Bethe ansatz

Last updated

In physics, the Bethe ansatz is an ansatz for finding the exact wavefunctions of certain quantum many-body models, most commonly for one-dimensional lattice models. It was first used by Hans Bethe in 1931 to find the exact eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the one-dimensional antiferromagnetic isotropic (XXX) Heisenberg model. [1]

Contents

Since then the method has been extended to other spin chains and statistical lattice models.

"Bethe ansatz problems" were one of the topics featuring in the "To learn" section of Richard Feynman's blackboard at the time of his death. [2]

Discussion

In the framework of many-body quantum mechanics, models solvable by the Bethe ansatz can be contrasted with free fermion models. One can say that the dynamics of a free model is one-body reducible: the many-body wave function for fermions (bosons) is the anti-symmetrized (symmetrized) product of one-body wave functions. Models solvable by the Bethe ansatz are not free: the two-body sector has a non-trivial scattering matrix, which in general depends on the momenta.

On the other hand, the dynamics of the models solvable by the Bethe ansatz is two-body reducible: the many-body scattering matrix is a product of two-body scattering matrices. Many-body collisions happen as a sequence of two-body collisions and the many-body wave function can be represented in a form which contains only elements from two-body wave functions. The many-body scattering matrix is equal to the product of pairwise scattering matrices.

The generic form of the (coordinate) Bethe ansatz for a many-body wavefunction is

in which is the number of particles, their position, is the set of all permutations of the integers , is the parity of the permutation taking values either positive or negative one, is the (quasi-)momentum of the -th particle, is the scattering phase shift function and is the sign function. This form is universal (at least for non-nested systems), with the momentum and scattering functions being model-dependent.

The Yang–Baxter equation guarantees consistency of the construction. The Pauli exclusion principle is valid for models solvable by the Bethe ansatz, even for models of interacting bosons.

The ground state is a Fermi sphere. Periodic boundary conditions lead to the Bethe ansatz equations or simply Bethe equations. In logarithmic form the Bethe ansatz equations can be generated by the Yang action. The square of the norm of Bethe wave function is equal to the determinant of the Hessian of the Yang action. [3]

A substantial generalization is the quantum inverse scattering method, or algebraic Bethe ansatz, which gives an ansatz for the underlying operator algebra that "has allowed a wide class of nonlinear evolution equations to be solved." [4]

The exact solutions of the so-called s-d model (by P.B. Wiegmann [5] in 1980 and independently by N. Andrei, [6] also in 1980) and the Anderson model (by P.B. Wiegmann [7] in 1981, and by N. Kawakami and A. Okiji [8] in 1981) are also both based on the Bethe ansatz. There exist multi-channel generalizations of these two models also amenable to exact solutions (by N. Andrei and C. Destri [9] and by C.J. Bolech and N. Andrei [10] ). Recently several models solvable by Bethe ansatz were realized experimentally in solid states and optical lattices. An important role in the theoretical description of these experiments was played by Jean-Sébastien Caux and Alexei Tsvelik.[ citation needed ]

Terminology

There are many similar methods which come under the name of Bethe ansatz

Examples

Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain

The Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain is defined by the Hamiltonian (assuming periodic boundary conditions)

This model is solvable using the (coordinate) Bethe ansatz. The scattering phase shift function is , with in which the momentum has been conveniently reparametrized as in terms of the rapidity The (here, periodic) boundary conditions impose the Bethe equations

or more conveniently in logarithmic form

where the quantum numbers are distinct half-odd integers for even, integers for odd (with defined mod).

