American Forensic Association National Speech Tournament

Last updated

The American Forensic Association National Speech Tournament (AFA-NST) is an intercollegiate, individual events based forensics tournament held in conjunction with the first Saturday in April, beginning on the prior Friday and continuing through the subsequent Monday. [1] In comparison to National Forensic Association Nationals, another prominent college-level individual events national tournament, the AFA-NST has significantly more stringent qualification procedures and a smaller, but more exclusive field of competition. [2] [3] The AFA-NST represents the culmination of the forensics season for many collegiate speech teams. [4]

Contents

Arizona State University - Host of the 2014 AFA-NST Asu campus 1.jpg
Arizona State University - Host of the 2014 AFA-NST

The 2022 AFA-NST took place at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln during the weekend of April 2–4. [5]

History

Formed in 1949, the American Forensic Association was created with the goal of teaching students to utilize the skills of argumentation and advocacy. In the first decades of its existence, the AFA was primarily focused on promoting debate competitions, with little to no interest in individual events.

As a result in the rapid rise of interest in individual events in the late 1960s, Dr. Seth Hawkins of Southern Connecticut State University, Dr. Raymond Beaty of Ohio University and Dr. Jack Howe of California State University, Long Beach began to propose ideas of an organized national tournament focused on individual events. Dr. Beaty reported that his proposals were disregarded by the debate community. [2] During the 1970-71 forensics season, Dr. Hawkins made the decision that, despite the lack of support from the debate community, the increased interest in IEs (individual events) justified the establishment of a national championship tournament. This tournament was held on the campus of Ohio Northern University, 23 schools participated, and the annual IE tournament that would eventually become known as NFA Nationals was established. [6]

Realizing that the NFA's new IE national tournament could perpetuate the already existing split within the community regarding the competitive validity of IEs, the AFA began working towards a solution in 1972. Jerry Anderson, the president of the AFA at the time, began calling meetings to address measures that could be taken to incorporate IEs into the AFA's agenda. Anderson proposed a change to the AFA's constitution to allow for the inclusion of IEs; this change was ratified in 1973. Anderson, along with E.R. Tame, the Chair of the Educational Policies Committee, proposed that the AFA enact institutional changes to accommodate IEs. In 1973, the AFA voted to establish the AFA Committee on Individual Events. [7] In the three years following its establishment, the Committee worked towards developing an inceptive procedural standard for the AFA-NST. This effort was bolstered in 1976, as James Weaver assumed the presidency of the AFA. Weaver proved a staunch advocate of the NST's establishment. Within the first year of taking office, Weaver established the National Individual Events Tournament Committee, and appointed Larry Schnoor of Minnesota State University, Mankato as Chair. Shortly thereafter, Schnoor and the committee began making preparatory arrangements for the inaugural AFA-NST. [7]

In April 1978 the inaugural AFA-NST was hosted by Illinois State University. 58 schools attended the 1978 AFA-NST. [8]

  1. Bethel College (Kansas)
  2. Bradley University
  3. George Mason University
  4. Kansas State University
  5. Minnesota State University, Mankato
  6. University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire [8]

The tournament was known as the AFA-NIET (American Forensics Associational National Individual Events Tournament) prior to a name change in 2019. [9]

Previous AFA-NSTs

List of Sweepstakes Champions

Team and individual sweepstakes awards are awarded to the best overall performing team and individual at each AFA-NST, respectively.

