The Assayer

Last updated

The Assayer
Assayertitle.png
Franceso Villamena's Frontispiece for The Assayer
Author Galileo Galilei
Publication date
October 1623
Publication placeItaly

The Assayer (Italian : Il Saggiatore) is a book by Galileo Galilei, published in Rome in October 1623. It is generally considered to be one of the pioneering works of the scientific method, first broaching the idea that the book of nature is to be read with mathematical tools rather than those of scholastic philosophy, as generally held at the time. Despite the retroactive acclaim given to Galileo's theory of knowledge, the empirical claims he made in the book—that comets are sublunary and their observed properties the product of optical phenomena—were incorrect. [1]

Contents

Background – Galileo vs. Grassi on comets

In 1619, Galileo became embroiled in a controversy with Father Orazio Grassi, professor of mathematics at the Jesuit Collegio Romano. It began as a dispute over the nature of comets, but by the time Galileo had published The Assayer, his last salvo in the dispute, it had become a much wider controversy over the very nature of science itself.

An Astronomical Disputation

The debate between Galileo and Grassi started in early 1619, when Father Grassi anonymously published the pamphlet, An Astronomical Disputation on the Three Comets of the Year 1618 (Disputatio astronomica de tribus cometis anni MDCXVIII), [2] which discussed the nature of a comet that had appeared late in November of the previous year. Grassi concluded that the comet was a fiery, celestial body that had moved along a segment of a great circle at a constant distance from the earth, [3] [4] and since it moved in the sky more slowly than the Moon, it must be farther away than the Moon.

Tychonic system

Grassi adopted Tycho Brahe's Tychonic system, in which the other planets of the Solar System orbit around the Sun, which, in turn, orbits around the Earth. In his Disputatio Grassi referenced many of Galileo's observations, such as the surface of the Moon and the phases of Venus, without mentioning him. Grassi argued from the apparent absence of observable parallax that comets move beyond the Moon. Galileo never explicitly stated that comets are an illusion, but merely wondered if they are real or an optical illusion.

Discourse on Comets

Grassi's arguments and conclusions were criticised in a subsequent pamphlet, Discourse on Comets, [5] published under the name of one of Galileo's disciples, a Florentine lawyer named Mario Guiducci, although it had been largely written by Galileo himself. [6] Galileo and Guiducci offered no definitive theory of their own on the nature of comets, [7] [8] although they did present some tentative conjectures that are now known to be mistaken. (The correct approach to the study of comets had been proposed at the time by Tycho Brahe.) In its opening passage, Galileo and Guiducci's Discourse gratuitously insulted the Jesuit Christoph Scheiner, [9] [10] [11] and various uncomplimentary remarks about the professors of the Collegio Romano were scattered throughout the work. [9]

The Astronomical and Philosophical Balance

The Jesuits were offended, [8] [9] and Grassi soon replied with a polemical tract of his own, The Astronomical and Philosophical Balance (Libra astronomica ac philosophica), [12] under the pseudonym Lothario Sarsio Sigensano, purporting to be one of his own pupils.

The Assayer

The Assayer was Galileo's devastating reply to the Astronomical Balance. [13] It has been widely recognized as a masterpiece of polemical literature, [14] [15] in which "Sarsi's" arguments are subjected to withering scorn. [16] It was greeted with wide acclaim, and particularly pleased the new pope, Urban VIII, to whom it had been dedicated. [17] In Rome, in the previous decade, Barberini, the future Urban VIII, had come down on the side of Galileo and the Lincean Academy. [18]

Galileo's dispute with Grassi permanently alienated many Jesuits, [19] and Galileo and his friends were convinced that they were responsible for bringing about his later condemnation, [20] although supporting evidence for this is not conclusive. [21] [22]

Science, mathematics, and philosophy

Pope Urban VIII Portrait of Pope Urban VIII, by Gian Lorenzo Bernini.jpg
Pope Urban VIII

In 1616 Galileo may have been silenced on Copernicanism. In 1623 his supporter and friend, Cardinal Maffeo Barberini, a former patron of the Accademia dei Lincei and uncle of future Cardinal Francesco Barberini, became Pope Urban VIII. The election of Barberini seemed to assure Galileo of support at the highest level in the Church. A visit to Rome confirmed this. The Assayer is a milestone in the history of science: here Galileo describes the scientific method, which was quite a revolution at the time.

The title page of The Assayer shows the crest of the Barberini family, featuring three busy bees. In The Assayer, Galileo weighs the astronomical views of a Jesuit, Orazio Grassi, and finds them wanting. The book was dedicated to the new pope. The title page also shows that Urban VIII employed a member of the Lynx, Cesarini, at a high level in the papal service. This book was edited and published by members of the Lynx.

