Fibred category

Last updated

Fibred categories (or fibered categories) are abstract entities in mathematics used to provide a general framework for descent theory. They formalise the various situations in geometry and algebra in which inverse images (or pull-backs) of objects such as vector bundles can be defined. As an example, for each topological space there is the category of vector bundles on the space, and for every continuous map from a topological space X to another topological space Y is associated the pullback functor taking bundles on Y to bundles on X. Fibred categories formalise the system consisting of these categories and inverse image functors. Similar setups appear in various guises in mathematics, in particular in algebraic geometry, which is the context in which fibred categories originally appeared. Fibered categories are used to define stacks, which are fibered categories (over a site) with "descent". Fibrations also play an important role in categorical semantics of type theory, and in particular that of dependent type theories.

Contents

Fibred categories were introduced by AlexanderGrothendieck  ( 1959 , 1971 ), and developed in more detail by JeanGiraud  ( 1964 , 1971 ).

Background and motivations

There are many examples in topology and geometry where some types of objects are considered to exist on or above or over some underlying base space. The classical examples include vector bundles, principal bundles, and sheaves over topological spaces. Another example is given by "families" of algebraic varieties parametrised by another variety. Typical to these situations is that to a suitable type of a map between base spaces, there is a corresponding inverse image (also called pull-back) operation taking the considered objects defined on to the same type of objects on . This is indeed the case in the examples above: for example, the inverse image of a vector bundle on is a vector bundle on .

Moreover, it is often the case that the considered "objects on a base space" form a category, or in other words have maps (morphisms) between them. In such cases the inverse image operation is often compatible with composition of these maps between objects, or in more technical terms is a functor. Again, this is the case in examples listed above.

However, it is often the case that if is another map, the inverse image functors are not strictly compatible with composed maps: if is an object over (a vector bundle, say), it may well be that

Instead, these inverse images are only naturally isomorphic. This introduction of some "slack" in the system of inverse images causes some delicate issues to appear, and it is this set-up that fibred categories formalise.

The main application of fibred categories is in descent theory, concerned with a vast generalisation of "glueing" techniques used in topology. In order to support descent theory of sufficient generality to be applied in non-trivial situations in algebraic geometry the definition of fibred categories is quite general and abstract. However, the underlying intuition is quite straightforward when keeping in mind the basic examples discussed above.

Formal definitions

There are two essentially equivalent technical definitions of fibred categories, both of which will be described below. All discussion in this section ignores the set-theoretical issues related to "large" categories. The discussion can be made completely rigorous by, for example, restricting attention to small categories or by using universes.

Cartesian morphisms and functors

If is a functor between two categories and is an object of , then the subcategory of consisting of those objects for which and those morphisms satisfying , is called the fibre category (or fibre) over, and is denoted . The morphisms of are called -morphisms, and for objects of , the set of Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "http://localhost:6011/en.wikipedia.org/v1/":): {\displaystyle S}-morphisms is denoted by . The image by of an object or a morphism in is called its projection (by ). If is a morphism of , then those morphisms of that project to are called -morphisms, and the set of -morphisms between objects and in is denoted by .

A morphism in is called -cartesian (or simply cartesian) if it satisfies the following condition:

if is the projection of , and if is an -morphism, then there is precisely one-morphism such that .

A cartesian morphism is called an inverse image of its projection ; the object is called an inverse image of by .

The cartesian morphisms of a fibre category are precisely the isomorphisms of . There can in general be more than one cartesian morphism projecting to a given morphism , possibly having different sources; thus there can be more than one inverse image of a given object in by . However, it is a direct consequence of the definition that two such inverse images are isomorphic in .

A functor is also called an -category, or said to make into an -category or a category over. An -functor from an -category to an -category is a functor such that . -categories form in a natural manner a 2-category, with 1-morphisms being -functors, and 2-morphisms being natural transformations between -functors whose components lie in some fibre.

