Technological rationality

Last updated

Technological rationality or technical rationality is a philosophical idea postulated by the Frankfurt School philosopher Herbert Marcuse in his 1941 article, "Some Social Implications of Modern Technology," published first in the journal Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences, Vol. IX. [1] It gained mainstream repute and a more holistic treatment in his 1964 book One-Dimensional Man .

Contents

It posits that rational decisions to incorporate technological advances into society can, once the technology is ubiquitous, change what is considered rational within that society.

Overview

Marcuse writes that technological progress has the potential to free humanity from its requirement to labor for survival. [2] Freedom from labor is true freedom for humanity, and this freedom from labor can be achieved from technological rationality. [2] But instead of embracing this freedom, humanity has been subsumed by a new system of reason rooted in technological innovation. This new rationality, technological rationality, encompasses all elements of life and replaces political rationality. [2]

Under this new system, technology and industry control the structure of the economy, intellectual pursuits, and leisure activities. [2] False needs, which are defined by Marcuse as needs created by technological rationality, become inseparable from true needs, which are needs that are life sustaining. [2] Reason in its pre-technological form collapses as opposition to the norms of technological society is denied under the new system of rationality. [2] Complacency within the status quo replaces reason as people grow content with the better life offered by technology. [2] This contentment and the subsequent loss of opposition makes humanity one-dimensional, which in turn makes humanity less free than before the onset of technological rationality. In this way technological rationality becomes totalitarian. [2]

Effects of technological rationality

Because of the totalitarian nature of technological rationality, Marcuse demonstrates in One-Dimensional Man the various ways that technological rationality has changed various facets of life.

Labor

Technology, rather than freeing the proletariat class, has instead entrenched their enslavement to the classist system. [3] The worker no longer has to labor with the same intensity due to mechanization, and this decreases the laborers feelings of enslavement. [3] The ratio of white collar to blue collar workers increases as fewer workers are needed to produce goods. [3] Progress has created a "technological veil" between the worker and his or her work, and the distinction between blue collar and white collar workers breaks down as technology reduces the labor gap between the blue collar and white collar worker. [3] The worker associates himself or herself more strongly with the factory rather than his or her class, and the factory owners become "bureaucrats in a corporate machine." [3] The Master-Slave relationship between worker and factory owner no longer exists, and the factory owner loses his or her power. [3] Under technological rationality, the technicians and scientists become the new authority. [3]

Government

Under technological rationality, the Welfare State rises in both need and prominence. [3] Increased productivity, the rational goal under technological rationality, requires planning on the scale that only the Welfare State can provide. [3] This new Welfare State is less free. [3] It requires the restriction of leisure time, the availability of goods and services, and the cognitive ability to understand and desire self-realization. [3] Yet as long as one's quality of life is improved under the new state as compared to the previous one, the people will not revolt. [3]

This society is driven to increase production by fear of the Enemy, which causes the state to exist constantly as a "defense society". [3] The Enemy can take the form of an idealized pure communism or pure capitalism. [3] This Enemy does not truly exist, but its constant feared presence drives the society to greater productivity. [3]

Art

Under technological rationality, high art has desublimated. [4] Culture and social reality have flattened from two dimensions into one. [4] Artistic alienation, which inspired the artistic works of the past, has disappeared due to this flattening. [4] The high culture before technological rationality no longer makes sense to the modern onlooker. Art under technological rationality instead becomes common and mass-produced. [4] This mass-produced art is integrated into everyday life, thus fully removing the distinction between high culture and social reality. [4]

Responses to technological rationality

Over 300,000 copies of the first-edition of One-Dimensional Man were sold. [5] The book was a New York Times bestseller and launched Marcuse's career as a leftist public intellectual. [5] His conception of technological rationality and its negative societal consequences were a direct critique to the industrial capitalist society of the time. This critique was incorporated into the ideology of the New Left that rose in the 1960s. [5] Many politicians on the right, such as Ronald Reagan and William F. Buckley, and philosophers, such as Alasdair MacIntyre, attacked Marcuse's idea of technological rationality. [5] Marcuse received death threats, and Brandeis and the University of California system attempted to fire him from his teaching positions due to One-Dimensional Man. [5]

Ultimately, the conception of technological rationality and Marcuse's book One-Dimensional Man fell out of favor with the left in the 1990s. [5] A small uptick in interest did resurface when One-Dimensional Man reached its fiftieth anniversary of publication in 2014. [5]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Industrial sociology</span> Branch of the discipline of sociology

