2011 Ohio Issue 2

Last updated

Issue 2
Issue 2 - Proposed Referendum on Amended Sub. S.B. 5.
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes1,373,72438.41%
Light brown x.svg No2,202,40461.59%
Total votes3,576,128100.00%
Registered voters/turnout7,709,47846.39%

2011 Ohio Issue 2 results map by county.svg
Source: Ohio Secretary of State

The Ohio Collective Bargaining Limit Repeal appeared on the November 8, 2011 general election ballot in the state of Ohio as a veto referendum. Senate Bill 5 (SB5) was repealed by Ohio voters after a campaign by firefighters, police officers and teachers against the measure, [1] which would have limited collective bargaining for public employees in the state. The formal title of the proposal that this measure nullified is Senate Bill 5. Among other provisions, SB 5 would have prevented unions from charging fair share dues to employees who opt out. [2] The process to place the referendum on the ballot for voters to decide was completed by supporters, as signatures were certified by the Ohio Secretary of State. The group behind the referendum effort was the political action committee We Are Ohio.

Contents

Senate Bill 5 would have impacted the state's 400,000 public workers, restricting their ability to strike and collectively bargain. The bill would have limited public employees to collectively bargain for wages, preventing them from collectively bargaining for health insurance and pensions. It would also have prohibited all public employees from striking and could have increased employee contributions for pensions and healthcare.

According to reports, the measure's language was decided on August 3, 2011. A "yes" vote was a vote to keep the law, while a "no" vote was a vote to repeal the law. Interests raised more than $30 million for the campaign.

Path to the ballot

Enactment of SB 5

The Ohio State Senate passed Senate Bill 5 with a vote of 17-16, sending the measure to the Ohio House of Representatives for a similar vote. According to reports, on March 28, 2011, the chamber was preparing to vote on the proposal. State Representative Bob Hagan stated that the measure was most likely going to be voted on by March 30, 2011 [3] [4] On that day, Senate Bill 5 passed the House by a margin of 53-44. The house-modified bill was referred back to the senate where it was approved before being sent to the Governor's desk. It was then signed into law on March 31, 2011 [5] [6]

Referendum process

Supporters collected about 3,000 signatures during the weekend of April 1, 2011, more than enough to turn in to the Ohio Secretary of State's office for the first step of the referendum process. A minimum of 1,000 valid signatures are required to launch a referendum. The first batch was turned in on April 4, 2011, according to reports. The Secretary of State verified the submitted signatures on April 15, 2011. The verification launched the second part of the referendum process. [7] [8]

According to state law, referendum supporters have until June 30, 2011, 90 days after the targeted law is signed by the state governor, to collect additional signatures. A total of 231,149 signatures must be collected from registered voters; equal to 6 percent of the total number of voters in the 2010 gubernatorial election. Additionally, those signatures must come from at least half of the 88 counties in the state. [9]

The Ohio Secretary of State had until July 26, 2011 to verify signatures once they were turned in. [10]

The proposal then went to the Ohio Ballot Board Archived 2011-10-06 at the Wayback Machine . The board then had total control over how the measure will be presented to voters. [11]

Signature gathering

On June 17, 2011, less than two weeks before the petition drive deadline, supporters announced the collection of 714,137 signatures. Previously, on May 20, 2011, supporters claimed that they had collected approximately 214,000 signatures. We Are Ohio spokeswoman Melissa Fazekas stated that a sampling of those signatures showed a validation rate of about 60 percent. According to reports, the group must collect 400,000 signatures at that rate in order for the measure to make the ballot. According to Fazekas at the time: "Our goal is to collect between 450,000 and 500,000 [signatures]." [12] [13]

Signature submission

In a record breaking performance, referendum proponents submitted a grand total of 1,298,301 signatures to the Ohio Secretary of State on June 29, 2011 in a parade marching towards the secretary's offices. This breaks the previously held record of 812,978 signatures in 2008 for a constitutional amendment allowing a casino resort in Clinton County. [14]

Signature verification

According to Matt McClellan, spokesperson for the Ohio Secretary of State: "The next step the signatures have to be verified. The secretary's office receives the petitions and we will take an inventory of them. Then we send them out to the proper county boards of election. They have the signatures on file." [15]

44 of the state's counties must have three percent of the signatures of those who voted in the 2010 gubernatorial election.

According to reports as of July 17, 2011, the proponents appeared to have enough signatures for the ballot. Although not all numbers had been verified, some counties recorded a high amount of verification rates. [16]

The proposal was then certified on July 21, 2011 by the Ohio Secretary of State.

Of the more than 1.3 million signatures submitted by supporters, the secretary of state's office certified 915,456 for an approximately 70.5% validation rate. The Ballot Board, which is given the responsibility of crafting ballot language, met on August 3, 2011. [17] [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California ballot proposition</span> Statewide referendum item in California

In California, a ballot proposition is a referendum or an initiative measure that is submitted to the electorate for a direct decision or direct vote. If passed, it can alter one or more of the articles of the Constitution of California, one or more of the 29 California Codes, or another law in the California Statutes by clarifying current or adding statute(s) or removing current statute(s).