Team sweepstakes awards are given to the teams with the highest aggregate total of sweepstakes points earned by the team's individual competitors. At the AFA-NST, team sweepstakes points are awarded as follows:

When tabulating individual sweepstakes, only the individual competitor's ranks and placings are used, and points awarded for preliminary ballot ranks are doubled. Otherwise, individual sweepstakes are tabulated identically to team sweepstakes. [1]

YearIndividual ChampionTeam Champion
1978Meg Langford, George Mason University Eastern Michigan University
1979Meg Langford, George Mason UniversityGeorge Mason University
1980Kim Norris, Iowa State University Bradley University
1981Sean Patrick O'Rourke, Humboldt State University Bradley University (2)
1982Laura Gordon, Clarion University of Pennsylvania Bradley University (3)
1983Pat Page, Whitman College Bradley University (4)
1984Pat Page, Whitman CollegeBradley University (5)
1985Greg Dolph, Bradley UniversityBradley University (6)
1986Greg Dolph, Bradley UniversityBradley University (7)
1987Tom Doyle, Bradley UniversityBradley University (8)
1988Ken Klawitter, Bradley UniversityBradley University (9)
1989Cam Jones, Cornell University Bradley University (10)
1990Peter Tagg, Southern Utah University Bradley University (11)
1991Karon Bowers, Bradley UniversityBradley University (12)
1992Karon Bowers, Bradley UniversityBradley University (13)
1993Tim Schultz, Kansas State University Bradley University (14)
1994Tim Schultz, Kansas State University University of Texas at Austin
1995August Benassi, Bradley UniversityUniversity of Texas at Austin (2)
1996August Benassi, Bradley UniversityBradley University (15)
1997Matthew Whitley, University of Texas at AustinBradley University (16)
1998Nance Riffe, George Mason UniversityBradley University (17)
1999Rajni Shankar, George Mason UniversityBradley University (18)
2000Chris McLemore, Kansas State UniversityBradley University (19)
2001Steve Zammit, Cornell UniversityUniversity of Texas at Austin (3)
2002Bonny McDonald, University of Texas at AustinUniversity of Texas at Austin (4)
2003Zenobia Harris, West Texas A&M University Western Kentucky University
2004Courtney Anderson, George Mason UniversityWestern Kentucky University (2)
2005Ryan Hubbell, Arizona State University Illinois State University
2006Natalie Sintek, Western Kentucky UniversityWestern Kentucky University (3)
2007Lydia Nelson, Western Kentucky UniversityWestern Kentucky University (4)
2008Jessy Ohl, Kansas State UniversityWestern Kentucky University (5)
2009Merry Regan, University of Texas at AustinWestern Kentucky University (6)
2010Amanda Voirol, Bradley UniversityBradley University (20)
2011Quincey Smith, George Mason UniversityWestern Kentucky University (7)
2012Jacoby Cochran, Bradley UniversityBradley University (21)
2013Jacoby Cochran, Bradley UniversityBradley University (22)
2014Nick Gilyard, Western Kentucky UniversityWestern Kentucky University (8)
2015Farrah Bara, University of Texas at AustinWestern Kentucky University (9)
2016Farrah Bara, University of Texas at AustinUniversity of Texas at Austin (5)
2017Nathan Leys, George Mason UniversityUniversity of Texas at Austin (6)
2018Andrea Ambam, Western Kentucky UniversityUniversity of Texas at Austin (7)
2019Andrea Ambam, Western Kentucky UniversityWestern Kentucky University (10)
2021Anna Kutbay, University of Alabama Western Kentucky University (11)
2022Anna Kutbay, University of AlabamaUniversity of Texas at Austin (8)
2023Terrence Mayfield, Illinois State UniversityUniversity of Texas at Austin (9)
2024Fernando Cereceres, University of Texas at AustinUniversity of Texas at Austin (10)

Due to COVID-19, the 2020 tournament was cancelled, resulting in no sweepstakes winners. [10]

Events

There are 11 events that are sanctioned by the AFA and held at the AFA-NIET. All events fall into one of three categories:

Interpretation Events

There are five AFA-sponsored events which fall into the interpretation category. Interpretation events involve the performer selecting and cutting a script (usually from a play, book, or movie), and acting out the scenes. All AFA interpretation events require the performer to hold a 'black book' that contains their manuscript. This book can be used as the competitor sees fit, meaning it may be used as a prop, but the use of other objects as props is prohibited. All interpretation events have a 10-minute time limit.

