The Color of Law

Last updated

The Color of Law
The Color of Law (book cover).jpg
Cover image
Author Richard Rothstein
Subject Jim Crow, redlining
Publisher Liveright
Publication date
May 2017
Pages368
Awards 2018 Hillman Prize for Book Journalism [1]
ISBN 978-1-63149-285-3
OCLC 959808903
305.8
LC Class E185.61

The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America is a 2017 book by Richard Rothstein on the history of racial segregation in the United States. The book documents the history of state sponsored segregation stretching back to the late 1800s and exposes racially discriminatory policies put forward by most presidential administrations in that time, including liberal presidents like Franklin Roosevelt. [2] The author argues that intractable segregation in America is the byproduct of explicit government policies at the local, state, and federal levels, also known as de jure segregation — and not happenstance, or de facto segregation. [3] Among other discussions, the book provides a history of subsidized housing and discusses the phenomenons of white flight, blockbusting, and racial covenants, and their role in housing segregation. Rothstein wrote the book while serving as a research associate for the Economic Policy Institute, where he is now a Distinguished Fellow.

Contents

The book has been reviewed many times and was received with critical acclaim; among other honors, it made the longlist for the 2017 National Book Awards, [4] was placed at number four on Publishers Weekly 's Top 10 Best Books of 2017, [5] and won Rothstein the 2018 Hillman Prize for Book Journalism. [1] It went on to become a bestseller during the mid-2020 resurgence of national interest in racial injustice following the George Floyd protests. [6] As of the December 20th, 2020 issue, the book has spent 32 total weeks on The New York Times Best Seller list. [7]

Background

The author, pictured in 2015 Richard Rothstein at Economic Policy Institute.jpg
The author, pictured in 2015

At the time of the book's release, Rothstein was a research associate at the Economic Policy Institute [2] [8] and a fellow Haas Institute at the University of California, Berkeley. [9] He is currently a Distinguished Fellow at the Policy Institute, a senior fellow emeritus at the Thurgood Marshall Institute of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and is considered a leading authority on housing policy in the United States. [1] He has previously written several other articles on race and educational accountability and is the author of several other books in the area, including Class and Schools: Using Social, Economic and Educational Improvement to Close the Black-White Achievement Gap and Grading Education: Getting Accountability Right. [1]

Themes

Segregation is categorized into two types by Rothstein, de jure and de facto. [10] While de facto segregation simply exists due to people's habits, de jure segregation is the result of laws and ordinances that discriminate against minorities. In the preface of the book, Rothstein argues that, if it can be shown that housing segregation in America is the result of de jure factors rather than simply de facto, then all Americans have a constitutional obligation to remedy the problem. [2] The book is devoted to arguing that intractable segregation in America is de jure in nature, being the result of explicit government policies at the local, state, and federal levels. [3] Focusing on post-Reconstruction racial segregation in the United States, the book provides a history of subsidized housing, the phenomenons of white flight and blockbusting, and the concept of racial covenants, which all factor into the history of housing segregation in America. [10] In the book's discussions of the history of subsidized housing, it exposes policies in FDR's New Deal that oversaw construction of public housing, built with federal tax dollars, in which African Americans were systematically excluded. [9] Among discussions of other government programs to the same end, the book finds that African Americans were excluded from most FHA insured loans, due to the high risk of providing mortgages on homes in racially mixed neighborhoods, and shows a pattern of US courts upholding private exclusionary agreements, known as covenants, which forbade the sale of homes to minority groups. [9]

Content

Table of contents
ChapterTitle
1If San Francisco, then Everywhere?
2Public Housing, Black Ghettos
3Racial Zoning
4"Own Your Own Home"
5Private Agreements, Government Enforcement
6White Flight
7IRS Support and Compliant Regulators
8Local Tactics
9State-Sanctioned Violence
10Suppressed Incomes
11Looking Forward, Looking Back
12Considering Fixes

