Why We Sleep

Last updated
Why We Sleep: The New Science of Sleep and Dreams
Why We Sleep book cover.png
First edition (UK)
Author Matthew Walker
LanguageEnglish
Genre Science book
Published3 October 2017
Publisher Allen Lane (UK), Scribner (US)
Pages368
ISBN 978-0-241-26906-0 (Hardcover)

Why We Sleep: The New Science of Sleep and Dreams (or simply known as Why We Sleep) is a 2017 popular science book about sleep written by Matthew Walker, an English scientist and the director of the Center for Human Sleep Science at the University of California, Berkeley, who specializes in neuroscience and psychology. In the book, Walker discusses about the importance of sleeping, the side effects of failing to do so, and its impact on society. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

Walker spent four years writing the book, in which he asserts that sleep deprivation is linked to numerous fatal diseases, including dementia. [4] [5]

Why We Sleep became a bestseller under The New York Times and The Sunday Times that discusses the topic of sleep from the viewpoint of neuroscience. The book has received generally positive reviews from critics, who praised Walker's research and views on the science of sleep, while criticizing the book for its certain claims regarding sleep. [2]

Background

According to Walker, who had never written a book at the time, he was motivated to write the book after an encounter with a woman who glanced at his work related to sleep and its benefits for health, stating, "When that comes out, I want to read it". [6] Walker described this encounter as a sincere "independent ratification" that made him write the book. [6] The book took Walker roughly four and a half years to write. [7] Walker and his team spent roughly 20 years studying the rejuvenating ability sleep has. [8] Walker's communication style, in which he makes use of "metaphors and analogies effectively," allowed him to explain ideas related to sleep in detail. [3] [9]

An image of Matthew Walker, the author of Why We Sleep. Matt Scientist Headshot.jpg
An image of Matthew Walker, the author of Why We Sleep.

At 18 years of age, Walker, who was a medical student at the time, became an "accidental sleep researcher" and moved over to studying neuroscience because of his habit of asking many questions. It was during his PhD at London's Medical Research Council when Walker learned about how little information there was on sleep. [10] A scientific paper helped Walker with his research after his failure to determine the differences of brainwave activity between various dementia found in people, with the paper's contents describing the areas of the brain each variant of dementia attacks. It was then Walker realized that in order to measure his patients' brainwave patterns properly, they need to be asleep. Walker spent six months teaching himself how to set up his sleep laboratory, which allowed him to voice his findings on sleep differences amongst his patients. [7]

Walker noted that many people misinterpret the amount of sleep they actually receive, likely caused by deep thought during the light sleep phases. [6] Following the release of the book, Walker went on to describe his book as having the potential to make readers sleep and jokingly admitted to being concerned to hear if his book kept people awake at night. [8] [11]

Contents

The book is written from a neuroscientific view and is mainly devoted to discussing about the impact sleep has on the functions of the human brain. The book is divided into four parts, each section focusing on how sleep works, its benefits, the reason why dreams occur and sleep issues surrounding society. [2] The book is written in a way so that it does not need to be read sequentially. [12] In the book, Walker discusses about the effects of the widespread effect of sleep-loss, in which the goal in mind being that readers will endeavour in achieving eight hours of sleep once they learn about the connection sleep loss has to other health issues, such as Alzheimer's disease. [7] Other details about lack of sleep explained by Walker include adults who sleep for less than 6 hours at the age of 40 and above have a higher chance of suffering a cardiac arrest or a stroke during their lifetime. [13]

Alzheimer's disease, according to Walker in his book, has a connection to sleep loss. Alzheimers brain.jpg
Alzheimer's disease, according to Walker in his book, has a connection to sleep loss.

"Sleep pressure and circadian rhythms", the driving forces and the framework of sleep, are brought up by Walker in the book. Other sleep behaviors, such as non-rapid eye movement sleep and rapid eye movement sleep, and the impact sleep has on "synaptic pruning" and the creation of memories during a human's lifespan are also covered. [14] NREM and REM are further explained by Walker to be the two sleeping basics, with 5 cycles present in a person's good night sleep. [11] The book mentions about "morning types" and "evening types" of people, with Walker writing about how spending fewer amounts of time sleeping benefited earlier human predecessors who slept in groups of people due to their time period being safer than now. [2]

