Working memory training

Last updated

Working memory training is intended to improve a person's working memory. Working memory is a central intellectual faculty, linked to IQ, ageing, and mental health. It has been claimed that working memory training programs are effective means, both for treating specific medical conditions associated with working memory deficit, as and for general increase in cognitive capacity among healthy neurotypical adults.

Contents

Individual studies of the topic show different, and sometime contradictory, results, and as one meta study puts it, [1] asking the question “Does cognitive training improve intelligence?” is as inappropriate as asking “Does medicine cure disease?”, since none of them specify which particular intervention (which medicine or working memory training program) is being evaluated, for alleviating which condition is it applied (ADHD, stroke, general cognitive improvement etc.), and under what circumstances is it administered (selection criteria, adherence rate, outcome variables etc.).

In an influential metastudy from 2012, highly critical to cognitive training, analysed 23 studies with 30 group comparisons, and concluded that clinical memory training programs produce reliable short-term improvements in working memory skills in children and adults with ADHD, but also that there is no evidence that such effects can be maintained long-term without additional follow-up training. [2] Three years later, another metastudy reached the opposite conclusion, that working memory training do have consistent and useful effects, not just on the type of working memory tests that are practiced, but also at other non trained tasks and everyday life. [3] Since then, a range of additional clinical experiments have been completed, with larger sample sizes, clearly defined control groups, and more uniform treatment of outcome variables. While the evidence is still far from unanimous, there are several experimental studies of working memory training that have shown beneficial effects for people with ADHD, [4] [5] those who have suffered stroke or traumatic brain injury, [6] [7] children who have undergone cancer treatment, [8] [9] as well as for normally developing children. [10] [11]

Working memory

Working memory (WM) is the system which holds multiple pieces of transitory information in the mind – information that is needed for different tasks right now. Working memory differs from short-term memory in that it is the storage and manipulation of information, while short-term is solely the storage of information in a readily available state. Therefore, short-term memory is a component of working memory. [12] Working Memory capacity is usually assessed by determining the number of pieces of information a person can hold in mind. For example, a person might be asked to listen to a series of digits and letters, sort them into order in mind, and then recall the sorted list aloud. The longest set of characters or other items that can reliably be recalled is the working memory capacity. [13]

The capacity of working memory differs between people: a person able to recall 8 instructions has a greater working memory capacity than someone who can only recall a series of 5. Numerous scientific studies have linked working memory capacity with strength in other fundamental cognitive abilities, including attention and intelligence. [14] [15] Conversely, poor working memory is assumed to be one of the core deficits in ADHD as well as a number of learning disabilities. [16] [17]

Tasks

Working memory training tasks are conducted on computers and are often paired with positive reinforcement, feedback of the individual's performance, [18] and other motivational features such as displaying the individual's current score beside their personal best score. [19] Practicing these tasks demands numerous processes such as encoding, inhibition, maintenance, manipulation, shifting and controlling attention, and the ability to manage two tasks simultaneously or dividing attention. [20] Possible forms of the tasks include recalling a series of locations of items on the screen, recalling digits or letters in either the order presented or reverse order, [19] or recalling specifically where a particular number or digit was in a sequence. [18] Computers are additionally programmed to adjust the difficulty of the task to the individual's performance with each trial in order to maximize learning and overall improvement. If the individual does poorer on one trial, the difficulty will decrease. Similarly, if the individual excels on the next few trials, the difficulty will increase. Two ways of altering the difficulty are adjusting the number of stimuli to be remembered and adding visual distractions. [21]

Strategies

Common strategies used in working memory training include repetition of the tasks, giving feedback such as tips to improve one's performance to both the parents and the individual, positive reinforcement from those conducting the study as well as parents through praise and rewarding, [18] and the gradual adjustment of the task difficulty from trial to trial. More explicitly used strategies by the individual include rehearsal of material, chunking, pairing mental images with the material, mnemonics, and other meta-cognitive strategies. [22] [23] The latter strategies have been learned and there is a conscious awareness of their use.

