Alessandro Strumia

Last updated

Alessandro Strumia
Born (1969-12-26) 26 December 1969 (age 54)
Alma mater University of Pisa
Awards1996 "Giorgio Gamberini" prize for the PhD thesis Supersymmetric Unification [1]
Scientific career
Fields Flavour physics
Vacuum decay
Cosmology
Dark matter
Thesis Supersymmetric Unification (1995)
Doctoral advisor Riccardo Barbieri

Alessandro Strumia (born 26 December 1969) [2] is an Italian physicist at the University of Pisa. His research focuses on high energy physics, beyond the Standard Model, studying the flavour of elementary particle, charge conjugation parity (CP) symmetry violations, and the Higgs boson. In September 2018, Strumia gave a controversial presentation at CERN's first Workshop on High Energy Theory and Gender, where he claimed that male, not female scientists, were the victims of discrimination on the part of universities.

Contents

Education

Strumia obtained his PhD in 1995, at the University of Pisa, where his doctoral advisor was Riccardo Barbieri. His thesis was titled Supersymmetric unification. [2]

Career

Strumia's research specialization is in physics beyond the Standard Model. [2] In 1995, with Riccardo Barbieri and Lawrence J. Hall, he studied flavour and CP violations, present in supersymmetric unified theories even in the absence of any flavour or CP violation in the input for the soft-supersymmetry breaking parameters. [3]

He is one of the originators of the idea of Minimal Flavor Violation, [4] a proposal to characterize the effects of flavor transitions in new theories of particle physics. In 2004, together with Riccardo Barbieri, Alex Pomarol and Riccardo Rattazzi, Alessandro Strumia laid out a conceptually clear and practically useful framework for the analysis of the combined electroweak precision data of the low- and high-energy phases of the LEP experiments. [5] After the OPERA experiment reported an observation of neutrinos apparently traveling faster than light, Strumia in collaboration with Gian Giudice and Sergey Sibiryakov showed that superluminal neutrinos would imply some anomalies in the velocities of electrons and muons as a result of quantum-mechanical effects. Such anomalies could be already ruled out from existing data on cosmic rays, thus contradicting the OPERA results. [6] [7]

After the discovery of the Higgs boson, he computed the probability that the Higgs vacuum undergoes quantum tunnelling, finding that the universe is in a critical state which will eventually end in a cosmic collapse. [8] He joined the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN)'s theory division as a fellow in 2000, [2] and as a member of the CMS Collaboration, he was a credited coauthor on the paper which announced the Higgs boson discovery; his primary affiliation was Estonia's National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics. [9] Along with Joseph Lykken and other collaborators, he later proposed the "modified naturalness" hypothesis for the Higgs boson's mass. [10]

While at CERN in June 2018, Strumia and Riccardo Torre worked on a new set of algorithms with which to evaluate the impact of published scientific research. Basing their investigation on PageRank used by Google, they proposed a similar system of ranking scientific papers and authors. Researchers had "mixed reaction", suggesting that it would be useful for "lifetime achievement" but possibly subject to "transparency issues". [11] The "simplicity" of current methods of evaluation allows for gaming the system. The difference in Strumia and Torres' approach is that they include what they describe as "second-generation" and later-generation citations in their algorithms. Therefore, not only the original citations of the work are taken into account, but subsequent citations to derivative material also. They named their systems PaperRank and AuthorRank. They also proposed a system called CitationCoin to reduce the effect of groups who "inflate" each other citation count. [11]

Controversies

Using pictures of conference slides

Marco Cirelli and Alessandro Strumia were amongst multiple teams that used digital photos from a conference presentation by other authors in 2008 in Stockholm for a subsequent publication. The presentation showed a highly anticipated but yet unpublished measurement of the positron fraction in cosmic rays by the PAMELA collaboration. [12] [13] [14] [15]

Talk on gender discrimination

On 28 September 2018, Strumia gave a presentation at CERN's first Workshop on High Energy Theory and Gender [16] that provoked considerable controversy. [17] Citing an analysis he had performed on data from the InSpire database, [18] he tested the idea that there is a gender bias against women within the academic circles of physics. He claimed that his results suggest that male scientists were victims of discrimination. [19] [20] [21]

On 30 September 2018, CERN released a short statement, removed the slides of Strumia's presentation from its conference website and on 1 October, suspended him from his "invited scientist" position, due to a breach of Code of Conduct (naming a CERN employee in the presentation). [17] [22] [23] [24] [25] On 1 October 2018, the University of Pisa released a statement signaling the opening of an ethical investigation [26] and subsequently sanctioned him. [27]

