Alexander v. Yale

Last updated
Alexander v. Yale
Court United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Full case nameRonni Alexander, Ann Olivarius, Pamela Price, Margery Reifler and Lisa Stone v. Yale University
ArguedApril 16, 1980
DecidedSeptember 22, 1980
Citation(s)631 F.2d 178
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Joseph Edward Lumbard, William Hughes Mulligan, Adrian A. Spears (W.D. Tex.)
Case opinions
MajorityLumbard, joined by a unanimous court
Laws applied
Title IX, 20 U.S.C.   § 1681, et seq.

Alexander v. Yale, 631 F.2d 178 (2d Cir. 1980), [1] was the first use of Title IX [2] of the United States Education Amendments of 1972 in charges of sexual harassment against an educational institution. [3] It further established that sexual harassment of female students could be considered sex discrimination, and was thus illegal.

Contents

Background

The plaintiffs were Ronni Alexander, Margery Reifler, Pamela Price, Lisa E. Stone and Ann Olivarius. All were Yale College students between 1973 and 1980.

Alexander and Reifler alleged that they were sexually harassed and/or assaulted by a flute teacher (Keith Brion) and hockey coach, [4] respectively, and that Yale provided no procedure through which they could complain. Pamela Price alleged a classic case of what is now known as quid pro quo sexual harassment, when a course instructor offered to give her an 'A' if she complied with his sexual demands. [5] Lisa Stone alleged that English professor Michael Cooke propositioned her during his office hours while putting his hand on her knee. Ann Olivarius alleged that the absence of a procedure for complaining about sexual harassment forced her to expend her own time and money on helping fellow students who had been sexually harassed, and that in the course of providing that help she was threatened by individuals whom she was investigating, and that Yale failed to protect her from those individuals.

At the district court level, a male faculty member and Lisa Stone's thesis adviser, John Winkler, alleged that the poisoned atmosphere arising from sexual harassment made a good relationship with his students impossible. [6] He did not join the other plaintiffs' appeal.

The plaintiffs did not seek damages from Yale. Rather, they wanted the court to order Yale to set up a grievance procedure for students who felt they had been sexually harassed.

Decisions

The students were advised by Catharine MacKinnon, who had just graduated from Yale Law School. [7] MacKinnon was working on her groundbreaking book, Sexual Harassment of Working Women, and shared pre-publication copies with the Women's Rights Litigation Clinic at Rutgers Law School, which represented Alexander and her co-plaintiffs. [8] Alexander v. Yale was an early test of MacKinnon's theory that sexual harassment constituted sex discrimination. [9]

The plaintiffs argued that sexual harassment constituted sex discrimination and that Yale University was thus in contravention of Title IX, which stated that educational institutions receiving federal money could not discriminate on the basis of sex. This novel legal strategy, which made use of Title IX, was developed by MacKinnon, Olivarius (then still an undergraduate), and Anne E. Simon, then working for the New Haven Law Collective and now a California Public Utilities Commission Administrative Law Judge. [10] The District Court upheld their legal argument, ruling that, "It is perfectly reasonable to maintain that academic advancement conditioned upon submission to sexual demands constitutes sex discrimination in education." The Court, however, found that Price had not been sexually propositioned in exchange for better grades. It dismissed the other plaintiffs' allegations as either moot because they had graduated, or untenable. [11]

The women appealed. Equal Rights Advocates (ERA) and Women Organized Against Sexual Harassment (WOASH) filed a joint friend-of-the-court brief ( amicus curiae ) when Alexander v. Yale was appealed. [12] Another amicus brief was filed jointly by the ACLU and others. [13] The U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the judgment of the lower court, holding in addition that the allegations were no longer relevant because Yale had instituted a grievance procedure. [1]

Impact

Although the women did not win their case, they achieved their objectives: Yale instituted a grievance procedure and a court held that sexual harassment constituted sex discrimination. [1]

As a result of Alexander v. Yale most U.S. universities instituted grievance procedures for sexual harassment. [14]

The case received media coverage in The New York Times , [15] Time magazine [16] [17] and The Nation , [18] which contributed to the emerging concept of sexual harassment. [19]

In 1986, the Supreme Court ruled, in Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson , that a hostile work environment constituted sexual discrimination, vindicating another line of argument in Alexander v. Yale. [20]

Three of the five plaintiffs – Ann Olivarius, Pamela Price and Ronni Alexander – have gone on to be prominent attorneys or law professors.

