2008 French mistaken virginity case

Last updated

On 1 April 2008, the high court of Lille (France) annulled a marriage on the grounds of "mistaken essential qualities of the spouse" in accordance with article 180 paragraph 2 [archive] of the French civil code. The woman was not a virgin at the time of the marriage ceremony, but had not admitted this to the man even though she knew that her status as a virgin was a determining factor in his motivation and consent to marry her. According to this initial court ruling, this was sufficient to declare the marriage annulled and therefore not to be recognized as a lawful marriage.

Contents

At the end of May 2008, a controversy ensued and several public figures, politicians, religious figures and intellectuals reacted to the decision. Following these events, the Minister of Justice Rachida Dati asked the Ministère public, namely the Procureur général of Douai, to make an appeal against the wishes of the couple. The appeal was lodged to the high court of Douai, on 3 June 2008.

On 17 November 2008, the judgment of the high court was declared null by the court of appeals. Since the annulment of the marriage was itself annulled, the final ruling was that the man and woman had been, and remained, legally married.

On 8 July 2006, the couple held a marriage ceremony at Mons-en-Barœul. [1] The man, born in 1976 in Morocco, was an engineering consultant. The woman was French, of Moroccan descent, born in 1983 in the North of France, and was a nursing student. Both were of Muslim faith.

At around four in the morning, after the couple had retired to their bedroom, the man returned to the guests and angrily informed them that the woman was not a virgin.

The plea of the former husband, accepted by the wife

On 26 July 2006, the man filed for an annulment to the high court of Lille. He pleaded the fact that his wife had been presented to him as chaste before the marriage. It would therefore be an annulment on the grounds of ‘mistaken essential qualities of the spouse [...] which were determining factors in his consent’, in accordance with article 180 paragraph 2 of the French civil code [2] concerning a ‘mistake regarding the person’. The wife approved the annulment, while the Ministère public ‘declares it has put its trust in justice’. On 1 April 2008, the high court of Lille announced the annulment of the marriage on the basis of article 180 of the civil code. [3] The woman's acceptance of the request allowed it to be deduced that she had known that her virginity constituted, in the view of her husband, an essential quality with regards to the consent to the proposed marriage.

Appeal of the prosecution against the will of the parties

Although having initially approved the court's decision, on 2 June 2008 the Minister of Justice, Rachida Dati, asked the parquet to lodge an appeal against the judgment, which was filed on 3 June [4] (this appeal may still be admissible, the one-month period available to the Ministère public to file it according to certain people is to be calculated from the notification of the judgement to him or her; [5] [6] this analysis is backed up by article 528 of the civil procedure code which indicates that: ‘The period at the expiry of which an appeal may no longer be lodged runs from the notification of the ruling, unless this period has started, by law, from the date of the ruling’).

The judgement being provided by provisional enforcement, the parquet also summoned the parties in emergency interim proceedings, (including the civil official of Mons-en-Barœul [7] ) to request his judgment. [8] The hearing took place on 12 June and the decision was made on 19 June. [9] [10] The court announced the end of the provisional enforcement of the annulment ruling, invoking the risk of an ‘irreparable prejudice, for both parties as well as for public order’. One of the objectives is to prevent the risk of having to annul a second marriage which would be contracted after the annulment of the first one, the annulment decision susceptible to being reversed. Consequently, the transcription of the annulment in the marriage register was suspended and the two people remained married.

The court of appeals examined the case on 22 September 2008.  The woman's lawyer, Mr Mauger, declared that he would request an annulment of the marriage, but for different reasons than those given in the previous instance. The parquet considered grounds such as mistaken identity, lack of cohabitation or lack of consent. The judgement had to be given on 17 November, [11] [12] [13]

The annulment of the Douai Court of Appeal

On 17 November 2008, the Court of Appeal of Douai overturned the decision. [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] The Court considered that the woman's virginity had not been cited by the husband as a necessary condition of the marriage. In fact, the husband indicated in his pleadings that the mistake was not about virginity but about the confidence he had in his wife, and that virginity was merely an expectation. According to him, his wife's lie caused a mistake with regards to the essential quality of the confidence he had in her. The Court rejected this argument, because the lie, contested by the wife, could not be proven.

Nevertheless, commenting on the possibility of virginity being an essential quality, the Court clarified that in any event, the wife's virginity cannot be considered as an essential quality since it has no negative impact on married life. The Court equally rejected the annulment application formulated by the wife, who alleged that her husband did not have ‘the willingness to accept, even the capacity to understand the obligation of respect between spouses’ because ‘the facts do not allow the characterisation of a mistake of the wife on essential qualities of the husband’. [22] [23] [24]

Since the annulment of the marriage was annulled, the spouses are still legally married.