The book is composed of twelve chapters and includes an epilogue as well as an appendix of frequently asked questions. [10] The first chapter of the book, "If San Francisco, then Everywhere?", argues that the racially disparate policies instituted by the otherwise liberal governments of cities such as San Francisco is evidence of a widespread problem. [10] Chapter two discusses the history of subsidized housing in the United States. [10] The third chapter covers policies of "racial zoning", where local zoning ordinances lead to the segregation of white and black neighborhoods. [10] Chapter four discusses a program by the US government, the Own-Your-Own-Home campaign, that systematically made it easier for white people to buy and pay off new homes in suburbs in the early 1900s. [10] The fifth chapter discusses police and court enforcement of private agreements forbidding the sale of homes in white neighborhoods to blacks and other minorities. [10] Many of these agreements were in the form of covenants in a house's deed which explicitly blocked sales of the homes to anyone not of the "Caucasian race". [10] Chapter six discusses white flight and blockbusting tactics used by real estate agents to accelerate the migration in order to make a profit. [10]

Reception

The book has received many reviews in newspapers, magazines, periodicals, and scientific journals and has been listed on The New York Times Non-Fiction Paperback Best Seller list for non-fiction paperback books over two dozen times. Among others, the book was reviewed by Francesca Russello Ammon, [8] David Oshinsky, [2] Anna Richardson, [9] Terry Gross, [11] and Jacqueline Jones. [12] Reviews have been published in several newspapers, including The New York Times , [2] The Washington Post , [6] NPR, [11] The Tampa Bay Times , [3] and The Baltimore Sun , [13] as well as several popular magazines and periodicals, such as Publishers Weekly , [14] Slate Magazine , [15] [16] The New York Review of Books , [17] The Los Angeles Review of Books , [9] The Kenyon Review , [18] Kirkus Reviews , [19] Dissent Magazine , [12] and Jacobin . [20] It has also received many reviews in history journals, [21] [22] [23] [10] education journals, [24] [25] and administrative and planning journals. [26] [27] [28] [29] [30]

Reviews

In The New York Times Book Review for the work, written by David Oshinsky in June 2017, the book is called "a powerful and disturbing history of residential segregation in America". [2] Oshinsky went on to write that "[o]ne of the great strengths of Rothstein's account is the sheer weight of evidence he marshals." [2] After some analysis of the book and a discussion of background information, Oshinsky closes the review by writing that "[w]hile the road forward is far from clear, there is no better history of this troubled journey than The Color of Law." [2]

In her November 2017 review, Anna Richardson wrote that the book is "broadly accessible yet painstakingly researched" and notes that "[i]t is the rare book that evokes as much anger and outrage as this one". [9] After a discussion of the book's insights, Richardson closes the review by stating that the book documents in "appalling detail" the need for affirmative action as the "remedy for state-sponsored discrimination of the past". [9] Jacqueline Jones called the book "compelling" in her Fall 2017 review of the book and wrote that it provides "a detailed examination of the ways public entities have colluded with private interests to keep black people out of white neighborhoods". [12]

In the June 2019 issue of Jacobin magazine, Richard Walker, a professor emeritus of geography at the University of California — Berkeley, criticized the book for giving outsized blame to federal policy for housing segregation, a conclusion that he said was the result of Rothstein's “dubious scholarship." Wrote Walker, “The fundamental error of this thesis stems from its depiction of racism as a system imposed from above, by the state, rather than something embedded in American social structures since before the founding." Walker states that, while federal housing law “lined up with the prevailing practices of racial segregation … Rothstein's idea that this was imposed on reluctant localities is ludicrous.” [31]

Accolades

Among other acclamations of the book, it made the longlist for the 2017 National Book Awards, [4] it was placed at number four on Publishers Weekly 's Top 10 Best Books of 2017, [5] it was named one of NPR's Best Books of 2017 [32] one of Bill Gates' favorite books of the same year, [33] and it won Rothstein the 2018 Hillman Prize for Book Journalism. [1] The book spent four weeks on The New York Times Best Seller list beginning at position three in the May 20, 2018, issue [34] and ending at number ten on June 10, 2018, issue. [35] Following racial unrest in the United States, the book re-entered the list in June 2020. [36] For the book's 23rd consecutive week and 28th total week on the list in the November 22, 2020, issue, the book was placed at number five. [37] As of the December 20th, 2020 issue, the book has spent 32 total weeks on the list. [7]

The book's award summary for the 2018 Hillman Prize for Book Journalism argues the work had provided "incontrovertible evidence that it was the laws and policies passed by local, state, and federal governments that actually promoted the discriminatory patterns that continue to this day". [1] After summarizing the topics, the Hillman Foundation went on to note that "Rothstein's invaluable examination shows that relearning this history is a necessary step because it is the foundation for understanding that aggressive policies are in order to desegregate these urban areas and finally pave the way for the nation to remedy its unconstitutional past". [1]

Publication information

This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources.

