Zero-divisor graph

Last updated
The zero-divisor graph of
Z
2
x
Z
4
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} _{2}\times \mathbb {Z} _{4}}
, the only possible zero-divisor graph that is a tree but not a star Zero-divisor graph of Z2xZ4.svg
The zero-divisor graph of , the only possible zero-divisor graph that is a tree but not a star

In mathematics, and more specifically in combinatorial commutative algebra, a zero-divisor graph is an undirected graph representing the zero divisors of a commutative ring. It has elements of the ring as its vertices, and pairs of elements whose product is zero as its edges. [1]

Contents

Definition

There are two variations of the zero-divisor graph commonly used. In the original definition of Beck (1988), the vertices represent all elements of the ring. [2] In a later variant studied by Anderson & Livingston (1999), the vertices represent only the zero divisors of the given ring. [3]

Examples

If is a semiprime number (the product of two prime numbers) then the zero-divisor graph of the ring of integers modulo (with only the zero divisors as its vertices) is either a complete graph or a complete bipartite graph. It is a complete graph in the case that for some prime number . In this case the vertices are all the nonzero multiples of , and the product of any two of these numbers is zero modulo . [3]

It is a complete bipartite graph in the case that for two distinct prime numbers and . The two sides of the bipartition are the nonzero multiples of and the nonzero multiples of , respectively. Two numbers (that are not themselves zero modulo ) multiply to zero modulo if and only if one is a multiple of and the other is a multiple of , so this graph has an edge between each pair of vertices on opposite sides of the bipartition, and no other edges. More generally, the zero-divisor graph is a complete bipartite graph for any ring that is a product of two integral domains. [3]

The only cycle graphs that can be realized as zero-product graphs (with zero divisors as vertices) are the cycles of length 3 or 4. [3] The only trees that may be realized as zero-divisor graphs are the stars (complete bipartite graphs that are trees) and the five-vertex tree formed as the zero-divisor graph of . [1] [3]

Properties

In the version of the graph that includes all elements, 0 is a universal vertex, and the zero divisors can be identified as the vertices that have a neighbor other than 0. Because it has a universal vertex, the graph of all ring elements is always connected and has diameter at most two. The graph of all zero divisors is non-empty for every ring that is not an integral domain. It remains connected, has diameter at most three, [3] and (if it contains a cycle) has girth at most four. [4] [5]

The zero-divisor graph of a ring that is not an integral domain is finite if and only if the ring is finite. [3] More concretely, if the graph has maximum degree , the ring has at most elements. If the ring and the graph are infinite, every edge has an endpoint with infinitely many neighbors. [1]

Beck (1988) conjectured that (like the perfect graphs) zero-divisor graphs always have equal clique number and chromatic number. However, this is not true; a counterexample was discovered by Anderson & Naseer (1993). [6]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Integral domain</span> Commutative ring with no zero divisors other than zero

In mathematics, specifically abstract algebra, an integral domain is a nonzero commutative ring in which the product of any two nonzero elements is nonzero. Integral domains are generalizations of the ring of integers and provide a natural setting for studying divisibility. In an integral domain, every nonzero element a has the cancellation property, that is, if a ≠ 0, an equality ab = ac implies b = c.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prime ideal</span> Ideal in a ring which has properties similar to prime elements

In algebra, a prime ideal is a subset of a ring that shares many important properties of a prime number in the ring of integers. The prime ideals for the integers are the sets that contain all the multiples of a given prime number, together with the zero ideal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ring (mathematics)</span> Algebraic structure with addition and multiplication

In mathematics, rings are algebraic structures that generalize fields: multiplication need not be commutative and multiplicative inverses need not exist. In other words, a ring is a set equipped with two binary operations satisfying properties analogous to those of addition and multiplication of integers. Ring elements may be numbers such as integers or complex numbers, but they may also be non-numerical objects such as polynomials, square matrices, functions, and power series.

In abstract algebra, an element a of a ring R is called a left zero divisor if there exists a nonzero x in R such that ax = 0, or equivalently if the map from R to R that sends x to ax is not injective. Similarly, an element a of a ring is called a right zero divisor if there exists a nonzero y in R such that ya = 0. This is a partial case of divisibility in rings. An element that is a left or a right zero divisor is simply called a zero divisor. An element a that is both a left and a right zero divisor is called a two-sided zero divisor. If the ring is commutative, then the left and right zero divisors are the same.

In mathematics, a unique factorization domain (UFD) is a ring in which a statement analogous to the fundamental theorem of arithmetic holds. Specifically, a UFD is an integral domain in which every non-zero non-unit element can be written as a product of irreducible elements, uniquely up to order and units.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commutative ring</span> Algebraic structure

In mathematics, a commutative ring is a ring in which the multiplication operation is commutative. The study of commutative rings is called commutative algebra. Complementarily, noncommutative algebra is the study of ring properties that are not specific to commutative rings. This distinction results from the high number of fundamental properties of commutative rings that do not extend to noncommutative rings.