Points of view of the spouses

The husband

The version of events given by the husband is known from the summary of his statement drawn up by the court: [3] his future wife had been presented to him as single and chaste and it was only on the night of the marriage that she admitted a previous liaison. Because of this lie, the trust necessary for a marital relationship seemed to him to be lacking, justifying the annulment of the marriage.

Once the case was mediatised, the husband's lawyer, Mr Xavier Labbée, [25] explained his client's position. [26] He notably exposed that the wife had had a long previous liaison, never mentioned before the marriage, and underlined again that it was above all due to this concealment that his client wished to be released from matrimonial ties – even if the lack of virginity had also played a role.

Mr Xavier Labbée underlined additionally that religion had nothing to do with the court's decision, and said that certain comments which have highlighted it without subtlety are 'scandalous' (his summons, however, refers to a "community where it is tradition that a wife remains a virgin until marriage" [1] ); he additionally said that an annulment has an advantage over a divorce since it helps the woman to 'start afresh'.

The wife

The woman's lawyer, Mr Charles-Édouard Mauger, explained the version of events from his client's point of view. [27] The future spouses had met two years before the marriage, during which time the woman did not have 'the strength' to explain to her fiancé that she was no longer a virgin; she had even considered an operation to reconstruct her hymen. On their wedding night, her angry husband had announced the news to the guests, at four in the morning before immediately driving back to his parents' house. Mr Mauger wanted to point out that he had found his client have been suffering greatly. He then explained his decision to 'accept the annulment': it was not for him a 'submission' but a strategy allowing ‘technical escape’ of a procedure that risked being long, but in which he was convinced that his client would have been able to obtain justice if she had chosen to oppose her husband's request. Ultimately, the court's decision satisfied her entirely since it 'allowed her to regain her freedom'.

The wife has also deeply criticised the way in which this case was dealt with; she is also angry about not being consulted on the appeal decision:

"Hearing everyone talking about me is very difficult," she said. "I am not the leader of a movement, I do not claim responsibility for anything. Since the beginning I've had to go through everything in this case. [...] That there can be an appeal against the ruling when I never asked for that outrages me. I just want to be able to live my life normally." [28]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joan, Countess of Flanders</span> Countess of Flanders and Hainaut

Joan, often called Joan of Constantinople, ruled as Countess of Flanders and Hainaut from 1205 until her death. She was the elder daughter of Baldwin IX, Count of Flanders and Hainaut, and Marie of Champagne.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in France since 18 May 2013, making France the thirteenth country in the world and the ninth in Europe to allow same-sex couples to marry. The legislation applies to metropolitan France as well as to all French overseas departments and territories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage in Quebec</span>

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Quebec since March 19, 2004 in accordance with a ruling from the Quebec Court of Appeal that the heterosexual definition of marriage violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Quebec was the third Canadian province after Ontario and British Columbia and the fifth jurisdiction in the world to open marriage to same-sex couples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Denis Robert</span> French journalist, novelist and filmmaker

Denis Robert is a French investigative journalist, novelist and filmmaker. He formerly worked for twelve years for the newspaper Libération. Robert's books, films and press interviews, denouncing the opaque workings of the Clearstream clearing house, earned him into more than 60 lawsuits in France, Belgium and Luxembourg by banks, such as Bank Menatep and BGL, as well as the Clearstream company. In 2008, he was involved in a polemic with Philippe Val and journalist Edwy Plenel in relation to the Clearstream affair.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in France</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in France are some of the most progressive by world standards. Although same-sex sexual activity was a capital crime that often resulted in the death penalty during the Ancien Régime, all sodomy laws were repealed in 1791 during the French Revolution. However, a lesser-known indecent exposure law that often targeted LGBT people was introduced in 1960, before being repealed in 1980.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Luxembourg</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Luxembourg have the same legal rights as non-LGBT people. Partnerships, which grant many of the benefits of marriage, have been recognised since 2004. In June 2014, the Luxembourgish Parliament passed a law enabling same-sex marriage and adoption rights, which took effect on 1 January 2015. Additionally, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and "change of sex" in employment, healthcare and the provision of goods and services is outlawed, and transgender people are allowed to change their legal gender on the basis of self-determination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2007 Republic of the Congo parliamentary election</span>

Parliamentary elections were held in the Republic of the Congo on 24 June 2007, with a second round initially planned for 22 July 2007, but then postponed to 5 August 2007. According to the National Commission of the Organization of the Elections (CONEL), 1,807 candidates stood in the first round for 137 seats in the National Assembly. The ruling Congolese Labour Party and parties and independent candidates allied with it won 125 seats, while two opposition parties won a combined 12 seats.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philippe Karsenty</span> French media analyst

Philippe Karsenty is a French politician and founder of Media-Ratings, a company monitoring the French media for bias. Karsenty came to public attention when he was sued for libel by the public French television network, France 2, over accusations of staged footage by France 2 over the killing of a 12-year-old Palestinian boy, Muhammad al-Durrah. The libel suit lasted a decade, with the ultimate verdict being against Karsenty and requiring him to pay damages to France 2.

