Brent Mishler

Last updated
Brent Mishler
Born1953 (age 7071)
NationalityAmerican
Alma mater California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (BS, MS)
Harvard University (PhD)
Scientific career
Fields Botany
Bryology
Institutions Duke University
University of California, Berkeley
Website https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/people/mishler.html

Brent D. Mishler (born 1953) is an American botanist who from was the director of the University and Jepson Herbaria at the University of California, Berkeley, from 1993 to 2023. He was also a professor in the Department of Integrative Biology, where he taught phylogenetics, plant diversity, and island biology. Following his retirement in 2024 he is now Distinguished Professor Emeritus and Curator of Bryophytes, and continues an active research program.

Contents

Early life and education

Mishler attended Bonita High School in La Verne, California, and worked as a Ranger-Naturalist for the Los Angeles County Nature Center Unit (Parks and Recreation Department). He received his B.S. and M.S. from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, in 1975 and 1978 respectively, then got his Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1984, working with Carroll E. Wood, Peter F. Stevens and Norton G. Miller He did his dissertation work on the systematics and evolution of the moss genus Syntrichia . [M 1]

Career

Research

Mishler was on the faculty of the Botany Department at Duke University from 1984. He moved to the Department of Integrative Biology at University of California, Berkeley in 1993.He has maintained two main areas of research: empirical studies of ecology, phylogeny, systematics, and development of mosses, and investigations into the theoretical basis of systematic and evolutionary biology. He has published over 200 scientific papers. [M 1]

Mishler has studied the diverse moss genus Syntrichia in the Pottiaceae family, including the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis. Syntrichia caninervis 01.jpg
Mishler has studied the diverse moss genus Syntrichia in the Pottiaceae family, including the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis .

Most recently, Mishler has helped to develop spatial phylogenetic tools for studying biodiversity and endemism, using large-scale phylogenies and collection data in a geographic and statistical framework. [M 3]

Species concept

Mishler has had a particular interest in concepts of species over his 40-year career, in relation to theories of biological classification in general. He realized early on that the evolutionary processes operating in different branches of the tree of life are distinct enough that different criteria need to be applied to decide when lineages are diverged enough to be called species. He later recognized that deciding which among the many nested levels in the vast tree of life should be ranked as a species is arbitrary and misleading, and began to advocate a rankless approach as was already being advocated for higher taxonomic levels by advocates of phylogenetic nomenclature in the PhyloCode naming system. Mishler argues that the species rank can and should be done away with, to be replaced by a multi-level approach to systematics, ecology, evolution, and conservation. [M 4] His two recent books [M 5] [M 6] explore this radical view of "species", and what it means for science and society to move to a rankless, phylogenetic view of biodiversity. Quentin Wheeler and Rudolf Meier note that the Mishler version of the phylogenetic species concept differs from that of Wheeler and Norman Platnick, and that biologists like Ernst Mayr disagree with both versions. [1]

Reception

Werner Kunz, noting that Charles Darwin "did not actually believe in the existence of species", describes Mishler as having an "extreme attitude ... related to denying any existence of biological species", shared with the botanist Konrad Bachmann, that the idea of a biological species is "worn out, hopelessly vague, or even evidently wrong". [2] The evolutionary biologist James Mallet writes that some taxonomists, including Mishler, "even argue that named Linnean ranks, including species, are no longer useful in taxonomy at all". [3]

The philosopher Marco Nathan distinguishes two kinds of pluralism, heterogeneity and theory-dependence. He defines heterogeneity as meaning that species are defined differently according to their attributes, e.g. Mayr's "interbreeding natural populations ... reproductively isolated" applies only to organisms that reproduce sexually, so asexual groups like bacteria need a different definition of species. Nathan defines theory-dependence as meaning that taxa are assigned according to the organisms being discussed and "the explanatory target at hand", so there is no unique or "natural" method for defining a species or taxa at any other level. Nathan calls the "common" labelling of heterogeneity as pluralism by biologists such as Mishler "dangerous" as it overlooks the distinction of the two kinds. [4]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clade</span> Group of a common ancestor and all descendants

In biological phylogenetics, a clade, also known as a monophyletic group or natural group, is a grouping of organisms that are monophyletic – that is, composed of a common ancestor and all its lineal descendants – on a phylogenetic tree. In the taxonomical literature, sometimes the Latin form cladus is used rather than the English form. Clades are the fundamental unit of cladistics, a modern approach to taxonomy adopted by most biological fields.

In biology, phylogenetics is the study of the evolutionary history and relationships among or within groups of organisms. These relationships are determined by phylogenetic inference, methods that focus on observed heritable traits, such as DNA sequences, protein amino acid sequences, or morphology. The result of such an analysis is a phylogenetic tree—a diagram containing a set of hypotheses about the relationships that reflect the evolutionary history of a group of organisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Systematics</span> Branch of biology

Systematics is the study of the diversification of living forms, both past and present, and the relationships among living things through time. Relationships are visualized as evolutionary trees. Phylogenies have two components: branching order and branch length. Phylogenetic trees of species and higher taxa are used to study the evolution of traits and the distribution of organisms (biogeography). Systematics, in other words, is used to understand the evolutionary history of life on Earth.