Applicability

The following systems can be solved using the Bethe ansatz

Chronology

Related Research Articles

In theoretical physics, the term renormalization group (RG) refers to a formal apparatus that allows systematic investigation of the changes of a physical system as viewed at different scales. In particle physics, it reflects the changes in the underlying force laws as the energy scale at which physical processes occur varies, energy/momentum and resolution distance scales being effectively conjugate under the uncertainty principle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nonlinear Schrödinger equation</span> Nonlinear form of the Schrödinger equation

In theoretical physics, the (one-dimensional) nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) is a nonlinear variation of the Schrödinger equation. It is a classical field equation whose principal applications are to the propagation of light in nonlinear optical fibers and planar waveguides and to Bose–Einstein condensates confined to highly anisotropic, cigar-shaped traps, in the mean-field regime. Additionally, the equation appears in the studies of small-amplitude gravity waves on the surface of deep inviscid (zero-viscosity) water; the Langmuir waves in hot plasmas; the propagation of plane-diffracted wave beams in the focusing regions of the ionosphere; the propagation of Davydov's alpha-helix solitons, which are responsible for energy transport along molecular chains; and many others. More generally, the NLSE appears as one of universal equations that describe the evolution of slowly varying packets of quasi-monochromatic waves in weakly nonlinear media that have dispersion. Unlike the linear Schrödinger equation, the NLSE never describes the time evolution of a quantum state. The 1D NLSE is an example of an integrable model.

In probability theory and mathematical physics, a random matrix is a matrix-valued random variable—that is, a matrix in which some or all of its entries are sampled randomly from a probability distribution. Random matrix theory (RMT) is the study of properties of random matrices, often as they become large. RMT provides techniques like mean-field theory, diagrammatic methods, the cavity method, or the replica method to compute quantities like traces, spectral densities, or scalar products between eigenvectors. Many physical phenomena, such as the spectrum of nuclei of heavy atoms, the thermal conductivity of a lattice, or the emergence of quantum chaos, can be modeled mathematically as problems concerning large, random matrices.

In quantum field theory, and specifically quantum electrodynamics, vacuum polarization describes a process in which a background electromagnetic field produces virtual electron–positron pairs that change the distribution of charges and currents that generated the original electromagnetic field. It is also sometimes referred to as the self-energy of the gauge boson (photon).

In mathematics, integrability is a property of certain dynamical systems. While there are several distinct formal definitions, informally speaking, an integrable system is a dynamical system with sufficiently many conserved quantities, or first integrals, that its motion is confined to a submanifold of much smaller dimensionality than that of its phase space.

The Thirring model is an exactly solvable quantum field theory which describes the self-interactions of a Dirac field in (1+1) dimensions.

The quantum Heisenberg model, developed by Werner Heisenberg, is a statistical mechanical model used in the study of critical points and phase transitions of magnetic systems, in which the spins of the magnetic systems are treated quantum mechanically. It is related to the prototypical Ising model, where at each site of a lattice, a spin represents a microscopic magnetic dipole to which the magnetic moment is either up or down. Except the coupling between magnetic dipole moments, there is also a multipolar version of Heisenberg model called the multipolar exchange interaction.

The Gross–Pitaevskii equation describes the ground state of a quantum system of identical bosons using the Hartree–Fock approximation and the pseudopotential interaction model.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Landau–Zener formula</span> Formula for the probability that a system will change between two energy states.

The Landau–Zener formula is an analytic solution to the equations of motion governing the transition dynamics of a two-state quantum system, with a time-dependent Hamiltonian varying such that the energy separation of the two states is a linear function of time. The formula, giving the probability of a diabatic transition between the two energy states, was published separately by Lev Landau, Clarence Zener, Ernst Stueckelberg, and Ettore Majorana, in 1932.