Industrial sociology, until recently a crucial research area within the field of sociology of work, examines "the direction and implications of trends in technological change, globalization, labour markets, work organization, managerial practices and employment relations" to "the extent to which these trends are intimately related to changing patterns of inequality in modern societies and to the changing experiences of individuals and families", and " the ways in which workers challenge, resist and make their own contributions to the patterning of work and shaping of work institutions".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Industrial society</span> Society driven by the use of technology to enable mass production

In sociology, an industrial society is a society driven by the use of technology and machinery to enable mass production, supporting a large population with a high capacity for division of labour. Such a structure developed in the Western world in the period of time following the Industrial Revolution, and replaced the agrarian societies of the pre-modern, pre-industrial age. Industrial societies are generally mass societies, and may be succeeded by an information society. They are often contrasted with traditional societies.

Fordism is an industrial engineering and manufacturing system that serves as the basis of modern social and labor-economic systems that support industrialized, standardized mass production and mass consumption. The concept is named after Henry Ford. It is used in social, economic, and management theory about production, working conditions, consumption, and related phenomena, especially regarding the 20th century. It describes an ideology of advanced capitalism centered around the American socioeconomic systems in place in the post-war economic boom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beacon Press</span> American non-profit book publisher

Beacon Press is an American left-wing non-profit book publisher. Founded in 1854 by the American Unitarian Association, it is currently a department of the Unitarian Universalist Association. It is known for publishing authors such as James Baldwin, Mary Oliver, Martin Luther King Jr., and Viktor Frankl, as well as The Pentagon Papers.

<i>One-Dimensional Man</i> 1964 book by Herbert Marcuse

One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society is a 1964 book by the philosopher and critical theorist Herbert Marcuse, in which the author offers a wide-ranging critique of both contemporary capitalism and the Communist society of the Soviet Union, documenting the parallel rise of new forms of social repression in both these societies, and the decline of revolutionary potential in the West. He argues that "advanced industrial society" created false needs, which integrated individuals into the existing system of production and consumption via mass media, advertising, industrial management, and contemporary modes of thought.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stanley Aronowitz</span> American academic and cultural critic (1933–2021)

Stanley Aronowitz was an American sociologist, trade union official, and political activist. A professor of sociology, cultural studies, and urban education at the CUNY Graduate Center, his longtime political activism and cultural criticism was influential in the New Left movement of the 1960s, 1970s, and beyond. He was also an advocate for organized labor and a member of the interim consultative committee of the International Organization for a Participatory Society. In 2012, Aronowitz was awarded the Center for Study of Working Class Life's Lifetime Achievement Award at Stony Brook University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Humanitarianism (Raëlianism)</span> Economic ideas of Raëlians

Humanitarianism in raelian literature is a collection of economic ideas which, according to its creator Raël, is designed to complement Geniocracy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jeremy J. Shapiro</span> American philosopher

Jeremy J. Shapiro, is an American academic, educational performance artist, translator, and activist. He is professor emeritus at Fielding Graduate University and works in the area of critical social theory with emphasis on the social and cultural effects of information technology and systems, social change, and the aesthetics of music. His main intellectual products/innovations include

<i>Eros and Civilization</i> 1955 book by Herbert Marcuse

Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud is a book by the German philosopher and social critic Herbert Marcuse, in which the author proposes a non-repressive society, attempts a synthesis of the theories of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud, and explores the potential of collective memory to be a source of disobedience and revolt and point the way to an alternative future. Its title alludes to Freud's Civilization and Its Discontents (1930). The 1966 edition has an added "political preface".

The philosophy of technology is a sub-field of philosophy that studies the nature of technology and its social effects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrew Feenberg</span> American philosopher (born 1943)

Andrew Feenberg is an American philosopher. He holds the Canada Research Chair in the Philosophy of Technology in the School of Communication at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver. His main interests are philosophy of technology, continental philosophy, critique of technology and science and technology studies.

Aesopian language is a means of communication with the intent to convey a concealed meaning to informed members of a conspiracy or underground movement, whilst simultaneously maintaining the guise of an innocent meaning to outsiders. The terminology refers to the allegorical writings of ancient Greek fabulist Aesop.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Douglas Kellner</span> American academic (born May 31, 1943)

Douglas Kellner is an American academic who works at the intersection of "third-generation" critical theory in the tradition of the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research, or Frankfurt School, and in cultural studies in the tradition of the Birmingham Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, or the "Birmingham School". He has argued that these two conflicting philosophies are in fact compatible. He is currently the George Kneller Chair in the Philosophy of Education in the Graduate School of Education and Information Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Criticism of technology is an analysis of adverse impacts of industrial and digital technologies. It is argued that, in all advanced industrial societies, technology becomes a means of domination, control, and exploitation, or more generally something which threatens the survival of humanity. Some of the technology opposed by the most radical critics may include everyday household products, such as refrigerators, computers, and medication. However, criticism of technology comes in many shades.

