International piracy law

Last updated

International piracy law is international law that is meant to protect against piracy. Throughout history and legal precedents, pirates have been defined as hostis humani generis, Latin for "the enemy of all mankind". [1] The United Nations has codified much of the law in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which defines different types of piracy and ways to combat it.

Contents

Piracy threatens maritime security and the legitimate uses of the seas for peaceful purposes [2] and the freedom of navigation (freedom of the seas, Mare Liberum ). [3] All ships and countries are free to trade and navigate the oceans, a right which is threatened by piracy. [4] A 2008 report by the International Maritime Organization found 4,821 incidents of modern piracy and maritime armed robbery in the period 1984 to 2008. [5] In these incidents, 6 crew were killed, 42 assaulted, 774 held hostage and 38 crew are unaccounted for. [5]

Piracy law as codified in UNCLOS

UNCLOS maritime zones UNCLOS Maritime Zones .png
UNCLOS maritime zones

UNCLOS codified the laws of piracy in Articles 100 to 110. [6] Article 108 is not strictly piracy law, but for the suppression of illicit traffic of narcotic drugs at sea. [6] Article 109 on pirate broadcasting by 'radio transmission' is considered an out-dated,[ by whom? ] or grandfather clause. [7] The piracy articles of UNCLOS replicate Articles 14 to 21 of the 1958 Geneva Convention on the High Seas. [8] It has been ratified by 168 states and there are 157 signatories (accepted but not signed). [9] The treaty is accepted as customary international law. [10]

The flag state normally has jurisdiction and responsibility for a vessel on the high seas. [4] The term hostis humani generis (enemy of all mankind) was applied to pirates in the 1927 Lotus case of the Permanent Court of International Justice, the League of Nations equivalent of the International Court of Justice. [8] As such, there is universal jurisdiction over piracy on the high seas. Pirates are denied protection of the flag state and all states have the right to seize a pirate ship on the high seas and to prosecute in national courts. [10]

Harvard Draft Convention on Piracy

The 1932 Convention of Piracy was provided as one of the thirteen commentaries presented in the 1930 League of Nations Codification Conference on International Law. It held piracy as not a crime against the law of nations; giving faith to the jurisdiction of individual states to repress piracy. [11]

Influences

The 1958 Geneva Convention on the High Seas had drawn on the research of the Harvard Draft. [12] The definition of piracy was adopted from the Geneva Convention unto the UNCLOS definition of Piracy verbatim. [2] To this day, the Harvard Draft adds to the debate of what constitutes piracy. [13]

Defining piracy

The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea defines in Article 101 (Definition of Piracy): [6]

Piracy consists of any of the following acts:

(a) any illegal acts of violence or detention, or any act of depredation, committed for private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or a private aircraft, and directed:
(i) on the high seas, against another ship or aircraft, or against persons or property on board such ship or aircraft;
(ii) against a ship, aircraft, persons or property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any State;
(b) any act of voluntary participation in the operation of a ship or of an aircraft with knowledge of facts making it a pirate ship or aircraft;
(c) any act of inciting or of intentionally facilitating an act described in subparagraph (a) or (b).

Piracy on the high seas

The 1958 Geneva Convention on the High Seas states that piracy occurs on the high seas. [10] Article 101(1)(a) of the UNCLOS definition also states that piracy occurs on the high seas. [6] Referring to Article 58(2) of UNCLOS shows that piracy can also occur in the exclusive economic zone. [10] Violent acts against ships in the territorial sea of any State cannot be piracy under international law. [14] Violent acts in the territorial sea are armed robbery under the law of the International Maritime Organization. [15]

Ships have been captured off the coast of Somalia and crews held for ransom since the 1990s, with armed groups in the territorial sea and the government unable to enforce the law. [10] Somali pirates attacked ships carrying humanitarian supplies to the Somali population. [10] [16]

The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1816 on Piracy in Somalia provided an exception, that piracy could occur in the Territorial Sea of Somalia. [17] This allowed states to cooperate with the Transitional Federal Government of Somalia in order to suppress piracy. [17] Resolution 1816 meant that a ship could chase a pirate vessel in a “reverse hot pursuit”, from the high seas into the territorial sea of Somalia. [18]