The book emphasises on the significance of having a good night's sleep without the feeling of uneasiness or guilt of laziness. [12] Walker, in his book, defines insomnia as a disorder that usually related to an overwrought commiserating nervous system that's usually caused by anxiousness. He goes on to addresses the P.T.S.D victims' nightmares, stating that their dreams' ability to heal them by reducing the emotions connected to a distressing memory is affected by an unusual quantity of noradrenaline being created. Walker also believed that dreams carry information regarding fundamental emotions while admitting that they can be quite apparent to people, resulting in no explanations required to describe them. [15]

The values of sleep and the consequences of sleep deprivation are also brought up in the book. One particular research conducted in the past, where people volunteered themselves to sleep for only six hours in a span of 10 nights, is brought up by Walker. This resulted in the volunteers being "cognitively impaired" along with their brains being heavily damaged, regardless of the three week eight-hour sleep schedule they received later. [16] Actions carried out by sleep-deprived people, such as answering emails at every hour of a day, are brought to question in the book. [13] Walker wrote that research proves that sleeping after studying allows for "memory, integration and retention benefits" to occur. [17] He further wrote that sleeping has the ability to retain memories and amend the abilities of human learning. [16] Many organizations, who make creativeness, productiveness and resilient workers valued, give themselves a "sleep bonus", with the amount of extra sleep received being determined through electronic monitoring. [17] Walker further noted that companies are changing their workplaces by allowing more "flexible working" and comfort zones for people to rest. [13]

Walker's research on what impacts sleep is brought up in the book, with temperature influencing sleep being one of them. [3] A five-step guideline is written in the book, with Walker explaining how to prevent "self-euthanasia" from missing sleep. The guideline also brings up "individual-level transformation" and a reformation of society. [12] The book teaches about the basics behind how sleep works neurologically and biologically. The impact of caffeine on sleep is written in the book, with Walker noting its effects on the adenosine that allows people to fall asleep. It is further explained that caffeine will take more time to exit the body as it ages, with younger people having the ability to break caffeine down at a fast pace. [16]

Walker wrote the book in a "reader-friendly" in areas such as discussing about neuroscientific techniques and how they were created. [2] The book ends with Walker's advice for better sleep through 12 tips, with one of the tips written in the book being to have an eight-to-nine-hour period of sleep. [11] [18]

Critical reception

Why We Sleep has garnered a generally positive reception from critics, with Walker admitting to not knowing his book would be a hit amongst readers. The book would go on to make Walker famous in his field of expertise. [6] The book became an international bestseller, including a #1 on the Sunday Times Bestseller in the UK, and a #8 on the New York Times Bestseller. [19] [20] It received numerous other reviews, including the Guardian, BBC, NPR, Financial Times, UC Berkeley and Kirkus Reviews. [1] [11] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] Critics praised the book for Walker's convincing studies on the importance of sleep and its impact on society. [8]

Seithikurippu R. Pandi-Perumal praised Walker's structuring of the book, calling it informative, organised and intelligibly written while noting its informative yet reader-friendly nature. [12] In a review from Bill Gates, he noted that the book teaches about the importance of sleeping, despite some points in the book not being convincing. He also noted that the book aided him in sleeping better, pointing out that it took a longer time to finish the book as he followed Walker's word on putting the book down to go to sleep. [26] Kylie O'Brien's review described the book as "beautifully written" and filled with scientific facts that clarifies the question its title asks. [14]

A review by Christopher Torrens in The Physiological Society described the book as informative and helpful, noting the book's evidence related to the consequences of having little to no sleep. He praised the book's style and formatting of being able to be read "from cover to cover or by cherry-picking chapters in whatever order you choose". [13] Ruth Armstrong wrote that the book was loaded with recent research towards sleep, noting the change in his sleeping patterns. [17]

Criticism surrounding the book involved the book telling stories about sleep instead of explaining facts about it. [27] A review from Alexey Guzey, an independent researcher, criticized the book in an essay entitled Matthew Walker's "Why We Sleep" Is Riddled with Scientific and Factual Errors. [28] The criticism was discussed on the BBC series More and Less. [29] Guzey's criticism was also discussed by Andrew Gelman, a statistician at Columbia University. [30] In a later post on Columbia's statistics blog, Gelman indicated that Walker's purported removal of a bar from a graph could be a "smoking gun," commenting that it entered "research misconduct" territory. [31]