Training setup and evaluation

Before training commences participants complete pre-training verbal and visuo-spatial tasks, which are additionally completed in the study's follow-up as post-training tasks. Pre-training and post-training tasks vary, some studies use verbal and visuo-spatial tasks along with slightly different tasks; referred to as "nontrained tasks." Klingberg et al. [21] used visuo-spatial tasks, a Span board, the Stroop task, Raven's coloured progressive matrices, and a choice reaction time task, during pre-training and post-training. Holmes et al. [19] used a nonword recall task, mazes memory task, listening recall, and the "odd one-out" task. By using tasks that differ from ones in the study, laboratory results can demonstrate transfer effects if high scores are achieved, since these were not learned during training.

The training itself is set up in studies so that participants attend a set number of sessions over a given period of time that widely varies between studies. This can vary anywhere from two weeks to a span of eight weeks. The time spent in sessions also ranges, with some studies being as short as fifteen minutes to other studies lasting forty minutes. Studies can take place in the lab, or even at home with researchers keeping in touch through weekly phone calls. [18] There is no universal way to set up the training schedule, since all schedules tended to vary to at least to some degree. The effects are tested immediately after training is completed and again a few months after, or even up to a year later, to see if the training outcomes are still in place. Testing and evaluation can be based on the measures of academic efficiency, ratings of the individual's symptoms from teachers and parents, comparing the experimental to the control groups of the study, and self-report measures.

Transfer effects

There are many possible transfer effects from working memory training. An increase in working memory capacity could make individuals more likely to take on tasks that have a higher working memory load, such as math and other challenging academics. [24] Holmes et al. [25] reported an improvement in mathematical reasoning, even six months after training was completed. Furthermore, there has been parent reported decreases of inattentive behaviours, hyperactivity, and impulsivity in children with ADHD, [24] in addition to a decrease in motor activity. [21] However the majority of transfer effects are seen in lab-based nontrained tasks that are completed during follow-up and immediately after training is over. A meta-analysis into 30 studies assessing the effects of various Working Memory Training found that WM training has short term reliable effects but the effectiveness in the long term is limited. [26] Another study found that using a demanding action video game could be beneficial to basic processes such as spatial cognition and rapid perception but that using a non-action 3D puzzle game showed improvements that were not transferable from the game itself. [27] Findings from these results vary according to which nontrained tasks the researcher chooses to use. The main general finding in these studies confirms that experimental groups improve on trained tasks in comparison to control groups, and that effects will need retraining to maintain. [24]

Along with reported decreases of inattentive behaviours, hyperactivity, and impulsivity in children with ADHD, a pilot study done on adults after experiencing a stroke found that systematic working memory training can improve working memory and attention. This study also contained a self-rating on symptoms of cognitive failures both before and after the study. Eight out of the nine participants that completed the study reported less cognitive failures occurring in the post-study rating compared to prior to the study. Overall, the pilot study concludes that working memory training in adult patients that have previously had a stroke can both improve their cognitive function as measured by neuropsychological tests as well as improvements in subjective reports of cognitive failures. [28]

Studies have also proven that working memory training can possibly help to improve deficits in working memory caused by anxiety and depression disorders, especially in adolescents. A trial study tested the WM of 733 adolescent participants, randomly assigning them to an active or placebo emotional working memory training. Emotional stimuli was used as the best way to see results because of the major influence anxiety and depression disorders have on emotional regulation. After 4 weeks of bi-weekly training, results showed improvements in working memory, both short-term and long-term emotional functioning, and even an increase in self esteem among the active group. While improvements in WM were observed in both groups, there were many limitations and further research is still needed to produce training that will create long term effects in those who suffer from mental health disorders such as anxiety and depression. [29]

Although some studies published have argued that working memory training has the ability to improve overall intelligence, more recent literature suggests that working memory training does not transfer to other cognitive ability tests. It also suggests that the conclusions drawn in the previous studies are a result of design limitations, mixed results, and a lack of theoretical grounding. [30] The limitations are mostly found in the lack of controls in the previous studies. A paper that evaluated all previous literature on working memory training noted that not a single study had concurrently controlled for "motivation, commitment, and difficulty" in both the experimental and control groups. [31] A few years after this paper was published, a randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted to test the transfer effects of working memory training while controlling for all aspects previously mentioned. [30] This study concluded that working memory training had no positive transfer to any of other cognitive ability tests including fluid intelligence, multitasking, crystallized intelligence, and perceptual speed.