The book was published in New York in May 2017 by Liveright Publishing, an imprint of W. W. Norton & Company. It was originally published in hardback with ISBN   978-1-63149-285-3 and in e-book format with ISBN   978-1-63149-286-0, while a paperback edition with ISBN   978-1-63149-453-6 was published a year later. In addition to the publications by Liveright, Recorded Books released an audiobook edition in October 2017.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Racial segregation</span> Systemic separation of people into racial or other ethnic groups in daily life

Racial segregation is the separation of people into racial or other ethnic groups in daily life. Segregation can involve the spatial separation of the races, and mandatory use of different institutions, such as schools and hospitals by people of different races. Specifically, it may be applied to activities such as eating in restaurants, drinking from water fountains, using public toilets, attending schools, going to films, riding buses, renting or purchasing homes or renting hotel rooms. In addition, segregation often allows close contact between members of different racial or ethnic groups in hierarchical situations, such as allowing a person of one race to work as a servant for a member of another race. Racial segregation has generally been outlawed worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Redlining</span> Systemic denial of services to some areas

Redlining is a discriminatory practice in which financial services are withheld from neighborhoods that have significant numbers of racial and ethnic minorities. Redlining has been most prominent in the United States, and has mostly been directed against African-Americans. The most common examples involve denial of credit and insurance, denial of healthcare, and the development of food deserts in minority neighborhoods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Levittown</span> 1950s housing developments in the United States

Levittown is the name of several large suburban housing developments created in the United States by William J. Levitt and his company Levitt & Sons. Built after World War II for returning white veterans and their new families, the communities offered attractive alternatives to cramped central city locations and apartments. The Veterans Administration and the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) guaranteed builders that qualified veterans could buy housing for a fraction of rental costs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rollingwood, California</span> Census-designated place in California, United States

Rollingwood is a census-designated place (CDP) in Contra Costa County, California, United States. As of the 2010 census, Rollingwood's population was 2,969.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John A. Volpe</span> American politician and diplomat (1908–1994)

John Anthony Volpe was an American businessman, diplomat, and politician from Massachusetts. A son of Italian immigrants, he founded and owned a large construction firm. Politically, he was a Republican in increasingly Democratic Massachusetts, serving as its 61st and 63rd Governor from 1961 to 1963 and 1965 to 1969, as the United States Secretary of Transportation from 1969 to 1973, and as the United States Ambassador to Italy from 1973 to 1977. As Secretary of Transportation, Volpe was an important figure in the development of the Interstate Highway System at the federal level.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1964 California Proposition 14</span> 1964 California ballot proposition

California Proposition 14 was a November 1964 initiative ballot measure that amended the California state constitution to nullify the 1963 Rumford Fair Housing Act, thereby allowing property sellers, landlords and their agents to openly discriminate on ethnic grounds when selling or letting accommodations, as they had been permitted to before 1963. The proposition became law after receiving support from 65% of voters. In 1966, the California Supreme Court in a 5–2 split decision declared Proposition 14 unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that decision in 1967 in Reitman v. Mulkey.

Racial steering refers to the practice in which real estate brokers guide prospective home buyers towards or away from certain neighborhoods based on their race. The term is used in the context of de facto residential segregation in the United States, and is often divided into two broad classes of conduct:

  1. Advising customers to purchase homes in particular neighborhoods on the basis of race.
  2. Failing, on the basis of race, to show, or to inform buyers of homes that meet their specifications.
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Racial segregation in the United States</span>

Facilities and services such as housing, healthcare, education, employment, and transportation have been systematically separated in the United States based on racial categorizations. Segregation was the legally or socially enforced separation of African Americans from whites, as well as the separation of other ethnic minorities from majority and mainstream communities. While mainly referring to the physical separation and provision of separate facilities, it can also refer to other manifestations such as prohibitions against interracial marriage, and the separation of roles within an institution. The U.S. Armed Forces were formally segregated until 1948, as black units were separated from white units but were still typically led by white officers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Housing Act of 1934</span> American law passed as part of the New Deal

The National Housing Act of 1934, H.R. 9620, Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law  73–479, 48 Stat. 1246, enacted June 27, 1934, also called the Better Housing Program, was part of the New Deal passed during the Great Depression in order to make housing and home mortgages more affordable. It created the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC).

