Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction

Last updated

Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction
Formation1987
Dissolved30 November 2016
Type Development Finance Institution
Legal statusStatutory
PurposeSick company remedies
Location
  • New Delhi
Coordinates 28°37′33″N77°13′13″E / 28.625846°N 77.220299°E / 28.625846; 77.220299
Region served
India
Chairman
Nirmal Singh
Parent organisation
 Ministry of Finance, Government of India
Website www.bifr.nic.in

The Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) was a development finance institution under the ownership of Ministry of Finance, Government of India, part of the Department of Financial Services of the Ministry of Finance. Set up in January 1987 by the Rajiv Gandhi government, its objective was to determine sickness of industrial companies and to assist in reviving those that may be viable and shutting down the others. [1] On 1 December 2016, the Narendra Modi government dissolved BIFR and referred all proceedings to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) as per provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. [2]

Contents

History

The BIFR was established under The Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA). The board was set up in January 1987 and became functional as of 15 May 1987. [1] A new industrial policy was tabled in Parliament on 24 July 1991 aiming to maintain growth in productivity and gainful employment and to encourage the growth of entrepreneurship and upgrades to technology. [3] That year the SICA was amended to include public sector enterprises in the board's purview. [4]

The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act of 2002 placed corporate debt outside the purview of the BIFR. [5] By preventing reference to the BIFR, which had become a haven for the promoters of sick companies, the Act gives banks and financial institutions a better tool for recovering bad debt. It was complemented by the corporate debt restructuring package under which lenders and borrowers would meet to agree on a way of recasting stressed debt. [6]

National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) would take over the functions of the BIFR and other bodies and speed up the process of winding down sick companies. The Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2001 was introduced because the government considered that the BIFR had not met its objective of preventing industrial sickness. [7] The Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, 2003 replaced SICA and sought to dissolve the BIFR and the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR), replacing them by the NCLT and NCLAT. However, legal hurdles prevented the NCLT from being constituted. [8]

Structure and objectives

The Board has a Chairman and from two to fourteen other members, all to be qualified as High Court judges or else to have at least fifteen years of relevant professional experience. [9] The Board only handles large or medium-sized sick industrial companies in which large amounts have been sunk. [4] Under the Sick Industrial Companies Act, the Board of a sick industrial company is legally obliged to report it to the BIFR, and the BIFR has the power to make whatever inquiries are needed to determine if the company is in fact sick. [10]

Among other objectives the act was to provide a way to revive sick industrial companies and release public funds. [11] If a company is found to be sick, the BIFR can give the company reasonable time to regain health (bring total assets above total liabilities) or it can recommend other measures. [10] The board can take other actions including changes to management, amalgamation of the sick unit with a healthy one, sale or financial reconstruction. [4] The Board can recommend a sick industrial company for winding up. [12]

The BIFR was intended to bridge the legal gap between sickness and revival. It would impose time schedules for revival related activities to be completed, oversee their implementation and conduct periodic reviews of sick accounts. The BIFR would provide a forum for sharing views, coordinating effort and developing a unified approach to dealing with sick companies, speeding up the start of corrective action. [13] The BIFR was meant to either turn companies around within six months or order closure. [14]

Activity and results

By the end of March 1991, the BIFR had registered 1020 cases and heard 954. 175 were dismissed as not maintainable, and 124 were approved for the company to try to become net-worth positive on their own. Of the other 661 cases, the board sanctioned 182 revival plans and recommended that 120 cases be wound up. [15] Up to the end of 2007, the BIFR had registered 5,471 references with 1,337 being recommended for winding up and 825 revival schemes being sanctioned. [16] There were 66 sick Public Sector Enterprises registered with the board as of the end of March 2008, of which the government had approved 34 for revival. [17]

BIFR has had mixed success. Some examples of successful recoveries are the recovery of Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited in the 1980s, and more recently[ when? ] the turnaround of Arvind Mills, Scooters India and the North Eastern Regional Agricultural Marketing Corporation. There have been many more cases where attempts to revive the companies failed, including Binny and Co., Calico Mills, Guest Keen Williams, Hindustan Cables, Metal Box Company and Wyman Gordon. [18] Problems have included insufficient resources, delays and lack of political willingness to take tough decisions. [19] The BIFR in practice often became a way of prolonging the life of unviable companies for years at taxpayer expense. [14]

