Twitter Joke Trial

Last updated

Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom.svg
Court High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division)
Full case namePaul Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions
Decided27 July 2012
Citation(s) [2012] EWHC 2157 (QB)
Transcript(s) High Court transcript
Case history
Appealed fromDoncaster Magistrates' Court
Case opinions
The message was not objectively menacing; the conviction was therefore quashed. [1]
Court membership
Judges sitting
Keywords

R v Paul Chambers (appealed to the High Court as Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions), popularly known as the Twitter Joke Trial, was a United Kingdom legal case centred on the conviction of a man under the Communications Act 2003 for posting a joke about destroying an airport to Twitter, a message which police regarded as "menacing". The conviction was widely condemned as a miscarriage of justice, [2] [3] [4] [5] and was appealed three times, the conviction being quashed as a result of the third appeal. [6]

Contents

Background

During late December 2009 and early January 2010, cold weather had resulted in considerable disruption across northern England. Robin Hood Airport in South Yorkshire was one of many airports which was forced to cancel flights. On 6 January 2010, [7] [8] [9] an intending traveller, Paul Chambers, then aged 26, [10] who was planning to fly to Northern Ireland to meet his then girlfriend (later wife), posted a message on Twitter:

Paul Chambers Twitter
@pauljchambers

Crap! Robin Hood airport is closed. You've got a week and a bit to get your shit together otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!!

6 January 2010 [11]

A week later, an off-duty manager at the airport found the message while doing an unrelated computer search. [9] The airport management considered the message to be "not credible" as a threat, [9] but contacted the police anyway. Chambers was arrested by anti-terror police at his office, [9] his house was searched and his mobile phone, laptop and desktop hard drive were confiscated. [11] He was later charged with "sending a public electronic message that was grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character contrary to the Communications Act 2003". [9] [12] On 10 May, he was found guilty at Doncaster Magistrates' Court, [9] fined £385 and ordered to pay £600 costs. [10] As a consequence he lost his job [11] as an administrative and financial supervisor at a car parts company. [13]

Response

A number of legal commentators and celebrities criticised the conviction and called for it to be overturned. They include journalist Nick Cohen, who drew comparison with Milan Kundera's anti-communist novel The Joke ; [14] television writer Graham Linehan; [15] and the comedian and television presenter Stephen Fry, who offered to pay Chambers's fine [16] and subsequent legal bills. [17] [18]

Appeals

Chambers lost an appeal against his conviction. Judge Jacqueline Davies, sitting with two magistrates, [10] heard his appeal in Doncaster Crown Court; she judged that the tweet contained "menace" and that Chambers must have known that it might be taken seriously. [19] Thousands of Twitter users responded by reposting Chambers' Tweet including the hashtag #iamspartacus, [20] [21] in reference to the climactic "I am Spartacus!" scene in the 1960 film Spartacus.

A further appeal to the High Court was heard on 8 February 2012, in which the two judge panel of Lord Justice Gross and Mr Justice Irwin failed to reach a decision after initially reserving judgement. [22] [23] The appeal by case stated was made by Chambers' barristers, Ben Emmerson QC and Sarah Przybylska; David Allen Green, who acted for Chambers in earlier proceedings, [24] also acted as his solicitor, through Preiskel & Co LLP. [25] The appeal was entirely on points of law and centred on the correct interpretation of section 127(1) of the Communications Act 2003. [23]

Chambers (centre), with Al Murray (left) and Stephen Fry (right) outside the High Court on 27 June 2012 Twitter Joke Trial 1.jpg
Chambers (centre), with Al Murray (left) and Stephen Fry (right) outside the High Court on 27 June 2012

A second High Court appeal, before a panel of three judges, headed by the Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge, opened on 22 June 2012. [26] One of the arguments made by Chambers' barrister for this last appeal, John Cooper QC, was that if the tweet was "menacing" so was John Betjeman's poem, "Slough", pleading "Come, friendly bombs, and fall on Slough!". [27] He also asked whether Shakespeare would have been prosecuted if he had tweeted his line from Henry VI, Part 2 (Act IV, Scene 2), "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers". [27] The latter reportedly drew laughter from the judges. On 27 June, the judges announced a reserved judgement. [28] Chambers arrived at court accompanied by Stephen Fry and the comedian Al Murray. [28]

Chambers's conviction was quashed on 27 July 2012. [6] The approved judgement concluded that "a message which does not create fear or apprehension in those to whom it is communicated, or who may reasonably be expected to see it, falls outside this provision [of the 2003 Act]". [29] Accordingly, the appeal against conviction was "allowed on the basis that this 'tweet' did not constitute or include a message of a menacing character". [29] [30]