An -functor between two -categories is called a cartesian functor if it takes cartesian morphisms to cartesian morphisms. Cartesian functors between two -categories form a category , with natural transformations as morphisms. A special case is provided by considering as an -category via the identity functor: then a cartesian functor from to an -category is called a cartesian section. Thus a cartesian section consists of a choice of one object in for each object in , and for each morphism a choice of an inverse image . A cartesian section is thus a (strictly) compatible system of inverse images over objects of . The category of cartesian sections of is denoted by

In the important case where has a terminal object (thus in particular when is a topos or the category of arrows with target in ) the functor

is fully faithful (Lemma 5.7 of Giraud (1964)).

Fibred categories and cloven categories

The technically most flexible and economical definition of fibred categories is based on the concept of cartesian morphisms. It is equivalent to a definition in terms of cleavages , the latter definition being actually the original one presented in Grothendieck (1959); the definition in terms of cartesian morphisms was introduced in Grothendieck (1971) in 1960–1961.

An category is a fibred category (or a fibred -category, or a category fibred over ) if each morphism of whose codomain is in the range of projection has at least one inverse image, and moreover the composition of any two cartesian morphisms in is always cartesian. In other words, an -category is a fibred category if inverse images always exist (for morphisms whose codomains are in the range of projection) and are transitive.

If has a terminal object and if is fibred over , then the functor from cartesian sections to defined at the end of the previous section is an equivalence of categories and moreover surjective on objects.

If is a fibred -category, it is always possible, for each morphism in and each object in , to choose (by using the axiom of choice) precisely one inverse image . The class of morphisms thus selected is called a cleavage and the selected morphisms are called the transport morphisms (of the cleavage). A fibred category together with a cleavage is called a cloven category. A cleavage is called normalised if the transport morphisms include all identities in ; this means that the inverse images of identity morphisms are chosen to be identity morphisms. Evidently if a cleavage exists, it can be chosen to be normalised; we shall consider only normalised cleavages below.

The choice of a (normalised) cleavage for a fibred -category specifies, for each morphism in , a functor; on objects is simply the inverse image by the corresponding transport morphism, and on morphisms it is defined in a natural manner by the defining universal property of cartesian morphisms. The operation which associates to an object of the fibre category and to a morphism the inverse image functor is almost a contravariant functor from to the category of categories. However, in general it fails to commute strictly with composition of morphisms. Instead, if and are morphisms in , then there is an isomorphism of functors

These isomorphisms satisfy the following two compatibilities:

  1. for three consecutive morphisms and object the following holds:

It can be shown (see Grothendieck (1971) section 8) that, inversely, any collection of functors together with isomorphisms satisfying the compatibilities above, defines a cloven category. These collections of inverse image functors provide a more intuitive view on fibred categories; and indeed, it was in terms of such compatible inverse image functors that fibred categories were introduced in Grothendieck (1959).

The paper by Gray referred to below makes analogies between these ideas and the notion of fibration of spaces.

These ideas simplify in the case of groupoids, as shown in the paper of Brown referred to below, which obtains a useful family of exact sequences from a fibration of groupoids.

Splittings and split fibred categories

A (normalised) cleavage such that the composition of two transport morphisms is always a transport morphism is called a splitting, and a fibred category with a splitting is called a split (fibred) category. In terms of inverse image functors the condition of being a splitting means that the composition of inverse image functors corresponding to composable morphisms in equals the inverse image functor corresponding to . In other words, the compatibility isomorphisms of the previous section are all identities for a split category. Thus split -categories correspond exactly to true functors from to the category of categories.

Unlike cleavages, not all fibred categories admit splittings. For an example, see below.

