Zygomatic plate

Last updated

Skull of Rattus macleari with the left zygomatic plate indicated. Rattus macleari skull zygomatic plate.png
Skull of Rattus macleari with the left zygomatic plate indicated.

In rodent anatomy, the zygomatic plate is a bony plate derived from the flattened front part of the zygomatic arch (cheekbone). [1] At the back, it connects to the front (maxillary) root of the zygomatic arch, and at the top it is connected to the rest of the skull via the antorbital bridge. [2] It is part of the maxillary bone, or upper jaw, which also contains the upper cheekteeth. Primitively, rodents have a nearly horizontal zygomatic plate. [3] In association with specializations in zygomasseteric system, several distinct morphologies have developed across the order.

Contents

The term is also used for an analogous structure in some South American typotheres, including Pseudotypotherium [4] and Medistylus . [5]

Function

The zygomatic plate serves to resist muscular tension resulting from the contraction of the incisors by the anterior deep masseter muscle; thus, rodents which pulverize hard food with the incisors tend to have broader zygomatic plates than those that rather use their molars for this purpose. [6]

Hystricomorpha

The members of this large and diverse suborder have a narrow, low zygomatic plate. [7]

Sciuromorpha

The suborder Sciuromorpha includes three families. [8] Squirrels (family Sciuridae) tend to have broad zygomatic plate that extend above the infraorbital foramen. [9] The mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa), the only surviving member of its family, retains the primitive narrow and low plate. [10] The dormice (Gliridae) have broad, high zygomatic plates, [11] except for Graphiurus , which has a lower plate. [12]

Castorimorpha

Members of the suborder Castorimorpha, which includes the beavers, pocket gophers, and pocket mice, [8] tend to have broad zygomatic plate that extend above the infraorbital foramen. [13]

Anomaluromorpha

Anomaluromorpha is a small suborder, containing only two families. [8] Anomaluridae have a low and narrow zygomatic plate. [14] Members of the subfamily Idiurinae are atypical in having the zygomatic plate extended forward nearly to the incisors. [15] The condition in the springhaas (Pedetes) is similar. [15]

Myomorpha

Myomorpha is the largest suborder of rodents. [8] In the most numerous subgroup, the Muroidea (including all living families except Dipodidae), the zygomatic plate is generally broad and tilted upwards. [16] Muroids may have the plate extending in front of the front (maxillary) root of the actual zygomatic arch, creating a zygomatic notch. [17] In some, the plate extends at the front into a spinous process, the zygomatic spine. [18]

Dipodidae

Members of the family Dipodidae, which have hystricomorphous zygomasseteric morphology, have nearly horizontal, narrow zygomatic plates. [19]

Platacanthomyidae

Members of the small family Platacanthomyidae have a relatively narrow zygomatic plate. [20]

Spalacidae

The fossorially specialized family Spalacidae shows peculiarities in the condition of the zygomatic plate. In Tachyoryctes and the Rhizomyinae, it is tilted upward and fused to the sides of the snout (rostrum). [20] In the Spalacinae and Myospalacinae, on the other hand, the plate is tilted downward into an almost horizontal position. [21]

Calomyscidae

The mouse-like hamster (Calomyscus), the only member of its family, has a straight front margin on the zygomatic plate. [22]

Nesomyidae

The family Nesomyidae is restricted to Africa. [23]

Dendromus has a narrow zygomatic plate, [24] as do Steatomys [25] and Prionomys . [26]

Brachyuromys has an arvicoline-like high zygomatic plate. [27] In Eliurus , the front border of the plate is straight. [28] Nesomys has a low zygomatic plate. [29] In Hypogeomys , it is broad, but rather low. [30]

Muridae

Muridae is the order's largest family, and contains several subfamilies. [23]

Deomys , a member of the Deomyinae, has an unusually low zygomatic plate, [27] as does Lophuromys , a member of the same subfamily. [31]

Most members of the subfamily Murinae, the Old World rats and mice, have a fairly broad zygomatic plate with a well-developed zygomatic notch. [32] A zygomatic spine is developed in some Australian genera, including Notomys and some Pseudomys . Except for Xeromys , Hydromys and related genera ("hydromyines") have a narrow plate, lacking the notch, as does Hyomys , [32] Macruromys , Crunomys , [31] and Rhynchomys . [33] The Philippine Batomys , Carpomys , and Crateromys have well-developed zygomatic plates, reminiscent of those in Arvicolinae. [34] Phloeomys has a broad zygomatic plate. [35]

