Wim Trengove

Last updated

Wim Trengove

SC
Wim Trengove at Stellenbosch University.png
Trengove at Stellenbosch University in 2012
Born (1949-10-27) 27 October 1949 (age 74)
Alma mater University of Pretoria
Occupation Advocate
Years active1975–present
Children6, including John
Parent

Wim Trengove SC (born 27 October 1949) is a South African advocate best known for his role in constitutional litigation. He has argued various administrative law, constitutional law, and human rights law matters in the Constitutional Court of South Africa, including several high-profile political cases.

Contents

Early life and career

Trengove was born on 27 October 1949. [1] His parents were liberal Afrikaans-speakers, [2] and his father, J. J. Trengove, was an advocate and later a judge of the Supreme Court. [3] Initially interested in a career as a civil engineer, [2] he instead studied law after serving his conscripted service in the South African Defence Force. [3] He graduated from the University of Pretoria with a BCom LLB cum laude. [1]

In 1975, Trengove joined the bar in Johannesburg. [1] Although he had intended to specialise in commercial law, he gained a reputation for handling labour law briefs and political trials involving anti-apartheid activists. [3] He took silk in 1987 and served stints both as chairman of the Johannesburg Bar Council and as chairman of the General Council of the Bar. [1]

Notable briefs

In the post-apartheid period, Trengove specialises in administrative law, constitutional law, and human rights law matters, [4] and he is best known for his appearances in the Constitutional Court of South Africa. Indeed, he argued in the certification of the Constitution itself. [5] In human rights matters, Trengove argued, inter alia, for the abolition of the death penalty in S v Makwanyane , [6] against discrimination on the basis of HIV status in Hoffmann v South African Airways , [7] for the protection of sex workers' labour rights in Kylie v CCMA , [8] for the restitution of land and mineral rights to groups dispossessed during apartheid in Alexkor Ltd v Richtersveld Community, [9] and for the roll-out of anti-retroviral treatment for HIV patients in Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign. [10] He also represented mineworkers in a class action to claim damages from mining companies for damages due to the widespread contraction of silicosis; [11] the $400 million settlement in favour of the miners was the largest in South African history. [12] Other notable constitutional matters in which he appeared include Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker , National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Home Affairs , Kruger v President of the Republic of South Africa , My Vote Counts v Speaker of the National Assembly , and Corruption Watch v President .

Trengove has been active in high-profile political cases, representing former president Nelson Mandela, including in his divorce from Winnie Madikizela-Mandela, [13] leading the prosecution of former president Jacob Zuma on charges of corruption, [14] [15] and representing President Cyril Ramaphosa in his dispute with the Public Protector. [16] Trengove was outspoken about the National Prosecuting Authority's decision in 2008 to withdraw its corruption charges against Zuma, criticising the decision at a public lecture at the University of Cape Town, where Trengove is an honorary professor. [17]

Personal life

Trengove met his wife, née  Estelle Viljoen, in the 1980s, when she was a journalist covering one of his cases in Pretoria. [3] They have six children, [3] one of whom is film director John Trengove.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitutional Court of South Africa</span> Supreme court of South Africa

The Constitutional Court of South Africa is a supreme constitutional court established by the Constitution of South Africa, and is the apex court in the South African judicial system, with general jurisdiction.

<i>Minister of Home Affairs v Fourie</i> South African legal case

Minister of Home Affairs and Another v Fourie and Another; Lesbian and Gay Equality Project and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Others, [2005] ZACC 19, is a landmark decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in which the court ruled unanimously that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. The judgment, authored by Justice Albie Sachs and delivered on 1 December 2005, gave Parliament one year to pass the necessary legislation. As a result, the Civil Union Act came into force on 30 November 2006, making South Africa the fifth country in the world to recognise same-sex marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edwin Cameron</span> South African judge

Edwin Cameron is a retired judge who served as a Justice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa. He is well known for his HIV/AIDS and gay-rights activism and was hailed by Nelson Mandela as "one of South Africa's new heroes". President Ramaphosa appointed him as Inspecting Judge of Correctional Services from 1 January 2020 and in October 2019 he was elected Chancellor of Stellenbosch University.