In The Assayer Galileo mainly criticized Grassi's method of inquiry, heavily biased by his religious belief and based on ipse dixit , rather than his hypothesis on comets. Furthermore, he insisted that natural philosophy (i.e. physics) should be mathematical. According to the title page, he was the philosopher (i.e. physicist) of the Grand Duke of Tuscany, not merely the mathematician. Natural philosophy (physics) spans the gamut from processes of generation and growth (represented by a plant) to the physical structure of the universe, represented by the cosmic cross-section. Mathematics, on the other hand, is symbolized by telescopes, and an astrolabe.

The language of science

The Assayer contains Galileo's famous statement that mathematics is the language of science. Only through mathematics can one achieve lasting truth in physics. Those who neglect mathematics wander endlessly in a dark labyrinth. From the book: [23]

Philosophy [i.e. natural philosophy] is written in this grand book—I mean the Universe—which stands continually open to our gaze, but it cannot be understood unless one first learns to comprehend the language and interpret the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and its characters are triangles, circles, and other geometrical figures, without which it is humanly impossible to understand a single word of it; without these, one is wandering around in a dark labyrinth.

Galileo used a sarcastic and witty tone throughout the essay. The book was read with delight at the dinner table by Urban VIII. [18] In 1620 Maffeo Barberini wrote a poem entitled Adulatio Perniciosa in Galileo's honor. [24] An official, Giovanni di Guevara, said that The Assayer was free from any unorthodoxy. [25]

Perceived vs. real phenomena

In The Assayer Galileo described heat as an artifact of our minds. He wrote that heat, pressure, smell and other phenomena perceived by our senses are apparent properties only, caused by the movement of particles, which is a real phenomenon. [26] [27] Galileo also theorized that senses such as smell and taste are made possible by the release of tiny particles from their host substances, which was correct but not proven until later. [28]

... about the proposition “motion is the cause of heat”... I suspect that people in general have a concept of this which is very remote from the truth. For they believe that heat is a real phenomenon, or property ... which actually resides in the material by which we feel ourselves warmed. [26]

Whenever I conceive any ... corporeal substance, I immediately ... think of it as ... having this or that shape; as being large or small ... and in some specific place at any given time; as being in motion or at rest; as touching or not touching some other body; and as being one in number, or few, or many. From these conditions I cannot separate such a substance by any stretch of my imagination. But that it must be white or red, bitter or sweet, noisy or silent, and of sweet or foul odor, my mind does not feel compelled ... Without the senses ... reason ... would probably never arrive at qualities like these. Hence I think that tastes, odors, colors, and so on are no more than mere names so far as the object in which we place them is concerned, and that they reside only in the consciousness. Hence if the living creature were removed, all these qualities would be ... annihilated. [29]

Those minute particles ... may enter by our nostrils and strike upon some small protuberances which are the instrument of smelling; here likewise their touch ... is received to our like or dislike according as they have this or that shape, are fast or slow, and are numerous or few. [30]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pope Urban VIII</span> Head of the Catholic Church from 1623 to 1644

Pope Urban VIII, born Maffeo Vincenzo Barberini, was head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 6 August 1623 to his death, in July 1644. As pope, he expanded the papal territory by force of arms and advantageous politicking, and was also a prominent patron of the arts, commissioning works from artists like Gian Lorenzo Bernini and a reformer of Church missions. His papacy also covered 21 years of the Thirty Years' War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heliocentrism</span> Sun-centered astronomical model

Heliocentrism is a superseded astronomical model in which the Earth and planets revolve around the Sun at the centre of the universe. Historically, heliocentrism was opposed to geocentrism, which placed the Earth at the center. The notion that the Earth revolves around the Sun had been proposed as early as the 3rd century BC by Aristarchus of Samos, who had been influenced by a concept presented by Philolaus of Croton. In the 5th century BC the Greek philosophers Philolaus and Hicetas had the thought on different occasions that the Earth was spherical and revolving around a "mystical" central fire, and that this fire regulated the universe. In medieval Europe, however, Aristarchus' heliocentrism attracted little attention—possibly because of the loss of scientific works of the Hellenistic period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina</span> Essay by Galileo

The "Letter to The Grand Duchess Christina" is an essay written in 1615 by Galileo Galilei. The intention of this letter was to accommodate Copernicanism with the doctrines of the Catholic Church. Galileo tried to use the ideas of Church Fathers and Doctors to show that any condemnation of Copernicanism would be inappropriate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christoph Scheiner</span> Jesuit priest, physicist and astronomer (1573–1650)

Christoph Scheiner SJ was a Jesuit priest, physicist and astronomer in Ingolstadt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copernican Revolution</span> 16th to 17th century intellectual revolution

The Copernican Revolution was the paradigm shift from the Ptolemaic model of the heavens, which described the cosmos as having Earth stationary at the center of the universe, to the heliocentric model with the Sun at the center of the Solar System. This revolution consisted of two phases; the first being extremely mathematical in nature and the second phase starting in 1610 with the publication of a pamphlet by Galileo. Beginning with the 1543 publication of Nicolaus Copernicus’s De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, contributions to the “revolution” continued until finally ending with Isaac Newton’s work over a century later.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Galileo affair</span> 17th century conflict between Galileo Galilei and the Roman Catholic Church

The Galileo affair began around 1610, and culminated with the trial and condemnation of Galileo Galilei by the Roman Catholic Inquisition in 1633. Galileo was prosecuted for holding as true the doctrine of heliocentrism, the astronomical model in which the Earth and planets revolve around the Sun at the centre of the universe.