Homer Hoyt was an American economist known for his pioneering work in land use planning, zoning, and real estate economics. He conducted notable research on land economics and developed an influential approach to the analysis of neighborhoods and housing markets. His sector model of land use was influential in urban planning for several decades. His legacy is controversial today, due to his prominent role in the development and justification of racially segregated housing policy and redlining in American cities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zoning in the United States</span> Provision in urban planning in the United States

Zoning is a law that divides a jurisdiction's land into districts, or zones, and limits how land in each district can be used. In the United States, zoning includes various land use laws enforced through the police power rights of state governments and local governments to exercise authority over privately owned real property.

Residential segregation is the physical separation of two or more groups into different neighborhoods—a form of segregation that "sorts population groups into various neighborhood contexts and shapes the living environment at the neighborhood level". While it has traditionally been associated with racial segregation, it generally refers to the separation of populations based on some criteria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elmwood, Berkeley, California</span> Human settlement in Berkeley, California, United States of America

The Elmwood District is a neighborhood of the City of Berkeley, California. It is primarily residential, with a small commercial area. The district does not have set lines of demarcation, but is focused around College and Ashby Avenues. The most extreme definitions of the district's boundaries do not extend past Telegraph Avenue to the west, Dwight Way to the north, or the Oakland city limit to the south. Elmwood was a streetcar suburb that was developed in the 1900s housing boom following the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, and was the first Berkeley subdivision to be assigned single-family residential zoning.

In the United States, housing segregation is the practice of denying African Americans and other minority groups equal access to housing through the process of misinformation, denial of realty and financing services, and racial steering. Housing policy in the United States has influenced housing segregation trends throughout history. Key legislation include the National Housing Act of 1934, the G.I. Bill, and the Fair Housing Act. Factors such as socioeconomic status, spatial assimilation, and immigration contribute to perpetuating housing segregation. The effects of housing segregation include relocation, unequal living standards, and poverty. However, there have been initiatives to combat housing segregation, such as the Section 8 housing program.

Housing discrimination in the United States refers to the historical and current barriers, policies, and biases that prevent equitable access to housing. Housing discrimination became more pronounced after the abolition of slavery in 1865, typically as part of Jim Crow laws that enforced racial segregation. The federal government didn't begin to take action against these laws until 1917, when the Supreme Court struck down ordinances prohibiting blacks from occupying or owning buildings in majority-white neighborhoods in Buchanan v. Warley. However, the federal government as well as local governments continued to be directly responsible for housing discrimination through redlining and race-restricted covenants until the Civil Rights Act of 1968.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central, Cleveland</span> Neighborhood of Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Central, also known as Cedar–Central, is a neighborhood on the East Side of Cleveland, Ohio. Situated on the outskirts of downtown, Central is bounded roughly by East 71st Street on its east and Interstate 90 on its west, with Euclid Avenue on its north and Interstate 77 and the Penn Central Railroad to the south. The neighborhood is eponymously named for its onetime main thoroughfare, Central Avenue. It is home to several schools, including East Technical High School.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">School segregation in the United States</span> Racial separation in schools

School segregation in the United States was the segregation of students based on their ethnicity. While not prohibited from having schools, various minorities were barred from most schools, schools for whites. Segregation laws were dismantled in the late 1960s by the U.S. Supreme Court. Segregation continued longstanding exclusionary policies in much of the Southern United States after the Civil War. School integration in the United States took place at different times in different areas and often met resistance. Jim Crow laws codified segregation. These laws were influenced by the history of slavery and discrimination in the US. Secondary schools for African Americans in the South were called training schools instead of high schools in order to appease racist whites and focused on vocational education. After the ruling of Brown v. Board of Education, which banned segregated school laws, school segregation took de facto form. School segregation declined rapidly during the late 1960s and early 1970s as the government became strict on schools' plans to combat segregation more effectively as a result of Green v. County School Board of New Kent County. Voluntary segregation by income appears to have increased since 1990. Racial segregation has either increased or stayed constant since 1990, depending on which definition of segregation is used. In general, definitions based on the amount of interaction between black and white students show increased racial segregation, while definitions based on the proportion of black and white students in different schools show racial segregation remaining approximately constant.