History

The concept of working memory became widely accepted and its importance better understood across the 1970s. At this time, a number of attempts to improve working memory were also initiated. [32] For instance, in one case, a college student practiced repeating numbers that were read to him aloud for an hour each day. [33] He did this three to five times a week for 20 months until he could repeat as many as 79 digits. While his capacity on this trained task had improved, his working memory: the ability to store information, as described above had not. This was most clearly demonstrated when, asked to repeat letters instead of numbers, this same student with over 320 hrs of practice at recalling digits could recall only six letters at a time: a normal to below average performance. The effect of the training was not to improve the working memory system but to change the information being stored: the student had learned multiple methods of grouping numbers and relating them to similar figures already in his long-term memory. In reality, his working memory capacity had not increased. This study and others like it contributed to the prevailing assumption in the scientific community that working memory is a set characteristic that cannot be improved.

ADHD controversy

Many clinical studies published in 1990s and 2000s claim that working memory training is an efficient strategy for mitigating effects of ADHD and other cognitive disorders. [34] Many studies also demonstrated that working memory training enhances episodic memory and could lead to better performance and improvements in fluid intelligence and processing speed tasks in the elderly. [35] [36] [37]

Georgia Institute of Technology researchers who reviewed 17 studies on WMT concluded that "the results are inconsistent" due to the fact that many studies had "inadequate controls" as well as "ineffective measurement of the cognitive abilities of interest." [38]

In 2012, a systematic meta-analytic review was undertaken. [2] Stringent criteria for inclusion ensured that all studies were either randomized controlled trials or quasi-experiments. All studies had to have a treatment and a treated or untreated control group. By this time, some twenty-three studies met these criteria, including both clinical samples of typically developing children and adults. The results closely replicated the original finding by Ericcson et al. (1980): [33] There were short-term improvements in practiced skills. While the results were conclusive for ADHD population, there was no convincing evidence for transfer or generalization effects (indicating improved capacity) in typically developing children and healthy adults." [2]

Other researchers have studied the effects of training on children with attention issues. Among them are NYU, [39] [40] and the University of York. [25] In addition, many researchers are now exploring the use of working memory training for various new applications, with studies having been completed or launched on normal and aging adults, [41] pediatric cancer survivors, [42] [ original research? ] and victims of stroke and traumatic brain injury. [43] [44] In the February 2009 edition of Science, Klingberg and colleagues, led by F McNab, claimed that adaptive span training had led to changes in dopamine D1 and D2 receptors. [45] In the same study, tests of "far transfer" – whether or not the skills in one test applied to very different intelligence-related skills – were made. The results were not reported. [38] (see supporting online materials). Moreover, research at the Wallenberg Neuroscience Center in Sweden indicates that working memory training may decrease hippocampal neurogenesis. When experimental medical scientists trained adult male rats in a working memory task for 4 or 14 days, rats trained for two weeks had fewer newborn hippocampal neurons than those that were only trained for 4 days. The report suggests that increased stress, caused by an intense training of working memory, can reduce the production of hippocampal neurons. [46]

Lack of credible evidence of efficacy is increasingly highlighted in popular media. [47] [48] [49]

Related Research Articles

Short-term memory is the capacity for holding a small amount of information in an active, readily available state for a short interval. For example, short-term memory holds a phone number that has just been recited. The duration of short-term memory is estimated to be on the order of seconds. The commonly cited capacity of 7 items, found in Miller's Law, has been superseded by 4±1 items. In contrast, long-term memory holds information indefinitely.

