Black Act 1723

Last updated

Coat of Arms of Great Britain (1714-1801).svg
Long title An Act for the more effectual punishing wicked and evil disposed Persons going armed in Disguise and doing Injuries and Violence to the Persons and Properties of His Majesty's Subjects, and for the more speedy bringing the Offenders to Justice
Citation 9 Geo. 1. c. 22
Dates
Commencement 27 May 1723
Other legislation
Repealed by Criminal Statutes Repeal Act 1827, s 1 [1]
Status: Repealed

The Act 9 Geo. 1. c. 22, commonly known as the Black Act, [2] or the Waltham Black Act, [3] and sometimes called the Black Act 1722, [4] the Black Act 1723, [5] the Waltham Black Act 1722, [6] the Criminal Law Act 1722, [7] or the Criminal Law Act 1723, [8] [9] was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain. It was passed in 1723 in response to a series of raids against landowners by two groups of poachers, known as the Blacks from their habit of blacking their faces when they undertook the raids. The Act was expanded over the years and greatly strengthened the criminal code by specifying over 200 capital crimes, many with intensified punishment. Arson, for example, had its definition expanded to include the new crime of burning (or threatening to burn) haystacks.

Contents

The legal rights of suspects and defendants under this Act were strictly limited. For example, suspects who did not surrender within 40 days could be summarily judged guilty and sentenced to execution, so that if they were apprehended at a later date they could be executed without delay. Villages were punished if they failed to find, prosecute and convict alleged criminals. [10]

The Act originated in the aftermath of the South Sea Bubble collapse and the ensuing economic downturn. The Blacks quickly demonstrated both "a calculated programme of action, and a conscious social resentment", [11] and their activities led to the introduction of the Black Act to Parliament on 26 April 1723. The Act came into force on 27 May and introduced the death penalty for over 350 criminal offences, [12] including being found disguised in a forest and carrying a weapon; "no other single statute passed during the eighteenth century equalled [the Black Act] in severity, and none appointed the punishment of death in so many cases". [13] A criminal law reform campaign in the early 19th century caused it to be largely repealed on 8 July 1823, when a reform bill introduced by Robert Peel came into force.

The Building Act 1774, which imposed restrictions on exterior decoration, was also known as the Black Act. [14] [15]

Background

The Waltham Blacks in Lives of the Most Remarkable Criminals 1735 ed. Arthur L. Hayward

Following the 1720 South Sea Bubble collapse, Britain suffered an economic downturn that led to heightened social tensions. A small element of the social unrest was the activity of two groups of poachers that were based in Hampshire and Windsor Forest respectively. [16] The first flurry of activity came from the Hampshire group and began in October 1721 when 16 poachers assembled in Farnham to raid the park of the Bishop of Winchester. Three deer were carried off and two others killed. Four of the poachers were later caught, with two released for lack of evidence and the others pilloried and sentenced to a year and a day in prison. The poachers became known as the "Blacks", because of their practice of blackening their faces to prevent identification; most famously, a Hampshire group became known as the "Waltham Blacks". After the convictions, the poachers decided to attack the Bishop's property again, which demonstrated "a calculated programme of action, and a conscious social resentment" that distinguished them from normal poachers. In reprisal for the earlier arrests and sentences, they took 11 deer and killed many more, which led to a royal proclamation offering £100 (equivalent to £20,000in 2023) for information that led to the arrest of the gang. [11]

More raids followed, highlighting a "fairly direct class hatred", culminating in the raid of a shipment of wine ordered for Frederick, Prince of Wales. That proved to be the final straw, with Sir Francis Page, a "notorious hanging judge", sent to the Winchester Assizes to preside over any prosecutions; this forced the Hampshire Blacks underground. [17] The Windsor Blacks then began their activities, copying the Hampshire group. Their main target was Caversham Park, owned by the Earl of Cadogan, with a series of increasingly-audacious raids in 1722 and 1723, including one in which a gamekeeper's son was killed. [18] As a response to the apparent spread of purposeful and organized raids by groups of poachers, the government introduced the Black Act, formally "An Act for the more effectual punishing wicked and evil disposed Persons going armed in Disguise and doing Injuries and Violence to the Persons and Properties of His Majesty's Subjects, and for the more speedy bringing the Offenders to Justice", [13] to Parliament on 26 April 1723. It came into force on 27 May. [19]

At the time, it was thought that the Blacks were Jacobites, and Sir Robert Walpole encouraged the spread of that idea to advance his own interests. The rationale for the Act has been described as "at least as much to do with the hysteria induced by Walpole ... as with any need for new powers to fight deer-stealing". [20]

