Altmetric

Last updated
Altmetric
Altmetric rgb.png
Official Altmetric Logo
URL www.altmetric.com
CommercialYes
Launched2012
Current statusActive

Altmetric, or altmetric.com, is a data science company that tracks where published research is mentioned online, and provides tools and services to institutions, publishers, researchers, funders and other organisations to monitor this activity, commonly referred to as altmetrics. [1] [2] [3] Altmetric was recognized by European Commissioner Máire Geoghegan-Quinn in 2014 as a company challenging the traditional reputation systems. [4]

Contents

Altmetric is a portfolio company of Digital Science, [5] [6] which is owned by Holtzbrinck Publishing Group. [7]

History

Altmetric was founded by Euan Adie [8] [9] in 2011. [10] Previously a researcher, Adie had already worked on Postgenomic.com, an open source scientific blog aggregator [11] founded in 2006. In 2011, Adie entered an altmetrics app into Elsevier's Apps for Science competition and won. [12] [13] The prize money enabled Altmetric to develop a full version of the Altmetric Explorer, released in February 2012. [14]

In July 2012, Altmetric took on additional investment from Digital Science [1] and is still a part of the group today, with offices in London, Germany, the United States and Australia.

In 2019 Altmetric and Nature received funding from the Google Digital News Innovation Fund to "build a novel tool for measuring the impact of journalism". [15]

Concept

A term first coined in the altmetrics manifesto in 2010, [9] [16] altmetrics (also known as 'alternative metrics') were developed to provide authors and other stakeholders a more comprehensive record of engagement with scholarly work, particularly that which takes place beyond the academy amongst a broader audience. In order to do this, Altmetric tracks a range of online sites and sources looking for 'mentions' (links or written references) to scholarly outputs (which include journal articles, blogs, data sets and more). [17] Sources of the attention include the mainstream media, public policy documents, social and academic networks, post-publication peer-review forums and, more recently, Wikipedia and the Open Syllabus Project. [18]

The data are tracked in real-time and collated in the Altmetric details pages, which provide a clickable summary of all of the online attention relating to a single research output.

The Altmetric Attention Score and Donut Badge

Altmetric employs an algorithm to assign each item an automatically calculated score. Based on the volume and source of attention an item has received, the score is intended to reflect the reach or popularity of the research output. A multicolored 'donut' visualization is also generated to provide a summary of the sources of the attention that an item has received (red for news, light blue for Twitter, etc.). [19] [20] Altmetric make the data available via the Altmetric Bookmarklet, a browser plugin, the Explorer platform, a cloud-hosted database, and API.

Trending papers from peer-reviewed psychology journals based on their Altmetric Attention Scores. Psychology-papers-top-trends.png
Trending papers from peer-reviewed psychology journals based on their Altmetric Attention Scores.

The sources include academic citations and academic platforms, patents, posts on social media and web forums, Wikipedia articles, users on Mendeley. [21]

Many publishers, including John Wiley & Sons, Taylor and Francis, The JAMA Network and Springer Nature embed the Altmetric 'Donut' Badges into their journal article and book pages to show the Altmetric score for individual items from within the publisher platform. [22] [23] [24] [25] At least one website, OOIR, is specifically built around the showcase of scientific trends based on Altmetric Attention Scores. [26] Even though there is no clear link between altmetric scores and societal impact, they can be used to predict future citation impact , [27] and may be a target for manipulation. [28]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citation</span> Reference to a source

A citation is a reference to a source. More precisely, a citation is an abbreviated alphanumeric expression embedded in the body of an intellectual work that denotes an entry in the bibliographic references section of the work for the purpose of acknowledging the relevance of the works of others to the topic of discussion at the spot where the citation appears.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Academic publishing</span> Subfield of publishing distributing academic research and scholarship

Academic publishing is the subfield of publishing which distributes academic research and scholarship. Most academic work is published in academic journal articles, books or thesis. The part of academic written output that is not formally published but merely printed up or posted on the Internet is often called "grey literature". Most scientific and scholarly journals, and many academic and scholarly books, though not all, are based on some form of peer review or editorial refereeing to qualify texts for publication. Peer review quality and selectivity standards vary greatly from journal to journal, publisher to publisher, and field to field.

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly mean number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal, as indexed by Clarivate's Web of Science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bibliometrics</span> Statistical analysis of written publications

Bibliometrics is the use of statistical methods to analyse books, articles and other publications, especially in scientific contents. Bibliometric methods are frequently used in the field of library and information science. Bibliometrics is closely associated with scientometrics, the analysis of scientific metrics and indicators, to the point that both fields largely overlap.