Cricetidae

The family Cricetidae is the order's second largest, containing several subfamilies and hundreds of species. [23]

The subfamily Arvicolinae, the voles and lemmings, has the zygomatic plate tilted upwards very strongly. [27]

In the subfamily Tylomyinae, Nyctomys has a narrow zygomatic plate. [36]

Among members of the Neotominae, Baiomys , Reithrodontomys , Onychomys , and Peromyscus has a narrow zygomatic plate. [37]

Members of the subfamily Sigmodontinae, which includes a number of tribes, usually have the antorbital bridge below the upper surface of the skull. [2] Most have a zygomatic notch. [17] The extent of the zygomatic plate at the back is also variable within Sigmodontinae, with some having the plate extending back to the level of the first upper molar and others having shorter plates. [38]

Members of the semiaquatic tribe Ichthyomyini are unique among the Sigmodontinae in lacking the zygomatic notch. [39] In ichthyomyines, the development of the zygomatic plate is correlated with the development of the teeth: those species with large molars and small incisors, including species of Anotomys and Rheomys , have slender plates that do not extend back to the first molars, whereas those with larger incisors and smaller molars, including some Ichthyomys and Neusticomys , have broader zygomatic plates that do reach the level of the first molars. [40]

The genus Sigmodon , which is classified in its own tribe, has a broad zygomatic plate and a zygomatic spine. [41] Relative width of the zygomatic plate can distinguish some species of Sigmodon. [42]

Most members of the tribe Phyllotini have the antorbital bridge located higher than is usual in Sigmodontinae ( Calomys and Andalgalomys show the normal sigmodontine condition). A similar condition characterizes Euneomys , Neotomys , Reithrodon , which are no longer considered phyllotines, but to an even larger extent than in most actual phyllotines; in Euneomys, the antorbital bridge is inserted on the upper surface of the skull. [43] Most phyllotines have zygomatic spines, but the structure is more well-developed in Reithrodon. [44] The zygomatic plate not extending backwards to the first molars is a diagnostic character of phyllotines. [45]

Most thomasomyines lack a well-developed zygomatic notch. [44] The genus Rhipidomys has a narrow zygomatic plate, no zygomatic spine and only a narrow notch. [46] Thomasomys shares a narrow zygomatic plate. [47]

In the Akodontini, Oxymycterus and Lenoxus have a low zygomatic plate, similar to that of Lophuromys. [48] Scapteromys shares a low plate. [49] In Akodon , the plate is narrow, [50] as in many others akodontine; this is extremely so in Blarinomys . [51]

The tribe Abrotrichini is characterized by a narrow zygomatic plate, without an extension at the upper border. [52]

In the tribe Oryzomyini, the configuration of the zygomatic plate is variable. Most have a well-developed zygomatic notch. In the three related genera Holochilus , Pseudoryzomys , and Lundomys , this extension has further developed into a zygomatic spine. In contrast, Microryzomys , Oreoryzomys , Oecomys , Scolomys , and Sigmodontomys aphrastus lack a well-defined notch and do not have the plate extending appreciably in front of the root of the zygomatic arch. [53] The zygomatic plate extending back to the level of the upper first molar is a putative synapomorphy of Clade C within Oryzomyini. [54]

The sigmodontine Juliomys pictipes has an almost vertical zygomatic plate. [55]

Related Research Articles

<i>Oryzomys nelsoni</i> Extinct species of rodent

Oryzomys nelsoni is an extinct rodent of María Madre Island, Nayarit, Mexico. Within the genus Oryzomys of the family Cricetidae, it may have been most closely related to the mainland species O. albiventer. Since its first description in 1898, most authors have regarded it as a distinct species, but it has also been classified as a mere subspecies of the marsh rice rat (O. palustris).

<i>Oryzomys</i> Genus of semiaquatic rodents

Oryzomys is a genus of semiaquatic rodents in the tribe Oryzomyini living in southern North America and far northern South America. It includes eight species, two of which—the marsh rice rat (O. palustris) of the United States and O. couesi of Mexico and Central America—are widespread; the six others have more restricted distributions. The species have had eventful taxonomic histories, and most species were at one time included in the marsh rice rat; additional species may be recognized in the future. The name Oryzomys was established in 1857 by Spencer Fullerton Baird for the marsh rice rat and was soon applied to over a hundred species of American rodents. Subsequently, the genus gradually became more narrowly defined until its current contents were established in 2006, when ten new genera were established for species previously placed in Oryzomys.