Two-ship requirement

The condition in Article 101(a)(i) UNCLOS definition is known as the “two-ship” requirement. [19] In the 1961 Santa Maria hijacking of a Portuguese passenger ship, the perpetrators were already on board posing as passengers, so there were not two ships. [20] Their motives were solely political. [20] Although there was extreme violence this did not meet the UNCLOS piracy definition of motivation ( mens rea ) for “private ends”. [20]

In the 1985 Achille Lauro hijacking the ship was captured in the Mediterranean by Palestinian Extremists who were already on board. [19] Although there was violence on board the ship, because there were not 'two ships' this could not be seen as piracy. [19] After this, the International Maritime Organization developed the 1988 Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation (SUA Convention). [21] The 1988 SUA Convention and its 2005 Protocol are United Nations treaties. [21]

Maritime environmental activism

Greenpeace ship Arctic Sunrise. Adventfjorden Greenpeace IMG 2861 Arctic Sunrise.jpg
Greenpeace ship Arctic Sunrise.

In the 2013 case Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation Society , a United States district court held that the actions of Sea Shepherd vessels against Japanese whaling vessels fell within the UNCLOS piracy definition of 'private ends'. [22]

In the 1986 case Castle John v. NV Mabeco, the court[ which? ] ruled that a Greenpeace vessel committed piracy in acts against a Dutch Vessel, which was discharging waste at sea. [22] The court ruled that Greenpeace motivation to 'alert the public of harmful discharge to the environment' fell within the UNCLOS piracy definition of 'private ends.' [22]

In the Arctic Sunrise case before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, the Greenpeace ship Arctic Sunrise staged protests in the waters of the Russian Exclusive Economic Zone, centred around the oil platform Prirazlomnoya. [23] The crew were initially charged with piracy, but the charge was later dropped by Russia. [23]

Other measures against piracy

UNSC resolutions

United Nations Security Council Resolutions on Somalia Piracy United Nations Security Council Resolution 2015.pdf
United Nations Security Council Resolutions on Somalia Piracy

The collapse of the Somali State in the 1990s opened the region to illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU), as well as the unregulated disposal of toxic waste by rich States. [24] Somalia Pirates claim that they take to the seas in order to protect pillaged local resources, and in response to lost income. [10] A series of UNSC Resolutions concerned piracy in Somalia. The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1918 adopted in 2010, called on States to establish national piracy laws and to prosecute Somalia pirates. [25]

Soft law

The Contact Group on Piracy of the Coast of Somalia (CGPCS) brings together States and International organisations, aiming for a holistic response to the root causes of piracy. [24] The International Maritime Organisation Djibouti Code of Conduct (DCoC) is a soft law approach, where Arab and African States collaborate in maritime security responses to piracy and armed robbery. [24] The Shared Awareness and Deconfliction Mechanism (SHADE) was set up in 2008 as an informal forum for States and Organisations to collaborate on counter-piracy measures off the Horn of Africa. [24]

Maritime domain awareness

An integrated understanding of threats at sea has been labelled maritime domain awareness. [26] Coordination between international naval operations, defensive actions of the shipping industry and agreements such as the CGPCS and the DCoC have contributed to repressing piracy and armed robbery. [27] Three regional agreements to combat piracy are the DCoC, the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combatting Piracy and armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP) and The Yaounde Code of Conduct (YCoC). [27] The regional agreements enabled development of best practices to combat piracy and global transfer of expertise. [27] The Jeddah Amendment to the DCoC included other illicit maritime activities and is a possible model for integrated maritime security, beyond its regional scope. [27]

Private security and insurance

Private insurance has been seen as a guarantee of certainty and security, but it also has a moral economy of risk. [28] For centuries Lloyd's of London has offered marine insurance and underwritten piracy risk. [28] The nature of the peril of piracy requires specialist underwriting to match the level of risk with the premium. [28] With ship ransoms of US$3 million per ship, armed security teams offered to transit with ships in heightened risk areas at a cost of US$60,000 for a team of four. [29] From 2005 Piracy has been managed by the marine war branch of Lloyd's, the Joint War Committee (JWC). [28] Lloyd's insurance of piracy is a governance mechanism. [28]