In March 1723, Philip Caryll was arrested by the government for drinking to the Old Pretender's health in the home of the latter's former nurse in Portsea, Portsmouth. An innkeeper of Horndean testified that Caryll held meetings at his inn with the former Tory MP Sir Henry Goring, who fled to France after the Jacobite Atterbury Plot had been discovered in August 1722. It quickly became known to the Dutch ambassador that Goring had requested the Waltham Blacks' support for a Jacobite rising. The ambassador wrote that the Blacks were originally a group of smugglers and that their Jacobite allegiance was the primary reason for the passing of the Black Act. [21] Goring wrote to the Pretender on 6 May 1723:

I had settled an affair with five gentlemen of that country who were each of them to raise a regiment of dragoons well mounted and well armed which I knew they could easily do for the men had horses and homes of their own, and were, to say the truth most of them, the persons who some time since robbed the late Bishop of Winchester's Park, and have increased in their number ever since. They go by the name of the Waltham Blacks (tho few of them live there) which is a most loyal little town. ... I once saw two hundred and upwards of these Blacks in a body within half a mile of my house. They had been running brandy. There was 24 customs officers following them who they abused heartily and carried off their cargo. I am told there is no less than a thousand of them and indeed I believe they have now taken loyalty into their heads, and will I hope prove very useful. [22]

Act

The Act dealt with any offender who was armed and with a blacked face, armed and otherwise disguised, merely blacked, merely disguised, accessories after the fact or "any other person or persons". [23] Anyone in one of the above categories found in a forest, chase, down or Royal Park could be sentenced to death. [24] Similarly, it was an offence to hunt, kill, wound or steal deer in those locations, with the first offence punishable by a fine and the second by penal transportation. [25] Other criminalised activities included fishing, the hunting of hares, the destruction of fish-ponds, the destruction of trees and the killing of cattle in those locations, the last of which also punishable by death. [26] An offender could also be executed for setting fire to corn, hay, straw, wood, houses or barns or shooting another person. [27] The same penalties applied to attempting to rescue anyone imprisoned under the Black Act or attempting to solicit other people to participate in crimes that violated it. [12] In total, the Act introduced the death penalty for over 350 criminal acts. [12]

Aftermath

Three of the Blacks' leaders had already been captured during the passage of the Act [18] although one later escaped, and a series of government raids captured a total of 32 Blacks who were tried after the Act's passage in Reading. Four were sentenced to death for the killing of the gamekeeper's son, and were executed on 15 June 1723. [28] Trials for the others continued into 1724, and seven more were captured and tried on 7 December. That marked the effective end of the Blacks as an organised group. [29]

As late as the Jacobite rising of 1745–46, newspapers reported that the Blacks had reappeared in Hampshire, where they had stolen deer and robbed parks. [30]

Modern scholars have differed in their view of whether the Blacks were Jacobites. Some argue that the links between the Blacks and the Jacobites were "fantasies" [20] and that the Blacks were "simply a mixed group of foresters: labourers, yeomen and some gentry defending their customary rights". [31] Others, however, have claimed that the Blacks were closely connected with Jacobitism and that the Black Act was designed to combat that political threat. [32] [33] Sir Geoffrey Elton claimed that the Act was "passed not in order to suppress legitimate protest but because organized gangs were destroying deer and planning a Jacobite rising". [34]

The Act has been described as "severe and sanguinary", [35] and L. Radzinowicz noted in the Cambridge Law Journal that "no other single statute passed during the eighteenth century equalled [the Black Act] in severity, and none appointed the punishment of death in so many cases". [13] Efforts to repeal it started in 1810, with comments by William Grant as part of a wider debate on penal reform. A formal recommendation for its repeal took almost a decade to appear, with the publication of the Report on Criminal Laws in 1819 that marked the first "official" suggestion that the law be removed from the statute books. Following the publication of that Report, Sir James Mackintosh introduced a law reform bill that would have repealed the Act, but although it passed through the House of Commons, it was strongly opposed in the House of Lords. [36] In 1823, he submitted a memo to the House of Commons, again to suggest the repeal of the Act, and a few months later, Robert Peel, the Home Secretary, introduced a bill to repeal most of the Black Act, while maintaining the parts that criminalised setting fire to houses and shooting a person. That repeal passed and came into effect on 8 July 1823. [37] [38] The Black Act was entirely repealed by the Criminal Statutes Repeal Act 1827. [39]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jacobitism</span> 17/18th-century British political ideology supporting the restoration of the House of Stuart

Jacobitism was a political movement that supported the restoration of the senior line of the House of Stuart to the British throne. The name derives from the first name of James II of England, which is rendered in Latin as Jacobus. When James went into exile after the November 1688 Glorious Revolution, the Parliament of England decided that he had abandoned the English throne, which they offered to his Protestant daughter Mary II of England, and her husband William III. In April, the Scottish Convention held that James "forfeited" the throne of Scotland by his actions, listed in the Articles of Grievances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jacobite succession</span> Post-1688 claim of succession of the British crowns

The Jacobite succession is the line through which Jacobites believed that the crowns of England, Scotland, and Ireland should have descended, applying primogeniture, since the deposition of James II and VII in 1688 and his death in 1701. It is in opposition to the legal line of succession to the British throne since that time.