<i>Lundomys</i> A semiaquatic rat species from southeastern South America.

Lundomys molitor, also known as Lund's amphibious rat or the greater marsh rat, is a semiaquatic rat species from southeastern South America.

<i>Pseudoryzomys</i> Genus of rodent from South America with one species

Pseudoryzomys simplex, also known as the Brazilian false rice rat or false oryzomys, is a species of rodent in the family Cricetidae from south-central South America. It is found in lowland palm savanna and thorn scrub habitats. It is a medium-sized species, weighing about 50 grams (1.8 oz), with gray–brown fur, long and narrow hindfeet, and a tail that is about as long as the head and body. The IUCN has assessed its conservation status as being of least concern, although almost nothing is known about its diet or reproduction.

<i>Transandinomys bolivaris</i> Small rodent found from northeastern Honduras to western Ecuador

Transandinomys bolivaris, also known as the long-whiskered rice rat, is a rodent in the family Cricetidae. It is found in humid forest from northeastern Honduras to western Ecuador, up to 1,800 m (5,900 ft) above sea level. Since it was first described in 1901 from Ecuador, six scientific names have been introduced for it, but their common identity was not documented until 1998 and the species has long been known under the name Oryzomys bombycinus, described from Panama in 1912. The name Oryzomys bolivaris was used before it was moved to the new genus Transandinomys with Transandinomys talamancae in 2006.

<i>Oryzomys gorgasi</i> Rodent from the family Cricetidae from northwestern Colombia and Venezuela

Oryzomys gorgasi, also known as Gorgas's oryzomys or Gorgas's rice rat, is a rodent in the genus Oryzomys of family Cricetidae. First recorded in 1967, it is known from only a few localities, including a freshwater swamp in the lowlands of northwestern Colombia and a mangrove islet in northwestern Venezuela. It reportedly formerly occurred on the island of Curaçao off northwestern Venezuela; this extinct population has been described as a separate species, Oryzomys curasoae, but does not differ morphologically from mainland populations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hammond's rice rat</span> Species of rodent in the family Cricetidae from Ecuador

Mindomys hammondi, also known as Hammond's rice rat or Hammond's oryzomys, is an endangered species of rodent in the tribe Oryzomyini of family Cricetidae. Formerly considered to be related with Nectomys, Sigmodontomys, Megalomys, or Oryzomys, it is now placed in then genus Mindomys, but its relationships remain obscure; some evidence supports a placement near Oecomys or as a basal member of Oryzomyini.

<i>Eremoryzomys</i> Rodent species in the family Cricetidae from central Peru

Eremoryzomys polius, also known as the gray rice rat or the Marañon oryzomys, is a rodent species in the tribe Oryzomyini of the family Cricetidae. Discovered in 1912 and first described in 1913 by Wilfred Osgood, it was originally placed in Oryzomys and named Oryzomys polius. In 2006, a cladistic analysis found that it was not closely related to Oryzomys in the strict sense or to any other oryzomyine then known, so that it is now placed in its own genus, Eremoryzomys. The Brazilian genus Drymoreomys, named in 2011, is probably the closest relative of Eremoryzomys. Eremoryzomys has a limited distribution in the dry upper valley of the Marañón River in central Peru, but may yet contain more than one species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oryzomyini</span> Tribe of rodents

Oryzomyini is a tribe of rodents in the subfamily Sigmodontinae of the family Cricetidae. It includes about 120 species in about thirty genera, distributed from the eastern United States to the southernmost parts of South America, including many offshore islands. It is part of the clade Oryzomyalia, which includes most of the South American Sigmodontinae.

<i>Noronhomys</i> Extinct rat species from the islands of Fernando de Noronha off northeastern Brazil

Noronhomys vespuccii, also known as Vespucci's rodent, is an extinct rat species from the islands of Fernando de Noronha off northeastern Brazil. Italian explorer Amerigo Vespucci may have seen it on a visit to Fernando de Noronha in 1503, but it subsequently became extinct, perhaps because of the exotic rats and mice introduced by the first explorers of the island. Numerous but fragmentary fossil remains of the animal, of uncertain but probably Holocene age, were discovered in 1973 and described in 1999.