The book's failure to answer its own title 'Why We Sleep' has been criticised, with renowned sleep researcher William Dement commenting that people only need sleep due to the sleepiness accumulated. [13] Anu Valtonen found fault in the book naming neuroscience as "the science that provides the knowledge of sleep and dreams" and its overlooking of other disciplinary areas related to sleep. She also criticised the book for lacking certain information on sleep, such as the "social aspects" of sleep or "socio-historical" route of sleep hygiene. [2] Rosa Breed criticised Walker's lack of references when writing the book, noting that there was no proof in certain statements made by him, such as Walker's suggestion of sleeping for eight hours as a necessity. [27] Jonathan Hawken felt that some of the book's contents were rather selective, criticising the book's lack of in-depth analysis towards the effect of sleep apnea. [18]

Controversies

The book has spawned controversy related to Walker's belief that the amount of sleep received worldwide has decreased. A researcher on sleep, Jim Horne, disagreed with the idea regarding how people are weighed down by a lack of sleep and that everybody was required to sleep for at least eight hours. [11] Bill Gates wrote that he disagreed with Walker's claim that sleep and Alzheimer's disease have a strong connection to each other. [26] Anu Valtonen voiced her concern regarding the speculation the book makes when taking a neuroscientific stance on the main insights into how sleep and dreams function. [2]

Some critics felt that Walker's way of writing made the book feel similar to a horror story. [2] Rosa Breed felt that some ideas brought up by Walker in the book were thought to be disturbing, noting Walker's suggestion for having people's sleeping behaviours be measured by "health insurance companies" to be prying. [27] Some of Walker's claims were based on laboratory studies without supporting real-world evidence, making them questionable to critics. [11]

Related Research Articles

Multiple hypotheses explain the possible connections between sleep and learning in humans. Research indicates that sleep does more than allow the brain to rest; it may also aid the consolidation of long-term memories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sleep</span> Naturally recurring resting state of mind and body

Sleep is a state of reduced mental and physical activity in which consciousness is altered and certain sensory activity is inhibited. During sleep, there is a marked decrease in muscle activity and interactions with the surrounding environment. While sleep differs from wakefulness in terms of the ability to react to stimuli, it still involves active brain patterns, making it more reactive than a coma or disorders of consciousness.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dream</span> Event occurring in the mind while sleeping

A dream is a succession of images, ideas, emotions, and sensations that usually occur involuntarily in the mind during certain stages of sleep. Humans spend about two hours dreaming per night, and each dream lasts around 5–20 minutes, although the dreamer may perceive the dream as being much longer than this.

Polyphasic sleep is the practice of sleeping during multiple periods over the course of 24 hours, in contrast to monophasic sleep, which is one period of sleep within 24 hours. Biphasicsleep refers to two periods, while polyphasic usually means more than two. Segmented sleep and divided sleep may refer to polyphasic or biphasic sleep, but may also refer to interrupted sleep, where the sleep has one or several shorter periods of wakefulness, as was the norm for night sleep in pre-industrial societies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caffeine dependence</span> Medical condition

Caffeine dependence is a condition characterized by a set of criteria, including tolerance, withdrawal symptoms, persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to control use, and continued use despite knowledge of adverse consequences attributed to caffeine. It can appear in physical dependence or psychological dependence, or both. Caffeine is one of the most common additives in many consumer products, including pills and beverages such as caffeinated alcoholic beverages, energy drinks, pain reliever medications, and colas. Caffeine is found naturally in various plants such as coffee and tea. Studies have found that 89 percent of adults in the U.S. consume on average 200 mg of caffeine daily. One area of concern that has been presented is the relationship between pregnancy and caffeine consumption. Repeated caffeine doses of 100 mg appeared to result in smaller size at birth in newborns. When looking at birth weight however, caffeine consumption did not appear to make an impact.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Davidson</span> American psychologist

Richard J. Davidson is an American psychologist and professor of psychology and psychiatry at the University of Wisconsin–Madison as well as founder and chair of the Center for Healthy Minds and the affiliated non-profit Healthy Minds Innovations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Eagleman</span> American neuroscientist, author, and science communicator (born 1971)

David Eagleman is an American neuroscientist, author, and science communicator. He teaches neuroscience at Stanford University and is CEO and co-founder of Neosensory, a company that develops devices for sensory substitution. He also directs the non-profit Center for Science and Law, which seeks to align the legal system with modern neuroscience and is Chief Science Officer and co-founder of BrainCheck, a digital cognitive health platform used in medical practices and health systems. He is known for his work on brain plasticity, time perception, synesthesia, and neurolaw.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allan Hobson</span> American psychiatrist (1933–2021)

John Allan Hobson was an American psychiatrist and dream researcher. He was known for his research on rapid eye movement sleep. He was Professor of Psychiatry, Emeritus, Harvard Medical School, and Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

<i>God Is Not Great</i> 2007 book by Christopher Hitchens

God Is Not Great is a 2007 book by author and journalist Christopher Hitchens in which he makes a case against organized religion. It was originally published in the United Kingdom by Atlantic Books as God Is Not Great: The Case Against Religion and in the United States by Twelve as God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything, but was republished by Atlantic Books in 2017 with no subtitle.