Poetry interpretation involves the performance of a selected cutting of poetry with significant literary merit. The performance may be one poem, or a combination of multiple pieces (often referred to as a 'program'). Play cuttings are prohibited from use. The focus of this performance should be on the development of language. [11]

Prose interpretation features the performance of a prose piece of significant literary merit. The performance may feature only one work, or it may be a program. Play cuttings and poetry pieces are prohibited from use. The focus of this performance should be on development of the narrative. [11]

Under the AFA rules of Drama Interpretation, the performer is to create a cutting from either stage, screen, or radio with significant literary merit. The performance may feature only one play, or it may be a program. The performer may portray multiple characters. The focus of this performance should be on the development of characterization. [11]

Program Oral Interpretation is an event that is unique to the AFA-NST and is not sanctioned by NFA nationals. [12] In POI, the performer is to create a program of selections linked by a common theme, and consisting of at least two of the different genres of forensics interpretation literature (prose, poetry, and drama), with the pieces being of significant literary merit. Each genre must be represented by a unique piece of literature; one piece may not represent multiple genres. One selection may be original. The focus of this event should be on the development of the theme through the established narrative. [11]

Dramatic Duo is the only AFA-sponsored event to feature two competitors in the performance. The performance may feature cuttings from any genre of literature; the cutting may be only one piece, or it may be a program. The selected cutting can be either humorous, serious, or a combination of the two. The performers are not allowed to directly look at each other or touch each other. The performers may each portray multiple characters if they so choose.

Public Address Events

There are four AFA-sponsored events that fall into the category of public address. Public address events involve the performance of an originally written speech covering a specific topic or issue. Audio and visual aids are permitted for use in all public address events. Performers are heavily encouraged to integrate multiple sources into their speech. All events in this category have a 10-minute time limit.

Persuasive speaking involves the performer delivering an original speech that is intended to inspire action or change the beliefs of the audience. [11] Minimal notes are permitted, but heavily discouraged. Visual aids are permitted, but not mandatory. Judging should be based on the performer's public speaking skills and the effectiveness of the message.

In informative speaking the performer delivers an original, factual speech that is intended to inform and educate the audience about a unique subject. [11] Minimal notes are permitted, but heavily discouraged.

Known as 'rhetorical criticism' at NFA nationals, communication analysis is an original speech centered on the evaluation of a communication event, often referred to as the 'artifact' (speeches, movements, advertisements, etc.). The evaluation should utilize rhetorical principles and theories. [11] Manuscripts are permitted, but heavily discouraged.

After dinner speaking is an original, humorous speech centered on a single theme or subject. While the speech should be mostly humorous, it should not resemble a stand-up comedy act. Judging should be based on speaking skill, speech coherence, and good taste in humor. [11] Minimal notes are permitted, but heavily discouraged.

Limited Preparation Events

There are two limited preparation events sponsored by the AFA. Limited preparation events are unique from other forensics events in that the speech is written 'on the spot' with a limited amount of time allocated to preparation. Both events are performed as speeches. Limited notes are commonly used in these events. Audio and visual aids may not be used. All limited preparation events have a 7-minute time limit.

In extemporaneous speaking, competitors receive three topics covering a range of current events. The competitor will select one of the three topics, and is then given 30 minutes to prepare an original speech utilizing multiple sources. Due to its preparation time, extemporaneous speaking is the only AFA-sponsored event where competitors speak in a previously assigned order which is generally not flexible or subject to change. [11] Limited notes may be used.

In impromptu speaking, the competitor receives a quotation to use as the topic of their speech. The competitor's 7-minute time limit starts at their reading of the quotation. The speech may be humorous, serious, or a combination of both, but should stay relevant to the quotation and the speaker's interpretation of it. [11] Limited notes are permitted.