Scientometrics is the field of study which concerns itself with measuring and analysing scholarly literature. Scientometrics is a sub-field of informetrics. Major research issues include the measurement of the impact of research papers and academic journals, the understanding of scientific citations, and the use of such measurements in policy and management contexts. In practice there is a significant overlap between scientometrics and other scientific fields such as information systems, information science, science of science policy, sociology of science, and metascience. Critics have argued that over-reliance on scientometrics has created a system of perverse incentives, producing a publish or perish environment that leads to low-quality research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Google Scholar</span> Academic search service by Google

Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines. Released in beta in November 2004, the Google Scholar index includes peer-reviewed online academic journals and books, conference papers, theses and dissertations, preprints, abstracts, technical reports, and other scholarly literature, including court opinions and patents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crossref</span> Organization

Crossref is a nonprofit open digital infrastructure organisation for the global scholarly research community. Uniquely and persistently recording and connecting knowledge through open metadata and identifiers for all research objects such as grants and articles. It is the largest digital object identifier (DOI) Registration Agency of the International DOI Foundation. It has 19,000 members from 150 countries representing publishers, libraries, research institutions, and funders and was launched in early 2000 as a cooperative effort among publishers to enable persistent cross-platform citation linking in online academic journals. As of July 2023, Crossref identifies and connects 150 million records of metadata about research objects made openly available for reuse without restriction. They facilitate an average of 1.1 billion DOI resolutions every month, and they see 1 billion queries of the metadata every month.

Journal ranking is widely used in academic circles in the evaluation of an academic journal's impact and quality. Journal rankings are intended to reflect the place of a journal within its field, the relative difficulty of being published in that journal, and the prestige associated with it. They have been introduced as official research evaluation tools in several countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Altmetrics</span> Alternative metrics for analyzing scholarship

In scholarly and scientific publishing, altmetrics are non-traditional bibliometrics proposed as an alternative or complement to more traditional citation impact metrics, such as impact factor and h-index. The term altmetrics was proposed in 2010, as a generalization of article level metrics, and has its roots in the #altmetrics hashtag. Although altmetrics are often thought of as metrics about articles, they can be applied to people, journals, books, data sets, presentations, videos, source code repositories, web pages, etc.

ResearchGate is a European commercial social networking site for scientists and researchers to share papers, ask and answer questions, and find collaborators. According to a 2014 study by Nature and a 2016 article in Times Higher Education, it is the largest academic social network in terms of active users, although other services have more registered users, and a 2015–2016 survey suggests that almost as many academics have Google Scholar profiles.

Figshare is an online open access repository where researchers can preserve and share their research outputs, including figures, datasets, images, and videos. It is free to upload content and free to access, in adherence to the principle of open data. Figshare is one of a number of portfolio businesses supported by Digital Science, a subsidiary of Springer Nature.

Article-level metrics are citation metrics which measure the usage and impact of individual scholarly articles.

OurResearch, formerly known as ImpactStory, is a nonprofit organization that creates and distributes tools and services for libraries, institutions and researchers. The organization follows open practices with their data, code, and governance. OurResearch is funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the National Science Foundation, and Arcadia Fund.

Author-level metrics are citation metrics that measure the bibliometric impact of individual authors, researchers, academics, and scholars. Many metrics have been developed that take into account varying numbers of factors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Library Genesis</span> File-sharing website for print publications

Library Genesis (LibGen) is a file-sharing based shadow library website for scholarly journal articles, academic and general-interest books, images, comics, audiobooks, and magazines. The site enables free access to content that is otherwise paywalled or not digitized elsewhere. LibGen describes itself as a "links aggregator", providing a searchable database of items "collected from publicly available public Internet resources" as well as files uploaded "from users".

Metascience is the use of scientific methodology to study science itself. Metascience seeks to increase the quality of scientific research while reducing inefficiency. It is also known as "research on research" and "the science of science", as it uses research methods to study how research is done and find where improvements can be made. Metascience concerns itself with all fields of research and has been described as "a bird's eye view of science". In the words of John Ioannidis, "Science is the best thing that has happened to human beings ... but we can do it better."

Digital Science is a technology company with its headquarters in London, United Kingdom. The company focuses on strategic investments into startup companies that support the research lifecycle.

Plum Analytics is a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-based altmetrics company dedicated to measuring the influence of scientific research.