Co-cartesian morphisms and co-fibred categories

One can invert the direction of arrows in the definitions above to arrive at corresponding concepts of co-cartesian morphisms, co-fibred categories and split co-fibred categories (or co-split categories). More precisely, if is a functor, then a morphism in is called co-cartesian if it is cartesian for the opposite functor . Then is also called a direct image and a direct image of for . A co-fibred-category is an -category such that direct image exists for each morphism in and that the composition of direct images is a direct image. A co-cleavage and a co-splitting are defined similarly, corresponding to direct image functors instead of inverse image functors.

Properties

The 2-categories of fibred categories and split categories

The categories fibred over a fixed category form a 2-category , where the category of morphisms between two fibred categories and is defined to be the category of cartesian functors from to .

Similarly the split categories over form a 2-category (from French catégorie scindée), where the category of morphisms between two split categories and is the full sub-category of -functors from to consisting of those functors that transform each transport morphism of into a transport morphism of . Each such morphism of split -categories is also a morphism of -fibred categories, i.e., .

There is a natural forgetful 2-functor that simply forgets the splitting.

Existence of equivalent split categories

While not all fibred categories admit a splitting, each fibred category is in fact equivalent to a split category. Indeed, there are two canonical ways to construct an equivalent split category for a given fibred category over . More precisely, the forgetful 2-functor admits a right 2-adjoint and a left 2-adjoint (Theorems 2.4.2 and 2.4.4 of Giraud 1971), and and are the two associated split categories. The adjunction functors and are both cartesian and equivalences (ibid.). However, while their composition is an equivalence (of categories, and indeed of fibred categories), it is not in general a morphism of split categories. Thus the two constructions differ in general. The two preceding constructions of split categories are used in a critical way in the construction of the stack associated to a fibred category (and in particular stack associated to a pre-stack).

Categories fibered in groupoids

There is a related construction to fibered categories called categories fibered in groupoids. These are fibered categories such that any subcategory of given by

  1. Fix an object
  2. The objects of the subcategory are where
  3. The arrows are given by such that

is a groupoid denoted . The associated 2-functors from the Grothendieck construction are examples of stacks. In short, the associated functor sends an object to the category , and a morphism induces a functor from the fibered category structure. Namely, for an object considered as an object of , there is an object where . This association gives a functor which is a functor of groupoids.

Examples

Fibered categories

  1. The functor , sending a category to its set of objects, is a fibration. For a set , the fiber consists of categories with . The cartesian arrows are the fully faithful functors.
  2. Categories of arrows: For any category the category of arrows in has as objects the morphisms in , and as morphisms the commutative squares in (more precisely, a morphism from to consists of morphisms and such that ). The functor which takes an arrow to its target makes into an -category; for an object of the fibre is the category of -objects in , i.e., arrows in with target . Cartesian morphisms in are precisely the cartesian squares in , and thus is fibred over precisely when fibre products exist in .
  3. Fibre bundles: Fibre products exist in the category of topological spaces and thus by the previous example is fibred over . If is the full subcategory of consisting of arrows that are projection maps of fibre bundles, then is the category of fibre bundles on and is fibred over . A choice of a cleavage amounts to a choice of ordinary inverse image (or pull-back) functors for fibre bundles.
  4. Vector bundles: In a manner similar to the previous examples the projections of real (complex) vector bundles to their base spaces form a category () over (morphisms of vector bundles respecting the vector space structure of the fibres). This -category is also fibred, and the inverse image functors are the ordinary pull-back functors for vector bundles. These fibred categories are (non-full) subcategories of .
  5. Sheaves on topological spaces: The inverse image functors of sheaves make the categories of sheaves on topological spaces into a (cleaved) fibred category over . This fibred category can be described as the full sub-category of consisting of étalé spaces of sheaves. As with vector bundles, the sheaves of groups and rings also form fibred categories of .
  6. Sheaves on topoi: If is a topos and is an object in , the category of -objects is also a topos, interpreted as the category of sheaves on . If is a morphism in , the inverse image functor can be described as follows: for a sheaf on and an object in one has equals . These inverse image make the categories into a split fibred category on . This can be applied in particular to the "large" topos of topological spaces.
  7. Quasi-coherent sheaves on schemes: Quasi-coherent sheaves form a fibred category over the category of schemes. This is one of the motivating examples for the definition of fibred categories.
  8. Fibred category admitting no splitting: A group can be considered as a category with one object and the elements of as the morphisms, composition of morphisms being given by the group law. A group homomorphism can then be considered as a functor, which makes into a -category. It can be checked that in this set-up all morphisms in are cartesian; hence is fibred over precisely when is surjective. A splitting in this setup is a (set-theoretic) section of which commutes strictly with composition, or in other words a section of which is also a homomorphism. But as is well known in group theory, this is not always possible (one can take the projection in a non-split group extension).
  9. Co-fibred category of sheaves: The direct image functor of sheaves makes the categories of sheaves on topological spaces into a co-fibred category. The transitivity of the direct image shows that this is even naturally co-split.

