, the texts are described as adamin in the doxologies at the end of the poem, which literally means "contests (between) two". [1]

Contents

Scholars have referred to the genre by various other names as well, such as "precedence poems", "debate poems", and so on. [2] The genre outlived its Sumerian form and continued to resonate in texts written in Middle Eastern languages for millennia. [3] [4]

The most well-attested of these poems are the Hoe and Plow and the Ewe and Grain, with over 60 and 70 manuscripts available for each respectively. [5]

Description

Structure

Disputations are poetic and are written in verse. They follows a tripartite structure:

  1. Prologue
  2. Disputation between two contenders
  3. Adjudication scene (where the winner is declared)

The structure is sometimes laid out as five parts, though, with two additional parts listed to signal transitions in the text between the aforementioned (1) and (2), and (2) and (3): [6]

  1. Prologue
  2. Transition 1 (where the cause for dispute is described)
  3. Disputation between two contenders
  4. Transition 2 (where at least one party seeks a judge to settle the dispute)
  5. Adjudication scene (where the winner is declared)

Features

As dialogues, and unlike fables or other narrative texts, very little narration is present in Sumerian disputations. The contenders are inarticulate objects or creatures, like trees or fish. Unlike dialogues from other cultures or genres which aims to resolve a problem, these disputations aim to establish what is superior. [7] Typically, the winner of the debate is also afforded more speaking time and has higher-quality argument over the course of the dispute. [8]

Each exchange typically involves two speeches and rejoinders on the part of each contender. Common arguments pertain to the utility of lack thereof of what is being debated to humans. The disputation section ends when the contenders decide to appeal to a higher authority, perhaps a god (e.g. Enlil in Hoe and Plough ) or man (e.g. Shulgi in Tree and Reed ), to elect the winner. There is some evidence that these disputations were used in public performances. [9]

Prologue

With the exception of the Hoe and the Plough, all these poems also contain a Sumerian cosmogony describing the creation of the cosmos and its creatures (including the two contenders) by the gods. [9] Other Sumerian texts also contain cosmogonical prologues, like Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Netherworld. The function of these prologues is to not to provide a broad cosmological discourse but instead to introduce the forthcoming subject. [10]

Ending

All disputations end with a doxology in the following format, where X and Y are the two contenders, and DN is the adjudicator who decides the winner of the dispute: [11]

Sumerian: X Y a-da-mìn dug₄-ga | X Y diri-ga-ba | DN zà-mí

English: Because in the disputation that X held with Y, X prevailed over Y, may DN be praised!C

Comparison with Akkadian disputations

Sumerian disputations ceased to be copied after the Old Babylonian Period. The oldest Akkadian disputation poem dates to the 18th century BC, and from this period onwards, it was Akkadian disputation poems that were copied in the 2nd and 1st millennia BC. None of the known Akkadian disputation poems are translations from Sumerian disputations; they use different literary conventions and verse structure, debate different topics, and so on, although the Akkadian Tamarisk and Palm has one Sumerian loanword. [12] Nevertheless, some remarkable phraseological continuity is attested, such as between Hoe and Plough with the Akkadian Palm and Vine , even though two millennia separate their composition. [13] However, there is a weakness to the literature of the Akkadian disputations: even though they are more recent, they are relatively fragmentary compared to the Sumerian disputations. Examples of this include that only a dozen lines survive of the Donkey Disputation and that less than a tenth is now known of the Series of the Poplar and the Series of the Fox , which, originally, would have been hundreds of versees in length. [14]

Scholarship

The major work behind the reconstruction of the disputation poems was done by M. Civil during the 1960s. The transliterations and translations subsequently became available on the Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (ETCSL) in the early 2000s: as of 2017, only the content of Tree and Reed is not publicly available in a database. [15]

List of Sumerian disputations

Six major disputations

Since the 1950s, every list of Sumerian disputations have included the six following texts: [2] [16] [17]

  1. Debate between the hoe and the plough (CSL 5.3.1) (translation)
  2. Debate between sheep and grain (CSL 5.3.2)
  3. Debate between Winter and Summer (CSL 5.3.3)
  4. Debate between tree and reed (CSL 5.3.4)
  5. Debate between bird and fish (CSL 5.3.5)
  6. Debate between silver and copper (CSL 5.3.6) (translation)

Controversial classifications

Kramer notes several other disputations: [16]

  1. Debate between the millstone and the gulgul-stone
  2. The Disputation between Enkmansi and Girnishag
  3. The Colloquy between an ungula and a Scribe
  4. The Disputation between Enkitalu and Enkihegal
  5. Disputation between Two School Graduates
  6. Disputation between two unnamed ladies

Jimenez identifies another three disputation texts, normally labelled as "epics" or "love poems", with the same basic tripartite structure as the six main poems: [17]