Working memory is a cognitive system with a limited capacity that can hold information temporarily. It is important for reasoning and the guidance of decision-making and behavior. Working memory is often used synonymously with short-term memory, but some theorists consider the two forms of memory distinct, assuming that working memory allows for the manipulation of stored information, whereas short-term memory only refers to the short-term storage of information. Working memory is a theoretical concept central to cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and neuroscience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cognition</span> Act or process of knowing

Cognition is the "mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses". It encompasses all aspects of intellectual functions and processes such as: perception, attention, thought, imagination, intelligence, the formation of knowledge, memory and working memory, judgment and evaluation, reasoning and computation, problem-solving and decision-making, comprehension and production of language. Cognitive processes use existing knowledge and discover new knowledge.

Dyscalculia is a disability resulting in difficulty learning or comprehending arithmetic, such as difficulty in understanding numbers, learning how to manipulate numbers, performing mathematical calculations, and learning facts in mathematics. It is sometimes colloquially referred to as "math dyslexia", though this analogy is misleading as they are distinct syndromes.

The interference theory is a theory regarding human memory. Interference occurs in learning. The notion is that memories encoded in long-term memory (LTM) are forgotten and cannot be retrieved into short-term memory (STM) because either memory could interfere with the other. There is an immense number of encoded memories within the storage of LTM. The challenge for memory retrieval is recalling the specific memory and working in the temporary workspace provided in STM. Retaining information regarding the relevant time of encoding memories into LTM influences interference strength. There are two types of interference effects: proactive and retroactive interference.

The concepts of fluid intelligence (gf) and crystallized intelligence (gc) were introduced in 1963 by the psychologist Raymond Cattell. According to Cattell's psychometrically-based theory, general intelligence (g) is subdivided into gf and gc. Fluid intelligence is the ability to solve novel reasoning problems and is correlated with a number of important skills such as comprehension, problem-solving, and learning. Crystallized intelligence, on the other hand, involves the ability to deduce secondary relational abstractions by applying previously learned primary relational abstractions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spatial memory</span> Memory about ones environment and spatial orientation

In cognitive psychology and neuroscience, spatial memory is a form of memory responsible for the recording and recovery of information needed to plan a course to a location and to recall the location of an object or the occurrence of an event. Spatial memory is necessary for orientation in space. Spatial memory can also be divided into egocentric and allocentric spatial memory. A person's spatial memory is required to navigate around a familiar city. A rat's spatial memory is needed to learn the location of food at the end of a maze. In both humans and animals, spatial memories are summarized as a cognitive map.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Executive functions</span> Cognitive processes necessary for control of behavior

In cognitive science and neuropsychology, executive functions are a set of cognitive processes that are necessary for the cognitive control of behavior: selecting and successfully monitoring behaviors that facilitate the attainment of chosen goals. Executive functions include basic cognitive processes such as attentional control, cognitive inhibition, inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. Higher-order executive functions require the simultaneous use of multiple basic executive functions and include planning and fluid intelligence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Memory and aging</span> Aspect of senescence

Age-related memory loss, sometimes described as "normal aging", is qualitatively different from memory loss associated with types of dementia such as Alzheimer's disease, and is believed to have a different brain mechanism.

In psychology and neuroscience, memory span is the longest list of items that a person can repeat back in correct order immediately after presentation on 50% of all trials. Items may include words, numbers, or letters. The task is known as digit span when numbers are used. Memory span is a common measure of working memory and short-term memory. It is also a component of cognitive ability tests such as the WAIS. Backward memory span is a more challenging variation which involves recalling items in reverse order.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adele Diamond</span> Neuroscientist

Adele Dorothy Diamond is a professor of neuroscience at the University of British Columbia, where she is currently a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. One of the pioneers in the field of developmental cognitive neuroscience, Diamond researches how executive functions are affected by biological and environmental factors, especially in children. Her discoveries have improved treatment for disorders such as phenylketonuria and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and they have impacted early education.

Brain training is a program of regular activities purported to maintain or improve one's cognitive abilities. The phrase “cognitive ability” usually refers to components of fluid intelligence such as executive function and working memory. Cognitive training reflects a hypothesis that cognitive abilities can be maintained or improved by exercising the brain, analogous to the way physical fitness is improved by exercising the body. Cognitive training activities can take place in numerous modalities such as cardiovascular fitness training, playing online games or completing cognitive tasks in alignment with a training regimen, playing video games that require visuospatial reasoning, and engaging in novel activities such as dance, art, and music.