In statistical mechanics, the Lee–Yang theorem states that if partition functions of certain models in statistical field theory with ferromagnetic interactions are considered as functions of an external field, then all zeros are purely imaginary. The first version was proved for the Ising model by T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang. Their result was later extended to more general models by several people. Asano in 1970 extended the Lee–Yang theorem to the Heisenberg model and provided a simpler proof using Asano contractions. Simon & Griffiths (1973) extended the Lee–Yang theorem to certain continuous probability distributions by approximating them by a superposition of Ising models. Newman (1974) gave a general theorem stating roughly that the Lee–Yang theorem holds for a ferromagnetic interaction provided it holds for zero interaction. Lieb & Sokal (1981) generalized Newman's result from measures on R to measures on higher-dimensional Euclidean space.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vladimir Korepin</span> Russian physicist and mathematician

Vladimir E. Korepin is a professor at the C. N. Yang Institute of Theoretical Physics of the Stony Brook University. Korepin made research contributions in several areas of mathematics and physics.

In quantum physics, the quantum inverse scattering method (QISM), similar to the closely related algebraic Bethe ansatz, is a method for solving integrable models in 1+1 dimensions, introduced by Leon Takhtajan and L. D. Faddeev in 1979.

In condensed matter physics, an AKLT model, also known as an Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki model is an extension of the one-dimensional quantum Heisenberg spin model. The proposal and exact solution of this model by Ian Affleck, Elliott H. Lieb, Tom Kennedy and Hal Tasaki provided crucial insight into the physics of the spin-1 Heisenberg chain. It has also served as a useful example for such concepts as valence bond solid order, symmetry-protected topological order and matrix product state wavefunctions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antisymmetric exchange</span> Contribution to magnetic exchange interaction

In Physics, antisymmetric exchange, also known as the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI), is a contribution to the total magnetic exchange interaction between two neighboring magnetic spins, and . Quantitatively, it is a term in the Hamiltonian which can be written as

The Lieb–Robinson bound is a theoretical upper limit on the speed at which information can propagate in non-relativistic quantum systems. It demonstrates that information cannot travel instantaneously in quantum theory, even when the relativity limits of the speed of light are ignored. The existence of such a finite speed was discovered mathematically by Elliott H. Lieb and Derek W. Robinson in 1972. It turns the locality properties of physical systems into the existence of, and upper bound for this speed. The bound is now known as the Lieb–Robinson bound and the speed is known as the Lieb–Robinson velocity. This velocity is always finite but not universal, depending on the details of the system under consideration. For finite-range, e.g. nearest-neighbor, interactions, this velocity is a constant independent of the distance travelled. In long-range interacting systems, this velocity remains finite, but it can increase with the distance travelled.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Light-front computational methods</span> Technique in computational quantum field theory

The light-front quantization of quantum field theories provides a useful alternative to ordinary equal-time quantization. In particular, it can lead to a relativistic description of bound systems in terms of quantum-mechanical wave functions. The quantization is based on the choice of light-front coordinates, where plays the role of time and the corresponding spatial coordinate is . Here, is the ordinary time, is one Cartesian coordinate, and is the speed of light. The other two Cartesian coordinates, and , are untouched and often called transverse or perpendicular, denoted by symbols of the type . The choice of the frame of reference where the time and -axis are defined can be left unspecified in an exactly soluble relativistic theory, but in practical calculations some choices may be more suitable than others.

Higher-spin theory or higher-spin gravity is a common name for field theories that contain massless fields of spin greater than two. Usually, the spectrum of such theories contains the graviton as a massless spin-two field, which explains the second name. Massless fields are gauge fields and the theories should be (almost) completely fixed by these higher-spin symmetries. Higher-spin theories are supposed to be consistent quantum theories and, for this reason, to give examples of quantum gravity. Most of the interest in the topic is due to the AdS/CFT correspondence where there is a number of conjectures relating higher-spin theories to weakly coupled conformal field theories. It is important to note that only certain parts of these theories are known at present and not many examples have been worked out in detail except some specific toy models.

Exact diagonalization (ED) is a numerical technique used in physics to determine the eigenstates and energy eigenvalues of a quantum Hamiltonian. In this technique, a Hamiltonian for a discrete, finite system is expressed in matrix form and diagonalized using a computer. Exact diagonalization is only feasible for systems with a few tens of particles, due to the exponential growth of the Hilbert space dimension with the size of the quantum system. It is frequently employed to study lattice models, including the Hubbard model, Ising model, Heisenberg model, t-J model, and SYK model.