Qualification

There are two ways that a competitor can qualify an event for the AFA-NST:

At-Large Qualification

For an event to be qualified through the at-large process, the competitor must obtain three 'legs' (placings) in the event that total out to 8 or less. (e.g. 3rd, 3rd, 2nd; 5th, 2nd, 1st; 6th, 1st, 1st; 1st, 1st, 1st) In the event that a final round contains more than six competitors (e.g. unbreakable tie), no placing beyond 6th will count as a leg under any circumstances. A leg can be acquired at any tournament in which at least 9 schools are participating. [1]

Placings will only count as a leg if the requirement for number of competitors in the event is met:

District Qualification

Events may also be qualified for the AFA-NST by placing in the top 10% of the field at their school's respective district qualifying tournament.

All AFA member schools are placed into a district. District placement is largely (but not entirely) based on the state that the school is located in:

Note: Schools may enter a petitioning process if they wish to be placed in a different district.

The respective district committees determine when the district qualifying tournament will be, specifically, but it must take place after January 15 and before the third weekend of March. Events that have already been qualified through the at-large process are ineligible for competition at the district qualifying tournaments. A student qualifies an event for the AFA-NST when they place in the top 10% of that event, rounding up. (e.g. 20 competitors: top 2; 21 competitors: top 3) If an individual has two legs coming into the district qualifier and finishes at a placing sufficient for their third leg, then that event is qualified at-large, and everyone who placed below said individual is moved up one spot, allowing them to potentially qualify. [1]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Speech and Debate Association</span> American interscholastic association

The National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA) is the largest interscholastic speech and debate organization serving middle school and high school students in the United States. It is also the national authority on public speaking and debate.

Lincoln–Douglas debate is a type of one-on-one competitive debate practiced mainly in the United States at the high school level. It is sometimes also called values debate because the format traditionally places a heavy emphasis on logic, ethical values, and philosophy. The Lincoln–Douglas debate format is named for the 1858 Lincoln–Douglas debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, because their debates focused on slavery and the morals, values, and logic behind it. LD debates are used by the National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA) competitions, and also widely used in related debate leagues such as the National Christian Forensics and Communication Association, the National Catholic Forensic League, the National Educational Debate Association, the Texas University Interscholastic League, Texas Forensic Association, Stoa USA and their affiliated regional organizations.

Policy debate is an American form of debate competition in which teams of two usually advocate for and against a resolution that typically calls for policy change by the United States federal government. It is also referred to as cross-examination debate because of the 3-minute questioning period following each constructive speech. Evidence presentation is a crucial part of policy debate. The main argument being debated during a round is to change or not change the status quo. When a team explains why their solvency is greater than the opposition's, they compare advantages. One team’s job is to argue that the resolution— the statement that we should make some specific change to a national or international problem —is a good idea. Affirmative teams generally present a plan as a proposal for implementation of the resolution. On the other hand, the Negative teams present arguments against the implementation of the resolution. In a single round of debate competition, each person gives two speeches. The first speech each person gives is called a “constructive” speech, because it is the speech when the first person of the team speaks positively, presenting the team's main idea without rebuttals that have not occurred, presents the basic arguments they will make throughout the debate. The second speech is called a “rebuttal”, because this is the speech where each person tries to rebut the arguments made by the other team, while using their own arguments to try to persuade the judge to vote for their team. The Affirmative has to persuade the judge to vote for the resolution, while the Negative has to persuade the judge the Negative's position is a better idea.

Duo Interpretation, or often simply called Duo Interp, or just Duo, is an official speech event of Stoa USA, the National Speech and Debate Association, the National Catholic Forensics League, National Christian Forensics and Communications Association, American Forensics Association, and the National Forensics Association. The event involves a pair of performers acting out a literary piece or program under certain constraints, including not making eye contact nor touching their partner, and not using props. Pieces used often include published books, movies, short stories, plays, or poems. Participants may cut anything out of their piece, but cannot add any dialogue. This event can either be dramatic or humorous.

Dramatic Interpretation is an event in National Speech and Debate Association high school forensics competitions. In the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association and the National Catholic Forensic League, the event is combined with Humorous Interpretation to create the Dramatic Performance event. It consists of a piece from any published work, edited to fit within a 10-minute span with a 30-second grace period.

