The Coddling of the American Mind

Last updated

The Coddling of the American Mind
The Coddling of the American Mind.png
Authors Greg Lukianoff
Jonathan Haidt
Audio read byJonathan Haidt
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Subject Psychology
Publisher Penguin Books
Publication date
September 4, 2018
Media typePrint
Pages352
ISBN 978-0735224896
Website www.thecoddling.com

The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure is a 2018 book by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt. It is an expansion of a popular essay the two wrote for The Atlantic in 2015. Lukianoff and Haidt argue that overprotection is having a negative effect on university students and that the use of trigger warnings and safe spaces does more harm than good.

Contents

Overview

Lukianoff and Haidt argue that many problems on campus have their origins in three "great untruths" that have become prominent in education: "What doesn’t kill you makes you weaker"; "always trust your feelings"; and "life is a battle between good people and evil people". The authors state that these three "great untruths" contradict modern psychology and ancient wisdom from many cultures. [1]

The book goes on to discuss microaggressions, identity politics, "safetyism", call-out culture, and intersectionality. [1] The authors define safetyism as a culture or belief system in which safety (which includes "emotional safety") has become a sacred value, which means that people become unwilling to make trade-offs demanded by other practical and moral concerns. They argue that embracing the culture of safetyism has interfered with young people’s social, emotional, and intellectual development. [2] Continuing on to discuss contemporary partisanship or the "rising political polarization and cross party animosity", they state that the left and right are "locked into a game of mutual provocation and reciprocal outrage". [2] : 125 

The authors call on university and college administrators to identify with freedom of inquiry by endorsing the Chicago principles on free speech, [2] : 255–257  through which university and colleges notify students in advance that they do not support the use of trigger warnings or safe spaces. [3] They suggest specific programs, such as LetGrow, Lenore Skenazy's Free Range Kids, teaching children mindfulness, and the basics of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). [2] : 241  They encourage a charitable approach to the interpretations of other people's statements instead of assuming they meant offense.

In their conclusion, the authors write that there will be positive changes in the near future as small groups of universities "develop a different sort of academic culture—one that finds ways to make students from all identity groups feel welcome without using the divisive methods." They say that "market forces will take care of the rest" as "applications and enrollment" surge at these schools. [2] : 268 

Safetyism

Safetyism is an approach to policy that seeks to prioritize feelings of safety. According to Haidt and Lukianoff, this comes at the cost of academic intellectual rigor, open debate and free expression of ideas. Safetyism seeks to regulate some speech or intellectual environments by minimizing the array of ideas or beliefs that make some or most people in that environment feel uncomfortable. [4] The Coddling of the American Mind describes a rise in this approach within higher education in the United States.

Safetyism is an ideology that places self-perceived safety, especially the feeling of being protected from disagreeable ideas and information, above all other concerns. It is based on the belief that it is harmful (including, but not limited to, being medically harmful [5] ) to experience uncomfortable emotions. [6] Compared to prior generations, one of the main differences is the belief that the world should not be organized according to what is right or wrong, but according to what is safe or unsafe. [7]

The term was coined by Pamela Paresky [8] and promulgated by The Coddling of the American Mind, [9] which described its status as "a sacred value", meaning that it was not possible to make practical tradeoffs or compromises with other desirable things (e.g., for people to be made to feel uncomfortable in support of free speech or learning new ideas). [10]

Lukianoff and Haidt say that underneath safetyism lie three core beliefs:

Development

The belief spread across universities in the United States and Canada, beginning with elite US universities, during the early 21st century, and especially accelerating in 2013. [4] [12] It has been compared to scope creep and the overall expansion of the concept of safety in other areas, such as school programs to address severe bullying being slowly expanded to provide adult intervention for ordinary, one-time incidents. [13] [14] People who support safetyism are more likely to self-report cognitive distortions (e.g., assuming the worst), to believe that words can cause harm, and to approve of trigger warnings. [6] By contrast, Greg Lukianoff, believes that words and ideas alone, unless they are turned into action, can never cause real harm. [5]

The desire to promote these feelings of safety resulted in universities promoting practices such as content warnings (e.g., telling students in advance that the homework contains disagreeable information about racism), safe spaces (e.g., a designated room where students who support trans rights can avoid those who disagree), and bias-response teams (e.g., university employees who can be called in case of non-criminal racist speech). [7]

