Alma-0

Last updated

Alma-0
Paradigm multi-paradigm: constraint, imperative, logic
Family Wirth Modula
Designed by Krzysztof Apt, Marc Bezem, Jacob Brunekreef, Vincent Partington, Andrea Schaerf
Developer Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
First appeared1997;29 years ago (1997)
Typing discipline static
Scope Lexical (static)
Website www.cwi.nl/en/alma
Major implementations
Alma-0
Influenced by
Modula-2

Alma-0 is a multi-paradigm computer programming language. This language is an augmented version of the imperative Modula-2 language with logic-programming features and convenient backtracking ability. [1] It is small, strongly typed, and combines constraint programming, a limited number of features inspired by logic programming and supports imperative paradigms. The language advocates declarative programming. The designers claim that search-oriented solutions built with it are substantially simpler than their counterparts written in purely imperative or logic programming style. [2] Alma-0 provides natural, high-level constructs for building search trees. [3]

Contents

Overview

Since the designers of Alma-0 wanted to create a distinct and substantially simpler proposal than prior attempts to integrate declarative programming constructs (such as automatic backtracking) into imperative programming, the design of Alma-0 was guided by four principles:

Alma-0 can be viewed not only as a specific and concrete programming language proposal, but also as an example of a generic method for extending any imperative programming language with features that support declarative programming.

The feasibility of the Alma-0 approach has been demonstrated through a full implementation of the language (including a description of its semantics) for a subset of Modula-2. [4]

Features

The implemented features in Alma-0 include:

Imperative and logic programming modes

The Alma-0 designers claim that the assignment, which is usually shunned in pure declarative and logic programming, is actually needed in a number of natural situations, including for counting and recording purposes. They also affirm that the means of expression of such "natural" uses of assignment within the logic programming paradigm are unnatural.

References

  1. Liu, Jed; Myers, Andrew C. (2003). "JMatch: Iterable Abstract Pattern Matching for Java". Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 2562/2003. pp. 110–127. doi:10.1007/3-540-36388-2_9. ISBN   978-3-540-00389-2.
  2. Partington, Vincent (July 1997). Implementation of an Imperative Programming Language with Backtracking (PDF) (Report). University of Amsterdam Programming, Research Group. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 November 2023. Retrieved 15 February 2021. Also in Postscript Archived 31 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine .
  3. Van Hentenryck, Pascal; Perron, Laurent; Puget, Jean-François (October 2000). "Search and strategies in OPL". ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. 1 (2): 285–320. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.17.836 . doi:10.1145/359496.359529. S2CID   15926704.
  4. Dahl, Veronica (12 February 2003). Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages: 5th International Symposium, PADL 2003, New Orleans, LA, USA, January 13-14, 2003, Proceedings. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN   978-3-540-00389-2. Archived from the original on 31 May 2024. Retrieved 25 February 2023.