In biology, taxonomy is the scientific study of naming, defining (circumscribing) and classifying groups of biological organisms based on shared characteristics. Organisms are grouped into taxa and these groups are given a taxonomic rank; groups of a given rank can be aggregated to form a more inclusive group of higher rank, thus creating a taxonomic hierarchy. The principal ranks in modern use are domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species. The Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus is regarded as the founder of the current system of taxonomy, as he developed a ranked system known as Linnaean taxonomy for categorizing organisms and binomial nomenclature for naming organisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Modern synthesis (20th century)</span> Fusion of natural selection with Mendelian inheritance

The modern synthesis was the early 20th-century synthesis of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and Gregor Mendel's ideas on heredity into a joint mathematical framework. Julian Huxley coined the term in his 1942 book, Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. The synthesis combined the ideas of natural selection, Mendelian genetics, and population genetics. It also related the broad-scale macroevolution seen by palaeontologists to the small-scale microevolution of local populations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolutionary biology</span> Study of the processes that produced the diversity of life

Evolutionary biology is the subfield of biology that studies the evolutionary processes that produced the diversity of life on Earth. It is also defined as the study of the history of life forms on Earth. Evolution holds that all species are related and gradually change over generations. In a population, the genetic variations affect the phenotypes of an organism. These changes in the phenotypes will be an advantage to some organisms, which will then be passed on to their offspring. Some examples of evolution in species over many generations are the peppered moth and flightless birds. In the 1930s, the discipline of evolutionary biology emerged through what Julian Huxley called the modern synthesis of understanding, from previously unrelated fields of biological research, such as genetics and ecology, systematics, and paleontology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orthogenesis</span> Hypothesis that organisms have an innate tendency to evolve towards some goal

Orthogenesis, also known as orthogenetic evolution, progressive evolution, evolutionary progress, or progressionism, is an obsolete biological hypothesis that organisms have an innate tendency to evolve in a definite direction towards some goal (teleology) due to some internal mechanism or "driving force". According to the theory, the largest-scale trends in evolution have an absolute goal such as increasing biological complexity. Prominent historical figures who have championed some form of evolutionary progress include Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, and Henri Bergson.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolutionary ecology</span> Interaction of biology and evolution

Evolutionary ecology lies at the intersection of ecology and evolutionary biology. It approaches the study of ecology in a way that explicitly considers the evolutionary histories of species and the interactions between them. Conversely, it can be seen as an approach to the study of evolution that incorporates an understanding of the interactions between the species under consideration. The main subfields of evolutionary ecology are life history evolution, sociobiology, the evolution of interspecific interactions and the evolution of biodiversity and of ecological communities.

Niles Eldredge is an American biologist and paleontologist, who, along with Stephen Jay Gould, proposed the theory of punctuated equilibrium in 1972.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leigh Van Valen</span> American biologist

Leigh Van Valen was an American evolutionary biologist. At the time of his death, he was professor emeritus in the Department of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">G. Ledyard Stebbins</span> American botanist and geneticist (1906-2000)

George Ledyard Stebbins Jr. was an American botanist and geneticist who is widely regarded as one of the leading evolutionary biologists of the 20th century. Stebbins received his Ph.D. in botany from Harvard University in 1931. He went on to the University of California, Berkeley, where his work with E. B. Babcock on the genetic evolution of plant species, and his association with a group of evolutionary biologists known as the Bay Area Biosystematists, led him to develop a comprehensive synthesis of plant evolution incorporating genetics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bernhard Rensch</span> German evolutionary biologist and ornithologist (1900–1990)

Bernhard Rensch was a German evolutionary biologist and ornithologist who did field work in Indonesia and India. Starting his scientific career with pro-Lamarckian views, he shifted to selectionism and became one of the architects of the modern synthesis in evolutionary biology, which he popularised in Germany. Besides his work on how environmental factors influenced the evolution of geographically isolated populations and on evolution above the species level, which contributed to the modern synthesis, he also worked extensively in the area of animal behavior (ethology) and on philosophical aspects of biological science. His education and scientific work were interrupted by service in the German military during both World War I and World War II.

Systematics and the Origin of Species from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist is a book written by zoologist and evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr, first published in 1942 by Columbia University Press. The book became one of the canonical publications on the modern synthesis and is considered to be exemplary of the original expansion of evolutionary theory. The book is considered one of his greatest and most influential.

