United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Last updated

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
(Vet. App.)
Uscavc-gray2018.png
Location Washington, D.C.
Appeals to Federal Circuit
Appeals from
EstablishedNovember 18, 1988
Authority Article I tribunal
Created by 38 U.S.C.   §§ 72517299
Composition method Presidential nomination
with Senate advice and consent
Judges7 (2 add'l temporary seats)
Judge term length15 years
Chief Judge Margaret Bartley
www.uscourts.cavc.gov

The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (in case citations, Vet. App.) is a federal court of record that was established under Article I of the United States Constitution, and is thus referred to as an Article I tribunal (court). The court has exclusive national jurisdiction to provide independent federal judicial oversight and review of final decisions of the Board of Veterans' Appeals. [1] [2]

Contents

Overview

The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims is commonly referred to as the Veterans Court, USCAVC, or simply CAVC. The court was previously known as the United States Court of Veterans Appeals, but was changed to the current name by the Veterans Programs Enhancement Act on March 1, 1999 (Pub.L. No. 105-368). [3] Opinions for the Veterans Court and other information about the Court can be found at www.uscourts.cavc.gov.

The Veterans Court is located in Washington, D.C. but may sit anywhere in the United States. While the Board of Veterans' Appeals is part of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, the Veterans Court is not a part of the VA, it is an independent federal court. The Veterans Court hears oral arguments and reviews final Board decisions, the record before the agency, and briefs of the parties on appeal. [4] Each judge on the Court serves a 15-year term.

History

The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims was created on November 18, 1988, by the Veterans' Judicial Review Act of 1988. [5] [6] Prior to the establishment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, from the U.S. Revolutionary War to 1988, there was no judicial recourse for veterans who were denied benefits. [7] The United States Department of Veterans Affairs, formerly titled the Veterans Administration, was the only federal administrative agency that operated without independent judicial oversight. [7] The Board of Veterans' Appeals, which is a part of the Department of Veterans Affairs, provided the final decision in a veteran's claim for benefits.

Veterans, advocacy groups, and veterans service organizations fought and urged Congress to provide judicial review of VA decisions since the 1950s. The lack of judicial review persisted, however, until the increase in veterans claims following the Vietnam War. The struggles of these veterans to obtain VA benefits highlighted the lack of independent oversight in the adjudication process. The House Committee on Veterans' Affairs initially resisted, noting that the Department of Veterans Affairs stood in "splendid isolation as the single federal administrative agency whose major functions were explicitly insulated from judicial review." [7]

After decades of debate, on November 18, 1988, Congress created the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. [5] [6] On March 1, 1999, the Court's name was changed from the United States Court of Veterans Appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims through the Veterans Programs Enhancement Act (Pub.L. No. 105-368). [3]

From 1990 to 2016, thirteen of the seventeen jurists who served on the CAVC had been veterans. [8]

The Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims - December 2019 1671 MR.jpg
The Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims - December 2019

Jurisdiction

The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has "exclusive jurisdiction to review decisions of the Board of Veterans' Appeals ... [with the] power to affirm, modify, or reverse a decision of the Board [of Veterans' Appeals] or to remand the matter, as appropriate." [9]

Judges

Judges are appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims by the president of the United States and confirmed by the United States Senate, in the same manner as Article III judges. [4] They are appointed to serve fifteen-year appointments. Retired judges are routinely recalled to active service to assist the Court in issuing its decisions in a timely manner.

Current composition

As of September 3,2020:

