Wrong rook pawn

Last updated
Chess pll45.svg

In a chess endgame of a king, bishop, and pawn versus king, a wrong rook pawn is a rook pawn (a pawn on the a- or h-file) whose promotion square is the opposite color from the bishop's square color. Since a side's rook pawns promote on opposite-colored squares, one of them may be the "wrong rook pawn". [1] This situation is also known as having the wrong-colored bishop or wrong bishop (i.e. the bishop is on the wrong-colored squares in relation to the rook pawn). [2] In many cases, the wrong rook pawn will only draw, when any other pawn would win. A fairly common defensive tactic is to reach one of these drawn endgames, often through a sacrifice.

Contents

In some endgames, such as bishop and pawn versus king (perhaps with pawns), the wrong rook pawn is the one whose promotion square is opposite the color on which the bishop moves, which makes the stronger side unable to win. This was known at least as early as 1623, as evidenced by an endgame study by Gioachino Greco.

A less common situation is the defense of bishop versus rook and rook pawn; the wrong rook pawn is the one that promotes on the square not controlled by the bishop; however, the defending king and bishop can form a blockade in the corner (on the pawn's promotion square) and draw the game. This is also called the safe corner for the defending king.

Bishop and pawn

Chess bld45.svg Chess pll45.svg
Müller & Lamprecht
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
The wrong rook pawn, draw with either side to move (can just as well be described as wrong colour of the bishop)

In this type of endgame, the wrong rook pawn is the one whose queening square is the opposite color as that on which the bishop resides. Many such positions are drawn because of a fortress if the defending king can get to the corner in front of the pawn. (See the diagram.) With the bishop not able to control the a8-square, the black king cannot be forced away from the corner, so the pawn will not be able to promote. [3] This is the basic type of position for most of these endgames. [4]

Defending king in front of pawn

Mednis, 1987
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move wins. Black to move draws.

In a king and pawn versus king endgame with a rook pawn, the defending king only has to get in front of the pawn to draw the game. In contrast, in the endgame with a bishop and the wrong rook pawn, getting the defending king in front of the pawn will not necessarily draw. In this position from Edmar Mednis, White wins if it is his move.

1. Kg8! Kg5
2. Kg7

and the pawn promotes. Black to move draws by 1... Kh7! followed by 2... Kh8. The defending king must be in the corner or be next to it to be sure of a draw. [5]

Examples from games

Goglidze versus Kasparian

Goglidze vs. Kasparian, 1929
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Black to move draws with 1...Bg4+!

In this position from a 1929 game between Viktor Arsentievich Goglidze and Genrikh Kasparian, Black uses the tactic of offering the sacrifice of his bishop for the pawn on the e- file to leave White with the wrong rook pawn:

1... Bg4+!

and the game was drawn twelve moves later. The bishop will remain on the c8–h3 diagonal and sacrifice itself for the e-pawn if it advances to e6. (Note that 1...Bb3+ 2.Ke7 Bxf7 does not work because of 3.h6+!) [6]

Fischer versus Taimanov

Fischer vs. Taimanov, 1971
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Black to move can draw.

In this game from the 1971 World Chess Championship Candidate's Match, the second game between Bobby Fischer and Mark Taimanov, Black could have drawn the game because of the wrong rook pawn. One way is:

81... Nd3!
82. h4 Nf4
83. Kf5 Kd6!
84. Kxf4 Ke7
½–½

In the actual game, [7] Black made an incorrect move (81...Ke4??) and lost because a knight has a hard time defending against rook pawns. [8] [9] The game continued 82.Bc8! Kf4 83.h4 Nf3 84.h5 Ng5 85.Bf5; see Zugzwang#Fischer versus Taimanov, second match game for the game's conclusion. (Fischer went on to win the match 6–0 and advance to the next round, and subsequently became World Champion.)

Ķeņģis versus Kasparov

Ķeņģis vs. Kasparov, 1973
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Black to move, draw

Ten-year-old Garry Kasparov [lower-alpha 1] thought that he was winning this game as Black against Edvīns Ķeņģis, being two pawns ahead. [10] Indeed, Black can win the white bishop (for two pawns), but then the game is a draw because of the wrong rook pawn. In the actual game, Black moved 48...Kh3 and the game was drawn after move 54. (No progress can be made with the bishops on opposite colors, see opposite-colored bishop endgame.) In an alternative line, Black can win the white bishop:

48... f4+
49. Bxf4 d2
50. Kxd2 Kxf4

but the position is drawn because the black rook pawn is on the wrong file for the bishop to help promote it. [11]

Karpov versus Kasparov

Karpov vs. Kasparov, 1985
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 82.Kd4. Black sacrifices two pawns for one to leave White with the wrong rook pawn.

