Toshio Kuroda (Shinto professor)

Last updated • 5 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

Toshio Kuroda (黒田 俊雄, Kuroda Toshio, January 21, 1926 - January 26, 1993) was a Japanese academic, historian and university professor. A specialist in medieval Japanese history and in the history of Japanese thought, [1] he greatly influenced Japanese historiography with several innovative and controversial theories. [2] His ideas were the opposite of what mainstream academics at the time believed, and for this reason his name is often at the center of controversies. [2] His work has been called "seminal", [3] "epochal" [4] and "revolutionary". [2] [5]

Contents

Career

Kuroda is known for having published "Shinto in the History of Japanese Religion," which argued that Shinto as an independent religion took shape only in the modern period, having emerged in the medieval age as an offshoot of Buddhism. [3] He is also known for his kenmon taisei (権門体制, system of ruling elites) and kenmitsu (顕密, exoteric - esoteric )" theories.

Kuroda's thought and writings influenced the work of such contemporary academics as John Breen and Mark Teeuwen. [3] The Fall 1996, 23/3–4 issue of Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture's Japanese Journal of Religious Studies [6] was entirely dedicated to him under the title "The Legacy of Kuroda Toshio".

Kuroda's position on Shinto

In his article "Shinto in the History of Japanese Religion", published in English in 1981, [7] Kuroda argues that Shinto as a "distinct, independent and organized religion" is a Meiji era invention of Japanese nationalist ideologues. [8] According to a BBC website, [9] Kuroda's scholarly writings about Shinto are considered important:

"The scholar Kuroda Toshio has suggested that the traditional view of Shinto as the indigenous religion of Japan stretching back into pre-history is wrong. He argues that Shinto didn't emerge as a separate religion until comparatively modern times, and that this happened for political reasons. The traditional view, he says, is a modern construction of Shinto that has been projected back into history." [9]

Specifically, Kuroda argues that Shinto as a distinct religion was born only in the modern period after emerging in the Middle Ages as an offshoot of Buddhism. [8] He points out how the state formalization of kami rituals and the state ranking of shrines during the Heian period were not the emergence of Shinto as an independent religion, but an effort to explain local beliefs in Buddhist terms. [8] He also claims that, if it's true that the two characters for "Shinto" (神道, Shintō) appear very early in the historical record, for example in the Nihon Shoki, this does not mean today's Shinto already existed as a religion at the time because it can be read as a generic term for popular beliefs. Alternatively, he proposes it could be a name for Taoism, as the term was used contemporaneously in China in that way. [8] Indeed, according to Kuroda, many lasting features of Shinto, for example the worship of mirrors and swords or the very structure of Ise Shrine (Shinto's holiest and most important site) are typical of Taoism. [8] The term Shinto in old texts therefore does not necessarily indicate something uniquely Japanese. [10]

Such has been his influence that today Japanese specialists, when talking about events antecedent the Japanese Middle Ages, to avoid using the term Shinto have acquired a strong tendency to use instead other terms like jingi shinkō (神祇信仰, kami worship). [11]

Kuroda's kenmon taisei

Another major contribution was his kenmon taisei (権門体制, system of ruling elites) theory. Traditional scholarship characterized medieval history as the period of emergence of military governments and new forms of Buddhism (the Kamakura Buddhist schools like Rinzai and Nichiren). [12] To the contrary, Kuroda emphasized the continuation of the power of the Kyoto court and of the older schools of Buddhism from the Heian period. [12] He claimed that government was not a prerogative of the warrior cast, but rather a power-sharing arrangement between three blocks (the "kenmon" (権門, system of ruling elites)), namely the warriors, the aristocrats, and the religious centers of power, with the Emperor acting as an arbiter. [12]