It has been claimed by sources talking to The Guardian that staff at the Crown Prosecution Service had been in favour of dropping the case, to the point of informing Chambers, via his solicitor, that they would not oppose the final appeal, but had then been overruled by the head of the service, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer. [31] Chambers' MP, Louise Mensch, called for a House of Commons committee to investigate Starmer's behaviour. [31] However, a spokesperson for the CPS said that Starmer had not taken part in decisions about the case. [31]

Impact of the case

The case led to a review of the guidance for the Crown Prosecution Service of their use of Section 127 and other speech related offences for online content, which attempted to narrow the use of the section in prosecutions. The "grossly offensive" test has remained controversial and has been further reviewed by the Law Commission, which is examining current offences to "improve the protection afforded to victims" while providing "better safeguards for freedom of expression". [32]

See also

Related Research Articles

Double jeopardy is a procedural defence that prevents an accused person from being tried again on the same charges following an acquittal and in rare cases prosecutorial and/or judge misconduct in the same jurisdiction. A variation in civil law countries is the peremptory plea, which may take the specific forms of autrefois acquit or autrefois convict. These doctrines appear to have originated in ancient Roman law, in the broader principle non bis in idem.

Censorship in the United Kingdom has a history with various stringent and lax laws in place at different times.

Baker McKenzie Multinational law firm

Baker McKenzie is a multinational law firm headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. Founded in 1949 as Baker & McKenzie, it has 77 offices in 46 countries, and over 6,000 lawyers worldwide. It is one of the largest law firms in the world by headcount and revenue.

Communications Act 2003 United Kingdom legislation

The Communications Act 2003 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The act, which came into force on 25 July 2003, superseded the Telecommunications Act 1984. The new act was the responsibility of Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell. It consolidated the telecommunication and broadcasting regulators in the UK, introducing the Office of Communications (Ofcom) as the new industry regulator. On 28 December 2003 Ofcom gained its full regulatory powers, inheriting the duties of the Office of Telecommunications (Oftel). Among other measures, the act introduced legal recognition of community radio and paved the way for full-time community radio services in the UK, as well as controversially lifting many restrictions on cross-media ownership. It also made it illegal to use other people's Wi-Fi broadband connections without their permission. In addition, the legislation also allowed for the first time non-European entities to wholly own a British television company.

Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi was a Libyan who was head of security for Libyan Arab Airlines, director of the Centre for Strategic Studies in Tripoli, Libya, and an alleged Libyan intelligence officer. On 31 January 2001, Megrahi was convicted, by a panel of three Scottish judges sitting in a special court at Camp Zeist in the Netherlands, of 270 counts of murder for the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, on 21 December 1988 and was sentenced to life imprisonment. His co-accused, Lamin Khalifah Fhimah, was found not guilty and was acquitted.

The Pan Am Flight 103 bombing trial began on 3 May 2000, 11 years, 4 months and 13 days after the destruction of Pan Am Flight 103 on 21 December 1988. The 36-week bench trial took place at a specially convened Scottish Court in the Netherlands set up under Scots law and held at a disused United States Air Force base called Camp Zeist near Utrecht.

David Harold Eastman is a former public servant from Canberra, Australia. In 1995, he was wrongfully convicted of the murder of Australian Federal Police Assistant Commissioner Colin Winchester and was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. A 2014 judicial inquiry recommended the sentence be quashed and he should be pardoned. On 22 August of the same year, the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory quashed the conviction, released Eastman from prison, and ordered a retrial.

Kenneth Donald John Macdonald, Baron Macdonald of River Glaven, QC is a British lawyer and politician who served as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) of England and Wales from 2003 to 2008. In that office he was head of the Crown Prosecution Service. He was previously a Recorder and defence barrister. He is a life peer in the House of Lords, where he sits as a crossbencher and was previously a Liberal Democrat. He was Warden of Wadham College, Oxford until 2021.

Khmer Rouge Tribunal Cambodian–UN court established in 1997 to try Khmer Rouge leaders

The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, commonly known as the Cambodia Tribunal or Khmer Rouge Tribunal (សាលាក្ដីខ្មែរក្រហម), is a court established to try the senior leaders and the most responsible members of the Khmer Rouge for alleged violations of international law and serious crimes perpetrated during the Cambodian genocide. Although it is a national court, it was established as part of an agreement between the Royal Government of Cambodia and the United Nations, and its members include both local and foreign judges. It is considered a hybrid court, as the ECCC was created by the government in conjunction with the UN, but remains independent of them, with trials held in Cambodia using Cambodian and international staff. The Cambodian court invites international participation in order to apply international standards.