#TitleJudgeDuty stationBornTerm of serviceAppointed by
Active Chief Senior
16Chief Judge Margaret Bartley Washington, D.C. 19592012–present2019–present Obama
15Judge Coral Wong Pietsch Washington, D.C. 19472012–present Obama
17Judge William S. Greenberg Washington, D.C. 19422012–present Obama
18Judge Michael P. Allen Washington, D.C. 19672017–present Trump
19Judge Amanda L. Meredith Washington, D.C. 19722017–present Trump
20Judge Joseph L. Toth Washington, D.C. 19732017–present Trump
21Judge Joseph L. Falvey Jr. Washington, D.C. 2018–present Trump
22Judge Scott J. Laurer Washington, D.C. 19652020–present Trump
23Judge Grant C. Jaquith Washington, D.C. 2020–present Trump
1Senior Judge Frank Q. Nebeker Washington, D.C. 19301989–20041989–20002004–present G.H.W. Bush
3Senior Judge Ken Kramer Washington, D.C. 19421989–20042000–20042004–present G.H.W. Bush
5Senior Judge Ronald M. Holdaway Washington, D.C. 19341990–20022002–present G.H.W. Bush
8Senior Judge William P. Greene Jr. Washington, D.C. 19431997–20102005–20102010–present Clinton
9Senior Judge Lawrence B. Hagel Washington, D.C. 19472003–20162015–20162016–present G.W. Bush
10Senior Judge Bruce E. Kasold Washington, D.C. 19512003–20162010–20152016–present G.W. Bush
11Senior Judge William A. Moorman Washington, D.C. 19452004–20152015–present G.W. Bush
12Senior Judge Robert N. Davis Washington, D.C. 19532004–20192016–20192019–present G.W. Bush
13Senior Judge Alan G. Lance Sr. Washington, D.C. 19492004–20172017–present G.W. Bush
14Senior Judge Mary J. Schoelen Washington, D.C. 19682004–20192019–present G.W. Bush

Former judges

#JudgeStateBorn–diedActive service Chief Judge Senior status Appointed byReason for
termination
2 John J. Farley III NY 1942–present1989–20042004–2012 G.H.W. Bush retirement
4 Hart T. Mankin DE 1924–19961989–19951995–1996 G.H.W. Bush death
6 Jonathan R. Steinberg MD 1939–20151990–2005 G.H.W. Bush expiration of term
7 Donald L. Ivers NM 1941–present1990–20052004–20052005–2017 G.H.W. Bush retirement

Succession of seats

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States courts of appeals</span> Post-1891 U.S. appellate circuit courts

The United States courts of appeals are the intermediate appellate courts of the United States federal judiciary. The courts of appeals are divided into 11 numbered circuits that cover geographic areas of the United States and hear appeals from the U.S. district courts within their borders, the District of Columbia Circuit, which covers only Washington, D.C., and the Federal Circuit, which hears appeals from federal courts across the United States in cases involving certain specialized areas of law. The courts of appeals also hear appeals from some administrative agency decisions and rulemaking, with by far the largest share of these cases heard by the D.C. Circuit. Appeals from decisions of the courts of appeals can be taken to the U.S. Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</span> Federal appellate court for the western U.S.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is the U.S. federal court of appeals that has appellate jurisdiction over the U.S. district courts in the following federal judicial districts:

In the United States, federal judges are judges who serve on courts established under Article Three of the U.S. Constitution. They include the chief justice and associate justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, circuit judges of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, district judges of the U.S. District Courts, and judges of the U.S. Court of International Trade. These judges are often called "Article Three judges".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit</span> Current United States federal appellate court

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is a United States court of appeals that has special appellate jurisdiction over certain types of specialized cases in the U.S. federal court system. It has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal cases involving patents, trademarks, government contracts, veterans' benefits, public safety officers' benefits, federal employees' benefits, and various other categories. Unlike other federal courts, the Federal Circuit has no jurisdiction over cases involving criminal, bankruptcy, immigration, or U.S. state law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Tax Court</span> United States federal court dealing with tax matters

The United States Tax Court is a federal trial court of record established by Congress under Article I of the U.S. Constitution, section 8 of which provides that the Congress has the power to "constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court". The Tax Court specializes in adjudicating disputes over federal income tax, generally prior to the time at which formal tax assessments are made by the Internal Revenue Service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Court of Federal Claims</span> Court that hears monetary claims against the U.S. government

The United States Court of Federal Claims is a United States federal court that hears monetary claims against the U.S. government. It was established by statute in 1982 as the United States Claims Court, and took its current name in 1992. The court is the successor to trial division of the United States Court of Claims, which was established in 1855.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review</span> United States Article III court

The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (FISCR) is a U.S. federal court whose sole purpose is to review denials of applications for electronic surveillance warrants by the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The FISCR was established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and consists of a panel of three judges. Like the FISC, the FISCR is not an adversarial court; rather, the only party to the court is the federal government, although other parties may submit briefs as amici curiae if they are made aware of the proceedings. Papers are filed and proceedings are held in secret. Records of the proceedings are kept classified, though copies of the proceedings with sensitive information redacted are very occasionally made public. The government may appeal decisions of the FISCR to the Supreme Court of the United States, which hears appeals on a discretionary basis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Administrative Office of the United States Courts</span> Administrative agency of the US federal court system

The Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AO) or the Administrative Office (AO) for short, is the administrative agency of the United States federal court system, established in 1939. The central support entity for the federal judicial branch, the AO provides a wide range of legislative, administrative, legal, financial, management, program, and information technology support services to the federal courts.