Richard Thompson Ford is the George E. Osborne Professor of Law at Stanford Law School. His scholarship includes work on critical race theory, local government law, housing segregation, and employment discrimination. He has served as a housing commissioner for the San Francisco Housing Commission, and continues to work with local governments on issues of affordable housing and segregation. His book Rights Gone Wrong: How Law Corrupts the Struggle for Equality was chosen as one of the New York Times 100 Notable Books of 2011. His 2021 book on dress codes explores the relationship between fashion and power.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Rothstein</span> American historian

Richard Rothstein is an American academic and author affiliated with the Economic Policy Institute, and a senior fellow (emeritus) at the Thurgood Marshall Institute of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. His current research focuses on the history of segregation in the United States with regards to education and housing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American ghettos</span> Poor racially segregated urban neighborhoods in the United States

Ghettos in the United States are typically urban neighborhoods perceived as being high in crime and poverty. The origins of these areas are specific to the United States and its laws, which created ghettos through both legislation and private efforts to segregate America for political, economic, social, and ideological reasons: de jure and de facto segregation. De facto segregation continues today in ways such as residential segregation and school segregation because of contemporary behavior and the historical legacy of de jure segregation.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America". Hillman Foundation . April 18, 2018. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Oshinsky 2017
  3. 1 2 3 Brink, Graham (July 24, 2018). "Government led segregation, author says". Tampa Bay Times . Retrieved November 13, 2020– via Newspapers.com.
  4. 1 2 "The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America". National Book Foundation . Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  5. 1 2 "Best Books 2017 Publishers Weekly". PublishersWeekly.com. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  6. 1 2 Mayes, Brittany Renee; Tierney, Lauren; Keating, Dan (July 2, 2020). "Demand for anti-racist literature is up. These black bookstore owners hope it lasts". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on July 4, 2020. Retrieved July 6, 2020.
  7. 1 2 "Paperback Nonfiction Books - Best Sellers - The New York Times". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  8. 1 2 Ammon 2017
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Richardson 2017
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Broyld, Dann J. (October 19, 2020). "The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America by Richard Rothstein (review)". The Public Historian . 42 (3): 168–170. doi:10.1525/tph.2020.42.3.168. ISSN   1533-8576. S2CID   225369236.
  11. 1 2 Gross 2017
  12. 1 2 3 Jones 2017
  13. ↑ Harrison, Jane (December 21, 2017). "Readers respond: Racial discrimination does drive government spending". The Baltimore Sun . Retrieved November 13, 2020.
  14. ↑ "Nonfiction Book Review: The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America by Richard Rothstein. Liveright, $27.95 (336p) ISBN 978-1-63149-285-3". Publishers Weekly . February 20, 2017. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  15. ↑ Cohen, Rachel M. (May 5, 2017). "The Courts Still Say No One Knows What Causes Segregation. A New Book Argues That's Absurd". Slate Magazine . Archived from the original on May 7, 2020. Retrieved July 13, 2020.
  16. ↑ Blumgart, Jake (June 2, 2017). "Housing Is Shamefully Segregated. Who Segregated It?". Slate Magazine . Archived from the original on September 5, 2019. Retrieved July 13, 2020.
  17. ↑ DeParle, Jason (February 22, 2018). "When Government Drew the Color Line". The New York Review of Books . ISSN   0028-7504. Archived from the original on July 17, 2020. Retrieved July 13, 2020.