Strumia's talk was condemned in a public letter titled “High Energy Physics Community Statement” on a website called “Particles for Justice” on 2 October. As of 13 October, it received nearly 4,000 signatures from scientists working in High Energy Physics and related fields, including those of John Ellis, Howard Georgi and David Gross. [28] [29] In response, a rebuttal titled "Justice For Strumia" was published online along with a petition for reinstatement of Strumia. [30] Subsequently, the petition and the list of "2370 signatories from 90 countries" were sent to the director general of CERN receiving "no response".[ citation needed ] An anonymous commentary on Strumia's talk and the community response was published in Areo magazine. [31]

One supporter of Strumia was the former string theorist Luboš Motl. [32] Physicist Sabine Hossenfelder performed an alternative analysis using a different database and found that after accounting for disproportionately higher rates of women leaving the field the sex differences become negligible. [30] [33] In a later paper, she defended Strumia's publication in the journal Quantitative Science Studies (QSS), calling the findings "significant and robust", while cautioning that the study "cannot reveal the origin of the existing gender differences". [34]

On March 7, 2019, CERN confirmed that Strumia's status as guest professor will not be continued. [35] [36] Following this announcement, Strumia uploaded an unofficial recording of the event on a newly started website, where he claimed that his position had been misrepresented in the media. [37]

In November 2019, the journal Quantitative Science Studies (QSS) announced it would publish the paper. [38] The journal published the paper in 2021, [39] and in the following issue published four critical commentaries about it, [40] [41] [42] [43] along with Strumia's response to the commentaries. [44]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Standard Model</span> Theory of forces and subatomic particles

The Standard Model of particle physics is the theory describing three of the four known fundamental forces in the universe and classifying all known elementary particles. It was developed in stages throughout the latter half of the 20th century, through the work of many scientists worldwide, with the current formulation being finalized in the mid-1970s upon experimental confirmation of the existence of quarks. Since then, proof of the top quark (1995), the tau neutrino (2000), and the Higgs boson (2012) have added further credence to the Standard Model. In addition, the Standard Model has predicted various properties of weak neutral currents and the W and Z bosons with great accuracy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Technicolor (physics)</span> Hypothetical model through which W and Z bosons acquire mass

Technicolor theories are models of physics beyond the Standard Model that address electroweak gauge symmetry breaking, the mechanism through which W and Z bosons acquire masses. Early technicolor theories were modelled on quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the "color" theory of the strong nuclear force, which inspired their name.

In particle physics the little hierarchy problem in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) is a refinement of the hierarchy problem. According to quantum field theory, the mass of the Higgs boson must be rather light for the electroweak theory to work. However, the loop corrections to the mass are naturally much greater; this is known as the hierarchy problem. New physical effects such as supersymmetry may in principle reduce the size of the loop corrections, making the theory natural. However, it is known from experiments that new physics such as superpartners does not occur at very low energy scales, so even if these new particles reduce the loop corrections, they do not reduce them enough to make the renormalized Higgs mass completely natural. The expected value of the Higgs mass is about 10 percent of the size of the loop corrections which shows that a certain "little" amount of fine-tuning seems necessary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gerald Guralnik</span>

Gerald Stanford "Gerry" Guralnik was the Chancellor’s Professor of Physics at Brown University. In 1964 he co-discovered the Higgs mechanism and Higgs boson with C. R. Hagen and Tom Kibble (GHK). As part of Physical Review Letters' 50th anniversary celebration, the journal recognized this discovery as one of the milestone papers in PRL history. While widely considered to have authored the most complete of the early papers on the Higgs theory, GHK were controversially not included in the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C. R. Hagen</span>

Carl Richard Hagen is a professor of particle physics at the University of Rochester. He is most noted for his contributions to the Standard Model and Symmetry breaking as well as the 1964 co-discovery of the Higgs mechanism and Higgs boson with Gerald Guralnik and Tom Kibble (GHK). As part of Physical Review Letters 50th anniversary celebration, the journal recognized this discovery as one of the milestone papers in PRL history. While widely considered to have authored the most complete of the early papers on the Higgs theory, GHK were controversially not included in the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physics.

