Benjamin K. Sovacool

Last updated
Benjamin K. Sovacool
Ben-122.JPG
Benjamin K. Sovacool, May 2010
Alma mater John Carroll University
Known for
AwardsDedication to Diversity and Justice Award (2015)
Scientific career
Institutions

Benjamin K. Sovacool is an American academic who is director of the Institute for Global Sustainability at Boston University as well as Professor of Earth and Environment at Boston University. [1] He was formerly Director of the Danish Center for Energy Technology at the Department of Business Development and Technology and a professor of social sciences at Aarhus University. He is also professor of energy policy at the University of Sussex, where he formerly directed the Center on Innovation and Energy Demand and the Sussex Energy Group. He has written on energy policy, environmental issues, and science and technology policy. Sovacool is also the editor-in-chief of Energy Research & Social Science .

Contents

Education

Sovacool has a bachelor's degree in Philosophy and Communication Studies (2001) from John Carroll University, master's degrees in Rhetoric (2003) from Wayne State University and in Science Policy (2005) Virginia Tech, and a PhD (2006) in Science and Technology Studies from Virginia Tech. [2] [3]

Career

While at Virginia Tech, Sovacool worked as a graduate student on a grant from the National Science Foundation's Electric Power Networks Efficiency and Security Program analyzing the barriers to small-scale renewable electricity sources and distributed generation in the United States. [4] He worked in research and advisory capacities for the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Semiconductor Materials and Equipment International, the Global Environment Facility, the World Bank Group, and the Union of Concerned Scientists. [4]

From 2007 until 2011 Sovacool was at the National University of Singapore, where he led research projects supported by the MacArthur Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation investigating how to improve energy security for impoverished rural communities throughout Asia. [5]

Sovacool was an associate professor at Vermont Law School and founded their Energy Security & Justice Program in 2011. [5] In 2012, Sovacool was an Erasmus Mundus Visiting Scholar at Central European University in Hungary. He consulted for the Asian Development Bank, United Nations Development Program, and United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. [4] He was awarded the Dedication to Diversity and Justice Award from the American Bar Association in 2015. [6]

In 2013, Sovacool was Director of the Center for Energy Technology and professor of business and social sciences at Aarhus University in Denmark. [7] [8] He is also Professor of Energy Policy at the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom. [9] Sovacool lectures on energy security, alternative and renewable energy, environmental economics, and energy policy. [4]

In 2014, Sovacool became the founding editor-in-chief of Energy Research & Social Science , which explores the interactions between energy systems and society. [10] [11]

Publications

Sovacool has authored numerous academic articles and book chapters and has written opinion editorials for The Wall Street Journal and the San Francisco Chronicle . [4] According to Google Scholar his scientific publication has (as of September 2022) an h-index of 113. [12]

In 2007, Sovacool co-edited Energy and American Society: Thirteen Myths . [13] [14] In 2008, he wrote The Dirty Energy Dilemma: What’s Blocking Clean Power in the United States which was published by Praeger and won a 2009 Nautilus Book Award. [15]

In Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power (2011) Sovacool says, following a detailed analysis, that there is a "consensus among a broad base of independent, nonpartisan experts that nuclear power plants are a poor choice for producing electricity", and that "energy efficiency programs and renewable power technologies are better than nuclear power plants". [16] In 2016, Sovacool, Andrew Lawrence and Andrew Stirling published an article in Climate Policy claiming that pro-nuclear energy countries had acted more slowly to address climate change. [17] [18] Critics pointed out errors in the data the article was based on, [19] [20] and the authors retracted it, as the two errors "had the combined effect of invalidating key findings of this paper". [21]

In October 2020, Sovacool and Stirling published another article in Nature Energy [22] analysing data from 123 countries over 25 years that again argues that pro-nuclear countries do not show significantly lower carbon emissions, and that in poorer countries nuclear programmes are associated with relatively higher carbon emissions. [23] [24] The results have been disputed in two publications. Harrison Fell et al. analyzed the same data as Sovacool did, finding that "nuclear power and renewable energy are both associated with lower per capita CO2 emissions with effects of similar magnitude", and pointing out bias and basic statistical fallacies in the Sovacool publication - for example, arbitrarily choosing 1990-2004 and 2000-2014 periods for their analysis, incorrectly accepting their null hypothesis when their analysis did not achieve statistical significance and other such issues. [25] Friedrich Wagner investigated the CO2 emissions caused by nuclear and renewable power. His "results are in complete contradiction" with the Sovacool study. [26] Sovacool and colleagues have challenged such publications, with a rebuttal in Nature Energy noting that "rather than finding any critical flaws in our analysis," such studies instead "have only effectively confirmed our own basis for raising critical questions about the assumptions of parity in the carbon reducing effects of nuclear and renewable strategies." [27]

Books

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainable energy</span> Energy that responsibly meets social, economic, and environmental needs

