Brain fingerprinting

Last updated

Brain fingerprinting (BF) is a lie detection technique which uses brain waves from a electroencephalography (EEG) to determine whether specific information is stored in the subject's cognitive memory. It was invented by Larry Farwell, a Harvard-graduated neuroscientist, and published in 1995. [1] The technique involves presenting words, phrases, or pictures containing salient details about a crime on a computer screen, in a series with other, irrelevant stimuli to identify whether the suspect recognizes the crime-related items. [2] Although brain fingerprinting has been used in investigations, the test results themselves can not be admitted as evidence in a legal trial. [3]

Contents

The assumption underpinning the application of BF is that the culprit has concealed information about the crime stored in the brain and it can be revealed by analysing fluctuations in the brainwaves that measure a human's neurological activity. Brain fingerprinting relies on two major components, specificity and recognition, as it is assumed that the culprit of the crime will recognize certain details of the investigation whilst innocent subjects will not, based on the familiarity of the items presented. [4] For example, only a guilty individual will have concealed information about the specific gun used in a crime. [4]

P300 response

The procedure begins by attaching sensors called electrodes to the subject's scalp to form a circuit that quantifies brain activity using a test called an electroencephalogram (EEG). [5] When conducting an EEG to measure electrical activity in the brain, a distinctive surge of electrical activity may appear between 300 and 800 milliseconds – this is referred to as the P300 response, first introduced in the 1960s. [6] This psychophysiological response signals one's reaction to seeing a familiar object immediately after being exposed to the stimulus. Based on this information, scientists have argued that they can accurately convict a guilty suspect. [5] Although the origins of this neurological response are unclear, the phenomenon has been extensively studied and peer-reviewed for over 100 years.

Contrary to a traditional polygraph (also known as a lie detector) that relies on changes to sweat glands as nervous responses to determine the subject's honesty, brain fingerprinting is entirely concealed in the brain's responses to stimuli. [7] This makes the technique harder to resist or beat, making it a more reliable method of detecting lies. The P300 response is supported by at least 80 laboratory experiments that use the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT). [8] The GKT, also known as the Concealed Information Test (CIT), is an alternative method of interrogation to reveal concealed information a culprit might have about a crime. Similarly, it focuses on measuring the physiological reaction of subjects, although it prioritises electrodermal, respiratory and cardiovascular responses rather than neurological activity. [7]

History

Brain fingerprinting was first used in a criminal case in 1999, when a man named James Grinder confessed to committing a murder that happened 15 years prior. [9] In a short time after his confession, he retracted his statements. [3] The police struggled to incriminate Grinder because the evidence was outdated. The police and FBI reached out to Lawrence Farwell with the aim of using BF to obtain enough evidence to incriminate Grinder. Soon after taking the test, Grinder confessed to the murder of Julie Helton and three other people, securing him life imprisonment. [3] This case was not the last time Farwell worked in collaboration with a US Intelligence Community as the CIA went on to fund Farwell's counterterrorism research for the US Navy, which was published by Frontiers in Neuroscience . [10]

In 2001, the US Federal Agency outlined how brain fingerprinting was only to be used as an investigative tool; however, several intelligence agencies came forth saying that despite the support and funds they had provided to the development of this technology, they were not to use it at all because of its lack of applicability. [11] Following the US court's rejection of BF, Farwell redirected his resources to advertising the technology abroad. He has worked alongside several government agencies, such as in the United Arab Emirates, and justice systems in India and New Zealand. [12] [13] Nevertheless, his technology has not yet achieved a widespread presence in any criminal setting around the world, and results of brainwave analysis are often not admissible as evidence in court. [9]

Criticism

Following extensive and ongoing research on the brain fingerprinting protocol for detecting deception and its decisive contribution to several trials, the accuracy of technology has been the subject of speculation for a decade. [14] J Peter Rosenfeld found methodological problems associated with brain fingerprinting and related methods. [14] Other researchers have argued that Farwell is misleading and misrepresenting the scientific status of brain fingerprinting technology. [1] [14] Additional studies have attempted to determine the success rate of BF, given that Farwell has claimed a 100% success rate for the technology and a lack of both false positives and negatives in his research. When carrying out comparative studies between the common polygraph lie detector and brain fingerprinting, the latter appears to have fewer false positives; however, when questioned about specific details, the P300 technique seems to be less reliable. [15]

The legitimacy of brain fingerprinting is still questioned. The lack of replication of his studies is largely due to legal restrictions regarding the use of his software and apparatus appointed by the patent issued to Farwell in 1994. [16] This controversy is enhanced by discussion surrounding the patent rights and the fraudulent behaviour of the developer Larry Farwell regarding fabricated FBI reports. [17] Brainwave Sciences, the technology company that owns BF, tainted the validity of the technique when some of its board members became the focal spotlights of scandals in the US. [17] As a result, the acceptance of BF is still the subject of controversy and debate among scholars and legal institutions.