ZZ dibosons are rare pairs of Z bosons. They were first observed by the experiments at the Large Electron–Positron Collider. The first observation in a hadron collider was made by the scientists of DØ collaboration at Fermilab.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Higgs boson</span> Elementary particle involved with rest mass

The Higgs boson, sometimes called the Higgs particle, is an elementary particle in the Standard Model of particle physics produced by the quantum excitation of the Higgs field, one of the fields in particle physics theory. In the Standard Model, the Higgs particle is a massive scalar boson with zero spin, even (positive) parity, no electric charge, and no colour charge that couples to mass. It is also very unstable, decaying into other particles almost immediately upon generation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fabiola Gianotti</span> Italian physicist, director general of the European Council for Nuclear Research

Fabiola Gianotti is an Italian experimental particle physicist who is the current and first woman Director-General at CERN in Switzerland. Her first mandate began on 1 January 2016 and ran for a period of five years. At its 195th Session in 2019, the CERN Council selected Gianotti for a second term as Director-General. Her second five-year term began on 1 January 2021 and goes on until 2025. This is the first time in CERN's history that a Director-General has been appointed for a full second term.

In particle physics, W′ and Z′ bosons refer to hypothetical gauge bosons that arise from extensions of the electroweak symmetry of the Standard Model. They are named in analogy with the Standard Model W and Z bosons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gian Francesco Giudice</span> Italian theoretical physicist

Gian Francesco Giudice is an Italian theoretical physicist working at CERN in particle physics and cosmology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Search for the Higgs boson</span> Effort to prove the existence or non-existence of the Higgs boson

The search for the Higgs boson was a 40-year effort by physicists to prove the existence or non-existence of the Higgs boson, first theorised in the 1960s. The Higgs boson was the last unobserved fundamental particle in the Standard Model of particle physics, and its discovery was described as being the "ultimate verification" of the Standard Model. In March 2013, the Higgs boson was officially confirmed to exist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sau Lan Wu</span> American physicist

Sau Lan Wu is a Chinese American particle physicist and the Enrico Fermi Distinguished Professor of Physics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She made important contributions towards the discovery of the J/psi particle, which provided experimental evidence for the existence of the charm quark, and the gluon, the vector boson of the strong force in the Standard Model of physics. Recently, her team located at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), using data collected at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), was part of the international effort in the discovery of a boson consistent with the Higgs boson.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Riccardo Barbieri</span>

Riccardo Barbieri is an Italian theoretical physicist and a professor at the Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. He has written more than two hundred research papers in the field of theoretical elementary particle physics, and has been particularly influential in physics beyond the Standard Model.

The two-Higgs-doublet model (2HDM) is an extension of the Standard Model of particle physics. 2HDM models are one of the natural choices for beyond-SM models containing two Higgs doublets instead of just one. There are also models with more than two Higgs doublets, for example three-Higgs-doublet models etc.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Future Circular Collider</span> Proposed post-LHC particle accelerator at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

The Future Circular Collider (FCC) is a proposed particle accelerator with an energy significantly above that of previous circular colliders, such as the Super Proton Synchrotron, the Tevatron, and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The FCC project is considering three scenarios for collision types: FCC-hh, for hadron-hadron collisions, including proton-proton and heavy ion collisions, FCC-ee, for electron-positron collisions, and FCC-eh, for electron-hadron collisions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Riccardo Rattazzi</span> Italian theoretical physicist and professor

Riccardo Rattazzi is an Italian theoretical physicist and a professor at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne. His main research interests are in physics beyond the Standard Model and in cosmology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">750 GeV diphoton excess</span> 2015 anomaly in the Large Hadron Collider

The 750 GeV diphoton excess in particle physics was an anomaly in data collected at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in 2015, which could have been an indication of a new particle or resonance. The anomaly was absent in data collected in 2016, suggesting that the diphoton excess was a statistical fluctuation. In the interval between the December 2015 and August 2016 results, the anomaly generated considerable interest in the scientific community, including about 500 theoretical studies. The hypothetical particle was denoted by the Greek letter Ϝ in the scientific literature, owing to the decay channel in which the anomaly occurred. The data, however, were always less than five standard deviations (sigma) different from that expected if there was no new particle, and, as such, the anomaly never reached the accepted level of statistical significance required to announce a discovery in particle physics. After the August 2016 results, interest in the anomaly sank as it was considered a statistical fluctuation. Indeed, a Bayesian analysis of the anomaly found that whilst data collected in 2015 constituted "substantial" evidence for the digamma on the Jeffreys scale, data collected in 2016 combined with that collected in 2015 was evidence against the digamma.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gavin Salam</span> Theoretical particle physicist

Gavin Phillip Salam, is a theoretical particle physicist and a senior research fellow at All Souls College as well as a senior member of staff at CERN in Geneva. His research investigates the strong interaction of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), the theory of quarks and gluons. Gavin Salam is not related to Abdus Salam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Victoria Martin</span> British Professor of Collider Physics

Victoria Jane Martin is a Scottish physicist who is Professor of Collider Physics at the University of Edinburgh. She works on the ATLAS experiment on the Higgs boson.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teresa Rodrigo</span> Spanish scientist (1956–2020)

Teresa Rodrigo Anoro was a Spanish scientist who worked in particle physics. She worked at CERN, Fermilab and the Instituto de Física de Cantabria and was professor at the University of Cantabria. Whilst at CERN, Rodrigo worked on the Compact Muon Solenoid and research for the Higgs boson.