Category fibered in groupoids

One of the main examples of categories fibered in groupoids comes from groupoid objects internal to a category . So given a groupoid object

there is an associated groupoid object

in the category of contravariant functors from the yoneda embedding. Since this diagram applied to an object gives a groupoid internal to sets

there is an associated small groupoid . This gives a contravariant 2-functor , and using the Grothendieck construction, this gives a category fibered in groupoids over . Note the fiber category over an object is just the associated groupoid from the original groupoid in sets.

Group quotient

Given a group object acting on an object from , there is an associated groupoid object

where is the projection on and is the composition map . This groupoid gives an induced category fibered in groupoids denoted .

Two-term chain complex

For an abelian category any two-term complex

has an associated groupoid

where

this groupoid can then be used to construct a category fibered in groupoids. One notable example of this is in the study of the cotangent complex for local-complete intersections and in the study of exalcomm.

See also

Related Research Articles

In mathematics, especially in category theory and homotopy theory, a groupoid generalises the notion of group in several equivalent ways. A groupoid can be seen as a:

In mathematics, the Yoneda lemma is a fundamental result in category theory. It is an abstract result on functors of the type morphisms into a fixed object. It is a vast generalisation of Cayley's theorem from group theory. It allows the embedding of any locally small category into a category of functors defined on that category. It also clarifies how the embedded category, of representable functors and their natural transformations, relates to the other objects in the larger functor category. It is an important tool that underlies several modern developments in algebraic geometry and representation theory. It is named after Nobuo Yoneda.

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, the abstract notion of a limit captures the essential properties of universal constructions such as products, pullbacks and inverse limits. The dual notion of a colimit generalizes constructions such as disjoint unions, direct sums, coproducts, pushouts and direct limits.

In mathematics, specifically category theory, adjunction is a relationship that two functors may exhibit, intuitively corresponding to a weak form of equivalence between two related categories. Two functors that stand in this relationship are known as adjoint functors, one being the left adjoint and the other the right adjoint. Pairs of adjoint functors are ubiquitous in mathematics and often arise from constructions of "optimal solutions" to certain problems, such as the construction of a free group on a set in algebra, or the construction of the Stone–Čech compactification of a topological space in topology.

In mathematics, a sheaf is a tool for systematically tracking data attached to the open sets of a topological space and defined locally with regard to them. For example, for each open set, the data could be the ring of continuous functions defined on that open set. Such data are well behaved in that they can be restricted to smaller open sets, and also the data assigned to an open set are equivalent to all collections of compatible data assigned to collections of smaller open sets covering the original open set.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Section (fiber bundle)</span>

In the mathematical field of topology, a section of a fiber bundle is a continuous right inverse of the projection function . In other words, if is a fiber bundle over a base space, :

In mathematics, especially in algebraic geometry and the theory of complex manifolds, coherent sheaves are a class of sheaves closely linked to the geometric properties of the underlying space. The definition of coherent sheaves is made with reference to a sheaf of rings that codifies this geometric information.