Current research

A research team in New Zealand conducted an examination of Farwell's technology and found that current forensic brainwave analysis (FBA) methods did not meet standards for foundational validity (validity in lab settings) set in the Report to the President on Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods. [9] However, they argued that the technique has the potential to serve as a useful tool in civil and criminal justice if its validity can be conclusively established. [9] Two pilot studies exploring FBA have been conducted, and preliminary results suggest the need for further research to determine the accuracy, validity and reliability of FBA. [9]

A recent review by Rosenfeld found that the P300 response has proven resistant and accurate. [18]

Brain fingerprinting has made appearances in the media. In 2018, Larry Farwell's technique made a brief appearance in the second season of Netflix's Making a Murderer ; however, his findings were not considered during the trial as he was using unauthorized software. [17]

Since 2020, the application of brain fingerprinting has changed. Most recently, the term "brain fingerprinting" referred to the uniqueness of brains from a functional neuroimaging context. This new field of study aims to predict patterns of brain connectivity to hopefully prognosticate mental disorders in the future. [19] [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DNA profiling</span> Technique used to identify individuals via DNA characteristics

DNA profiling is the process of determining an individual's deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) characteristics. DNA analysis intended to identify a species, rather than an individual, is called DNA barcoding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic science</span> Application of science to criminal and civil laws

Forensic science, also known as criminalistics, is the application of science principles and methods to support legal decision-making in matters of criminal and civil law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polygraph</span> Device that attempts to infer lying

A polygraph, often incorrectly referred to as a lie detector test, is a junk science device or procedure that measures and records several physiological indicators such as blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and skin conductivity while a person is asked and answers a series of questions. The belief underpinning the use of the polygraph is that deceptive answers will produce physiological responses that can be differentiated from those associated with non-deceptive answers; however, there are no specific physiological reactions associated with lying, making it difficult to identify factors that separate those who are lying from those who are telling the truth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Functional magnetic resonance imaging</span> MRI procedure that measures brain activity by detecting associated changes in blood flow

Functional magnetic resonance imaging or functional MRI (fMRI) measures brain activity by detecting changes associated with blood flow. This technique relies on the fact that cerebral blood flow and neuronal activation are coupled. When an area of the brain is in use, blood flow to that region also increases.

Neurotechnology encompasses any method or electronic device which interfaces with the nervous system to monitor or modulate neural activity.

A false confession is an admission of guilt for a crime which the individual did not commit. Although such confessions seem counterintuitive, they can be made voluntarily, perhaps to protect a third party, or induced through coercive interrogation techniques. When some degree of coercion is involved, studies have found that subjects with highly sophisticated intelligence or manipulated by their so-called "friends" are more likely to make such confessions. Young people are particularly vulnerable to confessing, especially when stressed, tired, or traumatized, and have a significantly higher rate of false confessions than adults. Hundreds of innocent people have been convicted, imprisoned, and sometimes sentenced to death after confessing to crimes they did not commit—but years later, have been exonerated. It was not until several shocking false confession cases were publicized in the late 1980s, combined with the introduction of DNA evidence, that the extent of wrongful convictions began to emerge—and how often false confessions played a role in these.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">P300 (neuroscience)</span> Event-related potential

The P300 (P3) wave is an event-related potential (ERP) component elicited in the process of decision making. It is considered to be an endogenous potential, as its occurrence links not to the physical attributes of a stimulus, but to a person's reaction to it. More specifically, the P300 is thought to reflect processes involved in stimulus evaluation or categorization.

Lie detection is an assessment of a verbal statement with the goal to reveal a possible intentional deceit. Lie detection may refer to a cognitive process of detecting deception by evaluating message content as well as non-verbal cues. It also may refer to questioning techniques used along with technology that record physiological functions to ascertain truth and falsehood in response. The latter is commonly used by law enforcement in the United States, but rarely in other countries because it is based on pseudoscience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electronic nose</span> Electronic sensor for odor detection

An electronic nose is an electronic sensing device intended to detect odors or flavors. The expression "electronic sensing" refers to the capability of reproducing human senses using sensor arrays and pattern recognition systems.