The Court of Claims was a federal court that heard claims against the United States government. It was established in 1855, renamed in 1948 to the United States Court of Claims, and abolished in 1982. Then, its jurisdiction was assumed by the newly created United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and United States Claims Court, which was later renamed the Court of Federal Claims.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whistleblower Protection Act</span> US law regarding protection of federal whistleblowers

The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8)-(9), Pub.L. 101-12 as amended, is a United States federal law that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report the possible existence of an activity constituting a violation of law, rules, or regulations, or mismanagement, gross waste of funds, abuse of authority or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. A federal agency violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if agency authorities take retaliatory personnel action against any employee or applicant because of disclosure of information by that employee or applicant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jerry Edwin Smith</span> American judge

Jerry Edwin Smith is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Alan George Lance Sr. is an American attorney, politician, and jurist who serves as a Senior judge of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Lance previously served as the Idaho Attorney General and as a member of the Idaho House of Representatives.

Lawrence Bain Hagel was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims by President George W. Bush in December 2003. He became Chief Judge in August 2015. His 13-year term expired in December 2016.

<i>Cardona v. Shinseki</i>

Cardona v. Shinseki was an appeal brought in the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) of a decision by the Board of Veterans' Appeals upholding the denial of service-connected disability benefits for the dependent wife of a female veteran. The United States Department of Veterans Affairs denied the disability benefits based on the definition of "spouse" as "a person of the opposite sex" under federal statute. On March 11, 2014, the CAVC dismissed the case as moot after the Secretary of Veterans Affairs advised the Court that he would neither defend nor enforce the federal statute. Cardona subsequently received full payment of her spousal benefits, retroactive to her date of application.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Board of Veterans' Appeals</span> Administrative tribunal within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

The Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA) is an administrative tribunal within the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), located in Washington, D.C. Established by Executive Order on July 28, 1933, it determines whether U.S. military veterans are entitled to claimed veterans' benefits and services. The Board's mission is to conduct hearings and decide appeals properly before the Board in a timely manner. The Board's jurisdiction extends to all questions in matters involving a decision by the Secretary under a law that affects a provision of benefits by the Secretary to Veterans, their dependents, or their Survivors. Final decision on such appeals are made by the Board based on the entire record in the proceedings and upon consideration of all evidence and applicable provisions of law and regulation. The Board's review is de novo.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is an administrative law body of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) which decides issues of patentability. It was formed on September 16, 2012, as one part of the America Invents Act. Prior to its formation, the main judicial body in the USPTO was the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael P. Allen</span> American judge

Michael Patrick Allen is an American lawyer and academic who serves as a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Prior to assuming his current role, he was a professor of law and director of the Veterans Law Institute at Stetson University College of Law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual</span> U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs policy and procedures manual

The M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual details policies and procedures for Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) staff who develop and adjudicate U.S. veterans' disability benefit claims.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniel P. Collins</span> American judge

Daniel Paul Collins is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

References

  1. "USCAVC – United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims". Uscourts.cavc.gov. Retrieved October 3, 2012.
  2. Jonathan M. Gaffney,  U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims: A Brief Introduction , Cong. Research Serv. (November 18, 2019).
  3. 1 2 Pub. L.   105–368 (text) (PDF), 112  Stat.   3315
  4. 1 2 "USCAVC – About the Court". Uscourts.cavc.gov. Archived from the original on October 18, 2012. Retrieved October 3, 2012.
  5. 1 2 Pub. L.   100–687, 102  Stat.   4105
  6. 1 2 United States. Congress. House ... "Veterans' Judicial Review Act". Open Library. Retrieved October 3, 2012.
  7. 1 2 3 "USCAVC – History". Uscourts.cavc.gov. Retrieved October 3, 2012.
  8. Hennings, Bradley; et al. (2016). "Now is the Time: Experts vs. the Uninitiated as Future Nominees to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims" (PDF). Fed. Circ. J.
  9. 38 U.S.C.   § 7252

Further reading

Ridgway, James D. (2015). Veterans Law: Cases and Theory. American Casebook Series. West Academic. ISBN   978-1628103489. OCLC   921166019.