Law of kidnap and ransom

The 1979 Hostages Convention is an international treaty against the taking of hostages. [30] The 1998 SUA Convention and its 2005 Protocol similarly address acts of terrorism. [9] The offence of hostage taking is the seizure and detention and threat to kill, injure and detain a hostage. [30] Under the 1988 SUA Convention it is an offence to seize control of a ship by force and act with violence against a person on the ship. [30]

These three conventions apply to piracy off Somalia, as there is intention to hold the crew hostage for ransom and to seize a ship violently. [30] State parties must take offenders into custody for trial or extradition, but this is only allowed in the territorial sea. [30] Pirates seized in the territorial sea of Somalia can be delivered to Kenya for trial and prosecution under the transfer rules of the SUA Convention. [30]

Any persons assisting or accomplance to an offence, under the SUA Convention, of seizing a ship can be prosecuted. [21] The UNCLOS definition of piracy in Article 101 indicates that conspiracy to, or aiding and abetting piracy could be prosecuted. [6] There are very few cases of prosecution on the grounds of aiding piracy. [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piracy</span> Act of robbery or criminality at sea

Piracy is an act of robbery or criminal violence by ship or boat-borne attackers upon another ship or a coastal area, typically with the goal of stealing cargo and other valuable goods. Those who conduct acts of piracy are called pirates, vessels used for piracy are pirate ships. The earliest documented instances of piracy were in the 14th century BC, when the Sea Peoples, a group of ocean raiders, attacked the ships of the Aegean and Mediterranean civilisations. Narrow channels which funnel shipping into predictable routes have long created opportunities for piracy, as well as for privateering and commerce raiding. Historic examples include the waters of Gibraltar, the Strait of Malacca, Madagascar, the Gulf of Aden, and the English Channel, whose geographic structures facilitated pirate attacks. The term piracy generally refers to maritime piracy, although the term has been generalized to refer to acts committed on land, in the air, on computer networks, and outer space. Piracy usually excludes crimes committed by the perpetrator on their own vessel, as well as privateering, which implies authorization by a state government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International waters</span> Water outside of national jurisdiction

The terms international waters or transboundary waters apply where any of the following types of bodies of water transcend international boundaries: oceans, large marine ecosystems, enclosed or semi-enclosed regional seas and estuaries, rivers, lakes, groundwater systems (aquifers), and wetlands.

Maritime security is an umbrella term informed to classify issues in the maritime domain that are often related to national security, marine environment, economic development, and human security. This includes the world's oceans but also regional seas, territorial waters, rivers and ports, where seas act as a “stage for geopolitical power projection, interstate warfare or militarized disputes, as a source of specific threats such as piracy, or as a connector between states that enables various phenomena from colonialism to globalization”. The theoretical concept of maritime security has evolved from a narrow perspective of national naval power projection towards a buzzword that incorporates many interconnected sub-fields. The definition of the term maritime security varies and while no internationally agreed definition exists, the term has often been used to describe both existing, and new regional and international challenges to the maritime domain. The buzzword character enables international actors to discuss these new challenges without the need to define every potentially contested aspect of it. Maritime security is of increasing concern to the global shipping industry, where there are a wide range of security threats and challenges. Some of the practical issues clustered under the term of maritime security include crimes such as piracy, armed robbery at sea, trafficking of people and illicit goods, illegal fishing or marine pollution. War, warlike activity, maritime terrorism and interstate rivalry are also maritime security concerns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piracy Act 1837</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Piracy Act 1837 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It abolished the death penalty for most offences of piracy, but created a new offence often known as piracy with violence, which was punishable with death. This offence still exists in the United Kingdom and in the Republic of Ireland, but is no longer punishable by death in either country.