In April 2012, the plaintiffs were collectively honored by the ACLU in its list of the nine most influential actors in the history of Title IX. [21]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Title IX</span> United States federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in federally-funded education programs

Title IX is the most commonly used name for the federal civil rights law in the United States that was enacted as part of the Education Amendments of 1972. It prohibits sex-based discrimination in any school or any other education program that receives funding from the federal government. This is Public Law No. 92‑318, 86 Stat. 235, codified at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual harassment</span> Unwanted sexual attention or advances

Sexual harassment is a type of harassment involving the use of explicit or implicit sexual overtones, including the unwelcome and inappropriate promises of rewards in exchange for sexual favors. Sexual harassment includes a range of actions from verbal transgressions to sexual abuse or assault. Harassment can occur in many different social settings such as the workplace, the home, school, or religious institutions. Harassers or victims may be of any sex or gender.

Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, 523 U.S. 75 (1998), is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court. The case arose out of a suit for sex discrimination by a male oil-rig worker, who claimed that he was repeatedly subjected to sexual harassment by his male co-workers with the acquiescence of his employer. The Court held that the protection of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against workplace discrimination "because of... sex" applied to harassment in the workplace between members of the same sex.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Catharine A. MacKinnon</span> American feminist and legal activist

Catharine Alice MacKinnon is an American radical feminist legal scholar, activist, and author. She is the Elizabeth A. Long Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School, where she has been tenured since 1990, and the James Barr Ames Visiting Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. From 2008 to 2012, she was the special gender adviser to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court.

<i>Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.</i> U.S. class-action sexual harassment lawsuit

Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co., 130 F.3d 1287, was the first class-action sexual harassment lawsuit in the United States. It was filed in 1988 on behalf of Lois Jenson and other female workers at the Eveleth Taconite mine in Eveleth, Minnesota on the state's northern Mesabi Range, which is part of the Iron Range.

Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986), is a US labor law case, where the United States Supreme Court, in a 9–0 decision, recognized sexual harassment as a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case was the first of its kind to reach the Supreme Court and would redefine sexual harassment in the workplace.

The Antipornography Civil Rights Ordinance is a name for several proposed local ordinances in the United States and that was closely associated with the anti-pornography radical feminists Andrea Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon. It proposed to treat pornography as a violation of women's civil rights and to allow women harmed by pornography to seek damages through lawsuits in civil courts. The approach was distinguished from traditional obscenity law, which attempts to suppress pornography through the use of prior restraint and criminal penalties.

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (2006), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court on sexual harassment and retaliatory discrimination. It was a landmark case for retaliation claims. It set a precedent for claims which could be considered retaliatory under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In this case the standard for retaliation against a sexual harassment complainant was revised to include any adverse employment decision or treatment that would be likely to dissuade a "reasonable worker" from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.

Sexual harassment in education in the United States is an unwelcome behavior of a sexual nature that interferes with an American student's ability to learn, study, work or participate in school activities. It is common in middle and high schools in the United States. Sexual or gender harassment is a form of discrimination under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Sexual harassment involves a range of behavior from mild annoyances to unwanted touching and, in extreme cases, rape or other sexual assault.

Equal Rights Advocates (ERA) is an American non-profit gender justice/women's rights organization that was founded in 1974. ERA is a legal and advocacy organization for advancing rights and opportunities for women, girls, and people of gender identities through legal cases and policy advocacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ann Olivarius</span> British lawyer (born 1955)

Ann Olivarius is an American-British lawyer who specializes in cases of civil litigation, sexual discrimination, and sexual harassment, assault, and abuse.

<i>Only Words</i> (book)

Only Words is a 1993 book by Catharine MacKinnon. In this work of feminist legal theory, MacKinnon contends that the U.S. legal system has used a First Amendment basis to protect intimidation, subordination, terrorism, and discrimination as enacted through pornography, violating the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Bundy v. Jackson, 641 F.2d 934, was a D.C. Circuit opinion, written by Judge Skelly Wright, that held that workplace sexual harassment could constitute employment discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Title IX of the United States Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits discrimination "on the basis of sex" in educational programs and activities that receive financial assistance from the federal government. The Obama administration interpreted Title IX to cover discrimination on the basis of assigned sex, gender identity, and transgender status. The Trump administration determined that the question of access to sex-segregated facilities should be left to the states and local school districts to decide. The validity of the executive's position is being tested in the federal courts.

Sexual harassment in the workplace in US labor law has been considered a form of discrimination on the basis of sex in the United States since the mid-1970s. There are two forms of sexual harassment recognized by United States law: quid pro quo sexual harassment and behavior that creates a hostile work environment. It has been noted that a number of the early sexual harassment cases were brought by African American women and girls.