Later, the idea spread to other academic areas, such as academic publications. [4] Proponents of safetyism say that certain provocative and unpopular ideas, such as proposing that self-determined transracial identities be socially accepted in the same way that self-determined transgender identities are, are so inherently threatening, harmful, or emotionally damaging to any marginalized students and scholars who might read it, that academic journals should not publish the ideas. [4]

Outside of academia, safetyism has been used to justify the removal of monuments to slaveholders and racist historical figures, rather than countering the historical expressive speech glorifying them with modern expressive speech condemning them. [15]

On the political left, safetyism is used to suppress criticism of trans rights; disagreement with the liberal political viewpoint is claimed to harm trans people. [4]

Policy discussions

While commonly associated with liberal and progressive values, safetyism is used by actors on some on the political right as well, on a handful of issues. [4] Safetyism is used to reject criticism of Israel and anti-racist ideas and organizations, such as critical race theory and Black Lives Matter. Disagreement with the conservative political viewpoint is claimed to harm Jewish people and white children. [4]

Personal victimhood by prominent figures

Conservatives who have been accused of engaging in safetyism to protect themselves from criticism include the former US president Donald Trump, due to his "inability to withstand even the slightest criticism without lashing out" against less powerful people, [16] [17] and Bret Stephens, who complained about the existence of safe spaces at universities, but also accused another Jewish person of antisemitism for jokingly calling him a bed bug. [16] [18]

Release

The book reached number eight on The New York Times hardcover nonfiction best-sellers list. [19] It spent four weeks on the list. [20]

Reception

Edward Luce of the Financial Times praised the book, saying the authors "do a great job of showing how 'safetyism' is cramping young minds." [21] Writing for The New York Times, Thomas Chatterton Williams praised the book's explanations and analysis of recent college campus trends as "compelling". [22] Historian Niall Ferguson and journalist Conor Friedersdorf also gave the book positive reviews. [23] [24]

Writing for The Washington Post , Michael S. Roth, president of Wesleyan University, gave the book a mixed review. He questioned the book's assertion that students today are "disempowered because they've been convinced they are fragile," but said that the authors' "insights on the dangers of creating habits of 'moral dependency' are timely and important." [25] Moira Weigel, writing for The Guardian , criticized Lukianoff and Haidt for insisting that "the crises moving young people to action are all in their heads." [1]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression</span> American free speech organization

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), formerly named the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, is a 501(c)(3) non-profit civil liberties group founded in 1999 with the mission of protecting freedom of speech on college campuses in the United States. FIRE changed its name in June 2022, when it broadened its focus from colleges to freedom of speech throughout American society.

Moral reasoning is the study of how people think about right and wrong and how they acquire and apply moral rules. It is a subdiscipline of moral psychology that overlaps with moral philosophy, and is the foundation of descriptive ethics.

White guilt is a conspiracy theory that white people bear a collective responsibility for the harm which has resulted from historical or current racist treatment of people belonging to other racial groups, as for example in the context of the Atlantic slave trade, European colonialism, and the genocide of indigenous peoples.

The marketplace of ideas is a rationale for freedom of expression based on an analogy to the economic concept of a free market. The marketplace of ideas holds that the truth will emerge from the competition of ideas in free, transparent public discourse and concludes that ideas and ideologies will be culled according to their superiority or inferiority and widespread acceptance among the population. The concept is often applied to discussions of patent law as well as freedom of the press and the responsibilities of the media in a liberal democracy.

The wisdom of repugnance or "appeal to disgust", also known informally as the yuck factor, is the belief that an intuitive negative response to some thing, idea, or practice should be interpreted as evidence for the intrinsically harmful or evil character of that thing. Furthermore, it refers to the notion that wisdom may manifest itself in feelings of disgust towards anything which lacks goodness or wisdom, though the feelings or the reasoning of such 'wisdom' may not be immediately explicable through reason.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greg Lukianoff</span> American free speech advocate

Gregory Christopher Lukianoff is an American lawyer, journalist, author and activist who serves as the president of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). He previously served as FIRE's first director of legal and public advocacy until he was appointed president in 2006.

