Brights movement

Last updated
Bright movement
Formation2003;21 years ago (2003)
Type Non-profit
PurposePromotion of naturalism and the bright label
Region served
Worldwide
Official language
English
Co-directors
Paul Geisert and Mynga Futrell
Website the-brights.net

The Brights movement is a social movement whose members since 2003 refer to themselves as Brights and have a worldview of philosophical naturalism.

Contents

Most Brights believe that public policies should be based on science (a body of knowledge obtained and tested by use of the scientific method). Brights are likely to oppose the practice of basing public policies on supernatural doctrines. Brights may therefore be described as secularists.

Terminology

The Bright movement has proposed the following terminology: [1]

History

Paul Geisert, who coined the term bright and co-founded the bright movement [2] is a one-time Chicago biology teacher, professor, entrepreneur and writer of learning materials. [3] In deciding to attend the Godless Americans March on Washington in 2002, Geisert disliked the label "godless" because he thought it would alienate the general public to whom that term was synonymous with "evil". He sought a new, positive word that might be well accepted and improve the image of those who did not believe in the supernatural. A few weeks later, Geisert came up with the noun "bright" after brainstorming many ideas. [4] [5] He then ran into another room and told his wife: "I've got the word, and this is going to be big!". [6]

It was also co-founded by his wife, Mynga Futrell. [7] Futrell remains director of the organization. [8] Paul Geisert died November 17, 2020.

After coming up with the term they pitched their idea to friends and decided to unveil their idea at an Atheist Alliance International conference in Tampa, Florida. They called the organizers and got permission to present the idea. [6]

Geisert and Futrell made their proposal in Spring 2003 at an atheist conference in Florida which was attended by Richard Dawkins. [9] They launched the Brights' Net website on June 4, 2003. The movement gained early publicity through articles by Richard Dawkins in The Guardian [10] and Wired ; [5] and by Daniel Dennett in The New York Times . [11]

The movement continued to grow and experienced accelerated registrations following media debate around New Atheism [9] prompted by a series of book releases in late 2006 including The God Delusion , Breaking the Spell , God Is Not Great , The End of Faith and Letter to a Christian Nation . The movement has grown to be a constituency of over 78,000 Brights in 204 nations and territories. [12]

Brights

Many, but not all, brights also identify as atheist, antitheist, humanist (specifically secular humanist), freethinker, irreligionist, naturalist, materialist or physicalist, agnostic, skeptic, or even naturalistic pantheist. [13] Even so, the "movement is not associated with any defined beliefs". The website Brights' Net says its goal is to include the umbrella term bright in the vocabulary of this existing "community of reason". [14]

However, "the broader intent is inclusive of the many-varied persons whose worldview is naturalistic", but are in the "general population" as opposed to associating solely with the "community of reason". Thus, persons who can declare their naturalistic worldview using the term bright extend beyond the familiar secularist categories as long as they do not hold theistic worldviews. [15] Registrations even include some members of the clergy, such as Presbyterian ministers and a Church History Professor and ordained priest.

Dawkins compares the coining of bright to the "triumph of consciousness-raising" from the term gay:

Gay is succinct, uplifting, positive: an "up" word, where homosexual is a down word, and queer, faggot and pooftah are insults. Those of us who subscribe to no religion; those of us whose view of the universe is natural rather than supernatural; those of us who rejoice in the real and scorn the false comfort of the unreal, we need a word of our own, a word like "gay"[,] [...] a noun hijacked from an adjective, with its original meaning changed but not too much. Like gay, it should be catchy: a potentially prolific meme. Like gay, it should be positive, warm, cheerful, bright. [10]

Despite the explicit difference between the noun and adjective, there have been comments on the comparison. In his Wired article, Dawkins stated: "Whether there is a statistical tendency for brights [noun] to be bright [adjective] is a matter for research".

Notable people who have self-identified as brights at one time or another include: biologists Richard Dawkins and Richard J. Roberts; cognitive scientist Steven Pinker; philosophers Daniel Dennett and Massimo Pigliucci; stage magicians and debunkers James Randi and Penn & Teller; Amy Alkon; Sheldon Glashow; Babu Gogineni; Edwin Kagin; Mel Lipman; Piergiorgio Odifreddi; and Air America Radio talk show host Lionel.

Contrasted with supers

Daniel Dennett suggests in his book Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon that if non-naturalists are concerned with connotations of the word bright, then they should invent an equally positive sounding word for themselves, like supers (i.e. one whose world view contains supernaturalism). [16] He also suggested this during his presentation at the Atheist Alliance International '07 convention. Geisert and Futrell maintain that the neologism has always had a kinship with the Enlightenment, an era which celebrated the possibilities of science and a certain amount of free inquiry. They have endorsed the use of super as the antonym to bright.