Maritime Security Regimes are codes and conventions of behavior agreed upon by coastal states to provide a degree of security within territorial waters and on the high seas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piracy in the Gulf of Guinea</span>

Piracy in the Gulf of Guinea affects a number of countries in West Africa as well as the wider international community. By 2011, it had become an issue of global concern. Pirates in the Gulf of Guinea are often part of heavily armed criminal enterprises, who employ violent methods to steal oil cargo. In 2012, the International Maritime Bureau, Oceans Beyond Piracy and the Maritime Piracy Humanitarian Response Program reported that the number of vessels attacks by West African pirates had reached a world high, with 966 seafarers attacked during the year. According to the Control Risks Group, pirate attacks in the Gulf of Guinea had by mid-November 2013 maintained a steady level of around 100 attempted hijackings in the year, a close second behind the Strait of Malacca in Southeast Asia. Piracy in the Gulf of Guinea continues to be a concern to the shipping industry, which is affected significantly. At the same time, governments in the region generally highlight that the fight against piracy requires a broad understanding of maritime security throughout the Gulf of Guinea.

Piracy off the coast of Somalia occurs in the Gulf of Aden, Guardafui Channel and Somali Sea, in Somali territorial waters and other surrounding places and has a long and troubled history with different perspectives from different communities. It was initially a threat to international fishing vessels, expanding to international shipping since the consolidation of states phase of the Somali Civil War around 2000.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Security Council Resolution 1918</span> United Nations Security Council resolution

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1918, adopted unanimously on April 27, 2010, after recalling resolutions 1814 (2008), 1816 (2008), 1838 (2008), 1844 (2008), 1846 (2008), 1851 (2008) and 1897 (2008) on Somalia, the Council called on countries to criminalise piracy within their national laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Security Council Resolution 1950</span> United Nations resolution adopted in 2010

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1950, adopted unanimously on November 23, 2010, after recalling previous resolutions on the situation in Somalia, including resolutions 1814 (2008), 1816 (2008), 1838 (2008), 1844 (2008), 1846 (2008), 1851 (2008), 1897 (2009) and 1918 (2010); the Council re-authorised states to intervene in acts of piracy by Somali pirates at sea for a further period of twelve months.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piracy in the 21st century</span> Piracy by period

Piracy in the 21st century has taken place in a number of waters around the world, including the Gulf of Guinea, Strait of Malacca, Sulu and Celebes Seas, Indian Ocean, and Falcon Lake.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piracy in the Sulu and Celebes Seas</span> Historical and contemporary piracy in the waters between Borneo and the western Philippines

The Sulu and Celebes Seas, a semi-enclosed sea area and porous region that covers an area of space around 1 million square kilometres, have been subject to illegal maritime activities since the pre-colonial era and continue to pose a maritime security threat to bordering nations up to this day. While piracy has long been identified as an ubiquitous challenge, being historically interwoven with the region, recent incidents also include other types of maritime crimes such as kidnapping and the trafficking of humans, arms and drugs. Attacks mostly classify as 'armed robbery against ships' according to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea as they occur in maritime zones that lie under the sovereignty of a coastal state. Incidents in the Sulu and Celebes Seas specifically involve the abduction of crew members. Since March 2016, the Information Sharing Centre (ISC) of the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP) reports a total of 86 abuctions, leading to the issue of a warning for ships transpassing the area.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1897 was unanimously adopted on 30 November 2009.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1816 was unanimously adopted on 2 June 2008.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1846 was unanimously adopted on 2 December 2008.

In keeping with the Paris Principles definition of a child soldier, the Roméo Dallaire Child Soldiers Initiative defines a child pirate as any person below 18 years of age who is or who has been recruited or used by a pirate gang in any capacity, including children – boys and/or girls – used as gunmen in boarding parties, hostage guards, negotiators, ship captains, messengers, spies or for sexual purposes, whether at sea or on land. It does not only refer to a child who is taking or has taken a direct part in kinetic criminal operations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Offshore installation security</span>

Offshore installation security is the protection of maritime installations from intentional harm. As part of general maritime security, offshore installation security is defined as the installation's ability to combat unauthorized acts designed to cause intentional harm to the installation. The security of offshore installations is vital as not only may a threat result in personal, economic, and financial losses, but it also concerns the strategic aspects of the petroleum market and geopolitics.