In graph theory and computer science, an adjacency matrix is a square matrix used to represent a finite graph. The elements of the matrix indicate whether pairs of vertices are adjacent or not in the graph.

Ring theory is the branch of mathematics in which rings are studied: that is, structures supporting both an addition and a multiplication operation. This is a glossary of some terms of the subject.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polynomial ring</span> Algebraic structure

In mathematics, especially in the field of algebra, a polynomial ring or polynomial algebra is a ring formed from the set of polynomials in one or more indeterminates with coefficients in another ring, often a field.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fractional ideal</span>

In mathematics, in particular commutative algebra, the concept of fractional ideal is introduced in the context of integral domains and is particularly fruitful in the study of Dedekind domains. In some sense, fractional ideals of an integral domain are like ideals where denominators are allowed. In contexts where fractional ideals and ordinary ring ideals are both under discussion, the latter are sometimes termed integral ideals for clarity.

In commutative algebra, a regular sequence is a sequence of elements of a commutative ring which are as independent as possible, in a precise sense. This is the algebraic analogue of the geometric notion of a complete intersection.

In ring theory, a branch of mathematics, a ring is called a reduced ring if it has no non-zero nilpotent elements. Equivalently, a ring is reduced if it has no non-zero elements with square zero, that is, x2 = 0 implies x = 0. A commutative algebra over a commutative ring is called a reduced algebra if its underlying ring is reduced.

In mathematics, the Lasker–Noether theorem states that every Noetherian ring is a Lasker ring, which means that every ideal can be decomposed as an intersection, called primary decomposition, of finitely many primary ideals. The theorem was first proven by Emanuel Lasker (1905) for the special case of polynomial rings and convergent power series rings, and was proven in its full generality by Emmy Noether (1921).

In mathematics, a GCD domain is an integral domain R with the property that any two elements have a greatest common divisor (GCD); i.e., there is a unique minimal principal ideal containing the ideal generated by two given elements. Equivalently, any two elements of R have a least common multiple (LCM).

In mathematics, specifically commutative algebra, a proper ideal Q of a commutative ring A is said to be primary if whenever xy is an element of Q then x or yn is also an element of Q, for some n > 0. For example, in the ring of integers Z, (pn) is a primary ideal if p is a prime number.

In mathematics, specifically in ring theory, a torsion element is an element of a module that yields zero when multiplied by some non-zero-divisor of the ring. The torsion submodule of a module is the submodule formed by the torsion elements. A torsion module is a module that equals its torsion submodule. A module is torsion-free if its torsion submodule comprises only the zero element.

In mathematics, a Bézout domain is a form of a Prüfer domain. It is an integral domain in which the sum of two principal ideals is again a principal ideal. This means that for every pair of elements a Bézout identity holds, and that every finitely generated ideal is principal. Any principal ideal domain (PID) is a Bézout domain, but a Bézout domain need not be a Noetherian ring, so it could have non-finitely generated ideals ; if so, it is not a unique factorization domain (UFD), but still is a GCD domain. The theory of Bézout domains retains many of the properties of PIDs, without requiring the Noetherian property. Bézout domains are named after the French mathematician Étienne Bézout.

In algebra, the zero-product property states that the product of two nonzero elements is nonzero. In other words,

In commutative algebra, an integrally closed domainA is an integral domain whose integral closure in its field of fractions is A itself. Spelled out, this means that if x is an element of the field of fractions of A which is a root of a monic polynomial with coefficients in A, then x is itself an element of A. Many well-studied domains are integrally closed, as shown by the following chain of class inclusions:

This is a glossary of commutative algebra.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Anderson, David F.; Axtell, Michael C.; Stickles, Joe A. Jr. (2011), "Zero-divisor graphs in commutative rings", Commutative algebra—Noetherian and non-Noetherian perspectives, Springer, New York, pp. 23–45, doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6990-3_2, MR   2762487
  2. Beck, István (1988), "Coloring of commutative rings", Journal of Algebra, 116 (1): 208–226, doi: 10.1016/0021-8693(88)90202-5 , MR   0944156
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Anderson, David F.; Livingston, Philip S. (1999), "The zero-divisor graph of a commutative ring", Journal of Algebra, 217 (2): 434–447, doi: 10.1006/jabr.1998.7840 , MR   1700509
  4. Mulay, S. B. (2002), "Cycles and symmetries of zero-divisors", Communications in Algebra, 30 (7): 3533–3558, doi:10.1081/AGB-120004502, MR   1915011
  5. DeMeyer, Frank; Schneider, Kim (2002), "Automorphisms and zero divisor graphs of commutative rings", Commutative rings, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science, pp. 25–37, MR   2037656
  6. Anderson, D. D.; Naseer, M. (1993), "Beck's coloring of a commutative ring", Journal of Algebra, 159 (2): 500–514, doi: 10.1006/jabr.1993.1171 , MR   1231228