According to former Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) chief Pradip Baijal, the board "was created to deal with the change in status quo outside government and given a quasi-judicial structure, to act in favour of public good, but has perhaps joined the tribe of numerous rent-seekers in the public ownership structure". [20] Discussing MS Shoes, whose reference was registered by BIFR on 22.2.2002. The productions and export turnover of MS Shoes increased from Rs.25 crores to Rs.171.93 crores. The company came up with public issues which were over subscribed by more than 50 times the company attempted for 5 star hotel land and ready built guest house complex at Hudco Place, New Delhi for deluxe 5 star hotel and 4 star hotel. The reasons of sickness was devolvement of public issue of February 1995 and cancellation as well as forfeiture by Hudco of the amount paid by MS Shoes. [21]

Nirmala Ganapathy said: "One look at the track record of BIFR, and it doesn’t take a whiz[ sic ] to conclude that it is nothing but a graveyard of companies. A tiny fraction comes out healthy — only if the promoter is interested in putting it back up on its feet". [22] The BIFR approved the revival scheme of the company as the promoters brought in Rs. 41.20 crores as on 31.3.2011 and Rs. 22.08 crores as loan to the company to be converted into equity shares further approving the promoters contribution to be converted into equity by increasing authorised capital from existing Rs. 90 crores to Rs. 200 crores. The promoters brought up the company to its healthy situation since the promoters were interested in putting the company back up on its feet. [21]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Go First</span> Ultra low-cost airline of India

Go First, founded as GoAir, was an Indian low-cost airline based in Mumbai, Maharashtra. It is owned by the Indian business conglomerate, Wadia Group. It commenced operations on 4 November 2005 and operated a fleet of Airbus A320 aircraft in an all economy configuration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ministry of Corporate Affairs</span> Indian government ministry

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs is an Indian government ministry primarily concerned with administration of the Companies Act 2013, the Companies Act 1956, the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited, doing business as HDIL, is an Indian real estate development company based in Mumbai.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bharat Pumps & Compressors</span>

Bharat Pumps & Compressors Limited (BPC) is a central public sector undertaking under the ownership of Ministry of Heavy Industries, Government of India. The psu manufactures Reciprocating pumps, Centrifugal pumps, Reciprocating compressors, and high pressure seamless Gas cylinders. Headquarters in Allahabad.

Bharat Wagon and Engineering Limited (BWEL) was a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) of the Government of India as a subsidiary of Bharat Bhari Udyog Nigam. The company was established on 4 December 1978 after taking over and merging two sick companies - Arthur Butler & Co and Britannia Engineering Company.

Essar Steel was a common name of the steel manufacturing companies of the Essar Group of Companies. Its main subsidiary was Essar Steel India Limited, a fully integrated flat carbon steel manufacturer based in Mumbai, which owned and operated a steel mill in Hazira, Surat district of Gujarat state. In addition, it had also a beneficiation plant at Bailadilla, Chhattisgarh, and pellet plants at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, and Paradeep, Odisha.

Hyderabad Allwyn Limited, established in 1942, was a Hyderabad State government engineering and white goods manufacturing company involved in manufacture of automobiles, trucks, scooters, bus coach building, refrigerators and wrist watches.

Industrial sickness is defined all over the world as "an industrial company which has, at the end of any financial year, accumulated losses equal to, or exceeding, its entire net worth and has also suffered cash losses in such financial year and the financial year immediately preceding such financial year".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Haldia Petrochemicals</span> Indian petrochemical company

Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd., often referred to as HPL, is one of the largest petrochemical companies in India. HPL which began commercial production in 1984, has its headquarters located in Kolkata, West Bengal, India. It has a large petrochemical plant based out of Haldia in Eastern India. The company as of 2018 held the position of being the fourth largest player in the domestic petrochemical market and enjoyed a dominant position in Eastern India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MS Shoes</span>

MS Shoes East Ltd. is a company established in Delhi, India on 17 March 1986 The main object of the company was to take over running business of exports in the name of Shoes East Propriety. It attracted large investments before collapsing in February 1995. The Bombay Stock Exchange closed for three days after the crash.