Maritime terrorism in Southeast Asia refers to acts of extreme maritime violence committed with political motives within the Southeast Asian region. Despite seaborne terrorist attacks accounting for only 2% of all international terrorist incidents from 1978 to 2008, according to RAND's Terrorism Database, Southeast Asia has proven a hotbed of maritime terrorism. Due to the high frequency of pirates in the region, many Southeast Asian-based terrorist groups have appropriated piratical tactics in carrying out their violent political struggles. In 2003, the International Maritime Bureau reported that out of the 445 actual or attempted piratical attacks on merchant vessels, 189 occurred in Southeast Asia, which was more cases than either Africa or Latin America, with 121 attacks occurring in Indonesian waters and 35 attacks occurring in Malaysian and Singaporean waters. In 2004, while the number of actual and attempted attacks fell to 325, Southeast Asia remained at the top of the regional rankings, with 93 incidents occurring in Indonesian waters. Between 2014 and 2018, 242 attacks occurred in Southeast Asia, with the majority occurring in Indonesian waters. The most popular weapons of choice among Southeast Asian maritime terrorists have been explosive devices and firearms, which were used in roughly 60% of maritime attacks in the region.

As a practice of piracy, petro-piracy, also sometimes called oil piracy or petrol piracy, is defined as “illegal taking of oil after vessel hijacks, which are sometimes executed with the use of motorships” with huge potential financial rewards. Petro-piracy is mostly a practice that is connected to and originates from piracy in the Gulf of Guinea, but examples of petro-piracy outside of the Gulf of Guinea is not uncommon. At least since 2008, the Gulf of Guinea has been home to pirates practicing petro-piracy by targeting the region's extensive oil industry. Piracy in the Gulf of Guinea has risen in the last years to become the hot spot of piracy globally with 76 actual and attempted attacks, according to the International Maritime Bureau (IMB). Most of these attacks in the Gulf of Guinea take place in inland or territorial waters, but recently pirates have been proven to venture further out to sea, e.g. crew members were kidnapped from the tanker David B. 220 nautical miles outside of Benin. Pirates most often targets vessels carrying oil products and kidnappings of crew for ransom. IMB reports that countries in the Gulf of Guinea, Angola, Benin, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Ghana, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Togo, Congo, and, especially, Nigeria, have experienced petro-piracy and kidnappings of crew as the most common trends of piracy attacks in the Gulf of Guinea.

Piracy kidnappings occur during piracy, when people are kidnapped by pirates or taken hostage. Article 1 of the United Nations International Convention against the Taking of Hostages defines a hostage-taker as "any person who seizes or detains and threatens to kill, to injure, or to continue to detain another person in order to compel a third party namely, a State, an international intergovernmental organization, a natural or Juridical person, or a group of people, to do or abstain from doing any act as an explicit or implicit condition tor the release of the hostage commits the offense of taking of hostages ("hostage-taking") within the meaning of this Convention." Kidnappers often try to obtain the largest financial reward possible in exchange for hostages, but piracy kidnappings can also be politically motivated.