Kenmitsu taisei theory

Unlike most scholars at the time, Kuroda believed that the dominant branches of Buddhism during the Japanese Middle Ages (1185 - 1603) were not those of the so-called Kamakura New Buddhism, namely the Zen, Jōdo and Nichiren schools, but older ones like the Hossō, Kegon, Tendai, and Shingon, which he called by the collective name kenmitsu taisei (顕密体制, exoteric - esoteric system) Buddhism because the group included both exoteric and esoteric schools of Japanese Buddhism. [12] Representative of the system were powerful temples like Kōfuku-ji, Tōdai-ji, Enryaku-ji, and Tō-ji, whose function was to perform rites for the ruling elites. [12] Because the then-dominant honji suijaku theological theory, which claimed Japanese kami were simply local emanations of Indian Buddhist gods, allowed the kenmitsu schools to incorporate kami cults into Buddhism, shrines dedicated to them could be included into the kenmon taisei political and economic system.

Selected works

In a statistical overview derived from writings by and about Toshio Kuroda, OCLC/WorldCat encompasses roughly 30+ works in 70+ publications in 2 languages and 500+ library holdings. [13]

Notes

  1. Library of Congress authority file, Kuroda Toshio, n83-219003
  2. 1 2 3 Dobbins (1996:1)
  3. 1 2 3 Rambelli, Fabio. "Dismantling stereotypes surrounding Japan's sacred entities," Japan Times. July 15, 2001
  4. Sueki (2007:8)
  5. Breen, Teuween (2000:4-6)
  6. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. Accessed 2-1-2011.
  7. KURODA TOSHIO, Shinto in the History of Japanese Religion, Translated by JAMES C. DOBBINS and SUZANNE GAY, Journal of Japanese Studies, 7-1, 1981
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Breen and Teuween (2000:4-5)
  9. 1 2 BBC "Shinto" website, "Problems in studying Shinto history" (at the bottom of the "History" webpage), 2011
  10. Kuroda (1981:7)
  11. Sueki, Fumihiko (2007). Chūsei no kami to hotoke. Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppansha. p. 13.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 Yoshida (2006:381)
  13. WorldCat Identities: 黒田俊雄 1926-

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shinto</span> Religion originated in Japan

Shinto is a religion originating from Japan. Classified as an East Asian religion by scholars of religion, its practitioners often regard it as Japan's indigenous religion and as a nature religion. Scholars sometimes call its practitioners Shintoists, although adherents rarely use that term themselves. There is no central authority in control of Shinto, with much diversity of belief and practice evident among practitioners.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Religion in Japan</span> Religious practices in Japan

Religion in Japan is manifested primarily in Shinto and in Buddhism, the two main faiths, which Japanese people often practice simultaneously. According to estimates, as many as 80% of the populace follow Shinto rituals to some degree, worshiping ancestors and spirits at domestic altars and public shrines. An almost equally high number is reported as Buddhist. Syncretic combinations of both, known generally as shinbutsu-shūgō, are common; they represented Japan's dominant religion before the rise of State Shinto in the 19th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Keiji Nishitani</span> Japanese university professor, scholar, and Kyoto School philosopher

Keiji Nishitani was a Japanese philosopher. He was a scholar of the Kyoto School and a disciple of Kitarō Nishida. In 1924, Nishitani received his doctorate from Kyoto Imperial University for his dissertation "Das Ideale und das Reale bei Schelling und Bergson". He studied under Martin Heidegger in Freiburg from 1937 to 1939.

<i>Shinbutsu-shūgō</i> Japanese syncretism of Shinto and Buddhism

Shinbutsu-shūgō, also called Shinbutsu shūShinbutsu-konkō, is the syncretism of Shinto and Buddhism that was Japan's main organized religion up until the Meiji period. Beginning in 1868, the new Meiji government approved a series of laws that separated Japanese native kami worship, on one side, from Buddhism which had assimilated it, on the other.

<i>Shinbutsu bunri</i> The separation of Shinto from Buddhism

The Japanese term shinbutsu bunri (神仏分離) indicates the separation of Shinto from Buddhism, introduced after the Meiji Restoration which separated Shinto kami from buddhas, and also Buddhist temples from Shinto shrines, which were originally amalgamated. It is a yojijukugo phrase.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kumano shrine</span> Type of Japanese temple

A Kumano shrine is a type of Shinto shrine which enshrines the three Kumano mountains: Hongū, Shingū, and Nachi [Kumano Gongen (熊野権現)]. There are more than 3,000 Kumano shrines in Japan, and each has received its kami from another Kumano shrine through a process of propagation called bunrei (分霊) or kanjō (勧請).