Garry Kasparov used sacrifices to leave Anatoly Karpov with the wrong rook pawn to save the twentieth game of their 1985 World Championship, after a long endgame. [12] In this position, Black sacrificed two pawns for one (the ones on f5 and g6 for the one on a4):

82... Bb3!
83. Be8 Ke7
84. Bxg6 Bxa4
85. Bxf5 Kf6
½–½

A draw was agreed because the black bishop can stop the advance of the pawn on the f-file, sacrificing itself if necessary, leaving White with the wrong rook pawn (the one on the h-file). [13] [14] (Kasparov went on to win the match 13–11 and became World Champion for the first time.)

Korchnoi versus Karpov

Korchnoi vs. Karpov, 1978
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 99.Bf4

In this game [15] from the 1978 World Championship between Victor Korchnoi and Anatoly Karpov, White's pawn is the wrong rook pawn. White went on to capture the black b-pawn on move 107, but was unable to force the black king far enough away from the a8-square to get to a winning position. The game ended in an intentional stalemate on move 124 (see Stalemate#Korchnoi versus Karpov for the final position). Some commentators thought that Korchnoi might have missed a win in this endgame, but Karpov defended well and White never had a theoretically won position. (However, Korchnoi did miss a win earlier in the game.) Black's pawn on b5 is actually a liability. If the black king is forced into a position where he cannot move, Black would have to move the pawn and White would win the game. As of 2008, this is the longest game of a world championship. [16] [17] (Karpov retained his title by a score of six wins to five.)

An exception

from Griffiths
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move wins, an exception because of the black pawns.

In this position White wins because he is able to force the exchange of pawns to get his pawn on the b- file .

1. Be3 Kb8
2. Bd4 Ka8
3. Kc8

and checkmate in two more moves. If Black did not have his rook pawn, he could draw by 3...b5. [18]

Opposite-colored bishops

Chess bll45.svg Chess pll45.svg Chess bdd45.svg
Fine & Benko, position 418
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Draw because of the wrong rook pawn

Usually when each side has a bishop and they are on opposite-colored squares and one side has two widely separated pawns, the stronger side wins. However, if one of the pawns is the wrong rook pawn and the defending king is blocking it, the position is usually a draw because the defending bishop can stop the other pawn. If the defending bishop is sacrificed for the other pawn, the resulting position is a draw like the ones above. [19]

de la Villa, position 9.3
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Draw because of wrong rook pawn

With opposite-colored bishops, two connected pawns win if they safely reach the sixth rank , except when one is the wrong rook pawn, i.e. the defending bishop is on the long diagonal that includes the square on which the rook pawn would promote. [20]

Example from game

Walther vs. Fischer, 1959
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 54.a4?

In this game between FIDE Master Edgar Walther and Bobby Fischer, [21] White has just made a bad move (54.a4?; 54.b4! wins). Black's defensive plan is to sacrifice his bishop for the two queenside pawns, leaving White with the wrong rook pawn (the h-pawn) for his bishop. The game was drawn nine moves later. [22] [23]

Rook and rook pawn versus bishop

Chess rll45.svg Chess pll45.svg Chess bdl45.svg
Berger (Fine & Benko, position 930)
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move, draw

The wrong rook pawn may come up in other situations, such as this position with a rook and rook pawn versus a bishop. This time the bishop is defending against the rook pawn. If the pawn had not yet reached the fifth rank , White would win. Play might continue:

1. Rb7 Bc2
2. Kg5 Bd3
3. Kh6 Kg8!
4. Rg7+ Kf8!!

4...Kh8?? loses.

½–½

White cannot win because his king cannot move to the h5-square. If the bishop were on the other colored squares, White would win. [24]

If the defending king is in the corner controlled by his bishop then the pawn can be sacrificed at the right moment to get to a winning rook versus bishop position. If the defending king is in the corner opposite his bishop's color, sacrificing the pawn does not work because the defender easily forms a fortress in the corner. [25] This is also referred to as the defending king being in the "safe" corner, since with the king in the corner with the bishop next to it, he is safe from the rook.

Examples from games

Euwe vs. Hromádka, 1922
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Black to move should win, but errs and allows a draw.

In this position from a game between future World Champion Max Euwe and Karel Hromádka, Black should win but he errs by advancing his pawn too soon. [26] Play continued:

1... h4??

Black wins easily after 1...Kh3!

2. Bd4 Kh3?

Black still could have won here with 2...Re2!, but it is complicated.

