The Great Jewel Robber | |
---|---|
![]() Theatrical release poster | |
Directed by | Peter Godfrey |
Screenplay by | Borden Chase |
Produced by | Bryan Foy |
Starring | David Brian Marjorie Reynolds John Archer Jacqueline deWit Perdita Chandler Stanley Church |
Cinematography | Sidney Hickox |
Edited by | Frank Magee |
Music by | William Lava |
Production company | |
Distributed by | Warner Bros. |
Release dates |
|
Running time | 91 minutes |
Country | United States |
Language | English |
The Great Jewel Robber is a 1950 American drama film directed by Peter Godfrey and written by Borden Chase. The film stars David Brian, Marjorie Reynolds, John Archer, Jacqueline deWit, Perdita Chandler and Stanley Church. It is based on the life of Gerard Dennis, a "society thief" who stole more than $600,000 worth of jewels. [2]
![]() | This article's plot summary needs to be improved.(June 2015) |
Gerard Dennis is a suave, controlling character. He supports himself by filching jewels in ingenious ways from their owners, often women whom he inveigles into his clutches by seducing them. Although he primarily relies on conniving and trickery, he also employs violence when necessary to escape apprehension by the law.
He executes a series of amazingly clever seductions, heists and escapes from the police. However, one of his conquests, whom he had married, helps the police catch him. He is sentenced to prison for 25 years.
The film is based on the real-life case of Gerard Dennis, known as a "society thief" after a string of jewel robberies netting a total of more than $600,000 in his native Montreal, Hollywood and Westchester County, New York, where he was sentenced to at least 18 years in prison in July 1949. Dennis was a career criminal who had been previously convicted of breaking and entering, possessing burglary tools and the attempted murder of a baby. [2] From prison, Dennis granted permission for his story to be told on film. [1]
In a contemporary review for The New York Times , critic Howard Thompson called The Great Jewel Robber a "spasmodically sincere attempt to show how crime didn't pay" and wrote: "[T]he picture has some dogmatic finger-wagging, but on the whole it's little more than a routine, backhanded glorification of a Raffles-Casanova." [1]