Brain-reading or thought identification uses the responses of multiple voxels in the brain evoked by stimulus then detected by fMRI in order to decode the original stimulus. Advances in research have made this possible by using human neuroimaging to decode a person's conscious experience based on non-invasive measurements of an individual's brain activity. Brain reading studies differ in the type of decoding employed, the target, and the decoding algorithms employed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neurolaw</span>

Neurolaw is a field of interdisciplinary study that explores the effects of discoveries in neuroscience on legal rules and standards. Drawing from neuroscience, philosophy, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and criminology, neurolaw practitioners seek to address not only the descriptive and predictive issues of how neuroscience is and will be used in the legal system, but also the normative issues of how neuroscience should and should not be used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Change detection</span> Statistical analysis

In statistical analysis, change detection or change point detection tries to identify times when the probability distribution of a stochastic process or time series changes. In general the problem concerns both detecting whether or not a change has occurred, or whether several changes might have occurred, and identifying the times of any such changes.

Statement analysis, also called scientific content analysis (SCAN), is a technique for analyzing the words people use to try to determine if what they said is accurate. Proponents claim this technique can be used to detect concealed information, missing information, embedded confessions and whether the information that person has provided is true or false.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Future Attribute Screening Technology</span> Surveillance program

Future Attribute Screening Technology (FAST) is a program created by the Department of Homeland Security. It was originally titled Project Hostile Intent. The purpose is to detect "Mal Intent" by screening people for "psychological and physiological indicators" in a "Mobile Screening Laboratory".

In modern psychology, vigilance, also termed sustained concentration, is defined as the ability to maintain concentrated attention over prolonged periods of time. During this time, the person attempts to detect the appearance of a particular target stimulus. The individual watches for a signal stimulus that may occur at an unknown time.

Dynamic angiothermography (DATG) is a technique for the diagnosis of breast cancer. This technique, though springing from the previous conception of thermography, is based on a completely different principle. DATG records the temperature variations linked to the vascular changes in the breast due to angiogenesis. The presence, change, and growth of tumors and lesions in breast tissue change the vascular network in the breast. Consequently, through measuring the vascular structure over time, DATG effectively monitors the change in breast tissue due to tumors and lesions. It is currently used in combination with other techniques for diagnosis of breast cancer. This diagnostic method is a low-cost one compared with other techniques.

John J. Furedy was a Hungarian-born Australian and Canadian psychophysiologist and distinguished research professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, noted for his extensive empirical research into the unreliability of the polygraph test in lie detection and similar problems associated with biofeedback, as well as addressing contemporary issues concerning academic freedom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature Profiling</span> Technique to detect a suspects participation in a crime

Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature Profiling is an EEG technique by which a suspect's participation in a crime is detected by eliciting electrophysiological impulses.

Neuroprivacy, or "brain privacy," is a concept which refers to the rights people have regarding the imaging, extraction and analysis of neural data from their brains. This concept is highly related to fields like neuroethics, neurosecurity, and neurolaw, and has become increasingly relevant with the development and advancement of various neuroimaging technologies. Neuroprivacy is an aspect of neuroethics specifically regarding the use of neural information in legal cases, neuromarketing, surveillance and other external purposes, as well as corresponding social and ethical implications.

James B. Grinder (1945–2010) was an American serial killer and rapist who murdered three teenage girls in Arkansas and a woman in Missouri between 1976 and 1984. Grinder wasn't apprehended until his confession in March 1998. However, authorities still had little evidence tying Grinder to the murders, so they used a technique known as brain fingerprinting to help prove his guilt. In 1999, Grinder was convicted of the four murders and sentenced to life imprisonment. He remained imprisoned until his death in 2010.

