Alabama v. Georgia

Last updated

Alabama v. Georgia
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Original jurisdiction
Decided May 1, 1860
Full case nameState of Alabama v. State of Georgia
Citations64 U.S. 505 ( more )
23 How. 505; 16 L. Ed. 556
Outcome
The true border between the states of Alabama and Georgia is the average water mark on the western bank of the Chattahoochee River
Court membership
Chief Justice
Roger B. Taney
Associate Justices
John McLean  · James M. Wayne
John Catron  · Peter V. Daniel
Samuel Nelson  · Robert C. Grier
John A. Campbell  · Nathan Clifford
Case opinion
MajorityWayne, joined by unanimous court

State of Alabama v. State of Georgia, 64 U.S. (23 How.) 505 (1860), is a unanimous ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the true border between the states of Alabama and Georgia was the average water mark on the western bank of the Chattahoochee River. In coming to its conclusion, the Court defined what constituted the bed and bank of a river. [1] [2] The case has had international repercussions as well. The Supreme Court's definition was adopted by courts in the United Kingdom in the case Hindson v. Ashby (1896) 65 LJ Ch. 515, 2 Ch. 27. [2]

Contents

Background

In 1629, during European colonization of the Americas, King Charles I granted Sir Robert Heath a charter giving him title to Native American-occupied land from the northern boundary of what is modern-day Florida north to Albemarle Sound (31st latitude), extending from the Atlantic Ocean west to the Pacific Ocean. [3] In 1663, Charles II of England revoked the Heath charter and issued a new charter to eight noblemen (the "Lords and Proprietors"). [4] In 1665, this charter was amended to extend the land grant northward roughly to the current border of North Carolina and Virginia. [4] In 1729, the Proprietors were forced to turn their charters over to George II of Great Britain, and North Carolina separated from South Carolina. [5]

In 1732, George II granted James Oglethorpe and other settlers a charter to all South Carolina Colony land west of the Savannah River. [6] However, the charter was unclear as to whether the new colony covered all of South Carolina's western border, and South Carolina continued to dispute Georgia's claim over a strip of land about 12 miles (19 km) wide. [7] In order to help secure ratification of the Articles of Confederation, the new United States Congress passed legislation encouraging all states to give up their western claims so that new territories might be formed and transformed into states which might eventually be admitted to the union. [8] In August 1787, South Carolina ceded the disputed strip of land to the state of Georgia. [9]

In the Compact of 1802, Georgia ceded its sparsely settled western lands beyond the Chattahoochee River to the United States in exchange for a guarantee that the federal government would extinguish all Native American claims to land within the state's borders. [10] [11] The United States made good on its promise, removing the Cherokee nation to reservations in the new Mississippi Territory (a process which would not end until the completion of the Trail of Tears forcible removals in 1838). [11] The Compact of 1802 specified that Georgia's western boundary would be as follows: [12]

West of a line beginning on the western bank of the Chattahoochee River where the same crosses the boundary between the United States and Spain, running up the said river and along the western bank thereof.

In 1817, what is now the modern state of Mississippi was created from the western half of the Mississippi Territory, the remaining territory renamed the Alabama Territory. [13] The territory became the modern state of Alabama in 1819. [14]

The state of Alabama entered into a dispute with the state of Georgia over the specific meaning of the Compact of 1802. Alabama argued that the contour of the land on the western bank of the Chattahoochee River was sometimes high bluffs and sometimes low, flat floodplains, and that the high-water mark sometimes marched as much as a half-mile inland to the west. [15] Georgia answered that it did indeed claim these lands as its own, and that the Compact of 1802 did not cover the northernmost part of the border (which Georgia claimed it had obtained directly from the state of South Carolina in 1787 without first transferring title to the United States). [16]

The State of Alabama submitted its case to the Supreme Court in December 1855. [17] The State of Georgia submitted its reply in December 1858. [18]

Decision

Associate Justice James Moore Wayne delivered the unanimous opinion of the court.