Hindustan Photo Films Manufacturing Company Limited (HPF) was an Indian-based public sector manufacturer of photographic films, cine films, X-ray films, graphic arts films, photographic paper, and chemistry. It was incorporated in 1960 It is based at Udhagamandalam, a hill station in Tamil Nadu. Their photographic films were sold under the name "Indu", which means "silver" in Sanskrit (silver halides are used in film).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SML Isuzu</span> Indian vehicle manufacturer

SML Isuzu Limited (SMLI) is a commercial vehicle manufacturer established in 1983. SMLI produces and sells buses, ambulances and customized vehicles. Sumitomo Corporation and Isuzu Motors hold a 44% and 15% stake of the company respectively.

Fertilizer Corporation of India Limited (FCIL) is a public sector undertaking in India under the ownership of Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Government of India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Company Law Tribunal</span> Quasi-judicial body in India

The National Company Law Tribunal is a quasi-judicial body in India that adjudicates issues relating to Indian companies. The tribunal was established under the Companies Act 2013 and was constituted on 1 June 2016 by the government of India and is based on the recommendation of the V. Balakrishna Eradi committee on law relating to the insolvency and the winding up of companies.

The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 is an Indian law. It allows banks and other financial institutions to auction residential or commercial properties of defaulters to recover loans. The first asset reconstruction company (ARC) of India, ARCIL, was set up under this act. By virtue of the SARFAESI Act 2002, the Reserve Bank of India has the authority to register and regulate Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs).

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) is an Indian law which creates a consolidated framework that governs insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings for companies, partnership firms, and individuals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Titagarh Rail Systems</span> Indian rolling stock manufacturer

Titagarh Rail Systems Limited, formerly known as Titagarh Wagons Limited, is an Indian rolling stock manufacturer in the private sector. Established in 1984 as a rolling stock foundry unit, the company's headquarters are situated in Kolkata, West Bengal. Titagarh is publicly traded on both the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and National Stock Exchange (NSE).

JSW Bhushan Power & Steel Limited formerly known as Bhushan Power & Steel Limited is a steel company that is engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of steel products. It was established in 1970. In July 2019, BPSL was allegedly involved in fraud worth ₹3805.15 crore rupees, as detected by Punjab National Bank. It is one of India's most indebted companies and appears among the 12 companies referred by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to a bankruptcy court for the purpose of debt resolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Company Law Appellate Tribunal</span> Indian tribunal

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) is a tribunal which was formed by the Central Government of India under Section 410 of the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLAT was formed as a body with an appellate jurisdiction at the same time when NCLT was established as a major reform as per powers granted to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in India,

Hindustan Fertilizer Corporation Limited is a government-owned fertilizer manufacturing company headquartered in New Delhi. It is under the ownership of the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Government of India. It mainly manufactures urea which is promoted and distributed by the company under the Moti Urea brand name. It has three manufacturing plants. The Namrup-II unit was closed up by the company in 1994 due to scant supply of natural gas. The corporation was part of the Fertilizer Corporation of India. It was spun off into a separate entity after re-organization of Fertilizer Corporation of India in early 1978 as per Government Of India's decision. It has manufacturing units at Durgapur and Haldia.

References

  1. 1 2 Brief Introduction.
  2. ↑ "Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 repealed and BIFR/ AIFR dissolved" (PDF). PWC. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  3. ↑ Reddy 2004, p. 42-43.
  4. 1 2 3 Jain, Trehan & Trehan 2008, p. 187.
  5. ↑ Pathak 2011, p. 515.
  6. ↑ Pathak 2011, p. 519.
  7. ↑ Luthra 2005, p. 241.
  8. ↑ Kazmi 2008, p. 220.
  9. ↑ The Sick Industrial Companies, p. 6.
  10. 1 2 Reddy 2004, p. 79.
  11. ↑ Pathak 2011, p. 514.
  12. ↑ The Sick Industrial Companies, p. 18.
  13. ↑ Balan 1996, p. 110-111.
  14. 1 2 Baijal 2008, p. 203.
  15. ↑ Balan 1996, p. 5.
  16. ↑ Jain, Trehan & Trehan 2008, p. 188.
  17. ↑ Trehan & Trehan, p. 152.
  18. ↑ Kazmi 2008, p. 220-221.
  19. ↑ Farazmand 2001, p. 538.
  20. ↑ Baijal 2008, p. 204.
  21. 1 2 "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 21 July 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  22. ↑ Ganapathy 2003.
Sources
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.