  1. Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta (CSL 1.8.2.3)
  2. Enmerkar and Ensuḫkešdana (CSL 1.8.2.4)
  3. Dumuzi and Enkimdu (CSL 4.8.31) (or: "Disputation between a shepherd and a farmer")

According to Jimenez, however, these works have features that distinguish them from Sumerian disputations proper: (1) In all six poems except for the Hoe and Plough, a cosmogonic prologue is contained; by contrast, none of these additional texts have a cosmogonic prologue (2) Unlike the inanimate objects of the six poems, the contenders in these disputations are humans (3) The six poems only have narration in the introduction but these other disputations have narration throughout the text. [17]

Finally, Tamarisk and Palm (CSL 5.3.7) has been included by some scholars among the Sumerian disputations, but it is a translation of an Akkadian disputation, and so does not belong to the proper corpus of Sumerian literary works. Other works that have been suggested but cannot be properly classified as disputation poems include the Song of the Millstone (CSL 6.2.9), Goose and Raven (CSL 6.2.10), and Heron and Turtle (CSL 6.2.3). [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gilgamesh</span> Sumerian ruler and protagonist of the Epic of Gilgamesh

Gilgamesh was a hero in ancient Mesopotamian mythology and the protagonist of the Epic of Gilgamesh, an epic poem written in Akkadian during the late 2nd millennium BC. He was possibly a historical king of the Sumerian city-state of Uruk, who was posthumously deified. His rule probably would have taken place sometime in the beginning of the Early Dynastic Period, c. 2900–2350 BC, though he became a major figure in Sumerian legend during the Third Dynasty of Ur.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inanna</span> Ancient Mesopotamian goddess

Inanna is the ancient Mesopotamian goddess of love, war, and fertility. She is also associated with sensuality, procreation, divine law, and political power. Originally worshipped in Sumer, she was known by the Akkadian Empire, Babylonians, and Assyrians as Ishtar. Her primary title is "the Queen of Heaven".

Akkadian literature is the ancient literature written in the East Semitic Akkadian language in Mesopotamia during the period spanning the Middle Bronze Age to the Iron Age.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disputation</span> Formalized method of debate designed to uncover and establish truths in theology and in sciences

Disputation is a genre of literature involving two contenders who seek to establish a resolution to a problem or establish the superiority of something. An example of the latter is in Sumerian disputation poems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sîn-lēqi-unninni</span> Babylonian scribe

Sîn-lēqi-unninni (Akkadian: 𒁹𒀭𒌍𒋾𒀀𒅆md30-TI-ER2) was a mašmaššu who lived in Mesopotamia, probably in the period between 1300 BC and 1000 BC. He is traditionally thought to have compiled the best-preserved version of the Epic of Gilgamesh. His name is listed in the text itself, which was unorthodox for works written in cuneiform. His version is known by its incipit, or first line "ša nagba īmuru" ("He who saw the deep" or "The one who saw the Abyss"). The extent to which his version is different from earlier texts is unknown; Andrew R. George argues that Sîn-lēqi-unninni "gave [The Epic of Gilgamesh] its final, fixed form". Tigay acknowledges that Sîn-lēqi-unninni shifted "Gilgamesh's greatness from deeds to the acquisition of knowledge". At time it was also known as "Gilgamesh series" (iškar Gilgāmeš).

Enkimdu (𒀭𒂗𒆠𒅎𒁺) was a Mesopotamian god associated with agriculture and irrigation. He is best known from the poem Dumuzi and Enkimdu, but in laments he was instead connected with the god Martu, who like Dumuzi could be described and depicted as a shepherd.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sumerian literature</span> 18th–17th century BCE writings

Sumerian literature constitutes the earliest known corpus of recorded literature, including the religious writings and other traditional stories maintained by the Sumerian civilization and largely preserved by the later Akkadian and Babylonian empires. These records were written in the Sumerian language in the 3rd and 2nd millennia BC during the Middle Bronze Age.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Debate between bird and fish</span> Sumerian language literature essay on clay tablets

The "Debate between bird and fish" is an essay written in the Sumerian language on clay tablets, dating back to the mid to late 3rd millennium BC. It belongs to the genre of Sumerian disputation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sumerian religion</span> First religion of the Mesopotamia region which is tangible by writing

Sumerian religion was the religion practiced by the people of Sumer, the first literate civilization found in recorded history and based in ancient Mesopotamia, and what is modern day Iraq. The Sumerians widely regarded their divinities as responsible for all matters pertaining to the natural and social orders of their society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lugalbanda in the Mountain Cave</span> Story in Sumerian mythology

Lugalbanda in the Mountain Cave is a Sumerian mythological account. It is one of the four known stories that belong to the same cycle describing conflicts between Enmerkar, king of Unug (Uruk), and an unnamed king of Aratta. The story is followed by another known as Lugalbanda and the Anzu Bird, together forming the two parts of one story. The stories, from the composer’s point of view, take place in the distant past. The accounts are believed to be composed during the Ur III Period, although almost all extant copies come from Isin-Larsa period. Tablets containing these stories were found in various locations of southern Iraq, primarily in the city of Nippur, and were part of the curriculum of Sumerian scribal schools during the Old Babylonian period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Debate between sheep and grain</span> Sumerian creation myth

