Unsavory Truth

Last updated

Unsavory Truth: How Food Companies Skew the Science of What We Eat is a 2018 book by American academic Marion Nestle.

Contents

In the book, Nestle heavily criticizes research funded by food companies as motivated by increasing profits through marketing. [1] [2] [3]

Background

Public awareness of nutrition has risen in recent decades. [4] Companies have been funding nutrition research since at least the 1940s, and until 1990 disclosure policies of conflict of interest for academics were voluntary. [5]

Unsavory Truth was released while potential and actual conflicts of interest in research were being subject to increased attention, particularly around pharmaceutical companies, with relatively limited attention on food. [1] [6] The book was released as Coca-Cola was publicly criticized for pressuring journalists writing about Coca-Cola's health effects, and for its funding of health science for its own gain. [7]

Marion Nestle

Nestle has researched food producers for over two decades, publishing works on specific types of foods rather than the entire industry. [8] [7] Her earlier publications included Food Politics (2002) and Safe Food (2003). [9]

In 2016, an email from an Australian public relations company warning Coca-Cola to monitor Nestle's comments was released in the 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak. [3]

Content

The book covers research into subjects including candy, sweeteners, meat and dairy products, [3] spending an entire chapter discussing Coca-Cola's initially undisclosed funding of the Global Energy Balance Network. [2] [8] [7]

The book highlights how university scientists reliance on research funding for promotions, [2] and offers nutrition scientists advice for navigating conflicts of interest. [3] She says that psychological research has shown effects of funding on scientists can be unconscious and unintentional, [10] and that positive findings are rarely due to fraud. [4] Nestle says that advisory bodies such as the World Health Organization and academic societies such as the American Society for Nutrition have also been co-opted by companies. [5]

Nestle offers solutions for food company's influence on research, while recognizing that these are unrealistic. [10] She is critical of transparency being the entire solution [4] and argues for citizens to be more engaged. [9]

Reception

Reviews praised Unsavory Truth for its convincing argument [3] [8] [9] and its documentation of evidence. [1] [2] [11] Reviewers praised the writing, with Rebecca Garofano writing that "Nestle’s writing is clear, accessible, and to the point." [2] [11]

Felicity Lawrence, reviewing Unsavory Truth in Nature wrote that she believed that Nestle is too generous in "exonerating" scientists for publishing misleading science due to unconscious bias. [9]

Some industry-funded scientists responded to Nestle's argument by claiming conflict of interest disclosure requirements were an attack on their integrity. Some argued against disclosure by saying that as all scientists are biased, financial conflicts of interest should not be considered a problem. [6] According to reviewer Garofano, the nutrition science field's response to the book appeared to be "almost complete silence." [11]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food pyramid (nutrition)</span> Visual representation of optimal servings from basic groups

A food pyramid is a representation of the optimal number of servings to be eaten each day from each of the basic food groups. The first pyramid was published in Sweden in 1974. The 1992 pyramid introduced by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) was called the "Food Guide Pyramid" or "Eating Right Pyramid". It was updated in 2005 to "MyPyramid", and then it was replaced by "MyPlate" in 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diet soda</span> Type of sugar-free or artificially sweetened soda

Diet or light beverages are generally sugar-free, artificially sweetened beverages with few or no calories. They are marketed for diabetics and other people who want to reduce their sugar and/or caloric intake.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is a Washington, D.C.-based non-profit watchdog and consumer advocacy group that advocates for safer and healthier foods.

Enviga is a Nestea carbonated canned green-tea drink. Enviga is a trademark of Nestlé licensed to Beverage Partners Worldwide, a joint venture between The Coca-Cola Company and Nestlé. It is available in three flavors: Green Tea, Tropical Pomegranate, and Mixed Berry. According to Coca-Cola, Enviga burns 60 to 100 calories per three 12-oz.(330 ml) cans due to its high EGCG and caffeine content. The makers of the drink were sued for making fraudulent health claims about weight loss, and agreed to settle and cease repeating them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food industry</span> Collective term for diverse businesses that supply much of the worlds food

The food industry is a complex, global network of diverse businesses that supplies most of the food consumed by the world's population. The food industry today has become highly diversified, with manufacturing ranging from small, traditional, family-run activities that are highly labour-intensive, to large, capital-intensive and highly mechanized industrial processes. Many food industries depend almost entirely on local agriculture, animal farms, produce, and/or fishing.

The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is a multi-unit enterprise that includes a 501(c)(6) trade association in the United States. With over 112,000 members, the association claims to be the largest organization of food and nutrition professionals. It has registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs), nutrition and dietetics technicians registered (NDTRs), and other dietetics professionals as members. Founded in 1917 as the American Dietetic Association, the organization officially changed its name to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics in 2012. According to the group's website, about 65% of its members are RDNs, and another 2% are NDTRs. The group's primary activities include providing testimony at hearings, lobbying the United States Congress and other governmental bodies, commenting on proposed regulations, and publishing statements on various topics pertaining to food and nutrition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marion Nestle</span> American academic

Marion Nestle is an American molecular biologist, nutritionist, and public health advocate. She is the Paulette Goddard Professor of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health Emerita at New York University. Her research examines scientific and socioeconomic influences on food choice, obesity, and food safety, emphasizing the role of food marketing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Life Sciences Institute</span> Nonprofit organization

The International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) is a global nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization headquartered in Washington, DC, United States that publishes peer-reviewed studies on nutrition and food safety. It was founded in 1978 by Alex Malaspina, a former Coca-Cola executive, and it is partially financed by its 300+ members, which includes food and chemical corporations such as BASF, McDonald's, Syngenta and Pepsi. In 2020, the organization's revenue was US$10.1 million.