The n-back task is a continuous performance task that is commonly used as an assessment in psychology and cognitive neuroscience to measure a part of working memory and working memory capacity. The n-back was introduced by Wayne Kirchner in 1958. N-Back games are purported to be a training method to improve working memory and working memory capacity and also increase fluid intelligence, although evidence for such effects are lacking.

In psychology and neuroscience, executive dysfunction, or executive function deficit, is a disruption to the efficacy of the executive functions, which is a group of cognitive processes that regulate, control, and manage other cognitive processes. Executive dysfunction can refer to both neurocognitive deficits and behavioural symptoms. It is implicated in numerous psychopathologies and mental disorders, as well as short-term and long-term changes in non-clinical executive control. Executive dysfunction is the mechanism underlying ADHD Paralysis, and in a broader context, it can encompass other cognitive difficulties like planning, organizing, initiating tasks and regulating emotions. It is a core characteristic of ADHD and can elucidate numerous other recognized symptoms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inhibitory control</span> Cognitive process

Inhibitory control, also known as response inhibition, is a cognitive process – and, more specifically, an executive function – that permits an individual to inhibit their impulses and natural, habitual, or dominant behavioral responses to stimuli in order to select a more appropriate behavior that is consistent with completing their goals. Self-control is an important aspect of inhibitory control. For example, successfully suppressing the natural behavioral response to eat cake when one is craving it while dieting requires the use of inhibitory control.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cogmed</span> Cognitive training software program

Cogmed is a cognitive training software program created in the lab of Torkel Klingberg, a neuroscientist at the Karolinska Institute. Dr. Klingberg was using it to present working memory challenges to people while he studied their brains using fMRI, to try to learn about neuroplasticity. When the studies appeared to show that the challenges improved working memory, Klingberg founded Cogmed in 2001, with financial backing from the Karolinska Institute and venture capitalists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Memory improvement</span> Act of improving ones memory

Memory improvement is the act of enhancing one's memory. Research on improving memory is driven by amnesia, age-related memory loss, and people’s desire to enhance their memory. Research involved in memory improvement has also worked to determine what factors influence memory and cognition. There are many different techniques to improve memory some of which include cognitive training, psychopharmacology, diet, stress management, and exercise. Each technique can improve memory in different ways.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Attentional control</span> Individuals capacity to choose what they pay attention to and what they ignore

Attentional control, colloquially referred to as concentration, refers to an individual's capacity to choose what they pay attention to and what they ignore. It is also known as endogenous attention or executive attention. In lay terms, attentional control can be described as an individual's ability to concentrate. Primarily mediated by the frontal areas of the brain including the anterior cingulate cortex, attentional control is thought to be closely related to other executive functions such as working memory.

NeuroRacer is a video game designed by a team of researchers at the University of California, San Francisco led by Adam Gazzaley as a way to help with mental cognition. It was designed as an "Adam Gazzaley intervention" for "top-down modulation deficits in older adults." A study on 60- to 85-year-olds showed that the multitasking nature of the game caused improvements in tasks outside of the game involving working memory and sustained attention. The game is presented as a driving simulator. Gameplay involves driving a vehicle down windy roads and pushing buttons when a sign appears.

Cognitive behavioral training (CBTraining), sometimes referred to as structured cognitive behavioral training, (SCBT) is an organized process that uses systematic, highly-structured tasks designed to improve cognitive functions. Functions such as working memory, decision making, and attention are thought to inform whether a person defaults to an impulsive behavior or a premeditated behavior. The aim of CBTraining is to affect a person's decision-making process and cause them to choose the premeditated behavior over the impulsive behavior in their everyday life. Through scheduled trainings that may be up to a few hours long and may be weekly or daily over a specific set of time, the goal of CBTraining is to show that focusing on repetitive, increasingly difficult cognitive tasks can transfer those skills to other cognitive processes in your brain, leading to behavioral change. There has been a recent resurgence of interest in this field with the invention of new technologies and a greater understanding of cognition in general.