Energy is sustainable if it "meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." Most definitions of sustainable energy include considerations of environmental aspects such as greenhouse gas emissions and social and economic aspects such as energy poverty. Renewable energy sources such as wind, hydroelectric power, solar, and geothermal energy are generally far more sustainable than fossil fuel sources. However, some renewable energy projects, such as the clearing of forests to produce biofuels, can cause severe environmental damage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy policy</span> How a government or business deals with energy

Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy is a core component of modern economies. A functioning economy requires not only labor and capital but also energy, for manufacturing processes, transportation, communication, agriculture, and more. Energy planning is more detailed than energy policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change mitigation</span> Actions to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions to limit climate change

Climate change mitigation is action to limit climate change. This action either reduces emissions of greenhouse gases or removes those gases from the atmosphere. The recent rise in global temperature is mostly due to emissions from burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas. There are various ways that mitigation can reduce emissions. These are transitioning to sustainable energy sources, conserving energy, and increasing efficiency. It is possible to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This can be done by enlarging forests, restoring wetlands and using other natural and technical processes. The name for these processes is carbon sequestration. Governments and companies have pledged to reduce emissions to prevent dangerous climate change. These pledges are in line with international negotiations to limit warming.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Politics of climate change</span> Interaction of societies and governments with modern climate change

The politics of climate change results from different perspectives on how to respond to climate change. Global warming is driven largely by the emissions of greenhouse gases due to human economic activity, especially the burning of fossil fuels, certain industries like cement and steel production, and land use for agriculture and forestry. Since the Industrial Revolution, fossil fuels have provided the main source of energy for economic and technological development. The centrality of fossil fuels and other carbon-intensive industries has resulted in much resistance to climate friendly policy, despite widespread scientific consensus that such policy is necessary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear energy policy</span> Review of the topic

Nuclear energy policy is a national and international policy concerning some or all aspects of nuclear energy and the nuclear fuel cycle, such as uranium mining, ore concentration, conversion, enrichment for nuclear fuel, generating electricity by nuclear power, storing and reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, and disposal of radioactive waste. Nuclear energy policies often include the regulation of energy use and standards relating to the nuclear fuel cycle. Other measures include efficiency standards, safety regulations, emission standards, fiscal policies, and legislation on energy trading, transport of nuclear waste and contaminated materials, and their storage. Governments might subsidize nuclear energy and arrange international treaties and trade agreements about the import and export of nuclear technology, electricity, nuclear waste, and uranium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Low-carbon economy</span> Economy based on energy sources with low levels of greenhouse gas emissions

A low-carbon economy (LCE) or decarbonised economy is an economy based on energy sources that produce low levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. GHG emissions due to human activity are the dominant cause of observed climate change since the mid-20th century. Continued emission of greenhouse gases will cause long-lasting changes around the world, increasing the likelihood of severe, pervasive, and irreversible effects for people and ecosystems. Shifting to a low-carbon economy on a global scale could bring substantial benefits both for developed and developing countries. Many countries around the world are designing and implementing low-emission development strategies (LEDS). These strategies seek to achieve social, economic, and environmental development goals while reducing long-term greenhouse gas emissions and increasing resilience to the effects of climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Diesendorf</span> Australian academic and environmentalist

Mark Diesendorf is an Australian academic and environmentalist, known for his work in sustainable development and renewable energy. He currently teaches environmental studies at the University of New South Wales, Australia. He was formerly professor of environmental science and founding director of the Institute for Sustainable Futures at the University of Technology, Sydney and before that a principal research scientist with CSIRO, where he was involved in early research on integrating wind power into electricity grids. His most recent book is Sustainable Energy Solutions for Climate Change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy commercialization</span> Deployment of technologies harnessing easily replenished natural resources

Renewable energy commercialization involves the deployment of three generations of renewable energy technologies dating back more than 100 years. First-generation technologies, which are already mature and economically competitive, include biomass, hydroelectricity, geothermal power and heat. Second-generation technologies are market-ready and are being deployed at the present time; they include solar heating, photovoltaics, wind power, solar thermal power stations, and modern forms of bioenergy. Third-generation technologies require continued R&D efforts in order to make large contributions on a global scale and include advanced biomass gasification, hot-dry-rock geothermal power, and ocean energy. In 2019, nearly 75% of new installed electricity generation capacity used renewable energy and the International Energy Agency (IEA) has predicted that by 2025, renewable capacity will meet 35% of global power generation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green-collar worker</span> Environmental-sector worker

A green-collar worker is a worker who is employed in an environmental sector of the economy. Environmental green-collar workers satisfy the demand for green development. Generally, they implement environmentally conscious design, policy, and technology to improve conservation and sustainability. Formal environmental regulations as well as informal social expectations are pushing many firms to seek professionals with expertise with environmental, energy efficiency, and clean renewable energy issues. They often seek to make their output more sustainable, and thus more favorable to public opinion, governmental regulation, and the Earth's ecology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fossil fuel phase-out</span> Gradual reduction of the use and production of fossil fuels

Fossil fuel phase-out is the gradual reduction of the use and production of fossil fuels to zero, to reduce deaths and illness from air pollution, limit climate change, and strengthen energy independence. It is part of the ongoing renewable energy transition, but is being hindered by fossil fuel subsidies.