The "jelly bean rule" is a rule put forth by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on May 19, 1994.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Nutrition Foundation</span> British food industry lobby group, company, and registered charity

The British Nutrition Foundation is a British lobby group mainly funded by the food industry. It has been widely criticised for conflicts of interest, and for downplaying them. It presents itself to journalists, the public, and the government as a independent, impartial, disinterested, and scientifically-rigorous; its industry funders also promote this image.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Society for Nutrition</span> American society for professional researchers and practitioners in the field of nutrition

The American Society for Nutrition (ASN) is an American society for professional researchers and practitioners in the field of nutrition. ASN publishes four journals in the field of nutrition. It has been criticized for its financial ties to the food and beverage industry.

Sheldon Krimsky was a professor of Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning at Tufts University, and adjunct professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health at Tufts University School of Medicine. He was a fellow of the Hastings Center, an independent bioethics research institution.

The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (AJCN) is a monthly peer-reviewed biomedical journal in the fields of dietetics and clinical nutrition.

Funding bias, also known as sponsorship bias, funding outcome bias, funding publication bias, and funding effect, refers to the tendency of a scientific study to support the interests of the study's financial sponsor. This phenomenon is recognized sufficiently that researchers undertake studies to examine bias in past published studies. Funding bias has been associated, in particular, with research into chemical toxicity, tobacco, and pharmaceutical drugs. It is an instance of experimenter's bias.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coming Together (advertisement)</span> 2013 Coca-Cola Company advertisement

Coming Together is a 2-minute ad created and distributed by the Coca-Cola Company and launched on the night of January 14, 2013, on several cable networks.

The Global Energy Balance Network (GEBN) was a US-based nonprofit organization claiming to fund research into causes of obesity, but was primarily known for promoting the idea that lack of physical exercise, not bad diet, was primarily responsible for the obesity epidemic. It has been characterised as an astroturfing organisation. It received substantial funding from Coca-Cola. It has been criticised by nutrition experts for downplaying the role of junk food in obesity. Critics have also accused the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) of supporting GEBN. The ACSM claims it had no affiliation with GEBN.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sugar Association</span> American sugar industry trade association

The Sugar Association is a trade association for the sugar industry of the United States. Its members include nearly 142,000 growers, processors and refiners of sugar beet and sugarcane plants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sugar marketing</span> Marketing of sugar

Sugar is heavily marketed both by sugar producers and the producers of sugary drinks and foods. Apart from direct marketing methods such as messaging on packaging, television ads, advergames, and product placement in setting like blogs, industry has worked to steer coverage of sugar-related health information in popular media, including news media and social media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nina Teicholz</span> American journalist

Nina Teicholz is an American journalist who advocates for the consumption of saturated fat, dairy products and meat. Her works include the 2014 book The Big Fat Surprise. She is the head of the Nutrition Coalition, a dietary advocacy group. Teicholz's work has been supported and financed by John D. Arnold and his Arnold Ventures group. Teicholz's views and assertions regarding the consumption of saturated fat and meat have been contested by scientists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conflicts of interest in academic publishing</span>

Conflicts of interest (COIs) often arise in academic publishing. Such conflicts may cause wrongdoing and make it more likely. Ethical standards in academic publishing exist to avoid and deal with conflicts of interest, and the field continues to develop new standards. Standards vary between journals and are unevenly applied. According to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, "[a]uthors have a responsibility to evaluate the integrity, history, practices and reputation of the journals to which they submit manuscripts".

References

Sources

Journal articles

  • Garofano, Rebecca (2020). "Book Review of Unsavory Truth: How Food Companies Skew the Science of What We Eat". Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems . 35. doi:10.1017/S1742170520000149.
  • James, Cyan (October 5, 2018). "Junk food, junk science?". Science . 362 (6410). doi:10.1126/science.aau6602.
  • Lajous, Martin (July 2019). "The Elephant in the Spoon: Recognizing Food Industry Influence in Nutrition Research". American Journal of Public Health . 109 (7). doi:10.2105/AJPH.2019.305153. PMC   6603460 .
  • Lawrence, Felicity (October 18, 2018). "Rotten meat and bottled formaldehyde: fighting for food safety". Nature . 562 (7727). doi:10.1038/d41586-018-07038-0.
  • Nguyen, Anna (2020). "Unsavory Truth: How Food Companies Skew the Science of What We Eat, by Marion Nestle A Pinch of Culinary Science: Boiling an Egg Inside Out and Other Kitchen Tales, by And Hopia and Erik Fooladi". Food, Culture & Society . 23 (3). doi:10.1080/15528014.2020.1725383.
  • Stirrups, Robert (February 2019). "Food companies and nutrition: beyond mere disclosure". The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology. 7 (2). doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30008-7.
  • Suter, Glenn (March 2019). "Book Reviews". Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 15 (2).

News and magazine articles