Facebook has been the subject of criticism and legal action since it was founded in 2004. Criticisms include the outsize influence Facebook has on the lives and health of its users and employees, as well as Facebook's influence on the way media, specifically news, is reported and distributed. Notable issues include Internet privacy, such as use of a widespread "like" button on third-party websites tracking users, possible indefinite records of user information, automatic facial recognition software, and its role in the workplace, including employer-employee account disclosure. The use of Facebook can have negative psychological and physiological effects that include feelings of sexual jealousy, stress, lack of attention, and social media addiction that in some cases is comparable to drug addiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jonathan Haidt</span> American social psychologist (born 1963)

Jonathan David Haidt is an American social psychologist and author. He is the Thomas Cooley Professor of Ethical Leadership at the New York University Stern School of Business. His main areas of study are the psychology of morality and moral emotions.

Microaggression is a term used for commonplace verbal, behavioral or environmental slights, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative attitudes toward stigmatized or culturally marginalized groups. The term was coined by Harvard University psychiatrist Chester M. Pierce in 1970 to describe insults and dismissals which he regularly witnessed non-black Americans inflicting on African Americans. By the early 21st century, use of the term was applied to the casual disparagement of any socially marginalized group, including LGBT people, poor people, and disabled people. Psychologist Derald Wing Sue defines microaggressions as "brief, everyday exchanges that send denigrating messages to certain individuals because of their group membership". The persons making the comments may be otherwise well-intentioned and unaware of the potential impact of their words.

The medium of television has had many influences on society since its inception. The belief that this impact has been dramatic has been largely unchallenged in media theory since its inception. However, there is much dispute as to what those effects are, how serious the ramifications are and if these effects are more or less evolutionary with human communication.

A trauma trigger is a psychological stimulus that prompts involuntary recall of a previous traumatic experience. The stimulus itself need not be frightening or traumatic and may be only indirectly or superficially reminiscent of an earlier traumatic incident, such as a scent or a piece of clothing. Triggers can be subtle, individual, and difficult for others to predict. A trauma trigger may also be called a trauma stimulus, a trauma stressor or a trauma reminder.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Safe space</span> Socially safe zone for communication

The term safe space refers to places "intended to be free of bias, conflict, criticism, or potentially threatening actions, ideas, or conversations". The term originated in LGBT culture, but has since expanded to include any place where a marginalized minority can come together to communicate regarding their shared experiences. Safe spaces are most commonly located on university campuses in the western world, but also are at workplaces, as in the case of Nokia.

Moral foundations theory is a social psychological theory intended to explain the origins of and variation in human moral reasoning on the basis of innate, modular foundations. It was first proposed by the psychologists Jonathan Haidt, Craig Joseph, and Jesse Graham, building on the work of cultural anthropologist Richard Shweder. More recently, Mohammad Atari, Jesse Graham, and Jonathan Haidt have revised some aspects of the theory and developed new measurement tools. The theory has been developed by a diverse group of collaborators and popularized in Haidt's book The Righteous Mind. The theory proposes that morality is "more than one thing", first arguing for five foundations, and later expanding for six foundations :

<i>The Righteous Mind</i> 2012 social psychology book by Jonathan Haidt

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion is a 2012 social psychology book by Jonathan Haidt, in which the author describes human morality as it relates to politics and religion.

American Mind can refer to:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ibram X. Kendi</span> American academic (born 1982)

Ibram Xolani Kendi is an American author, professor, anti-racist activist, and historian of race and discriminatory policy in America. In July 2020, he founded the Center for Antiracist Research at Boston University where he serves as director. Kendi was included in Time's 100 Most Influential People of 2020. Kendi had attracted criticism for his alleged financial mismanagement of the Center for Antiracist Research. However, he was cleared of any financial mismanagement following an internal investigation by the university.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heterodox Academy</span> American advocacy group

Heterodox Academy (HxA) is a non-profit advocacy group of academics working to counteract what they see as a lack of viewpoint diversity on college campuses, especially political diversity. The organization was founded in 2015 by Jonathan Haidt, Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, and Chris C. Martin. As of 2023, Heterodox Academy had about 5,000 members.

Quillette is an online magazine founded by Australian journalist Claire Lehmann. The magazine primarily focuses on science, technology, news, culture, and politics. It also has a podcast, hosted by Jon Kay.

Cancel culture is a phrase contemporary to the late 2010s and early 2020s used to refer to a cultural phenomenon in which some who are deemed to have acted or spoken in an unacceptable manner are ostracized, boycotted, or shunned. This shunning may extend to social or professional circles—whether on social media or in person—with most high-profile incidents involving celebrities. Those subject to this ostracism are said to have been "canceled".