A spin chain is a type of model in statistical physics. Spin chains were originally formulated to model magnetic systems, which typically consist of particles with magnetic spin located at fixed sites on a lattice. A prototypical example is the quantum Heisenberg model. Interactions between the sites are modelled by operators which act on two different sites, often neighboring sites.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexei Tsvelik</span> Theoretical physicist

Alexei Mikhaylovich Tsvelik is a theoretical condensed matter physicist working on strongly correlated electron systems. He is widely recognised for his pioneering contributions to the theory of low-dimensional systems, including applications of non-perturbative quantum field theory methods and the Bethe Ansatz.

References

  1. 1 2 Bethe, H. (March 1931). "Zur Theorie der Metalle. I. Eigenwerte und Eigenfunktionen der linearen Atomkette". Zeitschrift für Physik. 71 (3–4): 205–226. doi:10.1007/BF01341708. S2CID   124225487.
  2. "Richard Feynman's blackboard at time of his death | Caltech Archives". digital.archives.caltech.edu. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  3. Korepin, Vladimir E. (1982). "Calculation of norms of Bethe wave functions". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 86 (3): 391–418. Bibcode:1982CMaPh..86..391K. doi:10.1007/BF01212176. ISSN   0010-3616. S2CID   122250890.
  4. Korepin, V. E.; Bogoliubov, N. M.; Izergin, A. G. (1997-03-06). Quantum Inverse Scattering Method and Correlation Functions. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   9780521586467.
  5. Wiegmann, P.B. (1980). "Exact solution of s-d exchange model at T = 0" (PDF). JETP Letters. 31 (7): 364. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-05-17. Retrieved 2019-05-17.
  6. Andrei, N. (1980). "Diagonalization of the Kondo Hamiltonian". Physical Review Letters. 45 (5): 379–382. Bibcode:1980PhRvL..45..379A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.379. ISSN   0031-9007.
  7. Wiegmann, P.B. (1980). "Towards an exact solution of the Anderson model". Physics Letters A. 80 (2–3): 163–167. Bibcode:1980PhLA...80..163W. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(80)90212-1. ISSN   0375-9601.
  8. Kawakami, Norio; Okiji, Ayao (1981). "Exact expression of the ground-state energy for the symmetric anderson model". Physics Letters A. 86 (9): 483–486. Bibcode:1981PhLA...86..483K. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(81)90663-0. ISSN   0375-9601.
  9. Andrei, N.; Destri, C. (1984). "Solution of the Multichannel Kondo Problem". Physical Review Letters. 52 (5): 364–367. Bibcode:1984PhRvL..52..364A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.364. ISSN   0031-9007.
  10. Bolech, C. J.; Andrei, N. (2002). "Solution of the Two-Channel Anderson Impurity Model: Implications for the Heavy Fermion UBe13". Physical Review Letters. 88 (23): 237206. arXiv: cond-mat/0204392 . Bibcode:2002PhRvL..88w7206B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.237206. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   12059396. S2CID   15180985.
  11. Faddeev, Ludwig (1992). "How Algebraic Bethe Ansatz works for integrable model". arXiv: hep-th/9211111 .
  12. Sklyanin, E. K. (1985). "The quantum Toda chain". Non-Linear Equations in Classical and Quantum Field Theory. Lecture Notes in Physics. 226: 196–233. Bibcode:1985LNP...226..196S. doi:10.1007/3-540-15213-X_80. ISBN   978-3-540-15213-2.
  13. Sklyanin, E.K. (October 1990). "Functional Bethe Ansatz". Integrable and Superintegrable Systems: 8–33. doi:10.1142/9789812797179_0002. ISBN   978-981-02-0316-0.
