Bisexual theory

Last updated

Bisexual theory is a field of critical theory, inspired by queer theory and bisexual politics, that foregrounds bisexuality as both a theoretical focus and as an epistemology. [1] [2] [3] Bisexual theory emerged most prominently in the 1990s, in response to the burgeoning field of queer theory, and queer studies more broadly, frequently employing similar post-structuralist approaches but redressing queer theory's tendency towards bisexual erasure. [4] [5] [6] [7]

Contents

In their critique of the frequent elision of bisexuality in queer theory, Serena Anderlini-D'Onofrio and Jonathan Alexander write, "a queer theory that misses bisexuality's querying of normative sexualities is itself too mastered by the very normative and normalizing binaries it seeks to unsettle". [8]

Scholars who have been discussed in relation to bisexual theory include Ibrahim Abdurrahman Farajajé, [9] Steven Angelides, [10] Elisabeth Däumer, [11] Jo Eadie, [12] Shiri Eisner, [13] Marjorie Garber, [14] Donald E. Hall, [15] Clare Hemmings, [16] Michael du Plessis, [17] Maria Pramaggiore, [18] Merl Storr, [19] and Kenji Yoshino. [20]

History

Bisexual theory emerged in the 1990s, inspired by and responding to the emergence of queer theory. Elisabeth Däumer's 1992 article, "Queer Ethics; or, the Challenge of Bisexuality to Lesbian Ethics", was the first major publication to theorise bisexuality in relation to queer and feminist theory. [21]

In 1993, at the 11th National Bisexual Conference in the UK, a group of bisexual scholars formed Bi Academic Intervention. The same group published a volume of bisexual theory in 1997, entitled The Bisexual Imaginary: Representation, Identity and Desire. In 1995, Marjorie Garber released Vice Versa: Bisexuality and the Eroticism of Everyday Life, a monograph that aimed to reveal a 'bi-erotics' observable across disparate cultural locations, which however, drew some criticism due to its alleged ahistoricism. [22] In 1996, Maria Pramaggiore and Donald E. Hall edited the collection RePresenting Bisexualities: Subjects and Cultures of Fluid Desire, which turned a bisexual theoretical lens to questions of representation. Chapters of bisexual theory also appeared in Activating Theory: Lesbian, Gay Bisexual Politics (1993) and Queer Studies: A Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Anthology (1996).

The Journal of Bisexuality was first published in 2000 by the Taylor & Francis Group under the Routledge imprint, and its editors-in-chief have included Fritz Klein, Jonathan Alexander, Brian Zamboni, James D. Weinrich, and M. Paz Galupo.

In 2000, law scholar Kenji Yoshino published the influential article "The Epistemic Contract of Bisexual Erasure", which argues that "Straights and gays have an investment in stabilizing sexual orientation categories. The shared aspect of this investment is the security that all individuals draw from rigid social orderings." [23] [24] In 2001, Steven Angelides published A History of Bisexuality, in which he argues that bisexuality has operated historically as a structural other to sexual identity itself. In 2002, Clare Hemmings published Bisexual Spaces: A Geography of Sexuality and Gender in which she explores bisexuality's functions in geographical, political, theoretical, and cultural spaces.

In 2004, Jonathan Alexander and Karen Yescavage co-edited Bisexuality and Transgenderism: InterSEXions of the Others, which considers the intersections of bisexual and transgender identities.

Shiri Eisner's Bi: Notes for a Bisexual Revolution was released in 2013. This radical manifesto combines feminist, transgender, queer, and bisexual activism with theoretical work to establish a blueprint for bisexual revolution.

Epistemologies

One of the ways in which bisexual theorists have deployed bisexuality critically has been the formulation of bisexual epistemologies that ask how bisexuality generates or is given meaning. [25]

Elisabeth Däumer suggests that bisexuality can be "an epistemological as well as ethical vantage point from which we can examine and deconstruct the bipolar framework of gender and sexuality." [26]

Authors like Maria Pramaggiore [27] and Jo Eadie [28] repurposed the idea of bisexual people being "on the fence" in order to theorise an "epistemology of the fence":

a place of in-betweenness and indecision. Often precariously placed atop a structure that divides and demarcates, bisexual epistemologies have the capacity to reframe regimes and regions of desire by defaming and/or reframing in porous, nonexclusive ways... Bisexual epistemologies—ways of apprehending, organizing, and intervening in the world that refuse one-to-one correspondences between sex acts and identity, between erotic objects and sexualities, between identification and desire—acknowledge fluid desires and their continual construction and deconstruction of the desiring subject. [29]