Stéphan Barron was the first to develop the concept of Technoromanticism between 1991 and 1996 for his doctoral thesis at the University Paris VIII. The main theme of his research is what he calls “Technoromantisme/Technoromanticism”, a neologism which he created and which has been adopted by other English-speaking researchers. Technoromanticism is the theory of links between art and new technologies, within the context of the threats posed to nature by technoscience and economic development. Technoromanticism also seeks to analyse the return of the human body within technological arts, formulating the hypothesis that a technological society needs a corporeal rebalancing of perceptions. Delayed for editorial reasons, his book Technoromantisme was published by l'Harmattan in 2003. Technoromanticism is a term used to indicate those aspects of contemporary culture that ascribe to advanced technologies the capacity to promote the power of the imagination, to restore the role of genius and to bring about a unity; in other words that revive and perpetuate the legacy of the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century artistic and philosophical movement known as Romanticism, but by technological means. The term was used in 1999 in a book that bore the title Technoromanticism outlining evidence of romanticism in many commentaries on digital technology at the time.

Repressive desublimation is a term, first coined by Frankfurt School philosopher and sociologist Herbert Marcuse in his 1964 work One-Dimensional Man, that refers to the way in which, in advanced industrial society (capitalism), "the progress of technological rationality is liquidating the oppositional and transcending elements in the “higher culture.” In other words, where art was previously a way to represent "that which is" from "that which is not," capitalist society causes the "flattening out" of art into a commodity incorporated into society itself. As Marcuse put it in One-Dimensional Man, "The music of the soul is also the music of salesmanship."

<i>An Essay on Liberation</i> 1969 book by Herbert Marcuse

An Essay on Liberation is a 1969 book by the Frankfurt School philosopher Herbert Marcuse.

<i>Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844</i> German-language work by Karl Marx, published 1932

The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, also known as the Paris Manuscripts or the 1844 Manuscripts, are a series of notes written between April and August 1844 by Karl Marx. They were compiled and published posthumously in 1932 by the Soviet Union's Marx–Engels–Lenin Institute. They were first published in their original German in Berlin, and there followed a republication in the Soviet Union in 1933, also in German.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herbert Marcuse</span> German philosopher, sociologist, and political theorist (1898–1979)

Herbert Marcuse was a German-American philosopher, social critic, and political theorist, associated with the Frankfurt School of critical theory. Born in Berlin, Marcuse studied at the Humboldt University of Berlin and then at Freiburg, where he received his PhD. He was a prominent figure in the Frankfurt-based Institute for Social Research – what later became known as the Frankfurt School. In his written works, he criticized capitalism, modern technology, Soviet Communism, and popular culture, arguing that they represent new forms of social control.

<i>Industrial Society and Its Future</i> 1995 essay by Ted Kaczynski

Industrial Society and Its Future, also known as the Unabomber Manifesto, is a 1995 anti-technology essay by Ted Kaczynski, the "Unabomber". The manifesto contends that the Industrial Revolution began a harmful process of natural destruction brought about by technology, while forcing humans to adapt to machinery, creating a sociopolitical order that suppresses human freedom and potential. The 35,000-word manifesto formed the ideological foundation of Kaczynski's 1978–1995 mail bomb campaign, designed to protect wilderness by hastening the collapse of industrial society.

References

  1. Marcuse, Herbert (1982) [1941]. "Some Social Implications of Modern Technology". In Arato, Andrew; Eike, Gebhardt (eds.). The Essential Frankfurt School Reader. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company. pp.  138-162. ISBN   0-8264-0194-5.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Marcuse, Herbert, 1898-1979. (1971). One-dimensional man: studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press. pp.  1-18. ISBN   080701575X. OCLC   165665.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Marcuse, Herbert, 1898-1979. (1971). One-dimensional man : studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press. pp.  19-55. ISBN   080701575X. OCLC   165665.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Marcuse, Herbert, 1898-1979. (1971). One-dimensional man : studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press. pp.  56-84. ISBN   080701575X. OCLC   165665.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 One-dimensional man 50 years on : the struggle continues. edited by Terry Maley. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing. 2017. pp. 1–18. ISBN   9781552669297. OCLC   966396302.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)

See also