Symbol

The Brights' avatar represents a celestial body viewed from space. As there is no up or down or right or left in outer space, the arrangement of planet and darkness and starlight is changeable. [17] Although the symbol is open to the viewer's interpretation, it is generally meant to invoke transition and a sense of gradual illumination. The intentional ambiguity of the avatar is meant to symbolically reflect an important question: Is the future of humankind becoming luminous or more dim? The Brights aspire "to take the promising route, whereby the imagery brings to mind a gradually increasing illumination for this earth of ours, an escalation of enlightenment". [17] This optimistic interpretation of the Brights' symbol is summarized by the motto "Embrightenment Now!".

Name controversy

The movement has been criticised by some (both religious and non-religious) who have objected to the adoption of the title "bright" because they believe it suggests that the individuals with a naturalistic worldview are more intelligent ("brighter") than non-naturalists, such as philosophical skeptics or idealists, believers in the paranormal, philosophical theists, or the religious. [18] For example, the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry published an article by Chris Mooney titled "Not Too 'Bright'" in which he stated that although he agreed with the movement, Richard Dawkins's and Daniel Dennett's "campaign to rename religious unbelievers 'brights' could use some rethinking" because of the possibility that the term would be misinterpreted. [19] The journalist and noted atheist Christopher Hitchens likewise found it a "cringe-making proposal that atheists should conceitedly nominate themselves to be called 'brights'". [20]

In response to this, Daniel Dennett has stated: [16]

There was also a negative response, largely objecting to the term that had been chosen [not by me]: bright, which seemed to imply that others were dim or stupid. But the term, modeled on the highly successful hijacking of the ordinary word "gay" by homosexuals, does not have to have that implication. Those who are not gays are not necessarily glum; they're straight. Those who are not brights are not necessarily dim.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniel Dennett</span> American philosopher (born 1942)

Daniel Clement Dennett III is an American philosopher, writer, and cognitive scientist whose research centers on the philosophy of mind, philosophy of science, and philosophy of biology, particularly as those fields relate to evolutionary biology and cognitive science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Dawkins</span> English evolutionary biologist and author (born 1941)

Richard Dawkins is a British evolutionary biologist and author. He is an emeritus fellow of New College, Oxford, and was Professor for Public Understanding of Science in the University of Oxford from 1995 to 2008. His 1976 book The Selfish Gene popularised the gene-centred view of evolution, as well as coining the term meme. Dawkins has won several academic and writing awards.

Scientism is the opinion that science and the scientific method are the best or only way to render truth about the world and reality.

Mynga Futrell is an American activist who cofounded the international constituency of Brights. Her varied pursuits center around civic pluralism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Ruse</span> Canadian philosopher of science (born 1940)

Michael Ruse is a British-born Canadian philosopher of science who specializes in the philosophy of biology and works on the relationship between science and religion, the creation–evolution controversy, and the demarcation problem within science. Ruse currently teaches at Florida State University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Dawkins Award</span> Award presented by the Center for Inquiry

The Richard Dawkins Award is an annual prize awarded by the Center for Inquiry (CFI). It was established in 2003 and was initially awarded by the Atheist Alliance of America coordinating with Richard Dawkins and the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. In 2019, the award was formally moved to CFI. CFI is a US nonprofit organization that variously claims on its website to promote reason, science, freedom of inquiry, and humanist values, or science, reason, and secular values. The award was initially presented by the Atheist Alliance of America to honor an "outstanding atheist", who taught or advocated scientific knowledge and acceptance of nontheism, and raised public awareness. The award is currently presented by the Center for Inquiry to an individual associated with science, scholarship, education, or entertainment, and who "publicly proclaims the values of secularism and rationalism, upholding scientific truth wherever it may lead." They state that the recipient must be approved by Dawkins himself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sam Harris</span> American neuroscientist, author, and podcaster

Samuel Benjamin Harris is an American philosopher, neuroscientist, author, and podcast host. His work touches on a range of topics, including rationality, religion, ethics, free will, neuroscience, meditation, psychedelics, philosophy of mind, politics, terrorism, and artificial intelligence. Harris came to prominence for his criticism of religion, and is known as one of the "Four Horsemen" of New Atheism, along with Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Daniel Dennett.

Criticism of atheism is criticism of the concepts, validity, or impact of atheism, including associated political and social implications. Criticisms include positions based on the history of science, philosophical and logical criticisms, findings in both the natural and social sciences, theistic apologetic arguments, arguments pertaining to ethics and morality, the effects of atheism on the individual, or the assumptions that underpin atheism.

<i>The God Delusion</i> Book by Richard Dawkins

The God Delusion is a 2006 book by British evolutionary biologist and ethologist Richard Dawkins. In The God Delusion, Dawkins contends that a supernatural creator, God, almost certainly does not exist, and that belief in a personal god qualifies as a delusion, which he defines as a persistent false belief held in the face of strong contradictory evidence. He is sympathetic to Robert Pirsig's statement in Lila (1991) that "when one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion." In the book, Dawkins explores the relationship between religion and morality, providing examples that discuss the possibility of morality existing independently of religion and suggesting alternative explanations for the origins of both religion and morality.