Clare Hemmings outlines three forms that bisexual epistemological approaches have tended to take:

The first locates bisexuality as outside conventional categories of sexuality and gender; the second locates it as critically inside those same categories; and the third focuses on the importance of bisexuality in the discursive formation of "other" identities. [30]

Critiques

In his 1996 article, Jonathan Dollimore observes a trend he terms ‘wishful theory’ in bisexual theoretical work. Dollimore critiques bisexual theory's fabrication of eclectic theoretical narratives with little attention to how they relate to social reality, and its assumption of a subversive position that resists a consideration of how bisexual identity itself might be subverted. Dollimore contends that bisexual theory is "passing, if not closeted, as post-modern theory, safely fashioning itself as a suave doxa ." [31]

In her 1999 article, Merl Storr suggests that contemporary bisexual identity, community, organization, and politics are rooted in early postmodernity. By identifying this relation, Storr observes the postmodern themes of indeterminacy, instability, fragmentation, and flux that characterize bisexual theory and parses how these concepts might be reflected upon critically. [32]

One of the problems Clare Hemmings identifies with bisexual epistemological approaches is that bisexuality becomes metaphorized to the point that it is unrecognizable to bisexual people, [33] a critique that has also been made in transgender studies to the allegorization of trans feminine realities. [34]

Further reading

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eroticism</span> Quality that causes sexual feelings

Eroticism is a quality that causes sexual feelings, as well as a philosophical contemplation concerning the aesthetics of sexual desire, sensuality, and romantic love. That quality may be found in any form of artwork, including painting, sculpture, photography, drama, film, music, or literature. It may also be found in advertising. The term may also refer to a state of sexual arousal or anticipation of such – an insistent sexual impulse, desire, or pattern of thoughts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pansexuality</span> Sexual attraction to people regardless of sex or gender identity

Pansexuality is sexual, romantic, or emotional attraction towards people of all genders, or regardless of their sex or gender identity. Pansexual people might refer to themselves as gender-blind, asserting that gender and sex are not determining factors in their romantic or sexual attraction to others.

Femme is a term traditionally used to describe a lesbian woman who exhibits a feminine identity or gender presentation. While commonly viewed as a lesbian term, alternate meanings of the word also exist with some non-lesbian individuals using the word, notably some gay men and bisexuals. Some non-binary and transgender individuals also identify as lesbians using this term.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biphobia</span> Aversion to bisexual people

Biphobia is aversion toward bisexuality or people who are identified or perceived as being bisexual. Similarly to homophobia, it refers to hatred and prejudice specifically against those identified or perceived as being in the bisexual community. It can take the form of denial that bisexuality is a genuine sexual orientation, or of negative stereotypes about people who are bisexual. Other forms of biphobia include bisexual erasure.

"New queer cinema" is a term first coined by the academic B. Ruby Rich in Sight & Sound magazine in 1992 to define and describe a movement in queer-themed independent filmmaking in the early 1990s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-heterosexual</span> Sexual orientation other than heterosexual

Non-heterosexual is a word for a sexual orientation or sexual identity that is not heterosexual. The term helps define the "concept of what is the norm and how a particular group is different from that norm". Non-heterosexual is used in feminist and gender studies fields as well as general academic literature to help differentiate between sexual identities chosen, prescribed and simply assumed, with varying understanding of implications of those sexual identities. The term is similar to queer, though less politically charged and more clinical; queer generally refers to being non-normative and non-heterosexual. Some view the term as being contentious and pejorative as it "labels people against the perceived norm of heterosexuality, thus reinforcing heteronormativity". Still, others say non-heterosexual is the only term useful to maintaining coherence in research and suggest it "highlights a shortcoming in our language around sexual identity"; for instance, its use can enable bisexual erasure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick</span> American scholar of queer theory (1950–2009)

Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick was an American academic scholar in the fields of gender studies, queer theory, and critical theory. Sedgwick published several books considered groundbreaking in the field of queer theory, and her critical writings helped create the field of queer studies, in which she was one of the most influential figures. Sedgwick's essays became the framework for critics of poststructuralism, multiculturalism, and gay studies.

The UK BiCon, is the largest and most consistent annual gathering of the United Kingdom's bisexual community.

Jonathan G Dollimore is a British philosopher and critic in the fields of Renaissance literature, gender studies, queer theory, history of ideas, death studies, decadence, and cultural theory. He is the author of four academic books, a memoir, and numerous academic articles. With Alan Sinfield he was the co-editor of and key contributor to Political Shakespeare, and the co-originator of the critical practice known as cultural materialism. Dollimore is credited with making major interventions in debates on sexuality and desire, Renaissance literary culture, art and censorship, and cultural theory.