Keir Starmer Leader of the British Labour Party, MP for Holborn and St Pancras (born 1962)

Sir Keir Rodney Starmer is a British politician and former lawyer who has served as Leader of the Labour Party and Leader of the Opposition since 2020. He has been Member of Parliament (MP) for Holborn and St Pancras since 2015. Ideologically, Starmer has been described as being on the soft left within the Labour Party.

The Nancy Kissel murder case was a highly publicised criminal trial held in the High Court of Hong Kong, where American expatriate Nancy Ann Kissel was convicted of the murder of her husband, 40-year-old investment banker Robert Peter Kissel, in their apartment on 2 November 2003. It was arguably the highest profile criminal case involving an expatriate in Hong Kong's history, and was closely covered in the media.

Sergey Aleynikov is a former Goldman Sachs computer programmer. Between 2009 and 2016, he was prosecuted by NY Federal and State jurisdictions for the same conduct of allegedly copying proprietary computer source code from his employer, Goldman Sachs, before joining a competing firm. His first prosecution in federal court in New York ultimately resulted in acquittal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The outcome of his second prosecution and trial in New York state court was a split verdict dismissed by court, which acquitted him on all counts. One count in that order of dismissal was later overturned by New York Court of Appeals, which took a very broad interpretation of the statute, and on recommendation of prosecutors he was sentenced to time served without punishment. The same New York Court of Appeals denied his petition to appeal on double jeopardy grounds. His story inspired Michael Lewis's bestseller Flash Boys.

<i>HM Advocate v Sheridan and Sheridan</i>

Her Majesty's Advocate v Thomas Sheridan and Gail Sheridan was the 2010 criminal prosecution of Tommy Sheridan, a former Member of the Scottish Parliament and his wife Gail Sheridan for perjury in relation to the earlier civil case Sheridan v News Group Newspapers. Tommy Sheridan was found guilty and sentenced to three years in prison, whereas Gail was acquitted.

Jacqueline M. Davies styled Her Honour Judge Jacqueline Davies is a Circuit Judge, working in the North Eastern region of the UK. She was appointed on 29 June 1993. Her Honour Judge Jacqueline Davies died peacefully on April 18th, 2019 in Wheatfields Hospice, aged 70 years.

John Gordon Cooper QC is a British barrister specialising in human rights and criminal law. He is also a broadcaster and politician. He is a member of the Bar of England and Wales, where he practises with '25 Bedford Row' and the Australian Bar. He has been chairman of the League Against Cruel Sports since 1996, and he was appointed honorary professor of law at Cardiff University in 2011.

<i>R v Evans and McDonald</i>

R v Evans and McDonald was the prosecution of two footballers, Ched Evans and Clayton McDonald, who were accused of the rape of a woman. On 20 April 2012, Evans was convicted and sentenced to five years imprisonment. McDonald was acquitted. Several people were later fined after naming the woman on Twitter and other social media websites.

<i>New Jersey v. Dharun Ravi</i>

State of New Jersey vs. Dharun Ravi was a criminal trial held in Middlesex County, New Jersey, Superior Court from February 24, 2012, to March 16, 2012, in which former Rutgers University undergraduate student Dharun Ravi was tried and convicted on 15 counts of crimes involving invasion of privacy, attempted invasion of privacy, bias intimidation, tampering with evidence, witness tampering, and hindering apprehension or prosecution.

Trial of Oscar Pistorius Criminal trial

The trial of Oscar Pistorius for the murder of Reeva Steenkamp and several gun-related charges in the High Court of South Africa in Pretoria opened on 3 March 2014. Pistorius was a leading South African runner, who won attention as an athlete with a disability competing at a high level, including at multiple Paralympic Games and the 2012 Summer Olympics. Steenkamp, a model, had been Pistorius's girlfriend for three months. In the early morning of Thursday, 14 February 2013, Steenkamp was shot and killed by Pistorius at his Pretoria home. Pistorius acknowledged that he shot Steenkamp, but said that he mistook her for an intruder. Pistorius was taken into police custody and was formally charged with murder in a Pretoria court on 15 February 2013. The entire trial was broadcast live via audio and parts of the trial were also broadcast live via television.

Mark Meechan Scottish YouTuber

Mark Meechan is a Scottish YouTuber and former UK Independence Party candidate for the European Parliament. He uses the online name Count Dankula.

Eleanor Poppy Miranda de Freitas was an English woman who committed suicide three days before the commencement of her trial for perverting the course of justice for allegedly making a false accusation of rape. Her death prompted a debate over whether prosecuting people accused of making a false accusation of rape could deter rape victims from reporting the crime, as well as whether it was appropriate to prosecute vulnerable individuals.