Baaitse Elizabeth "Bess" Nkabinde is a former judge on the Constitutional Court of South Africa.

Catherine "Kate" O'Regan is a former judge of the Constitutional Court of South Africa. From 2013 to 2014 she was a commissioner of the Khayelitsha Commission and is now the inaugural director of the Bonavero Institute of Human Rights at the University of Oxford.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dikgang Moseneke</span> South African judge

Dikgang Ernest Moseneke OLG is a South African jurist and former Deputy Chief Justice of South Africa.

<i>S v Makwanyane</i> South African legal case

S v Makwanyane and Another was a landmark 1995 judgement of the Constitutional Court of South Africa. It established that capital punishment was inconsistent with the commitment to human rights expressed in the Interim Constitution. The court's ruling invalidated section 277(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, which had provided for use of the death penalty, along with any similar provisions in any other law in force in South Africa. The court also forbade the government from carrying out the death sentence on any prisoners awaiting execution, ruling that they should remain in prison until new sentences were imposed. Delivered on 6 June, this was the newly established court's "first politically important and publicly controversial holding."

The Judicial Service Commission is a body specially constituted by the South African Constitution to recommend persons for appointment to the judiciary of South Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mogoeng Mogoeng</span> Chief Justice of South Africa

Mogoeng Thomas Reetsang Mogoeng is a South African jurist who served as the Chief Justice of South Africa from 8 September 2011 until his retirement on 11 October 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997</span>

The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997 is an act of the Parliament of South Africa which dealt with the consequences of the Constitutional Court's ruling in S v Makwanyane in which capital punishment was declared to be unconstitutional. The act repealed the laws allowing for the death penalty and amended various other laws referring to death sentences or capital offences. It also established a procedure by which existing death sentences could be converted to prison sentences, and fixed minimum sentences for certain serious crimes. The act came into force on 13 November 1998, except for the minimum sentencing provisions, which came into force on 1 May 1998.

<i>Mohamed v President of the Republic of South Africa</i> South African legal case

Mohamed v President of the Republic of South Africa, [2001] ZACC 18, is a 2001 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa dealing with the legality of the South African government's actions in handing over Khalfan Khamis Mohamed to United States authorities. The court ruled that the South African government may not extradite a suspect who may face the death penalty without seeking an assurance from the receiving country that the suspect will not be sentenced to death.

Christopher Nyaole Jafta is a retired judge of the Constitutional Court of South Africa.

Hoffmann v South African Airways is an important case, heard by the Constitutional Court, in South African labour and constitutional law.

Mbuyiseli "Russell" Madlanga is a judge of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, having been appointed on 1 August 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hawks (South Africa)</span> National intelligence agency of South Africa

The Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI), commonly known as the Hawks, is the branch of the South African Police Service which investigates organised crime, economic crime, corruption, and other serious crime referred to it by the President or another division of the police. The unit was established in 2008 by President Jacob Zuma to replace the disbanded Scorpions.

Nomzamo Zondo is a South African attorney, specialising in human rights. Since July 2014, Zondo has been the Director of Litigation for the Socio-Economic Rights Institute for South Africa (SERI). In 2020, Zondo became executive director for SERI.

Geoffrey Budlender is a South African lawyer known for his involvement in public interest litigation. He co-founded the Legal Resources Centre, where he worked as an attorney until he was admitted as an advocate in 2005. He is currently a part-time member of the Competition Commission's Competition Tribunal.

<i>Democratic Alliance v President</i> South African legal case

Democratic Alliance v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others, often known as Simelane, is a 2012 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa which expanded rationality review to include evaluation of the relationship between the procedure by which executive decisions are taken and the purpose for which the relevant executive power is conferred. Applying this augmented standard, the court held that President Jacob Zuma had acted irrationally and unconstitutionally in appointing Menzi Simelane as the National Director of Public Prosecutions, given that he had neglected to consider prima facie evidence of dishonesty by Simelane.