<i>Energy and American Society: Thirteen Myths</i>

Energy and American Society: Thirteen Myths is a 2007 book about energy security and climate change, edited by Benjamin K. Sovacool and Marilyn A. Brown. The book is suitable for both technical and non-technical audiences since it is written in plain English and is "easily digested by anyone with a rudimentary background or interest in energy economics".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">100% renewable energy</span> Practice of exclusively using easily replenished natural resources to do work

100% renewable energy is the goal of the use renewable resources for all energy. 100% renewable energy for electricity, heating, cooling and transport is motivated by climate change, pollution and other environmental issues, as well as economic and energy security concerns. Shifting the total global primary energy supply to renewable sources requires a transition of the energy system, since most of today's energy is derived from non-renewable fossil fuels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power debate</span> Controversy over the use of nuclear power

The nuclear power debate is a long-running controversy about the risks and benefits of using nuclear reactors to generate electricity for civilian purposes. The debate about nuclear power peaked during the 1970s and 1980s, as more and more reactors were built and came online, and "reached an intensity unprecedented in the history of technology controversies" in some countries. In the 2010s, with growing public awareness about climate change and the critical role that carbon dioxide and methane emissions plays in causing the heating of the Earth's atmosphere, there was a resurgence in the intensity of the nuclear power debate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Z. Jacobson</span> American climatologist and engineer (born 1965)

Mark Zachary Jacobson is a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University and director of its Atmosphere/Energy Program. He is also a co-founder of the non-profit, Solutions Project.

<i>The Dirty Energy Dilemma</i> 2008 book by Benjamin K. Sovacool

The Dirty Energy Dilemma: What’s Blocking Clean Power in the United States is a 2008 book by academic Benjamin K. Sovacool, published by Praeger. In the book, Sovacool explores problems with the current U.S. electricity system and ways to overcome them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marilyn A. Brown</span>

Marilyn A. Brown is a Regents' and Brook Byers Professor of Sustainable Systems in the School of Public Policy at the Georgia Institute of Technology. She joined Georgia Tech in 2006 after 22 years at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, where she held various leadership positions. Her work was cited by President Clinton as providing the scientific justification for signing the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. With Eric Hirst, she coined the term "energy efficiency gap" and pioneered research to highlight and quantify the unexploited economic potential to use energy more productively.

<i>Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power</i> 2011 book by Benjamin K. Sovacool

Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power: A Critical Global Assessment of Atomic Energy is a 2011 book by Benjamin K. Sovacool, published by World Scientific. Sovacool's book addresses the current status of the global nuclear power industry, its fuel cycle, nuclear accidents, environmental impacts, social risks, energy payback, nuclear power economics, and industry subsidies. There is a postscript on the Japanese 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster. Based on detailed analysis, Sovacool concludes "that a global nuclear renaissance would bring immense technical, economic, environmental, political, and social costs". He says that it is renewable energy technologies which will enhance energy security, and which have many other advantages.

<i>Climate Change and Global Energy Security</i> 2011 book by Marilyn A. Brown

Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options is a 2011 book by Marilyn A. Brown and Benjamin K. Sovacool, in which the authors offer detailed assessments of commercially available technologies for strengthening global energy security and climate change mitigation. They also evaluate the barriers to the deployment of these technologies and critically review public policy options for their commercialization. Arguing that society has all the technologies necessary for the task, they discuss an array of options available today, including high-efficiency transportation, renewable energy, carbon sequestration, and demand side management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy transition</span> Significant structural change in an energy system

An energy transition is a significant structural change in an energy system regarding supply and consumption. Currently, a transition to sustainable energy is underway to limit climate change. It is also called renewable energy transition. The current transition is driven by a recognition that global greenhouse-gas emissions must be drastically reduced. This process involves phasing-down fossil fuels and re-developing whole systems to operate on low carbon electricity. A previous energy transition took place during the industrial revolution and involved an energy transition from wood and other biomass to coal, followed by oil and most recently natural gas.

Energy Research & Social Science is a peer-reviewed academic journal covering social science research on energy systems and energy and society, including anthropology, economics, geography, psychology, political science, social policy, sociology, science and technology studies and legal studies. It was established in 2014 and is now among the most highly ranked journals on energy and social sciences. It is published by Elsevier. The editor-in-chief is Benjamin K. Sovacool.