Individual events in speech include public speaking, limited preparation, acting and interpretation are a part of forensics competitions. These events do not include the several different forms of debate offered by many tournaments. These events are called individual events because they tend to be done by one person unlike debate which often includes teams. This distinction however is not entirely accurate any more given the addition of duo interpretation events and forms of single person debate. Competitive speech competitions and debates comprise the area of forensics. Forensics leagues have a number of speech events, generally determined by geographical region or league preference. While there are several key events that have been around a long time, there are several experimental events around the country every year that can be limited to individual tournaments. Forensics leagues in the United States includes the National Speech and Debate Association, the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association, the American Forensics Association, the National Forensics Association, the Interstate Oratorical Association and Stoa USA. Organized competitions are held at the high-school and collegiate level. Outside of the rules for each event provided by the individual leagues, there are several cultural norms within each region that are not written into law but are almost always followed. Rules for time limits vary by event and by individual tournaments, but there are penalties in every event for exceeding the time limits though the severity of the penalty widely varies.

Humorous Interpretation is an event in competitive middle and high school forensics leagues such as the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association and the National Speech and Debate Association. It consists of a piece from any published work, edited to fit within a 10-minute span with a 30-second grace period. It is judged based upon how the person portrays his or her characters and whether the piece is humorous. Ideally proper portrayal of characters should achieve a comedic effect to the judge. Humorous Interpretation and Dramatic Interpretation pieces are often used for the National Catholic Forensic League category of Dramatic Performance, which has similar rules but allows for a wider variety of pieces.

Public forum debate is a form of competitive debate which centers on current events and relies on both logic and evidence to construct arguments. It is primarily competed by middle and high school students, but college teams exist as well. Invented in the US, Public Forum is one of the most prominent American debate events, alongside policy debate and Lincoln-Douglas debate; it is also practiced in China and India, and has been recently introduced to Romania. Individuals give short speeches that are interspersed with 3 minute "Crossfire" sections, questions and answers between opposed debaters. The winner is determined by a judge who also serves as a referee. The debate centers on advocating or rejecting a position, "resolve", or "resolution", which is usually a proposal of a potential solution to a current events issue. Public Forum is designed to be accessible to the average citizen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Forensic Association</span>

The American Forensic Association is an American organisation which promotes and supports competitive debating and public speaking in high schools and colleges in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Christian Forensics and Communications Association</span> U.S. speech and debate league

The Christian Speech & Debate League, also known as the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association, is a speech and debate league for Christian students in the United States. The NCFCA was established in 2001 after outgrowing its parent organization, the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), which had been running the league since it was originally established in 1995. NCFCA is now organized under its own board of directors with regional and state leadership coordinating various tournaments throughout the season.


Extemporaneous Speaking is a speech delivery style/speaking style, and a term that identifies a specific forensic competition. The competition is a speech event based on research and original analysis, done with a limited-preparation; in the United States those competitions are held for high school and college students. In a Extemporaneous Speech competition, enrolled participants prepare for thirty minutes on a question related to current events and then give a seven-minute speech responding to that question. The extemporaneous speaking delivery style, referred to as "off-the-cuff", is a type of delivery method for a public presentation, that was carefully prepared and practiced but not memorized.

Impromptu speaking is a speech that a person delivers without predetermination or preparation. The speaker is most commonly provided with their topic in the form of a quotation, but the topic may also be presented as an object, proverb, one-word abstract, or one of the many alternative possibilities. While specific rules and norms vary with the organization and level of competition, the speeches tend to follow basic speech format and cover topics that are both humorous and profound.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Texas Forensic Association</span>

The Texas Forensic Association (TFA) is an organization that provides and regulates competition in speech and debate (forensics) for Texas high school students. The association authorizes forensics competitions nearly every weekend in Texas for the duration of the forensics season, which lasts from early August until the end of February, with the State competition typically in the first or second week of March.