Same-sex unions have been recognised in the microstate of Monaco since 27 June 2020. On 4 December 2019, the National Council passed a bill establishing cohabitation agreements, offering both same-sex and opposite-sex couples limited rights and benefits in the areas of inheritance and property. The law took effect on 27 June.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beyens de Grambais</span>

Beyens de Grambais is a Dutch-Belgian family of nobility, with a branch settling in the Southern Netherlands in the early 17th century.

On 10 March 2012, Amina El Filali (1996–2012), a 16-year-old girl from Larache, Morocco, committed suicide by taking rat poison, after she was forced by her family to marry a man who had raped her when she was 15. According to Article 475 of the Moroccan penal code, the rapist was allowed to avoid prosecution by marrying his victim. This incident drew much attention to Moroccan law, and many people expressed a desire to have the law changed. Local human rights groups also called for the repeal of Article 475 of the Moroccan penal code, which de-criminalises a rape if the rapist later marries their victim. Two years after the suicide, the parliament decided to modify Article 475; it was edited in 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law 2013-404</span>

The law opening marriage to same-sex couples, no. 2013-404 is a French law which, since 18 May 2013, grants same-sex couples the right to marry and jointly adopt children.

Adalbert I of Ostrevent was a 7th-century Frankish nobleman of the court of King Clovis II of France. He is recognized as a saint, and is commemorated on both 2 February and 2 May.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civitas (movement)</span>

Civitas, also known as France Jeunesse Civitas and Institut Civitas, was an association generally considered to be Traditionalist Catholic, integrist, nationalist, and of the extreme right. The association defines itself as a "Traditionalist Catholic lobby group". The group was once associated with the Society of St. Pius X, but it has evolved under the new leadership of Alain Escada and the "chaplaincy" is now provided by Capuchin Friars of Morgon. On February 14, 2023, the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism (GPAHE) released a report in which it classified Civitas as a "religious nationalist", "anti-LGBTQ+", and "conspiracy" group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ministère public (France)</span>

In French law, the ministère public or le parquet is the authority charged with defending the interests of society and of the application of law. It is primarily made up of magistrates, but is sometimes represented by other persons such as police officials. Its magistrates can be referred to as "standing" magistrates, as opposed to magistrats du siège. Its closest equivalent in some English-speaking countries is the director of public prosecutions and the attorney general in others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of appeal (France)</span> French court

In France, a cour d’appel of the ordre judiciaire (judiciary) is a juridiction de droit commun du second degré, a. It examines judgements, for example from the correctional tribunal or a tribunal de grande instance. When one of the parties is not satisfied with the verdict, it can appeal. While communications from jurisdictions of first instance are termed "judgements", or judgments, a court of appeal renders an arrêt (verdict), which may either uphold or annul the initial judgment. A verdict of the court of appeal may be further appealed en cassation. If the appeal is admissible at the cour de cassation, that court does not re-judge the facts of the matter a third time, but may investigate and verify whether the rules of law were properly applied by the lower courts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arash Derambarsh</span> French editor and political activist

Arash Derambarsh is a French editor, author, and debarred lawyer. He is a member of the City Council of Courbevoie, and an activist against food waste.

Yvan Benedetti is a French far-right activist. The former president of L'Œuvre Française (2012–13), he has been the spokesman of The Nationalists since 2015.

The Tunisian Association for the Support of Minorities or ATSM is a Tunisian Non-governmental organization fighting for minority rights, targeting antisemitism in particular.

International Scoop and Journalism Festival was a French festival held every year in Angers, in the Maine-et-Loire département. Its last edition in Angers took place in November 2010. The following year, the festival moved to Lille, and after this edition, the organizers announced that they would not be holding the event again.

