Affectio commodi and affectio iustitiae

Last updated • 5 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia
Duns Scotus as depicted in Duns Scotus, defender of the Immaculate Conception by Berard Vogt (1955 edition). Duns Scotus, Defender of the Immaculate Conception - title.png
Duns Scotus as depicted in Duns Scotus, defender of the Immaculate Conception by Berard Vogt (1955 edition).

Affectio commodi and affectio iustitiae are two fundamental concepts in Scotistic ethics. In the framework of Scotus' voluntarism and the Christian notion of charity, they are an alternative to the Aristotelian premise according to which every desired good is ultimately directed towards one's own happiness.

Contents

The first formulation of the duality was carried out by Anselm of Canterbury in his De casu diaboli, in a fragment regarding the fall of the angels. Despite not using the terms as affections, Saint Anselm explains the rebellion as a free search for an individual advantage (commodum) which went against justice (iustitia), ending up in a larger unhappiness to the angels than that happiness they were searching for when they rebelled. Free will implies the possibility to sin, and sin is defined as preferring one's advantage to justice. [1]

This notion was discussed in Second Scholasticism by figures such as Domingo de Soto or Francisco Suárez. Both did not fully agree with the concept, but made a critical acknowledgement of the distinction and adapted it to fit their systems. [2]

In Scotism

Scotus presents both affectiones as inclinations of the will, deriving from the Scholastic premise according to which all things have "a natural inclination to their own perfection". As appetites were divided between those sensitive and those intellective, and the will had been historically characterized as pertaining to the second kind, a question arises regarding how the will may fail to desire an apprehended good, and which relationship can be established between ignorance and free will considering the latter may seem to be caused by the former. Scotus answers by denying the notion that the will is to be associated exclusively with intellective appetite, a view he characterizes as deterministic. [3]

Scotus prefers to divide the will of rational agents in two aspects: the affectio commodi and the affectio iustitiae. The affectio commodi is equaled to the aforementioned inclination to happiness and perfection of one's own nature. The affectio iustitiae, contrastingly, is to be understood as the desire of good which is not directed towards oneself. [4] As formulated by the philosopher:

Two affections may be assigned to the will, namely, the affection for justice and the affection for the advantageous. The affection for justice is nobler than the affection for the advantageous, understanding by "justice" not only acquired or infused justice, but also innate justice, which is the will’s congenital liberty by reason of which it is able to will some good not oriented to self. [5]

The affectio iustitiae is therefore our capacity to love and seek the good of other entities, not with the objective of attaining any benefit nor to "complete" us but because they are of inherent value. The actions carried out of affectio iustitiae are those morally worthy. [5]

According to the affection for what is advantageous, however, nothing can be willed save with reference to self. And this we would possess if only an intellectual appetite with no liberty followed upon intellectual knowledge, as sense appetite follows sense cognition. The only point I wish to make from this is the following. To love something in itself [or for its own sake] is more an act of giving or sharing and is a freer act than is desiring that object for oneself. As such it is an act more appropriate to the will, as the seat of this innate justice at least. [5]

Scotus differs from Aristotle and Saint Thomas Aquinas regarding the possibility of an opposition between happiness and ethics. Both denied such option considering ethical acting was the means by which "human flourishing" was achieved, and a divinely-guaranteed road to happiness. The Scotistic primacy of the will, however, asserts that this faculty is absolutely free and therefore it can indeed will opposite things. Using the definition according to which moral acts are those with an intrinsic worth and meritorious acts are those which advance salvation, Scotistic ethics are based on honoring the covenant between God and mankind, and the meritorious character of actions is granted by the divine will. This differs from the Thomistic view according to which, as morally correct acts are logically conducting to eternal salvation, there is an ontological coincidence between moral and meritorious acts. In voluntarism, this equivalence is not ontological nor to be taken for granted despite the divine covenant will eventually make it effective. [6] Contrarily to their interpretation of Thomistic ethics, in which human will would be "bound to will happiness" in a universal sense but not in a particular one, Scotists pose the affectio iustitiae as freeing human beings from their natural appetite and providing a "spring of action" directed to the goodness of things which is not necessarily suited to our rational nature. This concept, according to Scotism, "provides the freedom that the will could not have if it were merely intellective appetite". [7] Scotus states

it is clear that a free will is not bound to will happiness in every way in which the will would will it if it were an intellective appetite without freedom. Rather, in eliciting its act the will is bound to moderate its appetite qua intellective appetite, that is, to moderate its affectio commodi, lest it will immoderately. [8]

As Scotus sees it, Thomism supposes that humans always act searching for happiness, despite they may not will the object in which happiness objectively is. Scotus agrees on this regarding the affectio commodi or natural appetite, but warns against believing this concept to be equal to the will or elicited from it. Nonetheless, the affectio commodi is still so fundamental to the will that the latter usually wills its own happiness in the end. [9]

More specifically, the affectio iustitiae can be defined as the inclination of the will to follow the moral law. [10] In Scotistic ethics, the faithful are to moderate their affectio commodi by searching for a primacy of the affectio iustitiae. Instead of following the unfree decrees of our appetites, the believer is to follow the God-given Christian law which frees him from such impulses. Divine commands are to be followed without regarding our own "perfection" or interest as rational beings. [11] Still, the affectio commodi is not to be understood as an invincible decree eliciting any specific act, but an inclination that can be freely followed or not. [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

Natural law is a system of law based on a close observation of natural order and human nature, from which values, thought by natural law's proponents to be intrinsic to human nature, can be deduced and applied independently of positive law. According to the theory of law called jusnaturalism, all people have inherent rights, conferred not by act of legislation but by "God, nature, or reason". Natural law theory can also refer to "theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality".