In the politics of the United States, the process of initiatives and referendums allow citizens of many U.S. states to place new legislation, or to place legislation that has recently been passed by a legislature on a ballot for a popular vote. Initiatives and referendums, along with recall elections and popular primary elections, are signature reforms of the Progressive Era; they are written into several state constitutions, particularly in the West. It is a form of direct democracy.

Robert F. Hagan is an American politician and member of the Democratic Party who held a seat in the Ohio House of Representatives for the 58th District from 2007 to 2014. He represented the same seat from 1987 to 1997, and served in the Ohio Senate from 1997 to 2006.

Electoral reform in Virginia refers to efforts to change the electoral system in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Virginia has undergone much electoral change since its settling in 1607, many of which were required by federal legislation. However, it remains a relatively conservative state in this respect compared to California and others which have experimented with various alternative systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in Oregon</span> Overview of the procedure of elections in the U.S. state of Oregon

Elections in Oregon are all held using a Vote by Mail (VBM) system. This means that all registered voters receive their ballots via postal delivery and can vote from their homes. A state Voters’ Pamphlet is mailed to every household in Oregon about three weeks before each statewide election. It includes information about each measure and candidate in the upcoming election.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Maine since December 29, 2012. A bill for the legalization of same-sex marriages was approved by voters, 53–47 percent, on November 6, 2012, as Maine, Maryland and Washington became the first U.S. states to legalize same-sex marriage by popular vote. Election results were certified by the Maine Secretary of State's office and the Governor of Maine, Paul LePage, on November 29.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Washington Referendum 71</span> LGBT rights referendum

The 2009 Washington Referendum 71 (R-71) legalized domestic partnership in Washington state, the first statewide referendum in the United States that extended to LGBT people the rights and responsibility of domestic partnership. The bill had passed State Legislature, and it was signed into law by the Governor in May 2009, but opponents gathered enough signatures to put the measure before the voters, who returned ballots by mail over three weeks ending on November 3, 2009, approving the measure 53% to 47%. The new law went into effect 30 days later, on December 3, 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matt Huffman</span> American politician (born 1960)

Matt Huffman is an American politician serving as a member of the Ohio Senate, representing the 12th district since 2017, while concurrently serving as the Ohio Senate President as a Republican. The district includes Allen, Champaign, Mercer and Shelby counties, as well as parts of Auglaize, Darke and Logan counties.

The No Sales Tax for Alcohol Question, also known as Question 1, was on the November 2, 2010 ballot in Massachusetts. The measure asked voters whether to repeal a sales tax on alcohol sales. The ballot measure for the 2010 ballot was added after the Massachusetts State Legislature increased the sales tax in the state from 5% to 6.25% and eliminated an exemption for alcohol sold in liquor stores.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Maine Question 1</span> Referendum on same-sex marriage

Maine Question 1 was a voter referendum conducted in Maine in the United States in 2009 that rejected a law legalizing same-sex marriage in the state. The measure passed 53–47% on November 3, 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2011 Wisconsin Senate recall elections</span> Elections during 2011 in Wisconsin, United States

Recall elections for nine Wisconsin state senators were held during the summer of 2011; one was held on July 19, and six on August 9, with two more held on August 16. Voters attempted to put 16 state senators up for recall, eight Democrats and eight Republicans, because of the budget bill proposed by Governor Scott Walker and circumstances surrounding it. Republicans targeted Democrats for leaving the state for three weeks to prevent the bill from receiving a vote, while Democrats targeted Republicans for voting to significantly limit public employee collective bargaining. Scholars could cite only three times in American history when more than one state legislator has been recalled at roughly the same time over the same issue.

Fair, Accurate, Inclusive, and Respectful Education Act, also known as the FAIR Education Act and informally described by media outlets as the LGBT History Bill, is a California law which compels the inclusion of the political, economic, and social contributions of persons with disabilities and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people into educational textbooks and the social studies curricula in California public schools by amending the California Education Code. It also revises the previous designation of "black Americans, American Indians, Mexicans, Asians, [and] Pacific Island people" into a list considered Indigenous peoples of the Americas. It would also amend an existing law by adding sexual orientation and religion into a list of characteristics that schools are prohibited from sponsoring negative activities about or teaching students about in an adverse way.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frank LaRose</span> Ohio Secretary of State

Frank LaRose is an American politician. He was elected Secretary of State of Ohio in 2019. He was a Republican member of the Ohio State Senate for two terms, from January 2011 to January 2019. He is a candidate for the U.S. Senate in the 2024 election, challenging incumbent Senator Sherrod Brown.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 Maine Question 1</span> Referendum on same-sex marriage

Maine Question 1 was a voter referendum on an initiated state statute that occurred on November 6, 2012. The referendum was held to determine whether or not to legalize same-sex marriage. The referendum passed with a 53-47% vote legalizing same-sex marriage in Maine.