References

  1. Katz B, Shah P, Meyer DE (October 2018). "How to play 20 questions with nature and lose: Reflections on 100 years of brain-training research". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 115 (40): 9897–9904. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.9897K. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617102114 . PMC   6176639 . PMID   30275315.
  2. 1 2 3 Melby-Lervåg M, Hulme C (February 2013). "Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review". Developmental Psychology. 49 (2): 270–291. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.281.7759 . doi:10.1037/a0028228. PMID   22612437. S2CID   12370312.
  3. Spencer-Smith M, Klingberg T (20 March 2015). "Benefits of a working memory training program for inattention in daily life: a systematic review and meta-analysis". PLOS ONE. 10 (3): e0119522. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1019522S. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119522 . PMC   4368783 . PMID   25793607.
  4. Gropper RJ, Tannock R (May 2009). "A pilot study of working memory and academic achievement in college students with ADHD". Journal of Attention Disorders. 12 (6): 574–581. doi:10.1177/1087054708320390. PMID   19380519. S2CID   4065499.
  5. Bigorra A, Garolera M, Guijarro S, Hervás A (August 2016). "Long-term far-transfer effects of working memory training in children with ADHD: a randomized controlled trial". European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 25 (8): 853–867. doi:10.1007/s00787-015-0804-3. PMID   26669692. S2CID   22989315.
  6. Björkdahl A, Akerlund E, Svensson S, Esbjörnsson E (2013). "A randomized study of computerized working memory training and effects on functioning in everyday life for patients with brain injury". Brain Injury. 27 (13–14): 1658–1665. doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.830196. PMID   24131298. S2CID   13491114.
  7. Peers PV, Astle DE, Duncan J, Murphy FC, Hampshire A, Das T, Manly T (July 2020). "Dissociable effects of attention vs working memory training on cognitive performance and everyday functioning following fronto-parietal strokes". Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 30 (6): 1092–1114. doi:10.1080/09602011.2018.1554534. PMC   7266670 . PMID   30569816.
  8. Conklin HM, Ashford JM, Clark KN, Martin-Elbahesh K, Hardy KK, Merchant TE, et al. (March 2017). "Long-Term Efficacy of Computerized Cognitive Training Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial". Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 42 (2): 220–231. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsw057. PMC   5896595 . PMID   27342301.
  9. Conklin HM, Ogg RJ, Ashford JM, Scoggins MA, Zou P, Clark KN, et al. (November 2015). "Computerized Cognitive Training for Amelioration of Cognitive Late Effects Among Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial". Journal of Clinical Oncology. 33 (33): 3894–3902. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6672. PMC   4652013 . PMID   26460306.
  10. Berger EM, Fehr E, Hermes H, Schunk D, Winkel K (June 2020). The Impact of Working Memory Training on Children's Cognitive and Noncognitive Skills. NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper (Report). doi:10.2139/ssrn.3622985. hdl: 11250/2657279 . S2CID   221652470.
  11. Judd N, Klingberg T (November 2021). "Training spatial cognition enhances mathematical learning in a randomized study of 17,000 children". Nature Human Behaviour. 5 (11): 1548–1554. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01118-4. PMID   34017098. S2CID   235073030.
  12. Baddeley A, Hitch GJ (2010). "Working Memory". Scholarpedia. 5 (2): 3015. Bibcode:2010SchpJ...5.3015B. doi: 10.4249/scholarpedia.3015 .
  13. Cowan N, Chen Z, Rouder JN (September 2004). "Constant capacity in an immediate serial-recall task: a logical sequel to Miller (1956)". Psychological Science. 15 (9): 634–640. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00732.x. PMID   15327636. S2CID   11730159.
  14. Barkley RA (January 1997). "Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD". Psychological Bulletin. 121 (1): 65–94. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65. PMID   9000892.