Many scientists and philosophers of science have described evolution as fact and theory, a phrase which was used as the title of an article by paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould in 1981. He describes fact in science as meaning data, not known with absolute certainty but "confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent". A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of such facts. The facts of evolution come from observational evidence of current processes, from imperfections in organisms recording historical common descent, and from transitions in the fossil record. Theories of evolution provide a provisional explanation for these facts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental sex determination</span> Method of sex-determination

Environmental sex determination is the establishment of sex by a non-genetic cue, such as nutrient availability, experienced within a discrete period after fertilization. Environmental factors which often influence sex determination during development or sexual maturation include light intensity and photoperiod, temperature, nutrient availability, and pheromones emitted by surrounding plants or animals. This is in contrast to genotypic sex determination, which establishes sex at fertilization by genetic factors such as sex chromosomes. Under true environmental sex determination, once sex is determined, it is fixed and cannot be switched again. Environmental sex determination is different from some forms of sequential hermaphroditism in which the sex is determined flexibly after fertilization throughout the organism’s life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Species</span> Basic unit of taxonomic classification, below genus

A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which any two individuals of the appropriate sexes or mating types can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual reproduction. It is the basic unit of classification and a taxonomic rank of an organism, as well as a unit of biodiversity. Other ways of defining species include their karyotype, DNA sequence, morphology, behaviour, or ecological niche. In addition, paleontologists use the concept of the chronospecies since fossil reproduction cannot be examined. The most recent rigorous estimate for the total number of species of eukaryotes is between 8 and 8.7 million. About 14% of these had been described by 2011. All species are given a two-part name, a "binomial". The first part of a binomial is the genus to which the species belongs. The second part is called the specific name or the specific epithet. For example, Boa constrictor is one of the species of the genus Boa, with constrictor being the species' epithet.

Jody Hey is an evolutionary biologist at Temple University. In the 1980s and 1990s he did research on natural selection and species divergence in fruit flies (Drosophila). More recently he has worked on the development of methods for studying evolutionary divergence, on the divergence of cichlid fishes from Lake Malawi, on chimpanzees and on human populations. His research on divergence and speciation also lead him to study the difficulties of identifying species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of evolution</span> Overview of and topical guide to change in the heritable characteristics of organisms

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to evolution:

Kevin de Queiroz is a vertebrate, evolutionary, and systematic biologist. He has worked in the phylogenetics and evolutionary biology of squamate reptiles, the development of a unified species concept and of a phylogenetic approach to biological nomenclature, and the philosophy of systematic biology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of speciation</span>

The scientific study of speciation — how species evolve to become new species — began around the time of Charles Darwin in the middle of the 19th century. Many naturalists at the time recognized the relationship between biogeography and the evolution of species. The 20th century saw the growth of the field of speciation, with major contributors such as Ernst Mayr researching and documenting species' geographic patterns and relationships. The field grew in prominence with the modern evolutionary synthesis in the early part of that century. Since then, research on speciation has expanded immensely.

References

Primary

These sources are used for basic information about the subject's life and work.

  1. 1 2 "Brent Drennen Mishler (CV)" (PDF). University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved 12 August 2022.
  2. Bowker, Matthew A.; Stark, Lloyd R.; McLetchie, D. Nicholas; Mishler, Brent D. (2000). "Sex expression, skewed sex ratios, and microhabitat distribution in the dioecious desert moss Syntrichia caninervis (Pottiaceae)". American Journal of Botany. 87 (4): 517–526. doi:10.2307/2656595. JSTOR   2656595. PMID   10766723.
  3. Thornhill, Andrew H.; Mishler, Brent D.; Knerr, Nunzio J.; González‐Orozco, Carlos E.; Costion, Craig M.; Crayn, Darren M.; Laffan, Shawn W.; Miller, Joseph T. (26 May 2016). "Continental‐scale spatial phylogenetics of Australian angiosperms provides insights into ecology, evolution and conservation". Journal of Biogeography. 43 (11): 2085–2098. doi:10.1111/jbi.12797. S2CID   89129946.
  4. Mishler, Brent D. (2022), "Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics in a Post-Species World", Species Problems and Beyond, pp. 177–190, doi:10.1201/9780367855604-12, ISBN   978-0-367-85560-4 , retrieved 2022-08-24
  5. Mishler, Brent D. (2021). What, if Anything, are Species?. doi:10.1201/9781315119687. ISBN   978-1-315-11968-7. S2CID   233525644.
  6. Swartz, B. and B.D. Mishler (eds.). 2022 Speciesism in Biology and Culture: How Human Exceptionalism is Pushing Planetary Boundaries. Springer Nature. ISBN   9783030990299

Secondary

  1. Wheeler, Quentin D.; Meier, Rudolf (2000). Species concepts and phylogenetic theory : a debate. New York: Columbia University Press. p. x, and relevant chapters in the book. ISBN   0-231-10142-2. OCLC   42291078.
  2. Kunz, Werner (2013). Do Species Exist? Principles of Taxonomic Classification. Wiley. 2.5 The Reality of Species: Ernst Mayr vs. Charles Darwin. ISBN   978-3-527-66426-9.
  3. Mallet, James (2001). "Species, Concepts of". Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (PDF). Vol. 5. Tarjomefa. pp. 427–440.
  4. Nathan, Marco J. (10 July 2019). "Pluralism is the Answer! What is the Question?". Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology. 11 (20220112). doi: 10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0011.015 . S2CID   210712334.