References

  1. Shearer, I. (2010). "Piracy". Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law.
  2. 1 2 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Part VII, High Seas, Section I, General Provisions, Article 88. United Nations. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  3. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Part VII, High Seas, Section 1, General Provisions, Article 87. United Nations. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  4. 1 2 UNCLOS, Part VII, High Seas, Section 1 General Provisions, Article 92. United Nations. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
  5. 1 2 Report on Acts of Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships, Annual Report -2008. International Maritime Organisation. Retrieved 30 April 2020.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 UNCLOS, Part VII, High Seas, Section 1, General Provisions, Articles 100 to 110. United Nations. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  7. Tiroch, K. (2010), ‘Pirate Broadcasting’, Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law, Oxford Public International Law, Oxford University Press.
  8. 1 2 Beckham, C.R. 2012, The Piracy Regime under UNCLOS: problems and prospects for cooperation, in Beckham, C.R. and Roach, J.A. Piracy and International Maritime Crimes for ASEAN: Prospects for Cooperation, Edward Elgar Publishing, UK, pp. 17-37.
  9. 1 2 Status as at 18-5-2020, 6. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. United Nations. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Treves, T. 2013, Piracy and the International Law of the Sea, in Guilfoyle (ed.) Modern Piracy: Legal Challenges and Responses, Edward Elgar Publishing, UK, pp. 117-146.
  11. Rubin, Alfred P. (1 January 1988). "The Law of Piracy. By Alfred P. Rubin. Newport, R.I.: Naval War College Press, 1988. Pp. xiv, 444. Indexes. $22". American Journal of International Law. 84 (2): 620–622. doi:10.2307/2203491. ISSN   0002-9300. JSTOR   2203491. S2CID   246010971 via Digital Commons.
  12. Bellish, Jon (2012-09-19). "Breaking News from 1932: Pirate Facilitators Must Be Physically Present on the High Seas". EJIL: Talk!. Retrieved 2022-05-05.
  13. Birnie, P.W. (July 1987). "Piracy Past, Present, Future". Marine Policy. 11 (3): 163–183. doi:10.1016/0308-597x(87)90054-6. ISSN   0308-597X via Elsevier Science Direct.
  14. Guilfoyle, D. (2013), ‘Policy tensions and the legal regime governing piracy’ in Guilfoyle (ed.) Modern Piracy: Legal Challenges and Responses, Edward Elgar Publishing, UK, pp. 325 to 336.
  15. Code of Practice for the Investigation of Crimes of Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships, 2019. International Maritime Organization. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
  16. This was the 2009 Maersk Alabama hijacking, which was the basis for the film Captain Phillips . A Danish thriller film about Somali piracy is the 2012 A Hijacking . Another movie is the 2017 The Pirates of Somalia .
  17. 1 2 United Nations Security Council Resolution 1816 (2018). United Nations. Retrieved 24 April 2020.
  18. Treves, T. (2013), ‘Piracy and the International law of the sea’ in Guilfoyle (ed.) Modern Piracy: Legal Challenges and Responses, Edward Elgar Publishing, UK, pp. 117 to 146.
  19. 1 2 3 Geib, R. and Petrig, A. 2011, Piracy and Armed Robbery at Sea: The Legal Framework for Counter-Piracy Operations in Somalia and the Gulf of Aden, Oxford University Press, New York.
  20. 1 2 3 Shearer, I. (2010), ‘Piracy’, Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law, Oxford Public International Law, Oxford University Press.  
  21. 1 2 3 Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf. International Maritime Organization. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
  22. 1 2 3 Rae, C. (2014), ‘Are Environmental Activists Pirates?’, Precedent, Jan/Feb, Issue 120, pp. 28 to 31.
  23. 1 2 The Arctic Sunrise Case (Kingdom of The Netherlands v. Russian Federation. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Retrieved 15 March 2020.
  24. 1 2 3 4 Bueger, C. and Edmunds, T. 2017, 'Beyond Sea Blindness: A New Agenda for Maritime Security Studies', International Affairs 93(6), pp. 1293-1311
  25. UNSC Resolution 1918 (2010). United Nations. Retrieved 24 April 2020.
  26. Bueger, C. 2015, From Dusk to Dawn? Maritime Domain Awareness in SouthEast Asia, Contemporary SouthEast Asia, 37(2) pp. 157-182.
  27. 1 2 3 4 Menzel, A. 2017, Institutional adoption and maritime crime governance: the Djiboui Code of Conduct, Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 14(2), pp. 152-169.
  28. 1 2 3 4 5 Lobo-Guerrero, L. 2012, Lloyds and the Moral Economy of Insuring Against Piracy, Journal of Cultural Economy, 5(1), pp. 67-83.
  29. Norris, B. 2010, Buyers and Insurers seek options as piracy risk leaps, Commercial Risk Europe: European Insurance and War Management News, 22 August,
  30. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Roach, J.A. 2010, Global Convention on Piracy, Ship-Jacking, Hostage-Taking and Maritime Terrorism, US Department of State CIL Workshop on Maritime Crimes, Session 3, 17 Jan 2011. Retrieved 5 May 2020.

See also