The "Bloody Code" was a series of laws in England, Wales and Ireland in the 18th and early 19th centuries which mandated the death penalty for a wide range of crimes. It was not referred to by this name in its own time; the name was given later owing to the sharply increased number of people given the death penalty, even for crimes considered minor by 21st century standards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arson in royal dockyards</span> Capital crime in the UK until 1971

Arson in royal dockyards and armories was a criminal offence in the United Kingdom and the British Empire. It was among the last offences that were punishable by capital punishment in the United Kingdom. The crime was created by the Dockyards etc. Protection Act 1772 passed by the Parliament of Great Britain, which was designed to prevent arson and sabotage against vessels, dockyards, and arsenals of the Royal Navy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sir Watkin Williams-Wynn, 3rd Baronet</span> 18th Century British Tory politician and Jacobite sympathiser

Sir Watkin Williams-Wynn, 3rd Baronet was a Welsh politician and landowner who sat in the British House of Commons from 1716 to 1749, when he died in office. A member of the Tory party, he was also a prominent Jacobite sympathiser. He helped engineer the downfall of Prime Minister Robert Walpole in 1742 and engaged in negotiations with the exiled Stuarts prior to the Jacobite rising of 1745 but did not participate in the rebellion himself. Watkin died in a hunting accident in 1749.

The Mutiny Acts were an almost 200-year series of annual Acts passed by the Parliament of England, the Parliament of Great Britain, and the Parliament of the United Kingdom for governing, regulating, provisioning, and funding the English and later British Army.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piracy Act 1717</span> Act of the Parliament of Great Britain

The Piracy Act 1717, sometimes called the Transportation Act 1717, was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain that established a regulated, bonded system to transport criminals to colonies in North America for indentured service, as a punishment for those convicted or attainted in Great Britain, excluding Scotland. The Act established a seven-year transportation sentence as a punishment for people convicted of lesser felonies, and a fourteen-year sentence for more serious crimes, in lieu of capital punishment. Completion of the sentence had the effect of a pardon; the punishment for returning before completion was death. It is commonly accepted that 30,000 convicts may have been transported to the British American colonies, with some estimates going as high as 50,000.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murder Act 1751</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Murder Act 1751, sometimes referred to as the Murder Act 1752, was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain.

Peel's Acts were Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. They consolidated provisions from a large number of earlier statutes which were then repealed. Their purpose was to simplify the criminal law. The term refers to the Home Secretary who sponsored them, Sir Robert Peel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Papists Act 1722</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Papists Act 1722 was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain, enacted after the discovery of the Jacobite Atterbury Plot. The Act required landowners to take the oaths of allegiance, supremacy, and abjuration, by 25 December 1723; those who declined were to register their estates by 25 March 1724 (N.S)/1723 (O.S).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jurors (Scotland) Act 1745</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Jurors (Scotland) Act 1745 was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain, passed during the Jacobite Rising of 1745. Its long title was "An Act for the more easy and speedy Trial of such Persons as have levied, or shall levy War against His Majesty; and for the better ascertaining the Qualifications of Jurors in Trials for High Treason or Misprision of Treason, in that Part of Great Britain called Scotland." It was one of the Juries (Scotland) Acts 1745 to 1869.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piracy Act 1850</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Piracy Act 1850, sometimes called the Pirates Repeal Act 1850, is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It relates to proceedings for the condemnation of ships and other things taken from pirates and creates an offence of perjury in such proceedings.

The first signs of the modern distinction between criminal and civil proceedings were during the Norman conquest of England in 1066. The earliest criminal trials had very little, if any, settled law to apply. However, the civil delictual law was highly developed and consistent in its operation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Act 1881</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Act 1881 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The Bill for this Act was the Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Bill.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Statute Law Revision Act 1892</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Statute Law Revision Act 1892 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The Bill for this Act was the Statute Law Revision Bill 1892.

<i>The Making of the English Working Class</i> 1963 history book by E. P. Thompson

The Making of the English Working Class is a work of English social history written by E. P. Thompson, a New Left historian. It was first published in 1963 by Victor Gollancz Ltd, and republished in revised form in 1968 by Pelican, after which it became an early Open University set book. It concentrates on English artisan and working-class society "in its formative years 1780 to 1832".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atterbury Plot</span> Failed conspiracy to overthrow the British government (1721–22)

The Atterbury Plot was a conspiracy led by Francis Atterbury, Bishop of Rochester and Dean of Westminster, aimed at the restoration of the House of Stuart to the throne of Great Britain. It came some years after the unsuccessful Jacobite rising of 1715 and Jacobite rising of 1719, at a time when the Whig government of the new Hanoverian king was deeply unpopular.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coronation riots</span> 1714 riots in England