References

  1. "BU Institute to Focus on Equity and Justice in the Climate Change Fight". Boston University. 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
  2. "Benjamin Sovacool's academic curriculum". Aarhus University. 15 October 2020.
  3. Grimes, Cathy (9 May 2019). "Benjamin Sovacool to receive the 2019 Graduate Alumni Achievement Award". Virginia Tech Daily. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Vermont Law School (2013). "Benjamin K. Sovacool Biography". Archived from the original on 2013-05-28.
  5. 1 2 "VT Law School Launches Energy Security & Justice Project". Vermont Law School. January 24, 2012. Archived from the original on March 13, 2012.
  6. ABA. "Environment, Energy, and Resources Dedication to Diversity and Justice Award - Past Award Recipients". Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2016-01-11.
  7. Aarhus University q. "Professor Benjamin Sovacool".
  8. Aarhus University (2013). "Keynote speakers". PMA 2014 Conference. Archived from the original on 2013-09-12.
  9. University of Sussex. "Benjamin Sovacool joins Sussex Energy Group".
  10. "Source details: Energy Research & Social Science". Scopus preview. Elsevier . Retrieved 2017-02-02.
  11. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy-research-and-social-science/news/energy-research-social-science-tops-recent-journal-rankings%7Ctitle= Energy Research & Social Science tops recent journal rankings
  12. "Benjamin Sovacool - User profile". Google Scholar. 2022-09-20. Retrieved 2022-09-20.
  13. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P. (December 2007). "Energy and American Society—Thirteen Myths, B. Sovacool, M. Brown (Eds.). Springer, Berlin (2007, ISBN: 978-1-4020-5563-8, 371pp., $79.95". Energy Policy. 35 (12): 6554–6555. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.008.
  14. Pasqualetti, Martin J. (2008). "Review of Energy and American Society--Thirteen Myths, B. Sovacool, M. Brown (eds.)". Annals of the Association of American Geographers . 8 (2): 504–505. doi:10.1080/00045600801944210. S2CID   128859012.
  15. Curriculum Vitae: Dr. Benjamin K. Sovacool [ permanent dead link ]
  16. Benjamin K. Sovacool (2011). Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power (PDF). World Scientific. pp. 248–250. doi:10.1142/7895. ISBN   978-981-4322-75-1.
  17. Lawrence, Andrew; Sovacool, Benjamin; Stirling, Andrew (3 July 2016). "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Nuclear energy and path dependence in Europe's 'Energy union': coherence or continued divergence?". Climate Policy. 16 (5): 622–641. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1179616 .
  18. "Pro-nuclear countries making slower progress on climate targets". Science News. 22 August 2016. Archived from the original on 23 August 2016. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
  19. "Refutation of recent Climate Policy paper written by Lawrence, Sovacool & Stirling". 2 September 2016. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
  20. Thompson, Nicholas (12 October 2016). "A Response to Lawrence, Sovacool, and Stirling" . Retrieved 9 October 2020.
  21. Lawrence, Andrew; Sovacool, Benjamin; Stirling, Andrew (2016). "Authorial statement of article withdrawal" (PDF). Climate Policy. 16 (5): ri–rii. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1260249. S2CID   157939679.
  22. Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Schmid, Patrick; Stirling, Andy; Walter, Goetz; MacKerron, Gordon (November 2020). "Differences in carbon emissions reduction between countries pursuing renewable electricity versus nuclear power" (PDF). Nature Energy. 5 (11): 928–935. Bibcode:2020NatEn...5..928S. doi:10.1038/s41560-020-00696-3. S2CID   225107514.
  23. Vowles, Neil (5 October 2020). "Two's a crowd: Nuclear and renewables don't mix. Only the latter can deliver truly low carbon energy says new study". News. University of Sussex. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
  24. Satherley, Dan (9 October 2020). "Nuclear power won't solve climate change - study". Newshub. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
  25. Fell, Harrison; Gilbert, Alexander; Jenkins, Jesse; Mildenberger, Matto (8 January 2021). "Reply to 'Differences in Carbon Emissions Reduction between Countries Pursuing Renewable Electricity Versus Nuclear Power,' by Sovacool Et Al. (2020)". doi:10.2139/ssrn.3762762. S2CID   234183759. SSRN   3762762.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  26. Wagner, Friedrich (2021-05-20). "CO2 emissions of nuclear power and renewable energies: a statistical analysis of European and global data". The European Physical Journal Plus. 136 (5): 562. Bibcode:2021EPJP..136..562W. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01508-7 .
  27. Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Schmid, Patrick; Stirling, Andy; Walter, Goetz; MacKerron, Gordon (January 2022). "Reply to: Nuclear power and renewable energy are both associated with national decarbonization". Nature Energy. 7 (1): 30–31. Bibcode:2022NatEn...7...30S. doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00965-9. S2CID   246363862.