<i>Outliers</i> (book) 2008 book by Malcolm Gladwell

Outliers: The Story of Success is a non-fiction book written by Malcolm Gladwell and published by Little, Brown and Company on November 18, 2008. In Outliers, Gladwell examines the factors that contribute to high levels of success. To support his thesis, he examines why the majority of Canadian ice hockey players are born in the first few months of the calendar year, how Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates achieved his extreme wealth, how the Beatles became one of the most successful musical acts in human history, how two people with exceptional intelligence—Christopher Langan and J. Robert Oppenheimer—end up with such vastly different fortunes, how Joseph Flom built Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom into one of the most successful law firms in the world, and how cultural differences play a large part in perceived intelligence and rational decision-making.

<i>Delusions of Gender</i> 2010 book by Cordelia Fine

Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference is a 2010 book by Cordelia Fine, written to debunk the idea that men and women are hardwired with different interests. The author criticizes claimed evidence of the existence of innate biological differences between men and women's minds as being faulty and exaggerated, and while taking a position of agnosticism with respect to inherent differences relating to interest/skill in "understanding the world" versus "understanding people", reviews literature demonstrating how cultural and societal beliefs contribute to sex differences.

<i>The Tell-Tale Brain</i> 2010 book by Vilayanur Ramachandran

The Tell-Tale Brain: A Neuroscientist's Quest for What Makes Us Human is a 2010 nonfiction book by V. S. Ramachandran that explores the uniqueness of human nature from a neurological viewpoint.

<i>The Social Animal</i> (Brooks book) 2011 book by David Brooks

The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement is a non-fiction book by American journalist David Brooks, who is otherwise best known for his career with The New York Times. The book discusses what drives individual behavior and decision making. Brooks goes through various academic topics such as sociology, psychology, and biology and attempts to summarize various discoveries—such as brain development in early life. The book continually refers to two fictional characters 'Harold' and 'Erica', used by Brooks as examples of how people's emotional personality changes over time.

Steven Kotler is an American author, journalist, and entrepreneur. He is best known for his non-fiction books, including Abundance, A Small Furry Prayer, West of Jesus, Bold, The Rise of Superman and Stealing Fire.

Daniel T. Willingham is a psychologist at the University of Virginia, where he is a professor in the Department of Psychology. Willingham's research focuses on the application of findings from cognitive psychology and neuroscience to K–12 education.

Dean Vincent Buonomano is an American neuroscientist and author. He is a professor at UCLA whose research focuses on neurocomputation and how the brain tells time. Buonomano has been described as one of the "first neuroscientists to begin to ask how the human brain encodes time" and has been published in various scientific journals. He is the author of two books, Brain Bugs: How the Brain's Flaws Shape our Lives and Your Brain is a Time Machine: The Neuroscience and Physics of Time. Buonomano's first book Brain Bugs examines the human brain's functional strengths and weaknesses, ultimately attributing some of the brain's 'bugs' to evolution.

The NeuroGenderings Network is an international group of researchers in neuroscience and gender studies. Members of the network study how the complexities of social norms, varied life experiences, details of laboratory conditions and biology interact to affect the results of neuroscientific research. Working under the label of "neurofeminism", they aim to critically analyze how the field of neuroscience operates, and to build an understanding of brain and gender that goes beyond gender essentialism while still treating the brain as fundamentally material. Its founding was part of a period of increased interest and activity in interdisciplinary research connecting neuroscience and the social sciences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matthew Walker (scientist)</span> British author, neuroscientist and psychologist

Matthew Walker is a British author, scientist and professor of neuroscience and psychology at the University of California, Berkeley.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Moran Cerf</span> American-French-Israeli neuroscientist and business professor

Moran Cerf is an American-French-Israeli neuroscientist, professor of business, investor and former white hat hacker.

<i>Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art</i> 2020 book by James Nestor

Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art is a 2020 popular science book by science journalist James Nestor. The book provides a historical, scientific and personal examination of breathing, with a specific interest in contrasting the differences between mouth breathing and nasal breathing. The book became an international bestseller, selling over two million copies worldwide.