In mathematics, an algebraic stack is a vast generalization of algebraic spaces, or schemes, which are foundational for studying moduli theory. Many moduli spaces are constructed using techniques specific to algebraic stacks, such as Artin's representability theorem, which is used to construct the moduli space of pointed algebraic curves and the moduli stack of elliptic curves. Originally, they were introduced by Alexander Grothendieck to keep track of automorphisms on moduli spaces, a technique which allows for treating these moduli spaces as if their underlying schemes or algebraic spaces are smooth. After Grothendieck developed the general theory of descent, and Giraud the general theory of stacks, the notion of algebraic stacks was defined by Michael Artin.

In mathematics, the derived categoryD(A) of an abelian category A is a construction of homological algebra introduced to refine and in a certain sense to simplify the theory of derived functors defined on A. The construction proceeds on the basis that the objects of D(A) should be chain complexes in A, with two such chain complexes considered isomorphic when there is a chain map that induces an isomorphism on the level of homology of the chain complexes. Derived functors can then be defined for chain complexes, refining the concept of hypercohomology. The definitions lead to a significant simplification of formulas otherwise described (not completely faithfully) by complicated spectral sequences.

In mathematics, a pullback bundle or induced bundle is the fiber bundle that is induced by a map of its base-space. Given a fiber bundle π : E → B and a continuous map f : B′ → B one can define a "pullback" of E by f as a bundle f*E over B. The fiber of f*E over a point b in B is just the fiber of E over f(b′). Thus f*E is the disjoint union of all these fibers equipped with a suitable topology.

This is a glossary of properties and concepts in category theory in mathematics.

In mathematics, the direct image functor is a construction in sheaf theory that generalizes the global sections functor to the relative case. It is of fundamental importance in topology and algebraic geometry. Given a sheaf F defined on a topological space X and a continuous map f: XY, we can define a new sheaf fF on Y, called the direct image sheaf or the pushforward sheaf of F along f, such that the global sections of fF is given by the global sections of F. This assignment gives rise to a functor f from the category of sheaves on X to the category of sheaves on Y, which is known as the direct image functor. Similar constructions exist in many other algebraic and geometric contexts, including that of quasi-coherent sheaves and étale sheaves on a scheme.

In mathematics, a pullback is either of two different, but related processes: precomposition and fiber-product. Its dual is a pushforward.

In mathematics a stack or 2-sheaf is, roughly speaking, a sheaf that takes values in categories rather than sets. Stacks are used to formalise some of the main constructions of descent theory, and to construct fine moduli stacks when fine moduli spaces do not exist.

The Grothendieck construction is a construction used in the mathematical field of category theory. It is a fundamental construction in the theory of descent, in the theory of stacks, and in fibred category theory. In categorical logic, the construction is used to model the relationship between a type theory and a logic over that type theory, and allows for the translation of concepts from indexed category theory into fibred category theory, such as Lawvere's concept of hyperdoctrine.

In mathematics, a topos is a category that behaves like the category of sheaves of sets on a topological space. Topoi behave much like the category of sets and possess a notion of localization; they are a direct generalization of point-set topology. The Grothendieck topoi find applications in algebraic geometry; the more general elementary topoi are used in logic.

This is a glossary of algebraic geometry.

In algebraic geometry, a prestackF over a category C equipped with some Grothendieck topology is a category together with a functor p: FC satisfying a certain lifting condition and such that locally isomorphic objects are isomorphic. A stack is a prestack with effective descents, meaning local objects may be patched together to become a global object.

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, an ∞-groupoid is an abstract homotopical model for topological spaces. One model uses Kan complexes which are fibrant objects in the category of simplicial sets. It is an ∞-category generalization of a groupoid, a category in which every morphism is an isomorphism.

A differentiable stack is the analogue in differential geometry of an algebraic stack in algebraic geometry. It can be described either as a stack over differentiable manifolds which admits an atlas, or as a Lie groupoid up to Morita equivalence.

References