  18. ↑ Garfinkle, Deborah. "The Color of Injustice: Richard Rothstein's The Color of Law". The Kenyon Review . Archived from the original on July 19, 2020. Retrieved July 13, 2020.
  19. ↑ "Rev. of The Color of Law". Kirkus Reviews . February 20, 2017.
  20. ↑ Walker, Richard (June 18, 2019). "The New Deal Didn't Create Segregation". Jacobin . Archived from the original on April 24, 2020. Retrieved July 13, 2020.
  21. ↑ Erickson, Ansley T. (February 2018). "Richard Rothstein . The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America (New York: Liveright Publishing, 2017), 368 pp". History of Education Quarterly . 58 (1): 165–167. doi:10.1017/heq.2017.56. ISSN   0018-2680. S2CID   149195897.
  22. ↑ Kurtulus, Fidan Ana (March 4, 2019). "Rev. of The Color of Law". Labor History . 60 (2): 162–163. doi:10.1080/0023656X.2019.1534318. ISSN   0023-656X. S2CID   158123494.
  23. ↑ Squires, Gregory D. (December 5, 2017). "The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America, by Richard Rothstein". Kalfou. 4 (2). doi:10.15367/kf.v4i2.171. ISSN   2372-0751.
  24. ↑ Ross, Lydia; Powers, Jeanne M. (December 12, 2018). "Rev. of The Color of Law". Education Review. 25. doi: 10.14507/er.v25.2440 . ISSN   1094-5296. Archived from the original on February 9, 2020. Retrieved July 13, 2020.
  25. ↑ Gale, Dennis E. (September 2019). "Review: The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America by Richard Rothstein". Journal of Planning Education and Research . 39 (3): 380–381. doi:10.1177/0739456X18771171. ISSN   0739-456X. S2CID   149820563.
  26. ↑ Callison, J. William (2017). "The Color of Law". Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law . 26 (1). Retrieved November 13, 2020– via heinonline.org.
  27. ↑ Mills, Alison (March 27, 2018). "The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America". Berkeley Planning Journal . 29 (1). doi: 10.5070/BP329138440 . ISSN   1047-5192.
  28. ↑ Zimmermann, Ulf (November 2019). "Richard Rothstein, The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America (New York, NY: Liveright, 2017). 345 pp. (hard cover), ISBN: 978‐1‐63149‐285‐3". Public Administration Review . 79 (6): 938–940. doi:10.1111/puar.13119. ISSN   0033-3352. S2CID   211389183.
  29. ↑ Hanley, Johanna (November 17, 2019). "The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America, by Richard Rothstein". Journal of Urban Affairs . 41 (8): 1231–1233. doi:10.1080/07352166.2019.1588576. ISSN   0735-2166. S2CID   213362050.
  30. ↑ Chapin, Tim (October 1, 2020). "Rothstein: The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America". Journal of the American Planning Association . 86 (4): 516–517. doi:10.1080/01944363.2020.1803632. ISSN   0194-4363. S2CID   222003337.
  31. ↑ Walker, Richard (June 18, 2019). "The New Deal Didn't Create Segregation". Jacobin. Retrieved June 9, 2021.
  32. ↑ "Best Books of 2017". npr.org. 2017. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  33. ↑ "8 Books Bill Gates Read and Loved in 2017". The Observer . December 5, 2017. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  34. ↑ "Paperback Nonfiction Books - Best Sellers - May 20, 2018 - The New York Times". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  35. ↑ "Paperback Nonfiction Books - Best Sellers - June 10, 2018 - The New York Times". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  36. ↑ "Paperback Nonfiction Books - Best Sellers - June 14, 2020 - The New York Times". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  37. ↑ "Paperback Nonfiction Books - Best Sellers - Books - Nov. 22, 2020 - The New York Times". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved December 15, 2020.

Further reading

External media
Audio
Nuvola apps arts.svg Author interview on NPR with Ari Shapiro, May 2017
Nuvola apps arts.svg NPR on-air book review by Terry Gross, May 2017
Video
Nuvola apps kaboodle.svg Conversation on c-span between Rothstein and Ta-Nehisi Coates, May 2017
Nuvola apps kaboodle.svg Acceptance speech for the 2018 Hillman Prize for Book Journalism, May 2018
Nuvola apps kaboodle.svg Brown University lecture on the book by Rothstein, February 2019
Nuvola apps kaboodle.svg Columbia University lecture on the book by Rothstein, September 2019
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.