Stillman Drake, an American historian of science who moved to Canada in 1967 and acquired Canadian citizenship a few years later, is best known for his work on Galileo Galilei (1569–1642).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mario Guiducci</span> Italian scholar and writer

Mario Guiducci was an Italian scholar and writer. A friend and colleague of Galileo, he collaborated with him on the Discourse on Comets in 1618.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orazio Grassi</span> Italian Jesuit priest, architect and scientist (1583–1654)

Orazio Grassi was an Italian Jesuit priest, who is best noted as a mathematician, astronomer and architect. He was one of the authors in controversy with Galileo Galilei on the nature of comets. His writings against Galileo were published under the pseudonym Sarsi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Melchior Inchofer</span>

Melchior Inchofer or Imhofer, in Hungarian: Inchofer Menyhért was an Austrian-Hungarian Jesuit. He played an important part in the trial of Galileo, by his arguments, later published in his Tractatus Syllepticus, that Galileo was an advocate of the Copernican system. His role in the Galileo affair is being reassessed in the light of fresh documentary evidence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Galileo Galilei</span> Florentine physicist and astronomer (1564–1642)

Galileo di Vincenzo Bonaiuti de' Galilei, commonly referred to as Galileo Galilei or mononymously as Galileo, was an Italian (Florentine) astronomer, physicist and engineer, sometimes described as a polymath. He was born in the city of Pisa, then part of the Duchy of Florence and present-day Italy. Galileo has been called the father of observational astronomy, modern-era classical physics, the scientific method, and modern science.

1623 in philosophy

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Giovanni Ciampoli</span> Italian priest, poet and humanist

Giovanni Ciampoli or Giovanni Battista Ciampoli was a priest, poet and humanist. He was closely associated with Galileo Galilei and his disputes with the Catholic Church.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Virginio Cesarini</span> Italian poet and intellectual

Virginio Cesarini was an Italian poet and intellectual.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scipione Chiaramonti</span> Italian philosopher (1565–1652)

Scipione Chiaramonti was an Italian philosopher and noted opponent of Galileo.

Agostino Oreggi was a Catholic theologian and cardinal. As personal theologian of Pope Urban VIII, he was involved in the Galileo affair.

Tommaso Rinuccini was an Italian noble, diplomat and friend of Galileo Galilei.

<i>Letters on Sunspots</i> 1613 pamphlet by Galileo Galilei

Letters on Sunspots was a pamphlet written by Galileo Galilei in 1612 and published in Rome by the Accademia dei Lincei in 1613. In it, Galileo outlined his recent observation of dark spots on the face of the Sun. His claims were significant in undermining the traditional Aristotelian view that the Sun was both unflawed and unmoving. The Letters on Sunspots was a continuation of Sidereus Nuncius, Galileo's first work where he publicly declared that he believed that the Copernican system was correct.

<i>Discourse on Comets</i> 1619 pamphlet likely by Galileo Galilei

The Discourse on Comets was a pamphlet published in 1619 with Mario Guiducci as the named author, though in reality it was mostly the work of Galileo Galilei. In it Galileo conjectured that comets were not physical bodies but atmospheric effects like the aurora borealis.

References

Citations

  1. "The Galileo Project | Science | Comets". galileo.rice.edu. Retrieved 2024-08-29.
  2. Grassi 1960a, p. 3-19.
  3. Drake 1978, p. 268.
  4. Grassi 1960a, p. 16.
  5. Guiducci 1960, p. 21–65.
  6. Drake 1960, p. xvi.
  7. Drake 1957, p. 222.
  8. 1 2 Drake 1960, p. xvii.
  9. 1 2 3 Sharratt 1994, p. 135.
  10. Drake 1960, p. xii.
  11. Guiducci 1960, p. 24.
  12. Grassi 1960b, p. 67–132.
  13. Guiducci 1960.
  14. Sharratt 1994, p. 137.
  15. Drake 1957, p. 227.
  16. Sharratt 1994, pp. 138–142.
  17. Drake 1960, p. xix.
  18. 1 2 Alexander 2014, p.  131.
  19. Drake 1960, p. vii.
  20. Sharratt 1994, p. 175.
  21. Sharratt 1994, pp. 175–178.
  22. Blackwell 2006, p. 30.
  23. Galilei 1957, p. 237-8.
  24. The Galileo Project
  25. William A. Wallace, Galileo, the Jesuits and the Medieval Aristotle, (1991), pp.VII, 81-83
  26. 1 2 Galilei 1957, p. 273-4.
  27. Adriaans, Pieter (2024), Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.), "Information", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2024 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
  28. Fermi 1961, p. 6.
  29. Galilei 1957, p. 274.
  30. Galilei 1957, p. 276.

References