References

  1. 1 2 Isabelle Monnin (5 June 2008). "Une justice communautariste ? Scandale pour un hymen". Le Nouvel Observateur (2274).
  2. ↑ Article 180, alinéa 2 du code civil : « S'il y a eu erreur dans la personne, ou sur des qualités essentielles de la personne, l'autre époux peut demander la nullité du mariage. »
  3. 1 2 "Jugement du tribunal de grande instance de Lille 1, 1 avril 2008 No. 07-08458". ProChoix . 2 June 2008. ; D. 2008, p. 1389 ; JCP G No. 26, 25 juin 2008, II, 10122, note G. Raoul-Cormeil : « Annulation d'un mariage par consentement mutuel ou validité d'un mariage civil en dépit d'un mensonge sur la virginité » ; Gazette du Palais, 5 juin 2008, No. 157, p. 16 ; « Autour d'une certaine qualité essentielle en mariage... beaucoup de bruit déjà pour une affaire à suivre », Droit de la familleNo. 7, juillet 2008, comm. 98, avec une note (Fac-similé [ permanent dead link ])
  4. ↑ "Mariage annulé : le parquet général va faire appel". Le Monde . 2 June 2008.
  5. ↑ "Mariage annulé pour "non virginité" : le parquet va faire appel du jugement". Le Nouvel Observateur . 2 June 2008. Archived from the original on 3 June 2008. Retrieved 14 January 2020.
  6. ↑ Véronique Mikalef-Toudic, Le ministère public, partie principale dans le procès civil, PUAM, 2006, p. 320-339
  7. ↑ Frédérick Lecluyse (6 June 2008). "Mariage annulé : les époux déjà remariés à l'état civil !". La Voix du Nord .
  8. ↑ S.L. (avec AFP) (6 June 2008). "Les eurodéputés s'élèvent contre le mariage annulé". Le Figaro .
  9. ↑ Maître Eolas (19 June 2008). "Affaire du mariage annulé à Lille : l'exécution provisoire a été suspendue".
  10. ↑ « Annulation du mariage pour erreur sur les qualités essentielles du conjoint : arrêt de l’exécution provisoire », La Semaine Juridique Édition Générale No. 26, 25 juin 2008, act. 451, mentionnant CA Douai, ord. réf., No. 95/8, 19 juin 2008
  11. ↑ Ségolène de Larquier (avec agence), « Mariage à Lille : les deux époux redemandent en appel l'annulation », LePoint.fr, 22 septembre 2008
  12. ↑ « Mariage annulé: décision de la cour d'appel le 17 novembre », AP French Worldstream, 22 septembre 2008
  13. ↑ Martin de Montvalon, « Mariage annulé: les époux ont redemandé en appel l'annulation de leur union », 22 septembre 2008, Agence France Presse
  14. ↑ L'annulation d'un mariage pour non-virginité de l'épouse rejetée en appel, lemonde.fr 17/11/2008
  15. ↑ CA Douai, 17 novembre 2008, RG 08/03786
  16. ↑ « L'annulation d'un mariage pour non-virginité de l'épouse rejetée en appel », Le Monde, 17 novembre 2008.
  17. ↑ Maître Eolas, « l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de Douai du 17 novembre 2008, annulant l'annulation du mariage de Lille qui a eu lieu à Mons-en-Barœul »
  18. ↑ « La cour d'appel de Douai rejette l'annulation du mariage pour mensonge sur la virginité », dépêches JurisClasseur, 27 novembre 2008, 1484
  19. ↑ Aline Cheynet de Beaupré (21 November 2008). "" Un mariage forcé "". blog Dalloz . Retrieved 14 May 2017.
  20. ↑ Adeline Gouttenoire, « Droit de la famille. Chronique sous la direction de Jacqueline Rubellin-Devichi », La Semaine Juridique, Édition Générale No. 1, 7 janvier 2009, I 102
  21. ↑ Philippe Malaurie, « Rejet de l'annulation du mariage pour mensonge sur la virginité », La Semaine Juridique Édition Générale No. 3, 14 janvier 2009, II 10005
  22. ↑ Martin de Montvalon, « Mariage annulé: l'annulation rejetée en appel, les époux remariés de fait », Agence France-Presse, 17 novembre 2008
  23. ↑ Damien Sadi, « Brèves observations à propos de l’erreur sur les qualités essentielles en matière de mariage », 19 novembre 2008
  24. ↑ Jean-Pierre Rosenczveig, « "Mariés malgré eux" : une décision très politique », 18 novembre 2008
  25. ↑ Gwenaëlle Moulins, « Portrait : Xavier Labbée, avocat de l'époux dans l'affaire du "mariage de Lille" », La Croix , 19 juin 2008
  26. ↑ "Le Post". Archived from the original on 3 June 2008. Retrieved 14 January 2020.
  27. ↑ Agnès Leclair (2 June 2008). "Mariage annulé : l'épouse a cédé aux pressions". Le Figaro .
  28. ↑ Libération
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.