The Massachusetts Automatic Gas Tax Increase Repeal Initiative, Question 1 was on the November 4, 2014 statewide ballot. Approved by voters, the measure repeals a 2013 law that would automatically adjust gas taxes according to inflation, allowing for automatic annual increases in the state's gas tax.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">June 2018 Maine Question 1</span>

Maine Question 1 was a people's veto referendum that appeared on the June 12, 2018 statewide ballot. It sought to reject a law passed by the Maine Legislature that suspended the implementation of ranked choice voting, authorized by Maine voters in a previous referendum, for use in Maine elections until and if an amendment to the Maine Constitution is passed to expressly permit it; failing that, the law would be automatically repealed in 2021. It qualified because supporters of the original referendum collected the necessary number of signatures from registered Maine voters. This vote coincided with primary elections in which party nominees for governor, U.S. Senate, U.S. House, and the Maine Legislature were chosen through RCV to run in general elections on November 6.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2011 Maine Question 1</span>

Maine Question 1, "Do you want to reject the section of Chapter 399 of the Public Laws of 2011 that requires new voters to register to vote at least two business days prior to an election?", was a 2011 people's veto referendum that rejected a bill repealing Election Day voter registration in Maine. The vote was held on November 8, 2011 after being placed on the ballot due to supporters collecting the necessary number of signatures. The veto effort was successful, with 237,024 votes in favor of repeal to 155,156 against repeal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 California Proposition 6</span> Failed amendment to the Constitution of California

California Proposition 6 was a measure that was submitted to California voters as part of the November 2018 election. The ballot measure proposed a repeal of the Road Repair and Accountability Act, which is also known as Senate Bill 1. The measure failed with about 57% of the voters against and 43% in favor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 Illinois elections</span>

A general election was held in the U.S. state of Illinois on November 8, 2022. The elections for United States Senate and United States House of Representatives, Governor, statewide constitutional officers, Illinois Senate, and Illinois House were held on this date.

References

  1. "Ohio Voters Overwhelmingly Reject Issue Two - :: Cincinnati news story :: LOCAL 12 WKRC-TV in Cincinnati". www.local12.com. Archived from the original on November 11, 2011. Retrieved June 6, 2022.
  2. Naymik, Mark (April 3, 2011). "Ohio's Senate Bill 5 will bring dramatic changes". The Plain Dealer . Archived from the original on November 9, 2011. Retrieved November 7, 2011.
  3. Vargas-Cooper, Natasha (March 16, 2011). "In Ohio, Labor Rallies for Referendum Against Anti-Union Bill". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on June 6, 2021. Retrieved October 7, 2021.
  4. Business-Journal.com, "Ohio House Prepares to Vote on SB 5", March 28, 2011 [ permanent dead link ]
  5. Guillen, Joe; Dealer, The Plain (March 30, 2011). "Opponents, supporters gear up for Senate Bill 5 referendum". cleveland. Archived from the original on April 11, 2021. Retrieved October 7, 2021.
  6. "Cincinnati, "Ohio House approves Senate Bill 5," March 30, 2011". Archived from the original on April 5, 2012. Retrieved October 7, 2021.
  7. "The Columbus Dispatch, "SB 5 opponents move swiftly to get referendum on ballot", April 4, 2011". Archived from the original on April 8, 2011. Retrieved October 11, 2011.
  8. "WTAM.com, "SB5 ballot referendum moves forward", April 15, 2011". Archived from the original on October 21, 2011. Retrieved October 11, 2011.
  9. Business Journal, "S.B. 5 Vote in 2011 Helps GOP in 2012", March 4, 2011 [ permanent dead link ]
  10. "The People's Defender, "Petitions circulating to repeal SB 5", April 30, 2011". Archived from the original on November 9, 2011. Retrieved October 11, 2011.
  11. "Columbus Dispatch, "Multiple choice for SB 5 vote?", June 23, 2011". Archived from the original on June 26, 2011. Retrieved October 11, 2011.
  12. "Twinsburg Bulletin". Akron Beacon Journal. Archived from the original on July 26, 2021. Retrieved October 7, 2021.
  13. "weareohio.com, "We Are Ohio Announces New Petition Signature Totals", June 17, 2011". Archived from the original on July 28, 2011. Retrieved October 11, 2011.
  14. "SB 5 opponents submit petition". The Blade. Archived from the original on January 14, 2021. Retrieved October 7, 2021.
  15. "Next step for Senate Bill 5 petitions". The Tribune. June 30, 2011. Archived from the original on October 7, 2021. Retrieved October 7, 2021.
  16. "The Columbus Dispatch, "Count on SB 5 being on ballot", July 17, 2011". Archived from the original on July 19, 2011. Retrieved October 11, 2011.
  17. Schwartz, Brian (July 21, 2011). "Secretary of State certifies S.B. 5 referendum signatures". WNWO. Archived from the original on October 7, 2021. Retrieved October 7, 2021.
  18. "The Columbus Dispatch, "Hearing on SB 5 ballot language scheduled", July 26, 2011".[ permanent dead link ]

Further reading