  15. Conway AR, Kane MJ, Engle RW (December 2003). "Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7 (12): 547–552. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.538.4967 . doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005. PMID   14643371. S2CID   9943197.
  16. Castellanos FX, Tannock R (August 2002). "Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes". Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 3 (8): 617–628. doi:10.1038/nrn896. PMID   12154363. S2CID   3346437.
  17. Gathercole SE, Pickering SJ (June 2000). "Working memory deficits in children with low achievements in the national curriculum at 7 years of age". The British Journal of Educational Psychology. 70 (2): 177–194. doi:10.1348/000709900158047. PMID   10900777. S2CID   17344876.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Beck SJ, Hanson CA, Puffenberger SS, Benninger KL, Benninger WB (2010). "A controlled trial of working memory training for children and adolescents with ADHD". Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 39 (6): 825–836. doi:10.1080/15374416.2010.517162. PMID   21058129. S2CID   14516995.
  19. 1 2 3 Holmes J, Gathercole SE, Place M, Dunning DL, Hilton KA, Elliott JG (2010). "Working Memory Deficits can be Overcome: Impacts of Training and Medication on Working Memory in Children with ADHD". Applied Cognitive Psychology. 24 (6): 827–836. doi:10.1002/acp.1589. S2CID   18459959.
  20. Borella E, Carretti B, Riboldi F, De Beni R (December 2010). "Working memory training in older adults: evidence of transfer and maintenance effects". Psychology and Aging. 25 (4): 767–778. doi:10.1037/a0020683. PMID   20973604. S2CID   6672210.
  21. 1 2 3 Klingberg T, Forssberg H, Westerberg H (September 2002). "Training of working memory in children with ADHD". Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 24 (6): 781–791. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.326.5165 . doi:10.1076/jcen.24.6.781.8395. PMID   12424652. S2CID   146570079.
  22. Cavallini E, Pagnin A, Vecchi T (1 November 2003). "Aging and everyday memory: the beneficial effect of memory training". Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 37 (3): 241–257. doi:10.1016/S0167-4943(03)00063-3. PMID   14511850.
  23. Carretti B, Borella E, De Beni R (1 January 2007). "Does strategic memory training improve the working memory performance of younger and older adults?". Experimental Psychology. 54 (4): 311–320. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.54.4.311. PMID   17953152.
  24. 1 2 3 Klingberg T, Fernell E, Olesen PJ, Johnson M, Gustafsson P, Dahlström K, et al. (February 2005). "Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD--a randomized, controlled trial". Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 44 (2): 177–186. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.397.4817 . doi:10.1097/00004583-200502000-00010. PMID   15689731. S2CID   15178125.
  25. 1 2 Holmes J, Gathercole SE, Dunning DL (July 2009). "Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children". Developmental Science. 12 (4): F9-15. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00848.x. PMID   19635074. S2CID   6744778.
  26. Melby-Lervåg M, Hulme C (February 2013). "Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review". Developmental Psychology. 49 (2): 270–291. doi:10.1037/a0028228. PMID   22612437. S2CID   12370312.
  27. Feng J, Spence I, Pratt J (October 2007). "Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition". Psychological Science. 18 (10): 850–855. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01990.x. PMID   17894600. S2CID   5885796.
  28. Westerberg H, Jacobaeus H, Hirvikoski T, Clevberger P, Ostensson ML, Bartfai A, Klingberg T (January 2007). "Computerized working memory training after stroke--a pilot study". Brain Injury. 21 (1): 21–29. doi:10.1080/02699050601148726. PMID   17364516. S2CID   1516059.
  29. Leone de Voogd E, Wiers RW, Zwitser RJ, Salemink E (September 2016). "Emotional working memory training as an online intervention for adolescent anxiety and depression: A randomised controlled trial". Australian Journal of Psychology. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Psychological Society. 68 (3): 228–238. doi:10.1111/ajpy.12134. PMC   5129510 . PMID   27917000.