<i>Thomasomys ucucha</i> Species of rodent from Ecuador

Thomasomys ucucha, also known as the ucucha thomasomys, is a rodent in the genus Thomasomys of the family Cricetidae. It is known only from high altitude forest and grassland habitats in the Cordillera Oriental of Ecuador. Seven other species of Thomasomys live in the same areas. First collected in 1903, T. ucucha was formally described as a new species in 2003 and most closely resembles T. hylophilus, which occurs further to the north. The species is listed as "vulnerable" in the IUCN Red List as a result of habitat destruction.

<i>Carletonomys</i> Extinct genus of rodents

Carletonomys cailoi is an extinct rodent from the Pleistocene (Ensenadan) of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Although known only from a single maxilla with the first molar, its features are so distinctive that it is placed in its own genus, Carletonomys. Discovered in 1998 and formally described in 2008, it is part of a well-defined group of oryzomyine rodents that also includes Holochilus, Noronhomys, Lundomys, and Pseudoryzomys. This group is characterized by progressive semiaquatic specializations and a reduction in the complexity of molar morphology.

<i>Juliomys anoblepas</i> Species of rodent

Juliomys anoblepas is a rodent in the genus Juliomys of the subfamily Sigmodontinae known from a single broken skull. The specimen was collected by Peter Wilhelm Lund in the caves of Lagoa Santa, Minas Gerais, Brazil, in the first half of the 19th century and described by Herluf Winge in 1888 as Calomys anoblepas. The species remained unstudied and its affinities unclear until 2011, when it was recognized as a member of the genus Juliomys, which includes three other species from southern Brazil and nearby Argentina and Paraguay. J. anoblepas is probably a separate extinct species of the genus, which is no longer found at Lagoa Santa.

<i>Transandinomys</i> Genus of small rodents from Central and South America

Transandinomys is a genus of rodents in the tribe Oryzomyini of family Cricetidae. It includes two species—T. bolivaris and T. talamancae—found in forests from Honduras in Central America south and east to southwestern Ecuador and northwestern Venezuela in northern South America. Until 2006, its members were included in the genus Oryzomys, but phylogenetic analysis showed that they are not closely related to the type species of that genus, and they have therefore been placed in a new genus. They may be most closely related to genera like Hylaeamys and Euryoryzomys, which contain very similar species. Both species of Transandinomys have had eventful taxonomic histories.

Nephelomys moerex is a species of rodent in the genus Nephelomys of family Cricetidae. The type locality is at Mindo in western Ecuador, where it has been recorded together with three other rodents of the oryzomyine group, Sigmodontomys aphrastus, Mindomys hammondi, and Handleyomys alfaroi, as well as three opossums, Chironectes minimus and unidentified species of Didelphis and Marmosa. Mindo is a "tiny agricultural community" located at 0°02'S, 78°48'W and 1,264 metres (4,150 ft) above sea level. It was originally described by Oldfield Thomas as a subspecies of Oryzomys albigularis. It remained synonymized under this species until it was recognized as a separate species when the genus Nephelomys was established for Oryzomys albigularis and related species in 2006.

<i>Oecomys sydandersoni</i> Species of rodent

Oecomys sydandersoni is an arboreal species of rodent in the genus Oecomys. It lives in forest patches in a small area in eastern Bolivia. It is a medium-sized species, weighing about 45 g (1.6 oz), with mostly grayish and brownish fur and short and broad hindfeet with well-developed pads.

In anatomy, posterolateral palatal pits are gaps at the sides of the back of the bony palate, near the last molars. Posterolateral palatal pits are present, in various degrees of development, in several members of the rodent family Cricetidae. Many members of the family lack them or have only simple pits, but Arvicolinae and Oryzomyini have more highly developed posterolateral palatal pits. Posterolateral palatal pits are also present in some other rodents, including Glis, Jaculus, Hystrix, Abrocoma, Ctenomys, Chinchilla, and Lagidium.

<i>Agathaeromys</i> Extinct genus of rodents

Agathaeromys is an extinct genus of oryzomyine rodents from the Pleistocene of Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles. Two species are known, which differ in size and some details of tooth morphology. The larger A. donovani, the type species, is known from hundreds of teeth that are probably 900,000 to 540,000 years old, found in four localities. A. praeuniversitatis, the smaller species, is known from 35 teeth found in a single fossil site, which is probably 540,000 to 230,000 years old.