Grand National Speech and Debate Tournament is the premier public speaking event of the National Catholic Forensic League. It is held annually in the United States over Memorial Day weekend. One can qualify for the tournament by performing sufficiently well in a local qualifying tournament.

The National Forensic Association (NFA) is an American intercollegiate organization designed to promote excellence in individual events and debate. The NFA sponsors the NFA Nationals as well many other regional tournaments throughout the year. The 2023 NFA national tournament will be hosted by Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois. Founded in 1971, the NFA Nationals is dedicated to a full range of literature interpretation, public address, limited preparation, and Lincoln-Douglas debate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Florida Forensic League</span>

The Florida Forensic League, Inc., or FFL, is a speech and debate organization offered to all schools in the state of Florida. It is the governing body for local and state speech and debate competitions in Florida, with higher-level competition under the auspices of the National Forensic League and the National Catholic Forensic League. The league was officially incorporated by the State of Florida on November 20, 2003, and began operations on January 1, 2004, although it existed some time before then in an unorganized fashion. Competitors in the league have been extremely successful at national tournaments.

The Iowa High School Speech Association (IHSSA) consists of member high schools from four districts in Iowa, United States, and offers three categories of competition: debate, large group, and individual events. At the end of each of the three contests, the Cooley Sweepstakes Trophy is awarded. To get to the all-state speech tournament, one must first proceed from the district and state tournaments. At district for speech, there is one judge who issues ratings and every team or individual who receives a "I" goes on. At State there are three judges, and two out of three must not only give a "I" rating, but also give a recommendation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pi Kappa Delta</span>

Pi Kappa Delta (ΠΚΔ) is a Forensics Honor Society for undergraduate university students and a professional organization for graduates, typically university Speech and Debate Coaches.

Stoa USA, also referred to as Stoa, is a Christian homeschool forensics organization in the United States. It is one of the four major national high school forensics organizations: the others are the National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA), National Catholic Forensic League (NCFL), and the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association (NCFCA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Interstate Oratorical Association</span> Public speaking competition

The Interstate Oratory Association is an intercollegiate contest in oratory or persuasive speaking. Founded in 1874, the IOA is the oldest public speaking organization in the United States and has held contests for the top oratory or persuasive speakers from each state ever since. The annual Interstate Oratory Contest is usually held within the last weekend of April with two representatives from state competing at the event. The most recent IOA contest was hosted virtually by South Dakota State University on April 23–24, 2021.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "AFA-NIET bylaws" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-03-06.
  2. 1 2 Bartanen, Michael (November 7, 2013). Forensics in America: A History. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 107.
  3. ↑ Renz, Mary; Keith Green (1989). "Factors Affecting Choice Among National Tournaments: Reports on a Survey" (PDF). National Forensic Journal. 7 (2): 107. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-02-21.
  4. ↑ Burnett, Ann; Jeffrey Brand; Mark Meister (2001). "Forensics Education? How the Structure and Discourse of Forensics Promotes Competition". Argumentation and Advocacy. 38 (2). Retrieved 6 February 2014.
  5. ↑ "SpeechWire Tournament Services - Forensics Tournament Software - Speech, Debate, Congress". www.speechwire.com. Retrieved 2022-03-29.
  6. ↑ Fryar, Linda (1984). "A Brief History of Individual Events Nationals" (PDF). National Forensic Journal. 2 (2): 73–83. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-02-21.
  7. 1 2 Yates, Guy; Larry Schnoor (2000). "AFA-NIET History". Argumentation and Advocacy. 37 (1).
  8. 1 2 "AFA-NIET attendance over the years" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-12.
  9. ↑ "History and Results". AFA-NST - Google Sites. Retrieved 4 April 2021.
  10. ↑ "National Tournament Results". AFA-NST. Retrieved 3 May 2021.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "AFA-NIET events" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-12-21. Retrieved 2013-12-28.
  12. ↑ "NFA Event rules". Archived from the original on 2013-12-19. Retrieved 2013-12-28.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.