<i>Corruption Watch v President</i> South African legal case

Corruption Watch NPC and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others; Nxasana v Corruption Watch NPC and Others is a 2018 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa on prosecutorial independence. In a judgment written by Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, the court affirmed unanimously that section 179(4) of the Constitution provided for the independence of the National Prosecuting Authority. It therefore held that sections of the National Prosecuting Authority Act, 1998 were unconstitutional insofar as they granted the President discretion over certain aspects of senior prosecutors' terms of employment, thereby compromising prosecutorial independence.

Phineas Mathale Deon Mojapelo is a South African retired judge of the High Court of South Africa. He was the Deputy Judge President of the South Gauteng Division from January 2005 to June 2020, and he joined the bench in January 2003 as a puisne judge of the North Gauteng Division. He was also an acting judge in the Constitutional Court of South Africa in 2017.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "The Chairman's contribution" (PDF). Consultus. 6 (2): 104. October 1993.
  2. 1 2 Beresford, David (23 November 2006). "A law unto himself". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 28 January 2024.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Wicks, Bernadette (9 October 2021). "From presidents to paupers, Wim Trengove has defended them all". The Citizen. Retrieved 28 January 2024.
  4. ↑ "Wim Trengove SC". Thulamela Chambers. 18 August 2020. Retrieved 28 January 2024.
  5. ↑ "Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (CCT 23/96) [1996] ZACC 26; 1996 (4) SA 744 (CC); 1996 (10) BCLR 1253 (CC) (6 September 1996)". saflii.org. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  6. ↑ "S v Makwanyane and Another (CCT3/94) [1995] ZACC 3; 1995 (6) BCLR 665; 1995 (3) SA 391; [1996] 2 CHRLD 164; 1995 (2) SACR 1 (6 June 1995)". saflii.org. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  7. ↑ "Hoffmann v South African Airways (CCT17/00) [2000] ZACC 17; 2001 (1) SA 1; 2000 (11) BCLR 1211 ; [2000] 12 BLLR 1365 (CC) (28 September 2000)". saflii.org. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  8. ↑ "Kylie v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (CA10/08) [2010] ZALAC 8; 2010 (4) SA 383 (LAC) ; 2010 (10) BCLR 1029 (LAC) ; (2010) 31 ILJ 1600 (LAC) ; [2010] 7 BLLR 705 (LAC) (26 May 2010)". saflii.org. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  9. ↑ "Diamonds are for Richtersveld". News24. 14 October 2003. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  10. ↑ "Minister of Health and Others v Treatment Action Campaign and Others (No 2) (CCT8/02) [2002] ZACC 15; 2002 (5) SA 721; 2002 (10) BCLR 1033 (5 July 2002)". saflii.org. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  11. ↑ Lewis, Pete (23 October 2015). "Silicosis case: mines are being obstructive, say miners' lawyers". GroundUp News. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  12. ↑ "South Africa miners reach $400 million silicosis settlement with mining companies". Reuters. 3 May 2018. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  13. ↑ Block, Robert. "No 'fairy-tale ending' as court gives Nelson Mandela divorce". The Irish Times. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  14. ↑ Khumalo, Juniour (23 May 2019). "Trengove: Zuma flourished during time of delayed prosecution". CityPress. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  15. ↑ Manyathela, Clement. "Wim Trengove: Zuma can't rely on spy tapes for permanent stay of prosecution". ewn.co.za. Retrieved 23 May 2020.
  16. ↑ "'Reckless, reckless, reckless!' – Mkhwebane 'thumbsucked' facts in finding against Ramaphosa, court hears". News24. 4 February 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  17. ↑ "Advocate Wim Trengove at UCT | Department of Public Law". publiclaw.uct.ac.za. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.