<i>Pennatomys</i> Extinct oryzomyine rodent in the Lesser Antilles

Pennatomys nivalis is an extinct oryzomyine rodent from the islands of Sint Eustatius, Saint Kitts, and Nevis in the Lesser Antilles. The only species in the genus Pennatomys, it is known from skeletal remains found in Amerindian archeological sites on all three islands, with dates ranging from 790–520 BCE to 900–1200 CE. No live specimens are known, but there are several historical records of rodents from Saint Kitts and Nevis that could conceivably refer to Pennatomys. The animal apparently belongs to a group within the tribe Oryzomyini that includes many other island-dwelling species.

<i>Drymoreomys</i> A rodent genus with one species in the family Cricetidae from the Atlantic Forest of Brazil

Drymoreomys is a rodent genus in the tribe Oryzomyini that lives in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. The single species, D. albimaculatus, is known only from the states of São Paulo and Santa Catarina and was not named until 2011. It lives in the humid forest on the eastern slopes of the Serra do Mar and perhaps reproduces year-round. Although its range is relatively large and includes some protected areas, it is patchy and threatened, and the discoverers recommend that the animal be considered "Near Threatened" on the IUCN Red List. Within Oryzomyini, Drymoreomys appears to be most closely related to Eremoryzomys from the Andes of Peru, a biogeographically unusual relationship, in that the two populations are widely separated and each is adapted to an arid or a moist environment.

References

  1. Voss, 1988, p. 271
  2. 1 2 Steppan, 1995, p. 29
  3. Wood, 1935, p. 246
  4. Patterson, 1934, p. 124
  5. Reguero et al., 2007, p. 1305
  6. Voss, 1988, pp. 408–410
  7. Ellerman, 1940, pp. 24–29, 33; Jenkins et al., 2005, p. 427
  8. 1 2 3 4 Carleton and Musser, 2005
  9. Ellerman, 1940, p. 30; Miller and Gidley, 1918, pp. 432–433
  10. Ellerman, 1940, p. 29
  11. Ellerman, 1940, p. 37
  12. Ellerman, 1940, p. 36
  13. Ellerman, 1940, p. 31; Miller and Gidley, 1918, pp. 432–433
  14. Ellerman, 1940, p. 32
  15. 1 2 Ellerman, 1940, p. 33
  16. Ellerman, 1940, p. 35; Ellerman, 1941, pp. 1–2
  17. 1 2 Steppan, 1995, p. 30; Weksler, 2006, p. 32
  18. Steppan, 1995, p. 30; Weksler, 2006, fig. 17
  19. Wood, 1935, p. 246; Ellerman, 1940, p. 34
  20. 1 2 Miller and Gidley, 1918, p. 437; Ellerman, 1940, p. 37
  21. Miller and Gidley, 1918, p. 438; Ellerman, 1940, p. 37
  22. Ellerman, 1941, p. 404
  23. 1 2 3 Musser and Carleton, 2005
  24. Ellerman, 1941, p. 307
  25. Ellerman, 1941, p. 311
  26. Ellerman, 1941, p. 315
  27. 1 2 3 Ellerman, 1941, p. 6
  28. Ellerman, 1941, p. 76
  29. Ellerman, 1941, p. 376
  30. Ellerman, 1941, p. 481
  31. 1 2 Ellerman, 1941, p. 56
  32. 1 2 Tate, 1951, p. 210
  33. Ellerman, 1941, p. 296
  34. Ellerman, 1941, p. 48
  35. Ellerman, 1941, p. 292
  36. Ellerman, 1941, p. 375
  37. Ellerman, 1941, pp. 378, 385, 401, 404
  38. Weksler, 2006, p. 32
  39. Voss, 1988, p. 284
  40. Voss, 1988, pp. 289–290
  41. Voss, 1992, p. 13
  42. Voss, 1992, p. 35
  43. Steppan, 1995, pp. 28–29; D'Elía et al., 2007, pp. 191–192
  44. 1 2 Steppan, 1995, p. 30
  45. Steppan, 1995, p. 72
  46. Patton et al., 2000, p. 162
  47. Ellerman, 1941, p. 367
  48. Ellerman, 1941, p. 330
  49. Ellerman, 1941, p. 426
  50. Ellerman, 1941, p. 407
  51. Ellerman, 1941, p. 422
  52. D'Elía et al., 2007, p. 188
  53. Weksler, 2006, pp. 31–32, fig. 17; Weksler et al., 2006, for nomenclature
  54. Weksler, 2006, p. 128
  55. Osgood, 1933, p. 12; Musser and Carleton, 2005, p. 1121

Literature cited