  30. 1 2 "Supplemental Material for No Evidence of Intelligence Improvement After Working Memory Training: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study". Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 18 June 2012. doi:10.1037/a0029082.supp. ISSN   0096-3445.
  31. Morrison AB, Chein JM (February 2011). "Does working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memory". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 18 (1): 46–60. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0034-0 . PMID   21327348.
  32. Butterfield EC, Wambold C (March 1973). "On the theory and practice of improving short-term memory". American Journal of Mental Deficiency. 77 (5): 654–659. PMID   4703996.
  33. 1 2 Ericcson KA, Chase WG, Faloon S (June 1980). "Acquisition of a memory skill". Science. 208 (4448): 1181–1182. Bibcode:1980Sci...208.1181E. doi:10.1126/science.7375930. PMID   7375930.
  34. Klingberg T (2009). "8. The plasticity of the brain". The overflowing brain: information overload and the limits of working memory . Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-537288-5. OCLC   218190606.
  35. Borella E, Carretti B, Riboldi F, De Beni R (December 2010). "Working memory training in older adults: evidence of transfer and maintenance effects". Psychology and Aging. 25 (4): 767–778. doi:10.1037/a0020683. PMID   20973604.
  36. Heinzel S, Schulte S, Onken J, Duong QL, Riemer TG, Heinz A, et al. (2013). "Working memory training improvements and gains in non-trained cognitive tasks in young and older adults". Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition. 21 (2): 146–173. doi:10.1080/13825585.2013.790338. PMID   23639070. S2CID   39724752.
  37. Xin Z, Lai ZR, Li F, Maes JH (May 2014). "Near- and Far-Transfer Effects of Working Memory Updating Training in Elderly Adults". Applied Cognitive Psychology. 28 (3): 403–408. doi: 10.1002/acp.3011 .
  38. 1 2 Shipstead Z, Redick TS, Engle RW (2010). "Does working memory training generalize?" (PDF). Psychologica Belgica. pp. 245–276.
  39. Lucas C, Abikoff H, Petkova E, Gan W, Sved S, Bruett L, Eldridge B (2008). NR6-052: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Forms of Computerized Working Memory Training in ADHD (poster) (PDF). American Psychiatric Association.
  40. Abikoff H, Gallagher R, Wells KC, Murray DW, Huang L, Lu F, Petkova E (February 2013). "Remediating organizational functioning in children with ADHD: immediate and long-term effects from a randomized controlled trial". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 81 (1): 113–128. doi:10.1037/a0029648. PMC   3549033 . PMID   22889336.
  41. Westerberg, H, Brehmer, Y, D'Hondt, N, Söderlund, D, Bäckman, L (2007) Computerized training of working memory – A new method for improving cognition in aging. Aging Research Conference. Sidney.
  42. Hardy C, Duke University. Research ongoing
  43. Westerberg H, Jacobaeus H, Hirvikoski T, Clevberger P, Ostensson ML, Bartfai A, Klingberg T (January 2007). "Computerized working memory training after stroke--a pilot study". Brain Injury. 21 (1): 21–9. doi:10.1080/02699050601148726. PMID   17364516. S2CID   1516059.
  44. Kober SE, Schweiger D, Witte M, Reichert JL, Grieshofer P, Neuper C, Wood G (December 2015). "Specific effects of EEG based neurofeedback training on memory functions in post-stroke victims". Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation. 12 (1): 107. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0105-6 . PMC   4666277 . PMID   26625906.
  45. McNab F, Varrone A, Farde L, Jucaite A, Bystritsky P, Forssberg H, Klingberg T (February 2009). "Changes in cortical dopamine D1 receptor binding associated with cognitive training". Science. 323 (5915): 800–802. Bibcode:2009Sci...323..800M. doi:10.1126/science.1166102. PMID   19197069. S2CID   206516408.
  46. Mohapel P, Mundt-Petersen K, Brundin P, Frielingsdorf H (October 2006). "Working memory training decreases hippocampal neurogenesis". Neuroscience. 142 (3): 609–613. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.07.033 . PMID   16962715. S2CID   16748836.
  47. Lewis JG (28 January 2014). "Are Brain-Training Games Worth It?". Slate.
  48. Colby L (21 May 2014). "Brain Training Seen as Dud for Attention-Deficit Children". Bloomberg Technology.
  49. Cook G (5 April 2013). "Brain Games are Bogus". The New Yorker. Condé Nast.

Further reading