Justice Wayne emphasized the mutual nature of the Compact of 1802, and pointed out that Georgia admitted in the agreement that its western boundary extended north to the border with the state of Tennessee. [19] This, then, made any argument over the South Carolina cession of 1787 moot.

Next, Justice Wayne argued that "The contract of cession must be interpreted by the words of it, according to their received meaning and use in the language in which it is written, as that can be collected from judicial opinions concerning the rights of private persons upon rivers, and the writings of publicists in reference to the settlement of controversies between nations and States as to their ownership and jurisdiction on the soil of rivers within their banks and beds." [20] Citing scholarly sources from Europe, American case law (such as Handly's Lessee v. Anthony , 18 U. S. 374 (1820)), and other cessions between states and the United States, Justice Wayne concluded that the Compact of 1802 did not mean the low-water mark as claimed by Alabama. [21]

However, Wayne concluded that this did not necessarily mean the high-water mark, as claimed by Georgia. Rather, the Compact of 1802 specified the western bank, and the bank was different from the high-water mark. Drawing on the sources cited, Wayne defined the bank as follows (emphasis in original): [22]

the bed of the river is that portion of its soil which is alternately covered and left bare as there may be an increase or diminution in the supply of water, and which is adequate to contain it at its average and mean stage during the entire year, without reference to the extraordinary freshets of the winter or spring or the extreme droughts of the summer or autumn.

The majority concluded, therefore, that only the average water level defined the bank, and that the boundary of Georgia should be so marked. [22] The Court also reaffirmed that the Compact of 1802 gave both states free navigation of the river. [22]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Alabama</span>

The history of what is now Alabama stems back thousands of years ago when it was inhabited by indigenous peoples. The Woodland period spanned from around 1000 BCE to 1000 CE and was marked by the development of the Eastern Agricultural Complex. This was followed by the Mississippian culture of Native Americans, which lasted to around the 1600 CE. The first Europeans to make contact with Alabama were the Spanish, with the first permanent European settlement being Mobile, established by the French in 1702.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Early County, Georgia</span> County in Georgia, United States

Early County is a county located on the southwest border of the U.S. state of Georgia. As of the 2020 census, the population was 10,854. The county seat is Blakely, where the Early County Courthouse is located. Created on December 15, 1818, it was named for Peter Early, 28th Governor of Georgia. The county is bordered on the west by the Chattahoochee River, forming the border with Alabama.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chattahoochee County, Georgia</span> County in Georgia, United States

Chattahoochee County, also known as Cusseta-Chattahoochee County, is a county located on the western border in central Georgia. As of the 2020 census, the population was 9,565. The county seat is Cusseta, with which the county shares a consolidated city-county government. The city of Cusseta remains a geographically distinct municipality within Chattahoochee County. The county was created on February 13, 1854.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chattahoochee River</span> River in Georgia, United States

The Chattahoochee River is a river in the Southeastern United States. It forms the southern half of the Alabama and Georgia border, as well as a portion of the Florida and Georgia border. It is a tributary of the Apalachicola River, a relatively short river formed by the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint rivers and emptying from Florida into Apalachicola Bay in the Gulf of Mexico. The Chattahoochee River is about 430 miles (690 km) long. The Chattahoochee, Flint, and Apalachicola rivers together make up the Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint River Basin. The Chattahoochee makes up the largest part of the ACF's drainage basin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yazoo lands</span> Former territory of the U.S. state of Georgia; now part of Alabama and Mississippi

The Yazoo lands were the central and western regions of the U.S. state of Georgia, when its western border stretched back to the Mississippi. The Yazoo lands were named for the Yazoo nation, that lived on the lower course of the Yazoo, in what is now Mississippi.