Ko-Shintō (古神道) refers to the animistic religion of Jōmon period Japan, which is the alleged basis of modern Shinto. The search for traces of Koshintō began with the "Restoration Shinto" in the Edo period, which goal was to remove any foreign ideas and worldviews from Shinto. Some movements which claim to have discovered this primeval way of thought are Oomoto, Izumo-taishakyo.

The term honji suijaku or honchi suijaku (本地垂迹) in Japanese religious terminology refers to a theory widely accepted until the Meiji period according to which Indian Buddhist deities choose to appear in Japan as native kami to more easily convert and save the Japanese. The theory states that some kami are local manifestations of Buddhist deities. The two entities form an indivisible whole called gongen and in theory should have equal standing, but this was not always the case. In the early Nara period, for example, the honji was considered more important and only later did the two come to be regarded as equals. During the late Kamakura period it was proposed that the kami were the original deities and the buddhas their manifestations.

<i>Shinbutsu kakuri</i> Practice of keeping kami separate from Buddhism

The term shinbutsu kakuri in Japanese Buddhist terminogy refers to the tendency in medieval and early modern Japan to keep some kami separate from Buddhism. While some kami were integrated in Buddhism, others were kept systematically away from Buddhism. This phenomenon had significant consequences for Japanese culture as a whole. It should not be confused with shinbutsu bunri or with haibutsu kishaku, which are phenomenons recurrent in Japanese history and usually due to political causes. While the first assumes the acceptance of Buddhism, the second and third actually oppose it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Breen (scholar)</span>

John Lawrence Breen is a British academic and Japanologist. He is a specialist in Japanese history at the International Research Center for Japanese Studies in Kyoto. He writes in English and Japanese on the history of Shinto and the imperial institution.

Fumihiko Sueki is a Japanese academic and historian, and one of Japan's leading scholars of Japanese Buddhism. He is a professor at the International Research Center for Japanese Studies in Kyoto. A member of the advisory board of Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture's Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, he is also a contributor to the journal itself.

Fabio Rambelli is an Italian academic, author and editor. He is a professor in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB).

James Carter Dobbins is an American academic, Japanologist and professor of religion and East Asian studies at Oberlin College in Oberlin, Ohio.

This is a genealogical tree of the leaders of the Fujiwara clan from 669 to 1871, who were otherwise known as the Tōshi no Chōja.

Secular Shrine Theory or Jinja hishūkyōron (神社非宗教論) was a religious policy and political theory that arose in Japan during the 19th and early 20th centuries due to the separation of church and state of the Meiji Government. It was the idea that Shinto Shrines were secular in their nature rather than religious, and that Shinto was not a religion, but rather a secular set of Japanese national traditions. This was linked to State Shinto and the idea that the state controlling and enforcing Shinto was not a violation of freedom of religion. It was subject to immense debate over this time and ultimately declined and disappeared during the Shōwa era.

Shinto is a religion native to Japan with a centuries'-long history tied to various influences in origin.

Sect Shinto refers to several independent organized Shinto groups that were excluded by law in 1882 from government-run State Shinto. These independent groups have more developed belief systems than mainstream Shrine Shinto, which focuses more on rituals. Many such groups are organized into the Kyōha Shintō Rengōkai. Before World War II, Sect Shinto consisted of 13 denominations, which were referred to as the 13 Shinto schools. Since then, there have been additions and withdrawals of membership.

The term unity of religion and rule refers to the unification of ritual and politics. ritual in ritual-politics means "ritual" and religion. The word "politics" means "ritual" and politics.

The Proclamation of the Great Doctrine was issued in the name of Emperor Meiji on January 3, 1870. It declared Shinto as the guiding principle of the state.

The Great Teaching Institute was an organization under the Ministry of Religion in the Empire of Japan.

References