References

  1. 1 2 Meijer, Ewout; Ben-Shakhar, Gershon; Verschuere, Bruno; Donchin, Emanuel (April 2013). "A comment on Farwell (2012): brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials". Cognitive Neurodynamics. 7 (2): 155–158. doi:10.1007/s11571-012-9217-x. PMC   3595430 . PMID   23493984.
  2. ↑ Farwell, Lawrence (2012-02-17). "Brain Fingerprinting". Cognitive Neurodynamics. 6 (2): 115–154. doi:10.1007/s11571-012-9192-2. PMC   3311838 . PMID   23542949.
  3. 1 2 3 Javaid, Arfa (2020-12-02). "What is Brain Fingerprinting?".
  4. 1 2 Meegan, Daniel V. (2008-01-25). "Neuroimaging Techniques for Memory Detection: Scientific, Ethical, and Legal Issues". The American Journal of Bioethics. 8 (1): 9–20. doi:10.1080/15265160701842007. ISSN   1526-5161. PMID   18236327.
  5. 1 2 Farwell, Lawrence A. (April 2012). "Brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials". Cognitive Neurodynamics. 6 (2): 115–154. doi:10.1007/s11571-012-9192-2. ISSN   1871-4080. PMC   3311838 . PMID   23542949.
  6. ↑ Sutton, Samuel; Braren, Margery; Zubin, Joseph; John, E. R. (1965-11-26). "Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty". Science. 150 (3700): 1187–1188. Bibcode:1965Sci...150.1187S. doi:10.1126/science.150.3700.1187. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   5852977.
  7. 1 2 Staunton, Ciara; Hammond, Sean (June 2011). "An Investigation of the Guilty Knowledge Test Polygraph Examination". Journal of Criminal Psychology. 1 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1108/20093829201100001. ISSN   2009-3829.
  8. ↑ Iacono, William G. (2008-01-25). "The Forensic Application of "Brain Fingerprinting:" Why Scientists Should Encourage the Use of P300 Memory Detection Methods". The American Journal of Bioethics. 8 (1): 30–32. doi:10.1080/15265160701828550. ISSN   1526-5161. PMID   18236333.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Palmer, Robin (2017). "Time to Take Brain-Fingerprinting Seriously? A Consideration of International Developments in Forensic Brainwave Analysis (FBA), in the Context of the Need for Independent Verification of FBA's Scientific Validity, and the Potential Legal Implications of its Use in New Zealand". Te Wharenga - New Zealand Criminal Law Review. University of Canterbury New Zealand. 6: 330–356. hdl: 10092/101246 .
  10. ↑ Farwell, Lawrence A.; Richardson, Drew C.; Richardson, Graham M.; Furedy, John J. (2014-12-23). "Brain fingerprinting classification concealed information test detects US Navy military medical information with P300". Frontiers in Neuroscience. 8: 410. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00410 . ISSN   1662-453X. PMC   4274905 . PMID   25565941.
  11. ↑ United States General Accounting Office (2001). "Investigative Techniques: Federal agency views on the potential application of "Brain Fingerprinting"" (PDF) (Government Document). United States General Accounting Office.
  12. ↑ "Dr. Purshottam Swaroopchand Soni vs The State Of Gujarat on 5 April, 2007". indiankanoon.org. Retrieved 2024-03-18.
  13. ↑ "'Brain fingerprinting' may soon serve NZ justice". www.thelawyermag.com. Retrieved 2024-03-18.
  14. 1 2 3 Rosenfeld, J Peter (Jan 2005). "'Brain fingerprinting': A critical analysis". The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice. 4 (1): 20–37.
  15. ↑ Meijer, Ewout H.; Selle, Nathalie Klein; Elber, Lotem; Ben-Shakhar, Gershon (September 2014). "Memory detection with the Concealed Information Test: A meta analysis of skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, and P300 data". Psychophysiology. 51 (9): 879–904. doi:10.1111/psyp.12239. ISSN   0048-5772. PMID   24916920.
  16. ↑ US5363858A,Farwell, Lawrence A.,"Method and apparatus for multifaceted electroencephalographic response analysis (MERA)",issued 1994-11-15
  17. 1 2 3 Tahir, Raymond (17 April 2023). "Steven Avery Defense Expert, and Former Brainwave Science, Inc. Scientific Advisor, Dr. Lawrence A. Farwell, Apologizes for "Deceitful" Conduct in Wake of Permanent Injunctions and $1,125,000 in Punitive Damages Awards". Business Wire. Retrieved 1 March 2024.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  18. ↑ Rosenfeld, J. Peter (July 2020). "P300 in detecting concealed information and deception: A review". Psychophysiology. 57 (7): e13362. doi:10.1111/psyp.13362. ISSN   0048-5772. PMID   30859600.
  19. ↑ Finn, Emily S; Shen, Xilin; Scheinost, Dustin; Rosenberg, Monica D; Huang, Jessica; Chun, Marvin M; Papademetris, Xenophon; Constable, R Todd (November 2015). "Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity". Nature Neuroscience. 18 (11): 1664–1671. doi:10.1038/nn.4135. ISSN   1097-6256. PMC   5008686 . PMID   26457551.
  20. ↑ Hermens, Daniel F.; Russo, Colin; Shan, Zack; Lagopoulos, Jim (September 2023). "Brain fingerprinting: A promising future application for predicting mental illness". Futures. 152: 103211. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2023.103211.


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.