Warsaw Framework on REDD-plus

Last updated

The Warsaw Framework on REDD-plus (also called the Warsaw Framework for REDD-plus) is a package of decisions on REDD+ adopted by the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) at its nineteenth session (COP 19) in Warsaw, Poland, in November 2013. [1] [2] Seven COP 19 decisions (Decisions 9-15/CP.19) form the core of the framework, complemented by three related decisions adopted at COP 21 in 2015 (Decisions 16-18/CP.21). [1] [3]

Contents

The framework provides methodological guidance and related institutional arrangements for implementing REDD+ activities by developing countries, including national forest monitoring systems, forest reference emission levels and forest reference levels, safeguards information, and monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV), as well as procedures for assessment and analysis of reported information that support results-based finance. [1] [4] Under the Paris Agreement, Article 5 encourages Parties to implement and support the existing REDD+ framework under the convention, including results-based payments for verified reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and forest-related removals. [5] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified the Warsaw Framework among the elements that link REDD+ implementation to access to results-based finance. [6]

Background

REDD+ refers to actions in developing countries to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and to support conservation, sustainable management of forests, and enhancement of forest carbon stocks. [6] [7] Earlier COP decisions established core elements of REDD+ implementation, including national strategies or action plans, reference levels, national forest monitoring systems, and safeguards. [1] The Warsaw decisions added procedures for assessing submitted reference levels, analysing reported results and related information, and publishing information on results and payments through UNFCCC systems used for results-based finance. [1] [2]

Adoption at COP 19

At COP 19, Parties adopted Decisions 9-15/CP.19, which are commonly grouped as the Warsaw Framework on REDD-plus. [1] [2] The Earth Negotiations Bulletin summary report listed the Warsaw REDD+ framework among the conference outcomes on land use and forests. [8]

Decisions and content

The COP 19 decisions cover both arrangements for results-based finance and technical guidance for measuring and reporting REDD+ outcomes. [1] [2] At a high level, the decisions address: [1]

National forest monitoring systems are intended to provide data and information suitable for MRV, while MRV covers the broader measurement, reporting, and verification requirements for results and related information. [1] [6] Provision of safeguards-related information is part of the requirements associated with access to results-based payments, while safeguards implementation is carried out through national frameworks and procedures. [1] [9]

Later decisions and relation to UNFCCC reporting

COP 21 additions

COP 21 adopted Decisions 16-18/CP.21, which complement the COP 19 decisions and add guidance on alternative policy approaches, non-carbon benefits, and safeguards-related matters. [3] [1]

Reporting and transparency after the Paris Agreement

Processes established under the Warsaw Framework, including technical assessment of reference levels and technical analysis of reported results, continue to operate through UNFCCC reporting arrangements after the adoption of the Paris Agreement, alongside the encouragement of implementation and support under Article 5. [1] [5] [6]

Reception and analysis

Legal analysis published soon after COP 19 described the Warsaw package as clarifying several methodological requirements for REDD+ implementation. [10] The same analysis argued that uncertainty about the scale and predictability of results-based finance remained a constraint on participation and implementation. [10] Later analysis of REDD+ finance and governance has similarly emphasized ongoing challenges in mobilising and coordinating results-based finance alongside the framework's technical requirements. [4]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 "Warsaw Framework for REDD+". UNFCCC REDD+ Web Platform.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013 - Addendum - Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its nineteenth session (PDF) (Report). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 31 January 2014.
  3. 1 2 Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015 - Addendum - Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twenty-first session (PDF) (Report). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
  4. 1 2 Morita, Kanako; Matsumoto, Ken'ichi (18 May 2023). "Challenges and lessons learned for REDD+ finance and its governance". Carbon Balance and Management. 18 (1): 8.
  5. 1 2 Paris Agreement (PDF) (Report). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 12 December 2015.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change - Chapter 14: International cooperation (PDF) (Report). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2022.
  7. "REDD+ resources". UNFCCC.
  8. "Summary report, 11-23 November 2013". Earth Negotiations Bulletin. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). 24 November 2013.
  9. Bodin, Blaise; Väänänen, Elina; van Asselt, Harro (2015). "Putting REDD+ Environmental Safeguards into Practice: Recommendations for Effective and Country-specific Implementation" . Carbon & Climate Law Review. 9 (2): 168–182.
  10. 1 2 Recio, Eugenia (2014). "The Warsaw framework and the future of REDD+". Yearbook of International Environmental Law. 24 (1): 37–69. doi:10.1093/yiel/yvu060.