Higher education in the United States is an optional stage of formal learning following secondary education. Higher education, also referred to as post-secondary education, third-stage, third-level, or tertiary education occurs most commonly at one of the 4,360 Title IV degree-granting institutions, either colleges or universities in the country. These may be public universities, private universities, liberal arts colleges, community colleges, or for-profit colleges. US higher education is loosely regulated by several third-party organizations.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Weigel, Moira (20 September 2018). "The Coddling of the American Mind review – how elite US liberals have turned rightwards". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 February 2019.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Greg Lukianoff; Jonathan Haidt (2018). The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure. Penguin Publishing Group. ISBN   978-0-7352-2489-6.
  3. ↑ Kingkade, Tyler (15 May 2015). "Purdue Takes A Stand For Free Speech, No Matter How Offensive Or Unwise". Huffington Post. Retrieved 29 March 2017.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Howard-Hassmann, Rhoda E.; McLaughlin, Neil (August 2022). "Ideacide: How On-Line Petitions and Open Letters Undermine Academic Freedom and Free Expression". Human Rights Quarterly. 44 (3): 451–475. doi:10.1353/hrq.2022.0023. ISSN   1085-794X. S2CID   251239148.
  5. 1 2 Lukianoff, Greg (4 September 2018). "Playing it Safe" (Interview). Interviewed by Devon Frye.
  6. 1 2 Celniker, Jared B.; Ringel, Megan M.; Nelson, Karli; Ditto, Peter H. (February 2022). "Correlates of "Coddling": Cognitive distortions predict safetyism-inspired beliefs, belief that words can harm, and trigger warning endorsement in college students". Personality and Individual Differences. 185: 111243. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111243 .
  7. 1 2 https://www.npr.org/2018/09/04/644446963/authors-of-a-new-book-take-on-the-coddling-of-american-minds
  8. ↑ "The Coddling of the American Mind - Notes". coddling. Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  9. ↑ Reno, R. R. (November 2021). "Safetyism." ''First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life'', 65–66.
  10. ↑ Lukianoff, G., & Haidt, J. (2019). "The Safety Police". Saturday Evening Post, 291(5), 12–84.
  11. ↑ Seltzer, Leon F (21 June 2017). "What's "Emotional Reasoning"—And Why Is It Such a Problem?". Psychology Today . Retrieved 26 November 2023.
  12. 1 2 Marks, J. (September 2018). "Bad Therapy". Commentary, 146(2), 63–65. Book review.
  13. ↑ Burns, R. (2021). :The Cult of Wellbeing Infecting Our Schools". Quadrant Magazine, 65(12), 14–18.
  14. ↑ Humphries, Stephen (14 August 2019). "How 'Safety First' Ethos is Destabilizing US Society". Christian Science Monitor . ISSN   0882-7729 . Retrieved 15 November 2023.
  15. ↑ Bell, Macalester (November 2022). "Against Simple Removal: A Defence of Defacement as a Response to Racist Monuments". Journal of Applied Philosophy. 39 (5): 778–792. doi:10.1111/japp.12525. ISSN   0264-3758. S2CID   237899836.
  16. 1 2 Warner, John. "Safetyism Was Never Real". Inside Higher Ed . Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  17. ↑ Brooks, David (10 August 2023). "Hey, America, Grow Up!". The New York Times .
  18. ↑ "Bret Stephens Compared Me to a Nazi Propagandist in the New York Times. It Proved My Point". Esquire. 3 September 2019. Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  19. ↑ "Hardcover Nonfiction Books - Best Sellers". The New York Times. 23 September 2018. Retrieved 18 February 2019.
  20. ↑ "Hardcover Nonfiction Books - Best Sellers". The New York Times. 18 November 2018. Retrieved 18 February 2019.
  21. ↑ Luce, Edward (29 August 2018). "Has campus liberalism gone too far?". Financial Times. Retrieved 18 February 2019.
  22. ↑ Williams, Thomas Chatterton (27 August 2018). "Does Our Cultural Obsession With Safety Spell the Downfall of Democracy?". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 February 2019.
  23. ↑ Ferguson, Niall. "Review: The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt — fear and loathing on campus". The Times . ISSN   0140-0460 . Retrieved 22 August 2023.
  24. ↑ Friedersdorf, Conor (16 October 2018). "The Idioms of Non-Argument". The Atlantic. Retrieved 22 September 2019.
  25. ↑ Roth, Michael S. (7 September 2018). "Have parents made their kids too fragile for the rough-and-tumble of life?". The Washington Post . Retrieved 18 February 2019.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.