In the United States, an interstate compact is a pact or agreement between two or more states, or between states and any foreign sub-national government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mississippi Territory</span> Territory of the United States from 1798 to 1817

The Territory of Mississippi was an organized incorporated territory of the United States that was created under an organic act signed into law by President John Adams on April 7, 1798. It was dissolved on December 10, 1817, when the western half of the territory was admitted to the Union as the State of Mississippi. The eastern half was redesignated as the Alabama Territory; it was admitted to the Union as the State of Alabama on December 14, 1819. The Chattahoochee River played a significant role in the definition of the territory's borders. The population increased in the early 1800s from settlement, with cotton being an important cash crop.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Georgia Railroad and Banking Company</span> Historic American railroad and banking company

The Georgia Railroad and Banking Company also seen as "GARR", was a historic railroad and banking company that operated in the U.S. state of Georgia. In 1967 it reported 833 million revenue-ton-miles of freight and 3 million passenger-miles; at the end of the year it operated 331 miles (533 km) of road and 510 miles (820 km) of track.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Montgomery and West Point Railroad</span>

The Montgomery and West Point Railroad (M&WP) was an early 19th-century railroad in Alabama and Georgia. It played an important role during the American Civil War as a supply and transportation route for the Confederate Army, and, as such, was the target of a large raid by Union cavalry in the summer of 1864, called Wilson's Raid. The railroad played an important role in this business, and it became a symbol to industrialization in the United States. The railroads make it possible to supply large military forces that were needed in order to take over and conquer the Southern part of the United States. During the early 19th-century, turnpikes, canals, and railroads all brought people to the west and more products to the east. There was an effort in Americans during this time to build a railroad that would link Georgia to trade with the Tennessee and Ohio areas, and the M&WP was a starting point in helping to accomplish this goal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scouting in Georgia (U.S. state)</span>

Scouting in Georgia has a long history, from the 1910s to the present day, serving thousands of youth in programs that suit the environment in which they live. The state is home to many milestones for the Scouting movement. The Girl Scout birthplace is located in Savannah, and President Jimmy Carter served as a Scoutmaster in Plains, Georgia.

Florida v. Georgia, 58 U.S. 478 (1854), was a United States Supreme Court case invoking the Court's original jurisdiction to determine boundary disputes between states. In this case the boundary dispute was between the State of Florida and the State of Georgia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northeast Georgia</span> Region of Georgia in the United States

Northeast Georgia is a region of Georgia in the United States. The northern part is also in the North Georgia mountains or Georgia mountain region, while the southern part is still hilly but much flatter in topography. Northeast Georgia is also served by the Asheville/Spartanburg/Greenville/Anderson market. Largest cities in the region: Gainesville, Flowery Branch, Toccoa, Dahlonega, Cumming.

Poole v. Fleeger, 36 U.S. 185 (1837), is a 7-to-0 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the states of Kentucky and Tennessee had properly entered into an agreement establishing a mutual border between the two states. The plaintiffs in the case were granted title to property improperly conveyed by the state of Tennessee north of this border. In the ruling, the Supreme Court asserted the fundamental right of states and nations to establish their borders regardless of private contract, and made a fundamental statement about the rights of parties to object to a trial court ruling under the rules of civil procedure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Rome, Georgia</span>

The history of Rome, Georgia extends to thousands of years of human settlement by ancient Native Americans. Spanish explorers recorded reaching the area in the later 16th century, and European Americans of the United States founded the city named Rome in 1834, when the residents of the area were still primarily Cherokee, before their removal on the Trail of Tears to Indian Territory. The competition for resources among its diverse inhabitants led to both innovation and strife. Its location at the confluence of three rivers enabled Rome to develop as a crossroads for trade and transportation. The city was later designated as the county seat of Floyd County, Georgia. Today, Rome is the largest city in Northwest Georgia, and is a regional center of healthcare, education, and manufacturing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tri-state water dispute</span> Water use conflict in the southeastern United States

The tri-state water dispute is a 21st-century water-use conflict among the U.S. states of Georgia, Alabama, and Florida over flows in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin and the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa River Basin. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has regulated water flow for the entire Chattahoochee River, from Lake Lanier in Forsyth County, Georgia, to Alabama and Florida.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tennessee–Georgia water dispute</span> Territorial dispute between the U.S. states of Tennessee and Georgia

The Tennessee–Georgia water dispute is an ongoing territorial dispute between the U.S. States of Tennessee and Georgia about whether or not the border between the two states should have been located farther north, allowing a small portion of the Tennessee River to be located in Georgia. The dispute has existed since the 19th century, but was further fueled by the increase in demand for water due to the rapid growth of the Atlanta metropolitan area which began in the latter 20th century.