References

  1. CV
  2. 1 2 3 4 "CV: Alessandro Strumia". Università di Pisa. Retrieved 22 October 2018.
  3. Riccardo Barbieri; Lawrence J. Hall; Alessandro Strumia (1995). "Violations of lepton flavor and CP in supersymmetric unified theories". Nucl. Phys. B . 405 (2–3): 219–251. arXiv: hep-ph/9501334 . Bibcode:1995NuPhB.445..219B. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00208-A. S2CID   14445005.
  4. G. D'Ambrosio; G. F. Giudice; G. Isidori; A. Strumia (2002). "Minimal flavor violation: an effective field theory approach". Nucl. Phys. B. 645 (1–2): 155–187. arXiv: hep-ph/9811291 . Bibcode:2002NuPhB.645..155D. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00836-2. S2CID   2049412.
  5. Barbieri, Riccardo; Pomarol, Alex; Rattazzi, Riccardo; Strumia, Alessandro (2004). "Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2". Nucl. Phys. B703 (1–2): 127–146. arXiv: hep-ph/0405040 . Bibcode:2004NuPhB.703..127B. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.10.014. S2CID   14746575.
  6. Giudice, G. F.; Sibiryakov, S.; Strumia, A. (26 September 2011). "Interpreting OPERA Results on Superluminal Neutrino". Nuclear Physics B . 861 (1): 1–16. arXiv: 1109.5682 . Bibcode:2012NuPhB.861....1G. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.03.008. S2CID   119108764.
  7. Overbye, Dennis (24 October 2011). "Particles Faster Than the Speed of Light? Not So Fast, Some Say". The New York Times .
  8. G. Degrassi; S. Di Vita; J. Elias-Miro; J. R. Espinosa; G. F. Giudice; G. Isidori; A. Strumia (2012). "Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO". JHEP . 1208 (8): 098. arXiv: 1205.6497 . Bibcode:2012JHEP...08..098D. doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2012)098. S2CID   53368704.
  9. "Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC". Physics Letters B . 716 (1): 30–61. 17 September 2012. arXiv: 1207.7235 . Bibcode:2012PhLB..716...30C. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021.
  10. Wolchover, Natalie (1 June 2013). "New Physics Complications Lend Support to Multiverse Hypothesis". Scientific American .
  11. 1 2 "New metrics rank physicists and their work". Physics Today . 2018. doi:10.1063/pt.6.1.20180607a. S2CID   242092789.
  12. Cirelli, Marco; Franceschini, Roberto; Strumia, Alessandro (29 March 2008). "Minimal Dark Matter predictions for galactic positrons, anti-protons, photons". Nuclear Physics B . 800 (1–2): 204–220. arXiv: 0802.3378 . Bibcode:2008NuPhB.800..204C. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.03.013. S2CID   15194313.
  13. Jaffe, Andrew (2 September 2008). "Stealing Data?" . Retrieved 5 October 2018.
  14. Brumfiel, Geoff (2 September 2008). "Physicists aflutter about data photographed at conference". Nature . Retrieved 5 October 2018.
  15. Stemwedel, Janet (5 September 2008). "Data paparazzi" . Retrieved 5 October 2018.
  16. "1st Workshop on High Energy Theory and Gender". CERN . Retrieved 5 October 2018.
  17. 1 2 Castelvecchi, Davide (1 October 2018). "CERN suspends physicist over remarks on gender bias". Nature .
  18. Strumia, Alessandro; Torre, Riccardo (2019). "Biblioranking fundamental physics". Journal of Informetrics. 13 (2): 515–539. arXiv: 1803.10713 . doi:10.1016/j.joi.2019.01.011. S2CID   4374527.
  19. Jackson, Marie; Scott, Jennifer (3 October 2018). "Women in science: 'We want to be accepted into the club'". bbc.co.uk. BBC News . Retrieved 3 October 2018.
  20. Ghosh, Pallab (1 October 2018). "Cern scientist: 'Physics built by men – not by invitation'". bbc.co.uk. BBC News . Retrieved 2 October 2018.
  21. Oberhaus, Daniel (1 October 2018). "Top CERN Scientist Suspended for Presentation That Argued There Is No Sexism in Physics". Vice . Retrieved 2 October 2018.
  22. "Updated statement: CERN stands for diversity". CERN. Retrieved 4 June 2019.
  23. "CERN scientist Alessandro Strumia suspended after comments". bbc.co.uk. BBC News. 1 October 2018. Retrieved 2 October 2018.