Theological virtues are virtues associated in Christian theology and philosophy with salvation resulting from the grace of God. Virtues are traits or qualities which dispose one to conduct oneself in a morally good manner. Traditionally the theological virtues have been named faith, hope, and charity (love). They are coupled with the four natural or cardinal virtues, and opposed to the seven deadly sins.

Will, within philosophy, is a faculty of the mind. Will is important as one of the parts of the mind, along with reason and understanding. It is considered central to the field of ethics because of its role in enabling deliberate action.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divine simplicity</span> View of God without parts or features

In classical theistic and monotheistic theology, the doctrine of divine simplicity says that God is simple . God exists as one unified entity, with no distinct attributes; God's existence is identical to God's essence.

In Christian theology, merit accrues when a believer's good work incurs "a future reward from a graceful God". The role of human merit in Christian life has been a point of dispute between Catholics and Protestants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divine command theory</span> Meta-ethical theory of morality

Divine command theory is a meta-ethical theory which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God. The theory asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monotheistic and polytheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted the importance of God's commands in establishing morality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Virtue ethics</span> Normative ethical theories

Virtue ethics is a philosophical approach that treats virtue and character as the primary subjects of ethics, in contrast to other ethical systems that put consequences of voluntary acts, principles or rules of conduct, or obedience to divine authority in the primary role.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euthyphro dilemma</span> Ethical problem on the origin of morality posed by Socrates

The Euthyphro dilemma is found in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro, in which Socrates asks Euthyphro, "Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?" (10a)

<i>Nicomachean Ethics</i> Aristotles theory of virtue ethics grounded in natural philosophy and human teleology

The Nicomachean Ethics is Aristotle's best-known work on ethics: the science of the good for human life, that which is the goal or end at which all our actions aim. It consists of ten sections, referred to as books, and is closely related to Aristotle's Eudemian Ethics. The work is essential for the interpretation of Aristotelian ethics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomism</span> Philosophical system originating from Thomas Aquinas

Thomism is the philosophical and theological school which arose as a legacy of the work and thought of Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), the Dominican philosopher, theologian, and Doctor of the Church.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Francis Turretin</span> Genevan-Italian Reformed scholastic theologian (1623–1687)

Francis Turretin was a Genevan-Italian Reformed scholastic theologian.

Aristotle first used the term ethics to name a field of study developed by his predecessors Socrates and Plato which is devoted to the attempt to provide a rational response to the question of how humans should best live. Aristotle regarded ethics and politics as two related but separate fields of study, since ethics examines the good of the individual, while politics examines the good of the city-state, which he considered to be the best type of community.

<i>Summa Theologica</i> Theological treatise by Thomas Aquinas

The Summa Theologiae or Summa Theologica, often referred to simply as the Summa, is the best-known work of Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), a scholastic theologian and Doctor of the Church. It is a compendium of all of the main theological teachings of the Catholic Church, intended to be an instructional guide for theology students, including seminarians and the literate laity. Presenting the reasoning for almost all points of Christian theology in the West, topics of the Summa follow the following cycle: God; Creation, Man; Man's purpose; Christ; the Sacraments; and back to God.

Affect is a concept, used in the philosophy of Baruch Spinoza and elaborated by Henri Bergson, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, that places emphasis on bodily or embodied experience. The word affect takes on a different meaning in psychology and other fields.

Glossary of terms commonly found in Stoic philosophy.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to ethics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Augustinianism</span> Philosophical and theological system

Augustinianism is the philosophical and theological system of Augustine of Hippo and its subsequent development by other thinkers, notably Boethius, Anselm of Canterbury and Bonaventure. Among Augustine's most important works are The City of God, De doctrina Christiana, and Confessions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Good and evil</span> Philosophical dichotomy

In philosophy, religion, and psychology, "good and evil" is a common dichotomy. In religions with Manichaean and Abrahamic influence, evil is perceived as the dualistic antagonistic opposite of good, in which good should prevail and evil should be defeated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scottish philosophy</span>

Scottish philosophy is a philosophical tradition created by philosophers belonging to Scottish universities. Although many philosophers such as Francis Hutcheson, David Hume, Thomas Reid, and Adam Smith are familiar to almost all philosophers it was not until the 19th century that the notion of 'Scottish philosophy' became recognized and highly regarded internationally. In the 20th century, however, this tradition declined as Scottish-educated philosophers left for England.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomistic theology of merit</span> Theological discipline

Thomistic theology of merit is the set of beliefs developed by Thomistic thinkers regarding merit in Christianity.

References

  1. Soliani 2020, pp. 797–798.
  2. Orrego 2014, p. 162.
  3. Williams 1995, pp. 425–426.
  4. Bruni et al. 2023, pp. 581–582.
  5. 1 2 3 Bruni et al. 2023, p. 582.
  6. Bruni et al. 2023, pp. 582–583.
  7. Williams 1995, p. 428.
  8. Williams 1995, p. 427.
  9. Williams 1995, pp. 428–429.
  10. Williams 1995, p. 437.
  11. Williams 1995, p. 443.
  12. Williams 1995, p. 444.

Bibliography