The coronation riots of October 1714 were a series of riots in southern and western England in protest against the coronation of the first Hanoverian king of Great Britain, George I.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1715 England riots</span> 1715 series of riots in England

In the spring and summer of 1715 a series of riots occurred in England in which High Church mobs attacked over forty Dissenting meeting-houses. The rioters also protested against the first Hanoverian king of Britain, George I and his new Whig government. The riots occurred on symbolic days: 28 May was George I's birthday, 29 May was the anniversary of Charles II's Restoration and 10 June was the birthday of the Jacobite Pretender, James Francis Edward Stuart.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Procedure Act 1851</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Procedure Act 1851 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It was drafted by Charles Sprengel Greaves. Stephen said that compared to earlier legislation on defects in indictments, the Criminal Procedure Act 1851 "went further in the way of removing technicalities, but it did so by an enumeration of them, so technical and minute, that no one could possibly understand it who had not first acquainted himself with all the technicalities which it was meant to abolish."

References

  1. The Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, 7 & 8 George IV. 1827. pp 152, 156 & 165
  2. Lowe v Inhabitants of the Hundred of Broxtowe (1832) 3 Barnewall & Adolphus 550 at 560
  3. William Blackstone. Commentaries on the Laws of England. A New Edition, adapted to the Present State of the Law, by Robert Malcolm Kerr. John Murray. Albemarle Street, London. 1857. Volume 4. Page 286.
  4. Cornish et al. The Oxford History of the Laws of England. Oxford University Press. 2003. Volume 13. Page xlvii.
  5. Clive Emsley. Crime and Society in England: 1750-1900. Fourth Edition. Taylor & Francis. 2010. Routledge. 2013. Page 325.
  6. Turner and Armitage. Cases on Criminal Law. Third Edition. Cambridge University Press. 1964. p 58. Leon Radzinowicz. A History of English Criminal Law and Its Administration from 1750. The Macmillan Company. New York. 1948. Volume 4. Page 799.
  7. Mackenzie and Johnson (eds). The Law Relating to Municipal Corporations in England and Wales. Fourth Edition. Shaw and Sons. London. 1894. Page ix.
  8. Cornish et al. Law and Society in England 1750-1950. Second Edition. Hart. 2019. Page xli.
  9. As to the year of an Act, see Johnson, Privatised Law Reform, 2018, p 31; Johnson, Parliament, Inventions and Patents, 2018, note 1 to Introduction; Chitty's Statutes of Practical Utility, 6th Ed, 1911, vol 1, title "Act of Parliament", p 28.
  10. A. J. Graham Cummings and Jack Fruchtman, ed. (1997). Britain in the Hanoverian Age, 1714-1837: An Encyclopedia. Taylor & Francis. p. 58. ISBN   9780815303961.
  11. 1 2 Rogers 1974, p. 468.
  12. 1 2 3 Radzinowicz 1945, p. 72.
  13. 1 2 3 Radzinowicz 1945, p. 56.
  14. Santo, Philip (2013). Inspections and Reports on Dwellings: Assessing Age. Taylor & Francis. p. 83.
  15. Street, Emma (2011). Architectural Design and Regulation. John Wiley & Sons.
  16. Rogers 1974, p. 467.
  17. Rogers 1974, p. 470.
  18. 1 2 Rogers 1974, p. 471.
  19. Broad 1988, p. 70.
  20. 1 2 Broad 1988, p. 71.
  21. Monod, p. 116.
  22. Monod, p. 117.
  23. Radzinowicz 1945, p. 57.
  24. Radzinowicz 1945, p. 58.
  25. Radzinowicz 1945, p. 59.
  26. Radzinowicz 1945, p. 60-67.
  27. Radzinowicz 1945, p. 68.
  28. Rogers 1974, p. 472.
  29. Rogers 1974, p. 481.
  30. Monod, p. 118.
  31. Vann 1977, p. 180.
  32. Paul Kleber Monod, Jacobitism and the English People, 1688–1788 (Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 116–117.
  33. Eveline Cruickshanks and Howard Erskine-Hill, "The Waltham Black Act and Jacobitism", Journal of British Studies 24 no. 3 (1985), pp. 358–365.
  34. G. R. Elton, The English (Blackwell, 1992), p. 186.
  35. Gilbert White, The Natural History of Selborne, "Letter VII To Thomas Pennant, Esquire", 1789.
  36. Radzinowicz 1945, p. 78–79.
  37. Radzinowicz 1945, p. 81.
  38. 4 Geo 4 c 54, sections 1 to 3. These sections are subject to a proviso in section 4.
  39. Adderly v Hundred of Offlow North (1802) Peake's Additional Cases 206 at 208

Bibliography

Further reading