The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (LM) is a list of "ten principles to guide research evaluation", published as a comment in Volume 520, Issue 7548 of Nature, on 22 April 2015. It was formulated by public policy professor Diana Hicks, scientometrics professor Paul Wouters, and their colleagues at the 19th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, held between 3–5 September 2014 in Leiden, The Netherlands.

The open science movement has expanded the uses scientific output beyond specialized academic circles.

References

  1. 1 2 Piwowar, Heather (9 January 2013). "AOP". Nature. 493 (7431): 159. Bibcode:2013Natur.493..159P. doi: 10.1038/493159a . PMID   23302843. S2CID   205075867.
  2. Shema, Hadas. "Thoughts about altmetrics (an unorganized, overdue post)". Scientific American Blog Network. Retrieved 25 February 2017.
  3. Clark, Liat (2014-08-13). "How 'Google Science' could transform academic publishing". Wired UK. Retrieved 25 February 2017.
  4. Geoghegan-Quinn, Máire. "EuroScience Open Forum (ESOF) Keynote Speech: "Science 2.0: Europe can lead the next scientific transformation"". europa.eu. European Commission. Retrieved 25 February 2017.
  5. "Home - Digital Science". Digital Science. Retrieved 2017-02-25.
  6. Coghill, Jeffrey G.; Russell, Roger G., eds. (2016). Developing Librarian Competencies for the Digital Age. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 9. ISBN   9781442264458.
  7. Carpenter, Caroline (2015-05-06). "Completed merger forms 'Springer Nature'". The Bookseller. Retrieved 10 February 2017.
  8. Stuart, David (2015-06-01). "Research Information" . Retrieved 10 February 2017.
  9. 1 2 Luther, Judy (2012-07-25). "Altmetrics – Trying to Fill the Gap". The Scholarly Kitchen. Society for Scholarly Publishing. Retrieved 10 February 2017.
  10. Hicks, Diana; Wouters, Paul; Waltman, Ludo; de Rijcke, Sarah; Rafols, Ismael (22 April 2015). "Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics". Nature. 520 (7548): 429–431. Bibcode:2015Natur.520..429H. doi: 10.1038/520429a . hdl: 10261/132304 . PMID   25903611.
  11. McIntosh, Joyce, ed. (2016). Library and Information Science: Parameters and Perspectives. CRC Press. p. 33. ISBN   9781466562028.
  12. "Altmetric | Apps for Science". Apps for Science. Retrieved 2017-02-09.
  13. Elsevier. "Elsevier Announces Winners of "Apps for Science" Challenge". www.prnewswire.com (Press release). Retrieved 2017-02-09.
  14. "Explorer for Publishers". Altmetric. 2015-07-09. Retrieved 2017-02-09.
  15. "Altmetric and Nature awarded funding from the Google Digital News Innovation Fund – Altmetric" . Retrieved 2022-02-21.
  16. "altmetrics: a manifesto – altmetrics.org". altmetrics.org. Retrieved 2017-02-09.
  17. "How it works". Altmetric. 2015-07-09. Archived from the original on 2020-02-12. Retrieved 2017-02-09.
  18. "Our sources". Altmetric. 2015-07-09. Retrieved 2017-02-09.
  19. "The donut and Altmetric Attention Score". Altmetric. 2015-07-09. Retrieved 2017-02-09.
  20. Sheffield, University of. "Altmetric donuts - Altmetric - Research Information Systems - Research & Innovation Services - The University of Sheffield". www.sheffield.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 2017-03-08. Retrieved 2017-02-10.
  21. "Sources of Attention: Altmetric track a unique range of online sources to capture the conversations relating to research outputs". 2015-07-09.
  22. "Altmetrics" . Retrieved 2017-02-10.
  23. "Author Services Measuring impact with article metrics". authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com. 2015-05-25. Retrieved 2017-02-10.
  24. Network, The JAMA. "About Altmetrics on The JAMA Network". sites.jamanetwork.com. Retrieved 2017-02-10.
  25. "Springer now sharing data from Altmetric on SpringerLink". springer.com. Retrieved 2017-02-10.
  26. "About OOIR" . Retrieved 2023-03-14.
  27. Thelwall, Mike; Nevill, Tamara (2018). "Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts?". Journal of Informetrics. 12 (1): 237–248. arXiv: 1801.10311 . doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.008. S2CID   4623584.
  28. Wien, Charlotte; Deutz, Daniella B. (2019-06-21). "What's in a tweet? Creating Social Media Echo Chambers to inflate 'the donut'". LIBER Quarterly. 29: 3. doi: 10.18352/lq.10289 .