Florida v. Georgia, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in an original jurisdiction case. It involves a long-running dispute over waters within the ACF River Basin, running from the north Georgia mountains through metro Atlanta to the Florida panhandle, which is managed by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Waters in the area have been stressed by the population growth of Atlanta over previous decades. The immediate case stemmed from droughts in 2011 and 2012 that caused economic damage to Florida due to lower water flows from the ACF River Basin into the panhandle, impacting its seafood production; Florida sought relief to have more water allocated towards them from the ACF by placing a water allocation cap on Georgia. The Supreme Court assigned a special master to review Florida's complaint, but ultimately found in 2016 that Florida had not fully demonstrated the need for more allocation. Florida challenged this determination to the Supreme Court. On June 27, 2018, the Supreme Court ruled 5–4 that the special master had not properly considered Florida's argument and remanded the case to be reheard and reviewed.

References

  1. ↑ Wisdom, The Law of Rivers and Watercourses, 1962, p. 9.
  2. 1 2 Kalinoe, Water Law and Customary Water Rights in Papua New Guinea, 1999, p. 27-28.
  3. ↑ Chiorazzi and Most, Prestatehood Legal Materials: A Fifty-State Research Guide, Including New York City and the District of Columbia, 2006, p. 840.
  4. 1 2 Chiorazzi and Most, Prestatehood Legal Materials: A Fifty-State Research Guide, Including New York City and the District of Columbia, 2006, p. 840-841.
  5. ↑ Chiorazzi and Most, Prestatehood Legal Materials: A Fifty-State Research Guide, Including New York City and the District of Columbia, 2006, p. 841.
  6. ↑ Channing, A Students' History of the United States, 1898, p. 128-129.
  7. ↑ Lalor, "Territories," in Cyclopædia of Political Science, Political Economy, and of the Political History of the United States, 1886, p. 915.
  8. ↑ Lalor, "Territories," in Cyclopædia of Political Science, Political Economy, and of the Political History of the United States, 1886, p. 916-917.
  9. ↑ Lalor, "Territories," in Cyclopædia of Political Science, Political Economy, and of the Political History of the United States, 1886, p. 917.
  10. ↑ Lalor, "Territories," in Cyclopædia of Political Science, Political Economy, and of the Political History of the United States, 1886, p. 391.
  11. 1 2 Sturgis, Presidents From Washington Through Monroe: 1789–1825: Debating the Issues in Pro and Con Primary Documents, 2002, p. 109.
  12. ↑ State of Alabama v. State of Georgia, 64 U.S. 505.
  13. ↑ Chiorazzi and Most, Prestatehood Legal Materials: A Fifty-State Research Guide, Including New York City and the District of Columbia, 2006, p. 9.
  14. ↑ Chiorazzi and Most, Prestatehood Legal Materials: A Fifty-State Research Guide, Including New York City and the District of Columbia, 2006, p. 14-16.
  15. ↑ State of Alabama v. State of Georgia, 64 U.S. 505, 506–507.
  16. ↑ State of Alabama v. State of Georgia, 64 U.S. 505, 509–510.
  17. ↑ State of Alabama v. State of Georgia, 64 U.S. 505, 506.
  18. ↑ State of Alabama v. State of Georgia, 64 U.S. 505, 508.
  19. ↑ State of Alabama v. State of Georgia, 64 U. S. 505, 511.
  20. ↑ State of Alabama v. State of Georgia, 64 U. S. 505, 512–513.
  21. ↑ State of Alabama v. State of Georgia, 64 U. S. 505, 514–515.
  22. 1 2 3 State of Alabama v. State of Georgia, 64 U. S. 505, 515.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.