References

  1. ↑ Martin Beckford (27 July 2012). "Twitter joke trial conviction quashed in High Court". The Telegraph . Retrieved 9 September 2012.
  2. ↑ "The Twitter "Bomb Hoax" case: worse than we thought?" . The Lawyer. 2 March 2010. Retrieved 19 September 2010.
  3. ↑ Mitchell, David (16 May 2010). "Sacked and fined £1,000 for a joke about an airport? - David Mitchell column - The Observer". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 19 September 2010.
  4. ↑ Cohen, Nick (19 September 2010). "Twitter and terrifying tale of modern Britain - The Observer". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 19 September 2010.
  5. ↑ "Jack of Kent: Why the Paul Chambers case matters". Blogger . Retrieved 19 September 2010.
  6. 1 2 "Robin Hood Airport tweet bomb joke man wins case". BBC News. 27 July 2012. Retrieved 9 September 2012.
  7. ↑ Hughes and Walsh, Mark and Jason (10 January 2010). "Twitter joke led to Terror Act arrest and airport life ban - Home news - The Independent". Independent. London. Retrieved 27 June 2012.
  8. ↑ Walsh, Jason (22 January 2010). "Twitter terror? Man arrested for venting about canceled flight – World news – The Christian Science Monitor". Boston, USA: The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 4 July 2012.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Wainwright, Martin (10 May 2010). "Wrong kind of tweet leaves air traveller £1,000 out of pocket - UK news - The Guardian". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 17 September 2010.
  10. 1 2 3 "John Betjeman would have been prosecuted under Twitter joke laws, court hears". The Daily Telegraph . 27 June 2012. Retrieved 27 June 2012.
  11. 1 2 3 Chambers, Paul (11 May 2010). "My tweet was silly, but the police reaction was absurd - The Guardian". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 17 September 2010.
  12. ↑ "Communications Act 2003". www.legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  13. ↑ Sarah Lyall (2010). "Briton Loses Twitter Case, but Wins Following". New York Times. He was fired from his job as an administrative and financial supervisor at a car-parts company.
  14. ↑ Cohen, Nick (19 September 2010). "Twitter and terrifying tale of modern Britain". The Observer . Retrieved 27 June 2012.
  15. ↑ Linehan, Graham (11 May 2010). "Prague, 1965" . Retrieved 27 June 2012.
  16. ↑ Wainwright, Martin (11 November 2010). "Stephen Fry leads protest tweets against Twitter joke verdict | Technology | guardian.co.uk". The Guardian . Retrieved 27 June 2012.
  17. ↑ Siddique, Haroon (12 November 2010). "#IAmSpartacus campaign explodes on Twitter in support of airport joker". The Guardian. London.
  18. ↑ "Stephen Fry says British judges don't understand Twitter". BBC News. London. 8 February 2012.
  19. ↑ Wainwright, Martin (11 November 2010). "Twitter joke trial: Paul Chambers loses appeal against conviction". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 12 November 2010.
  20. ↑ Siddique, Haroon (12 November 2010). "#IAmSpartacus campaign explodes on Twitter in support of airport joker". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 12 November 2010.
  21. ↑ "Thousands of Twitter users express support for Chambers". Mashable . 12 November 2010. Retrieved 12 November 2010.
  22. ↑ "the Twitter Joke Trial" . Retrieved 3 December 2011.
  23. 1 2 Alllen Green, David (7 February 2012). "Must read posts on the Twitter Joke Trial appeal". New Statesman . Retrieved 27 June 2012.
  24. ↑ "David Allen Green - Profile from Preiskel.com" . Retrieved 7 April 2011.
  25. ↑ "High Court Date for "Twitter Joke Trial"". New Statesman . 8 September 2011. Retrieved 8 September 2011.
  26. ↑ Allen Green, David (22 June 2012). "The "Twitter Joke Trial" returns to the High Court". New Statesman . Retrieved 27 June 2012.
  27. 1 2 Booth, Robert (27 June 2012). "Twitter joke humorous not menacing, high court judges told". The Guardian . Retrieved 27 July 2017.
  28. 1 2 "Paul Chambers 'blow up' airport tweet appeal judgement reserved". BBC Online . 27 June 2012. Retrieved 27 June 2012.
  29. 1 2 "Approved Judgment" (PDF). 27 July 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 January 2016.
  30. ↑ "Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions [2012] EWHC 2157 (QB) (27 July 2012)". BAILII. 27 July 2012. Retrieved 27 July 2012.
  31. 1 2 3 Cohen, Nick (28 July 2012). "'Twitter joke' case only went ahead at insistence of DPP". The Observer . Retrieved 28 July 2012.
  32. ↑ "Reform of the Communications Offences". Law Commission.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.