  14. Heisenberg, W. (September 1928). "Zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus". Zeitschrift für Physik. 49 (9–10): 619–636. Bibcode:1928ZPhy...49..619H. doi:10.1007/BF01328601. S2CID   122524239.
  15. Bloch, F. (March 1930). "Zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus". Zeitschrift für Physik. 61 (3–4): 206–219. Bibcode:1930ZPhy...61..206B. doi:10.1007/BF01339661. S2CID   120459635.
  16. Hulthén, Lamek (1938). "Über das Austauschproblem eines Kristalles". Arkiv Mat. Astron. Fysik. 26A: 1.
  17. Orbach, R. (15 October 1958). "Linear Antiferromagnetic Chain with Anisotropic Coupling". Physical Review. 112 (2): 309–316. Bibcode:1958PhRv..112..309O. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.112.309.
  18. des Cloizeaux, Jacques; Pearson, J. J. (1 December 1962). "Spin-Wave Spectrum of the Antiferromagnetic Linear Chain". Physical Review. 128 (5): 2131–2135. Bibcode:1962PhRv..128.2131D. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.128.2131.
  19. Anderson, P. W. (1 June 1952). "An Approximate Quantum Theory of the Antiferromagnetic Ground State". Physical Review. 86 (5): 694–701. Bibcode:1952PhRv...86..694A. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.86.694.
  20. Lieb, Elliott H.; Liniger, Werner (15 May 1963). "Exact Analysis of an Interacting Bose Gas. I. The General Solution and the Ground State". Physical Review. 130 (4): 1605–1616. Bibcode:1963PhRv..130.1605L. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.130.1605.
  21. Lieb, Elliott H. (15 May 1963). "Exact Analysis of an Interacting Bose Gas. II. The Excitation Spectrum". Physical Review. 130 (4): 1616–1624. Bibcode:1963PhRv..130.1616L. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.130.1616.
  22. Griffiths, Robert B. (3 February 1964). "Magnetization Curve at Zero Temperature for the Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Linear Chain". Physical Review. 133 (3A): A768–A775. Bibcode:1964PhRv..133..768G. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.133.A768.
  23. Yang, C. N.; Yang, C. P. (7 October 1966). "One-Dimensional Chain of Anisotropic Spin-Spin Interactions. I. Proof of Bethe's Hypothesis for Ground State in a Finite System". Physical Review. 150 (1): 321–327. Bibcode:1966PhRv..150..321Y. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.150.321.
  24. Yang, C. N.; Yang, C. P. (7 October 1966). "One-Dimensional Chain of Anisotropic Spin-Spin Interactions. II. Properties of the Ground-State Energy Per Lattice Site for an Infinite System". Physical Review. 150 (1): 327–339. Bibcode:1966PhRv..150..327Y. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.150.327.
  25. Yang, C. N.; Yang, C. P. (4 November 1966). "One-Dimensional Chain of Anisotropic Spin-Spin Interactions. III. Applications". Physical Review. 151 (1): 258–264. Bibcode:1966PhRv..151..258Y. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.151.258.
  26. Yang, C. N. (4 December 1967). "Some Exact Results for the Many-Body Problem in one Dimension with Repulsive Delta-Function Interaction". Physical Review Letters. 19 (23): 1312–1315. Bibcode:1967PhRvL..19.1312Y. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1312.
  27. Lieb, Elliott H.; Wu, F. Y. (17 June 1968). "Absence of Mott Transition in an Exact Solution of the Short-Range, One-Band Model in One Dimension". Physical Review Letters. 20 (25): 1445–1448. Bibcode:1968PhRvL..20.1445L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.1445.
  28. Yang, C. N.; Yang, C. P. (July 1969). "Thermodynamics of a One‐Dimensional System of Bosons with Repulsive Delta‐Function Interaction". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 10 (7): 1115–1122. Bibcode:1969JMP....10.1115Y. doi:10.1063/1.1664947.