The "Debate between sheep and grain" or "Myth of cattle and grain" is a Sumerian disputation and creation myth, written on clay tablets in the mid to late 3rd millennium BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Debate between Winter and Summer</span> Sumerian creation myth

The Debate between Winter and Summer or Myth of Emesh and Enten is a Sumerian creation myth belonging to the genre of Sumerian disputations, written on clay tablets in the mid to late 3rd millennium BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Song of the hoe</span> Sumerian creation myth

The Song of the hoe, sometimes also known as the Creation of the pickaxe or the Praise of the pickaxe, is a Sumerian creation myth, written on clay tablets from the last century of the 3rd millennium BCE.

Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Netherworld is one of five extant compositions of the Sumerian language about the deeds of the hero Gilgamesh. It was known to the ancients by its incipit, ud ri-a ud sud-rá ri-a or "In those days, in those faraway days". It spans 330 lines.

Palm and Vine is an Akkadian disputation poem. It contains a disputation poem between two litigants, Palm and Vine, each of which praises its own merits and many uses, and discredits those of its rival. The text may have been composed in the second-millennium BCE, but only first-millennium manuscripts of it are known. Fifty-four lines from the middle section of the text are preserved, which begin in medias res with a long speech of Palm, immediately followed by Vine's rejoinder. Three library manuscripts of the poem are known, as well as an excerpt on a peculiar school tablet.

The Debate between tree and reed is a work of Sumerian literature belonging to the genre of disputations poem. It was written on clay tablets and dates to the Third Dynasty of Ur. The text was reconstructed by M. Civil in the 1960s from 24 manuscripts but it is currently the least studied of the disputation poems and a full translation has not yet been published. Some other Sumerian disputations include the dispute between bird and fish, cattle and grain, and Summer and Winter.

The Debate between the hoe and the plough is a work of Sumerian literature and one of the six extant works belonging to this literature's genre of disputations poem. It was written on clay tablets and dates to the Third Dynasty of Ur and runs 196 lines in length. The text was reconstructed by M. Civil in the 1960s. The two protagonists, as in other disputation poems, are two inarticulate things: in this case, two pieces of agricultural equipment, the hoe and the plough. The debate is about which is the better tool.

The Debate between silver and copper is a work of Sumerian literature and one of the six extant works belonging to this literature's genre of disputations poem. It was written on clay tablets and dates to the Third Dynasty of Ur and runs 196 lines in length. The text was reconstructed by M. Civil in the 1960s. Like other Sumerian disputation poems, it features two typically inarticulate things debating over which one is superior.

Tamarisk and Palm is an Akkadian disputation poem written on clay tablets and dates to the 18th century BC from the reign of Hammurabi. The poem features an argument between a tamarisk and a date palm; the Tamarisk leads in the name of the poem because it presents the first speech during the debate, followed by a reply from Palm. The text is fragmentary but appears to have followed the typical structure of Sumerian disputation poems. It was the most famous Akkadian disputation poem of antiquity, with its manuscripts ranging from the 18th to 12th centuries BC, and it continues to be the best-known Akkadian disputation today.

The Akkadian disputation poem or Akkadian debate, also known as the Babylonian disputation poem, is a genre of Akkadian literature in the form of a disputation. They feature a dialogue or a debate involving two contenders, usually cast as inarticulate beings such as particular objects, plants, animals, and so forth. Extant compositions from this genre date from the early 2nd millennium BC, the earliest example being the Tamarisk and Palm, to the late 1st millennium BC. These poems occur in verse and follow a type of meter called 2||2 or Vierheber, which is the same meter found in some other Akkadian texts like the Enuma Elish.

References

Citations

  1. Mittermayer 2023, p. 181.
  2. 1 2 Mittermayer 2020, p. 11.
  3. Brock 2002.
  4. Brock 2009.
  5. Jimenez 2017, p. 17–18.
  6. Mittermayer 2020, p. 13–14.
  7. Jimenez 2017, p. 11–12.
  8. Mittermayer 2020, p. 14–15.
  9. 1 2 Jimenez 2017, p. 14–16.
  10. Gadotti 2014, p. 21–22.
  11. Jimenez 2017, p. 9.
  12. Jimenez 2017, p. 24–26.
  13. Jimenez 2017, p. 25.
  14. Jimenez 2017, p. 4.
  15. Jimenez 2017, p. 16.
  16. 1 2 Kramer 1963, p. 217–228.
  17. 1 2 3 Jimenez 2017, p. 13.
  18. Jimenez 2017, p. 23–24.

Sources

Further reading