3. Be5 Rg2+
4. Kf1! ½–½ [27]
van Wely vs. Nakamura, 2013
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move

This 2013 game between Loek van Wely and Hikaru Nakamura was drawn. [28] If White tries 64.Kf4 then after 64...Kh6 65.Rh3 Be8 66.Rh2 Bb5 67.Kf5 Bc4 draws, or 67...Kh7 68.Kg5 Bd3! is a book draw, because the pawn is too far advanced. The game continued:

64. Rf6 Be8
65. h6 Bg6
66. Rxg6 Kxg6
67. h7 Kxh7
½–½ [29]

In studies

Rauzer

Study by Rauzer, 1928
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess xot45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess xot45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess xot45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess xot45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess xot45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess xot45.svg
Chess xot45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White wins if the white king and bishop confine the black king on or below the line (including on e4).

In this 1928 endgame study by Vsevolod Rauzer, White can force a win if the black king is on or below the line indicated, and white king and bishop are placed to prevent the black king from escaping. It may take up to 33 moves to capture the black pawn. Similar positions were studied by Josef Kling and Bernhard Horwitz in 1851 and by Johann Berger in 1921. A very similar position occurred in the Korchnoi–Karpov game above. [30] [31]

Greco

Greco, 1623
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Black to play and draw

The theme is used in this 1623 composition by Gioachino Greco. Black draws:

1...Ra1+
2. Rf1 Rxf1+
3. Kxf1 Bh3!

and Black will sacrifice his bishop for the g-pawn or it transforms into an h-pawn after 4.gxh3. [32]

Notes

  1. He was still using his birth name of Garry Weinstein at the time.

Related Research Articles

In chess and other similar games, the endgame is the stage of the game when few pieces are left on the board.

Zugzwang is a situation found in chess and other turn-based games wherein one player is put at a disadvantage because of their obligation to make a move; a player is said to be "in zugzwang" when any legal move will worsen their position.

Stalemate is a situation in chess where the player whose turn it is to move is not in check and has no legal move. Stalemate results in a draw. During the endgame, stalemate is a resource that can enable the player with the inferior position to draw the game rather than lose. In more complex positions, stalemate is much rarer, usually taking the form of a swindle that succeeds only if the superior side is inattentive. Stalemate is also a common theme in endgame studies and other chess problems.

The two knights endgame is a chess endgame with a king and two knights versus a king. In contrast to a king and two bishops, or a bishop and a knight, a king and two knights cannot force checkmate against a lone king. Although there are checkmate positions, a king and two knights cannot force them against proper, relatively easy defense.

Triangulation is a tactic used in chess to put one's opponent in zugzwang. Triangulation is also called losing a tempo or losing a move.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tarrasch rule</span> General principle in chess

The Tarrasch rule is a general principle that applies in the majority of chess middlegames and endgames. Siegbert Tarrasch (1862–1934) stated the "rule" that rooks should be placed behind passed pawns – either the player's or the opponent's. The idea behind the guideline is that (1) if a player's rook is behind his passed pawn, the rook protects it as it advances, and (2) if it is behind an opponent's passed pawn, the pawn cannot advance unless it is protected along its way.

The chess endgame with a king and a pawn versus a king is one of the most important and fundamental endgames, other than the basic checkmates. It is an important endgame for chess players to master, since most other endgames have the potential of reducing to this type of endgame via exchanges of pieces. Players need to be able to determine quickly whether a given position is a win or a draw, and to know the technique for playing it. The crux of this endgame is whether or not the pawn can be promoted, so checkmate can be forced.

In chess, the exchange is a material imbalance of a minor piece for a rook. The side which wins the rook is said to have won the exchange, while the other player has lost the exchange, since the rook is usually more valuable. Alternatively, the side having a rook for a minor piece is said to be up the exchange, and the other player is down the exchange. The opposing captures often happen on consecutive moves, although this is not strictly necessary. It is generally detrimental to lose the exchange, although occasionally one may find reason to purposely do so; the result is an exchange sacrifice. The minor exchange is an uncommon term for the exchange of a bishop and knight.

In chess, a fortress is an endgame drawing technique in which the side behind in material sets up a zone of protection that the opponent cannot penetrate. This might involve keeping the enemy king out of one's position, or a zone the enemy cannot force one out of. An elementary fortress is a theoretically drawn position with reduced material in which a passive defense will maintain the draw.

The rook and pawn versus rook endgame is a fundamentally important, widely studied chess endgame. Precise play is usually required in these positions. With optimal play, some complicated wins require sixty moves to either checkmate, capture the defending rook, or successfully promote the pawn. In some cases, thirty-five moves are required to advance the pawn once.

In chess, a blunder is a critically bad move or decision. A blunder severely worsens the player's situation by allowing a loss of material, checkmate, or anything similar. It is usually caused by some tactical oversight, whether due to time trouble, overconfidence, or carelessness. Although blunders are most common in beginner games, all human players make them, even at the world championship level. Creating opportunities for the opponent to blunder is an important skill in over-the-board chess.