  24. Giuffrida, Angela; Busby, Mattha (1 October 2018). "'Physics was built by men': Cern suspends scientist over remarks". The Guardian . Retrieved 2 October 2018.
  25. McKenna, Josephine (1 October 2018). "Italian lecturer suspended by CERN for 'physics invented by men' speech". The Daily Telegraph . Retrieved 1 October 2018.
  26. "Note of the Rector of the University of Pisa: Ethical proceedings against Alessandro Strumia". University of Pisa. October 2018. Retrieved 2 January 2019.
  27. "Ethical sanctions against Alessandro Strumia". University of Pisa. 18 January 2019. Retrieved 4 September 2022.
  28. Ghosh, Pallab (5 October 2018). "Scientists condemn professor's 'morally reprehensible' talk". BBC. Retrieved 5 October 2018.
  29. Mandelbaum, Ryan F. (5 October 2018). "More Than 200 Physicists Denounce Sexist Lecture at CERN". Gizmodo . Retrieved 6 October 2018.
  30. 1 2 "La replica di Strumia e le disuguaglianze di genere nella ricerca". Hookii. 17 March 2019. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
  31. "Gender controversy comes to physics: A response to the statement against Alessandro Strumia". Areo. 31 October 2018. Retrieved 24 December 2018.
  32. Sahadat, Ianthe (5 October 2018). "Theoretisch natuurkundigen schrijven antiseksismebrief" (in Dutch). de Volkskrant . Retrieved 5 October 2018.
  33. Flaherty, Kevin (2 October 2018). "The Leaky Pipeline for Postdocs: A study of the time between receiving a PhD and securing a faculty job for male and female astronomers". arXiv: 1810.01511 [astro-ph.IM].
  34. Hossenfelder, Sabine (26 April 2021). "Analyzing data is one thing, interpreting it another". Quant. Sci. Stud. 2: 273–274. doi: 10.1162/qss_c_00116 . S2CID   233875322 . Retrieved 9 March 2022.
  35. Ghosh, Pallab (7 March 2019). "Cern cuts ties with 'sexist' scientist". BBC News.
  36. "CERN splits with scientist over offensive remarks on women". Phys.org. 7 March 2019. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
  37. "ENG – The gender talk at CERN" (in Italian). 28 January 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  38. Chawla, Dalmeet Singh (1 November 2019). "In decision certain to draw fire, journal will publish heavily criticized paper on gender differences in physics". Science | AAAS. Retrieved 4 November 2019.
  39. Strumia, Alessandro (8 April 2021). "Gender issues in fundamental physics: A bibliometric analysis". Quantitative Science Studies. 2 (1): 225–253. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00114 . ISSN   2641-3337. S2CID   233874607.
  40. Andersen, Jens Peter; Nielsen, Mathias W.; Schneider, Jesper W. (2021). "Selective referencing and questionable evidence in Strumia's paper on "Gender issues in fundamental physics"". Quantitative Science Studies. 2 (1): 254–262. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00119 . ISSN   2641-3337. S2CID   233874078.
  41. Ball, Philip; Britton, T. Benjamin; Hengel, Erin; Moriarty, Philip; Oliver, Rachel A.; Rippon, Gina; Saini, Angela; Wade, Jessica (2021). "Gender issues in fundamental physics: Strumia's bibliometric analysis fails to account for key confounders and confuses correlation with causation". Quantitative Science Studies. 2 (1): 263–272. arXiv: 2106.15255 . doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00117 . ISSN   2641-3337. S2CID   233874939.
  42. Hossenfelder, Sabine (2021). "Analyzing data is one thing, interpreting it another". Quantitative Science Studies. 2 (1): 273–274. doi: 10.1162/qss_c_00116 . ISSN   2641-3337. S2CID   233875322.
  43. Thelwall, Mike (2021). "Female contributions to high-energy physics in a wider context: Commentary on an article by Strumia". Quantitative Science Studies. 2 (1): 275–276. doi: 10.1162/qss_c_00118 . ISSN   2641-3337. S2CID   233874649.
  44. Strumia, Alessandro (8 April 2021). "Reply to commentaries about "Gender issues in fundamental physics: A bibliometric analysis"". Quantitative Science Studies. 2 (1): 277–287. doi: 10.1162/qss_c_00120 . ISSN   2641-3337. S2CID   207912716.