Diane R. Williams was an American lawyer who is best known for her part in the landmark sexual harassment case, Williams v. Saxbe. Williams was fired from her job at the U.S. Department of Justice after refusing sexual advances from her boss. She sued in a Washington federal court and won, resulting in the first U.S. District Court ruling that quid pro quo sexual harassment constitutes sex discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Williams was a news aide for the Washington Post in the late 1960s and also served as a reporter for the Chicago Tribune. She had a 30-year career as a lawyer.

<i>Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College</i> U.S. court case

Kimberly Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College, 853 F.3d 339, was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in which the Court held that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The ruling made the Seventh Circuit the first federal appeals court to find that sexual orientation is a protected class under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Nadine Taub was an American lawyer who laid the essential groundwork for women's rights in the workplace, including defending and winning the first sexual harassment case in the US in 1977. Taub played a pivotal, but largely unrecognized, role in the development of sexual harassment law in the United States. As part of a group of young female lawyers in the 1970s, including Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Nancy Stearns and others, Taub made legal history by winning cases which argued that the Constitution protected women's rights.

McAllister Olivarius is an international law firm dual-headquartered in London and New York. It specializes in civil litigation and plaintiff work, particularly in education and employment law.

Gebser v. Lago Vista 524 U.S. 274 (1998) is a United States Supreme Court ruling regarding sexual harassment in schools. The case was heard before the Rehnquist Court on March 25, 1998, and decided on June 22, 1998. In a 5-4 ruling, the Court held that a school district may be liable for a teacher’s sexual harassment of a student, but in order for an aggrieved party to recover damages under Title IX, a school official who had authority to address the alleged discrimination must have actual knowledge of the discrimination and must be deliberately indifferent.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Alexander v. Yale, 631F.2d178 (2d Cir.1980).
  2. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C.   § 1681, et seq.
  3. "Legislative History of Title IX". Archived from the original on 2010-06-24. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  4. The coach was Richard Kentwell, who is still active in young women's athletics as owner of the WC Eagles field hockey club in Pottstown, Pennsylvania.
  5. The instructor was political science professor Raymond Duvall, now at the University of Minnesota.[ citation needed ]
  6. Allen, Nicole. "To Break the Silence or Be Broken by It: A Genealogy of Women Who Have Refused to Shut Up About Harassment at Yale." An unpublished Allen WC Senior Project, Yale University, April 27, 2009, excerpted at https://web.archive.org/web/20110714063453/http://www.mcolaw.com/docs/ao_tobreakthesilence_speech.pdf.
  7. "Catharine MacKinnon". www.cddc.vt.edu. Archived from the original on 1999-11-05.
  8. Frances Olsen, Feminist Theory in Grand Style, 89 Colum. L. Rev. 1147, 1147 & n.4 (1989) (citing Conversation with Professor Nadine Taub, attorney with Rutgers Law School Women's Rights Litigation Clinic who litigated early sexual harassment cases (July 1985))
  9. Hoffmann, Frances (July 1986). "Sexual Harassment in Academia: Feminist Theory and Institutional Practice". Harvard Educational Review. 56 (2): 105–122. doi:10.17763/haer.56.2.y11m78k58t4052x2. ISSN   0017-8055.
  10. For Simon's account of the case, see "Alexander v. Yale University: An Informal History," Directions in Sexual Harassment Law, Catherine A. MacKinnon and Reva B. Siegel, eds, 2007, Yale University Press, pp. 51-59.
  11. "Alexander v. Yale | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse". www.clearinghouse.net. Retrieved 2019-03-05.
  12. Carrie N. Baker, The women's movement against sexual harassment, 92.
  13. "ALEXANDER v. YALE UNIVERS | 631 F.2d 178 (1980) | 1f2d1781757 | Leagle.com". Leagle. Retrieved 2019-03-05.
  14. Directions in sexual harassment law. Catharine A. MacKinnon, Reva B. Siegel. New Haven: Yale University Press. 2004. ISBN   978-0-300-13530-5. OCLC   228171928.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  15. Henry, Diane (1977-08-22). "Yale Faculty Members Charged With Sexual Harassment in Suit". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-03-26.
  16. 'The Law: Man and Bod at Yale' Time, August 8, 1977. https://content.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601770808,00.html'
  17. Sexes: Fighting Lechery on Campus' Time, February 4, 1980.
  18. Anne Nelson 'Sexual Harassment at Yale' The Nation, January 7, 1978.
  19. Baker, Carrie N. (2008). The women's movement against sexual harassment. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-87935-4. OCLC   157022665.
  20. Kuersten, Ashlyn K. (2003). Women and the law : leaders, cases, and documents. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO. ISBN   1-57607-700-4. OCLC   53948731.
  21. "Title IX - The Nine". American Civil Liberties Union.