1929 Battersea South by-election

Last updated

1929 Battersea South by-election
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg
  1924 7 February 1929 1929  
  William Bennett.jpg
Candidate Bennett Selley Albu
Party Labour Unionist Liberal
Popular vote11,78911,2132,858
Percentage46.13%43.87%10.00%

BatterseaSouth.png

MP before election

Viscount Curzon
Unionist

Subsequent MP

William Bennett
Labour

The 1929 Battersea South by-election was held on 7 February 1929. The by-election was held when the incumbent Conservative MP, Francis Curzon, succeeded to the peerage as Earl Howe. It was won by the Labour candidate William Bennett in a three-way contest. [1] [2]

Contents

Candidates

The local Liberal association selected 40 year-old Vivian Claude Albu as their candidate. Albu had stood for the Liberals in the 1922 general election at Battersea North. [3] Labour selected William Bennett, who had been their candidate in Guildford in three general elections between 1918 and 1923. The Conservative Party selected Harry Selley, a builder and member of the London County Council for Battersea South. [4]

Result

Battersea South by-election, 1929
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Labour William Bennett 11,789 46.13
Conservative Harry Selley 11,21343.87
Liberal Vivian Claude Albu2,85810.00New
Majority 5762.25
Turnout 25,55757.7−18.8
Labour gain from Conservative Swing +8.8

Aftermath

A few months later at the next general election Bennett again defeated Selley, this time by 418 votes in a much increased poll. The Liberals were again third, though with a new candidate, the former Mayor of Battersea, Captain William J. West. [4] [5] In 1931 Selley won the seat at the third attempt, defeating Bennett with a majority of over 15,000 votes. [5]

References

  1. "British By-Election". The Mercury (Hobart). 9 February 1929. p. 6. Retrieved 8 August 2010.
  2. Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs
  3. The Liberal Year Book, 1926
  4. 1 2 The Times House of Commons 1929. London: The Times Office. 1929. pp. 17–18.
  5. 1 2 The Times House of Commons 1931. London: The Times Office. 1931. p. 17.