References

  1. 1 2 Cooke, Rachel (2017-09-24). "The shorter your sleep, the shorter your life: the new sleep science". The Observer. ISSN   0029-7712 . Retrieved 2017-09-24.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Valtonen, Anu (2019). "Why We Sleep: The new science of sleep and dreams". Organization Studies. 40 (9): 1. doi:10.1177/0170840619831946. S2CID   150689987.
  3. 1 2 3 Jones, Roger (2018). "Books: Why We Sleep: The New Science of Sleep and Dreams: Wake Up to Sleep". British Journal of General Practice. 68 (669): 1.
  4. ↑ O'Connell, Mark (2017-09-21). "Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker review – how more sleep can save your life". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2017-09-24.
  5. ↑ "A 'catastrophic sleep-loss epidemic' is killing us, warns leading scientist". The Independent. 2017-09-24. Retrieved 2017-09-24.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Ganesh, Janan (2019). "Sleep expert Matthew Walker on the secret to a good night's rest". Financial Times.
  7. 1 2 3 Cooke, Rachel (2017). "'Sleep should be prescribed': what those late nights out could be costing you". The Guardian.
  8. 1 2 3 Kamp, David (2017). "Exploring the Necessity and Virtue of Sleep". The New York Times.
  9. ↑ Cookson, Clive (2017). "Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker – for a longer life, press snooze". Financial Times.
  10. ↑ Kresser, Chris (2019). "Why We Need Sleep, with Dr. Matthew Walker". Chris Kresser.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cookson, Clive (2017). "Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker – for a longer life, press snooze". Financial Times.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Pandi-Perumal, Seithkurippu R. (3 January 2018). "Why We Sleep: The New Science of Sleep and Dreams by Matthew Walker, Ph.D." Sleep and Vigilance. 2 (1): 93–94. doi:10.1007/s41782-018-0034-0. S2CID   188627621 – via The University of Sydney Library.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 Torrens, Christopher (2018). "Book review: Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker". Physiology News. 113 (1): 21. doi:10.36866/pn.113.21. S2CID   214376318 – via The Physiological Society.
  14. 1 2 O'Brien, Kylie (2021). "Review of Why we sleep [Book Review]". Journal of the Australian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine. 40 (1): 1 – via The University of Sydney Library.
  15. ↑ Heller, Zoë (2018). "Why We Sleep, and Why We Often Can't". The New Yorker.
  16. 1 2 3 Richards, Joy (2019). "Book Review: Why We sleep By Matthew Walker". Happy Beds.
  17. 1 2 3 Armstrong, Ruth (2019). "Why We Sleep: The new science of sleep and dreams". Clinical Psychology Forum. 318: 1.
  18. 1 2 Hawken, Jonathan (2020). "Why We Sleep by Matthew walker". Practical Neurology. 20 (4): 345. doi:10.1136/practneurol-2019-002471. S2CID   212567273 – via The University of Sydney Library.
  19. ↑ Why We Sleep. 4 January 2018.
  20. ↑ New York Times, Bestsellers, Science
  21. ↑ Gray, Richard. "Are you a sleep procrastinator?" . Retrieved 2017-09-24.
  22. ↑ Kamp, David (10 October 2017). "Exploring the Necessity and Virtue of Sleep". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
  23. ↑ Moody, Oliver (30 September 2017). "Review: Why We Sleep: The New Science of Sleep and Dreams by Matthew Walker" . Retrieved 4 May 2018– via www.thetimes.co.uk.
  24. ↑ "Everything you need to know about sleep, but are too tired to ask". 17 October 2017. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
  25. ↑ "Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker". Kirkus Reviews. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
  26. 1 2 Gates, Bill. "This book put me to sleep". gatesnotes.com. Retrieved 2024-12-21.
  27. 1 2 3 Breed, Rosa (2020). "Why We Write About Sleep". Spiegeloog.
  28. ↑ "Matthew Walker's "Why We Sleep" Is Riddled with Scientific and Factual Errors". Alexey Guzey. January 23, 2022. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
  29. ↑ "Dozy Science". More or Less. 25 January 2020. BBC. Radio 4.
  30. ↑ ""Why We Sleep" update: some thoughts while we wait for Matthew Walker to respond to Alexey Guzey's criticisms". Columbia University. November 24, 2019. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
  31. ↑ Gelman, Andrew (2019-12-27). "Why we sleep" data manipulation: A smoking gun?". statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.