In chess, a desperado is a piece that is either en prise or trapped, but captures an enemy piece before it is itself captured in order to compensate the loss a little, or is used as a sacrifice that will result in stalemate if it is captured. The former case can arise in a situation where both sides have hanging pieces, in which case these pieces are used to win material prior to being captured. A desperado in the latter case is usually a rook or a queen; such a piece is sometimes also called crazy or mad.

The chess endgame of a queen versus pawn is usually an easy win for the side with the queen. However, if the pawn has advanced to its seventh rank it has possibilities of reaching a draw, and there are some drawn positions with the pawn on the sixth rank. This endgame arises most often from a race of pawns to promote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swindle (chess)</span> Chess maneuver

In chess, a swindle is a ruse by which a player in a losing position tricks their opponent and thereby achieve a win or draw instead of the expected loss. It may also refer more generally to obtaining a win or draw from a clearly losing position. I. A. Horowitz and Fred Reinfeld distinguish among "traps", "pitfalls", and "swindles". In their terminology, a "trap" refers to a situation where players go wrong through their own efforts. In a "pitfall", the beneficiary of the pitfall plays an active role, creating a situation where a plausible move by the opponent will turn out badly. A "swindle" is a pitfall adopted by a player who has a clearly lost game. Horowitz and Reinfeld observe that swindles, "though ignored in virtually all chess books", "play an enormously important role in over-the-board chess, and decide the fate of countless games".

The opposite-colored bishops endgame is a chess endgame in which each side has a single bishop and the bishops reside on opposite-colored squares. Without other pieces besides pawns, these endings are widely known for their tendency to result in a draw. These are the most difficult endings in which to convert a small material advantage to a win. With additional pieces, the stronger side has more chances to win, but not as many as when bishops are on the same color.

A pawnless chess endgame is a chess endgame in which only a few pieces remain, and no pawns. The basic checkmates are types of pawnless endgames. Endgames without pawns do not occur very often in practice except for the basic checkmates of king and queen versus king, king and rook versus king, and queen versus rook. Other cases that occur occasionally are (1) a rook and minor piece versus a rook and (2) a rook versus a minor piece, especially if the minor piece is a bishop.

The rook and bishop versus rook endgame is a chess endgame where one player has just a king, a rook, and a bishop, and the other player has just a king and a rook. This combination of material is one of the most common pawnless chess endgames. It is generally a theoretical draw, but the rook and bishop have good winning chances in practice because the defense is difficult. Ulf Andersson won the position twice within a year, once against a grandmaster and once against a candidate master; and grandmaster Keith Arkell has won it 18 times out of 18. In positions that have a forced win, up to 59 moves are required. Tony Kosten has seen the endgame many times in master games, with the stronger side almost always winning. Pal Benko called this the "headache ending."

In a chess endgame, a wrong bishop is a bishop that would have been better placed on the opposite square color. This most commonly occurs with a bishop and one of its rook pawns, but it also occurs with a rook versus a bishop, a rook and one rook pawn versus a bishop, and possibly with a rook and one bishop pawn versus a bishop.

The queen and pawn versus queen endgame is a chess endgame in which both sides have a queen and one side has a pawn, which one tries to promote. It is very complicated and difficult to play. Cross-checks are often used as a device to win the game by forcing the exchange of queens. It is almost always a draw if the defending king is in front of the pawn.

References

  1. ( Burgess 2000 :494)
  2. ( Rosen 2003 :61)
  3. ( Müller & Lamprecht 2001 :96–100)
  4. ( Mednis 1987 :64)
  5. ( Mednis 1987 :64–65)
  6. ( van Perlo 2006 :356)
  7. Fischer vs. Taimanov
  8. ( Dvoretsky 2006 :82–84)
  9. ( Benko 2007 :213)
  10. Kengis vs. Kasparov
  11. ( Kasparov 2011 :23–24)
  12. Karpov vs. Kasparov
  13. ( Mednis 1990 :73–74)
  14. ( Kasparov 2008 :385)
  15. Korchnoi vs. Karpov
  16. ( Griffiths 1992 :43–46)
  17. ( Kasparov 2006 :112–20)
  18. ( Griffiths 1976 :93)
  19. ( Fine & Benko 2003 :192)
  20. ( de la Villa 2008 :106)
  21. Walther vs. Fischer
  22. ( Fischer 2008 :67)
  23. ( Dvoretsky 2006 :94)
  24. ( Fine & Benko 2003 :468–72)
  25. ( Müller & Lamprecht 2001 :271–72)
  26. Euwe vs. Hromádka
  27. ( Dvoretsky 2006 :237)
  28. van Wely vs. Nakamura
  29. ( Benko 2013 :44)
  30. ( Griffiths 1992 :44–45)
  31. ( Kasparov 2006 :120)
  32. ( Averbakh 1996 :85)

Bibliography

Further reading