The bisexual community, also known as the bi+, m-spec, bisexual/pansexual, or bi/pan/fluid community, includes members of the LGBT community who identify as bisexual, pansexual, omnisexual, polysexual and sexually fluid. As opposed to hetero- or homosexual people, people in the bisexual community experience attraction to more than one gender.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bisexual erasure</span> Dismissing or misrepresenting bisexuals in the public perception

Bisexual erasure, also called bisexual invisibility, is the tendency to ignore, remove, falsify, or re-explain evidence of bisexuality in history, academia, the news media, and other primary sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transgender sexuality</span> Sexuality of transgender people

Sexuality in transgender individuals encompasses all the issues of sexuality of other groups, including establishing a sexual identity, learning to deal with one's sexual needs, and finding a partner, but may be complicated by issues of gender dysphoria, side effects of surgery, physiological and emotional effects of hormone replacement therapy, psychological aspects of expressing sexuality after medical transition, or social aspects of expressing their gender.

Sexuality and space is a field of study within human geography. The phrase encompasses all relationships and interactions between human sexuality, space and place, themes studied within cultural geography, i.e., environmental and architectural psychology, urban sociology, gender studies, queer studies, socio-legal studies, planning, housing studies and criminology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bisexuality</span> Sexual attraction to people of any gender

Bisexuality is a romantic or sexual attraction or behavior toward both males and females, to more than one gender, or to both people of the same gender and different genders. It may also be defined to include romantic or sexual attraction to people regardless of their sex or gender identity, which is also known as pansexuality.

Bisexual politics are arguments surrounding individuals who identify as bisexual and their perspectives on issues involving sexuality, equality, visibility and inclusion. Some authors describe "bisexual politics" as a form of identity politics. One form of activism within bisexual politics includes the addition of the word bisexual onto lesbian and gay organisations and fighting employment discrimination for bisexual individuals.

Jonathan Alexander is an American rhetorician and memoirist. He is Chancellor's Professor of English, Informatics, Education, and Gender & Sexuality Studies at the University of California, Irvine. His scholarly and creative work is situated at the intersections of digital culture, sexuality, and composition studies. For his work in cultural journalism and memoir, Tom Lutz, founding editor of the Los Angeles Review of Books, has called him "one of our finest essayists."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of LGBT topics</span> Overview of and topical guide to LGBT topics

The following outline offers an overview and guide to LGBT topics.

Gender and sexual diversity (GSD), or simply sexual diversity, refers to all the diversities of sex characteristics, sexual orientations and gender identities, without the need to specify each of the identities, behaviors, or characteristics that form this plurality.

LGBT erasure refers to the tendency to intentionally or unintentionally remove LGBT groups or people from record, or downplay their significance, which includes lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender people and those who identify as queer. This erasure can be found in a number of written and oral texts, including popular and scholarly texts.

Bi Academic Intervention was a group of bisexual academics, researchers, scholars and writers active in the UK from 1993 to 1997. The group provided a forum for discussing bisexual theory.

References

  1. ↑ Hemmings, Clare (2002). Bisexual Spaces: A Geography of Sexuality and Gender. London and New York, NY: Routledge. pp.  18-22. ISBN   978-0415930826.
  2. ↑ Alexander, Jonathan; Anderlini-D'Onofrio, Serena (2011). Bisexuality and Queer Theory: Intersections, Connections and Challenges. London and New York: Routledge. p. 10. ISBN   978-0415686716.
  3. ↑ Eadie, Jo (1993). "Activating Bisexuality: Towards a Bi/Sexual Politics." In Activating Theory: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Politics. London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp.139-170. ISBN   978-0853157908.
  4. ↑ Callis, April S. (2009). "Playing with Butler and Foucault: Bisexuality and Queer Theory". Journal of Bisexuality. 9 (3–4): 213–233. doi: 10.1080/15299710903316513 . S2CID   55240759.
  5. ↑ Erickson-Schroth, Laura; Mitchell, Jennifer (2009). "Queering Queer Theory, or Why Bisexuality Matters". Journal of Bisexuality. 9 (3–4): 297–315. doi: 10.1080/15299710903316596 . S2CID   144446326.
  6. ↑ Gammon, Mark A.; Isgro, Kirsten L. (2006). "Troubling the canon: Bisexuality and queer theory". Journal of Homosexuality. 52 (1–2): 159–184. doi:10.1300/J082v52n01_07. PMID   17287190. S2CID   20038125 . Retrieved 7 July 2022.
  7. ↑ Gurevich, Maria; Bailey, Helen; Bower, Jo (2009). "Querying Theory and Politics: The Epistemic (Dis)Location of Bisexuality within Queer Theory". Journal of Bisexuality. 9 (3–4): 235–257. doi:10.1080/15299710903316539. S2CID   144698725 . Retrieved 7 July 2022.
  8. ↑ Alexander, Anderlini-D'Onofrio, Bisexuality and Queer Theory, p. 7.
  9. ↑ Robinson, Margaret (2014). "Bisexual People". In Thatcher, A. (ed.). (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Theology, Sexuality, and Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780199664153
  10. ↑ Alexander; Anderlini-D'Onofrio, Bisexuality and Queer Theory, 6.
  11. ↑ Hemmings, Bisexual Spaces, 19.
  12. ↑ Eisner, Shiri (2013). Bi: Notes for a Bisexual Revolution. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press. pp. 128–130. ISBN   978-1580054744.
  13. ↑ Rapoport, Esther (2019). From Psychoanalytic Bisexuality to Bisexual Psychoanalysis: Desiring in the Real. Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge. p. 70. ISBN   978-0367227500.
  14. ↑ Hemmings, Clare (1997). "Bisexual Theoretical Perspectives". In Bi Academic Intervention (eds.), The Bisexual Imaginary: Representation, Identity, and Desire. London and Washington: Cassel. p. 16.
  15. ↑ Hemmings, Bisexual Spaces, 19.
  16. ↑ Alexander; Anderlini-D'Onofrio, Bisexuality and Queer Theory, 6.
  17. ↑ Hemmings, Bisexual Spaces, p. 3.
  18. ↑ Hemmings, Bisexual Spaces, p. 3.
  19. ↑ George, Sue (2002). "British Bisexual Women: A New Century." Bisexual Women in the Twenty-First Century. New York, NY, London, and Oxford: Harrington Park Press. p. 180.
  20. ↑ Eisner, Bi, 66.
  21. ↑ Hemmings, Bisexual Spaces, 19.
  22. ↑ Eadie, Jo (1997). "Living in the Past: Savage Nights, Bisexual Times". International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies. 2 (1): 7–26. doi:10.1023/A:1026385031442. S2CID   141159957 . Retrieved 7 July 2022.
  23. ↑ Yoshino, Kenji (2000). "The Epistemic Contract of Bisexual Erasure". Stanford Law Review. 52 (2): 353–461 [403]. doi:10.2307/1229482. JSTOR   1229482.
  24. ↑ This point echoes the one by Young, Stacey. (1997). Dichotomies and Displacement: Bisexuality in Queer Theory and Politics. In Shane Phelan (ed.), Playing with Fire: Queer Politics, Queer Theories . New York: Routledge.
  25. ↑ Hemmings, Bisexual Spaces, p. 31.
  26. ↑ Däumer, Elisabeth D. (1992). "Queer Ethics; or, The Challenge of Bisexuality to Lesbian Ethics". Hypatia. 7 (4): 91–105 [98]. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1992.tb00720.x. JSTOR   3810080. S2CID   144876898.
  27. ↑ Pramaggiore, Maria (1996). "BI-ntroduction I: Epistemologies of the Fence." In Hall, Donald E., Pramaggiore, Maria (eds.), Representing Bisexualities: Subjects and Cultures of Fluid Desire. New York, NY and London: New York University Press
  28. ↑ Eadie, Jo (1994). "The motley crew: what's at stake in the production of bisexual identity (?)". Paragraph. 17 (1): 17–26. doi:10.3366/para.1994.17.1.17 . Retrieved 7 July 2022.
  29. ↑ Pramaggiore, Maria (1996). "BI-ntroduction I: Epistemologies of the Fence." In Hall, Donald E., Pramaggiore, Maria (eds.), Representing Bisexualities: Subjects and Cultures of Fluid Desire. New York, NY and London: New York University Press, p. 3.
  30. ↑ Hemmings, Bisexual Spaces, p. 31.
  31. ↑ Dollimore, Jonathan (1996). "Bisexuality, Heterosexuality, and Wishful Theory". Textual Practice. 10 (3): 523–539 [526–527]. doi:10.1080/09502369608582258.
  32. ↑ Storr, Merl (1999). "Postmodern Bisexuality". Sexualities. 2 (3): 309–325. doi:10.1177/136346099002003003. S2CID   220395745.
  33. ↑ Hemmings, Bisexual Spaces, p. 36.
  34. ↑ Heaney, Emma (2017). The New Woman. Literary Modernism, Queer Theory, and the Trans Feminine Allegory. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. ISBN   9780810135536.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.