<i>The Portable Atheist</i> 2007 anthology

The Portable Atheist: Essential Readings for the Nonbeliever (2007) is an anthology of atheist and agnostic thought edited by Christopher Hitchens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Out Campaign</span> Public awareness initiative for freethought and atheism

The Out Campaign is a public awareness initiative for freethought and atheism in the US. It was initiated by Robin Elisabeth Cornwell, and is endorsed by Richard Dawkins, a prominent atheist. The campaign aims to create more openness about being an atheist by providing a means by which atheists can identify themselves to others by displaying the movement's scarlet letterA, a scarlet colored capital "A" in the Zapfino typeface, and an allusion to the scarlet letter A worn by Hester Prynne after being convicted of adultery in Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter. It encourages those who wish to be part of the campaign to come out and re-appropriate, in a humorous way, the social stigma that in some places persists against atheism, by branding themselves with a scarlet letter.

Atheism, in the broadest sense, is an absence of belief in the existence of deities. Less broadly, atheism is a rejection of the belief that any deities exist. In an even narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities. Atheism is contrasted with theism, which in its most general form is the belief that at least one deity exists.

The term New Atheism was coined by the American journalist Gary Wolf in 2006 to describe the positions of some atheist academics, writers, scientists, and philosophers of the 21st century. New Atheism advocates the view that superstition, religion, and irrationalism should not simply be tolerated. Instead, they should be criticised, countered, examined, and challenged by rational argument, especially when they exert strong influence on the broader society, such as in government, education, and politics. Major figures of New Atheism include Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens and Daniel Dennett, collectively referred to as the "four horsemen" of the movement, as well as Ayaan Hirsi Ali until her conversion to Christianity in 2023.

Secular paganism is an outlook upholding virtues and principles associated with paganism while maintaining a secular worldview. Alternately called naturalistic paganism or humanistic paganism, approaches vary, but typically include the respect for living creatures and the Earth itself, while rejecting belief in deities. Secular pagans may recognize goddesses/gods as useful metaphors for different cycles of life, or reframe magic as a purely psychological practice.

Secular liberalism is a form of liberalism in which secularist principles and values, and sometimes non-religious ethics, are especially emphasised. It supports the separation of religion and state. Moreover, secular liberals are usually advocates of liberal democracy and the open society as models for organising stable and peaceful societies.

<i>The Irrational Atheist</i> 2008 book by Vox Day

The Irrational Atheist: Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens is a 2008 non-fiction book by Vox Day, an American far-right activist, writer, musician, publisher, and video game designer. Day describes himself as a Christian nationalist. The Irrational Atheist was one of a number of books including God's Undertaker, and The Devil's Delusion, published in response to Dawkins and other New Atheists.

The secular movement refers to a social and political trend in the United States, beginning in the early years of the 20th century, with the founding of the American Association for the Advancement of Atheism in 1925 and the American Humanist Association in 1941, in which atheists, agnostics, secular humanists, freethinkers, and other nonreligious and nontheistic Americans have grown in both numbers and visibility. There has been a sharp increase in the number of Americans who identify as religiously unaffiliated, from under 10 percent in the 1990s to 20 percent in 2013. The trend is especially pronounced among young people, with about one in three Americans younger than 30 identifying as religiously unaffiliated, a figure that has nearly tripled since the 1990s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Humanist Global Charity</span> Charity based in the US

Humanist Global Charity (HGC) is a 501c3 non-profit in California.

<i>The Evolution of Atheism</i> 2015 book by Stephen LeDrew

The Evolution of Atheism: The Politics of a Modern Movement is a 2015 book by Stephen LeDrew, adapted from his PhD dissertation. Though an atheist, LeDrew criticises the movement of New Atheism, which arose in the 2000s with the "Four Horsemen" Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens as prominent figures.

References

  1. ↑ "The Brights' Net - Who are The Brights?". The Brights' Net. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  2. ↑ The Brights' Net (8 August 2012). "A Glimpse Inside: The Brights' Network - Describing the Brights' Net (Paul Geisert)". YouTube. Archived from the original on 2021-12-12. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  3. ↑ "The Brights' Net - Enthusiastic Brights (Page 3)". The Brights' Net. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  4. ↑ Leibrock, Rachel (12 August 2010). "The Bright side". Colorado Springs Independent . Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  5. 1 2 "Religion Be Damned". Wired . Condé Nast. 1 October 2003. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  6. 1 2 "A brights idea". St. Petersburg Times . 20 July 2003. Retrieved 20 July 2003.
  7. ↑ Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine : The Brights' Net (8 August 2012). "A Civic Umbrella for a Wide-Ranging Diversity: The Brights and Tradition". YouTube. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  8. ↑ "Who directs The-Brights.Net?". The Brights' Net. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  9. 1 2 "The Church of the Non-Believers". Wired . Condé Nast. 14 November 2006. Retrieved 14 November 2006.
  10. 1 2 Dawkins, Richard (21 June 2003). "The future looks bright". The Guardian . Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  11. ↑ Dennett, Daniel C. (12 July 2003). "The Bright Stuff". The New York Times . Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  12. ↑ "Supporting the Brights". The Brights' Net. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  13. ↑ "Bright (n.)--What is the definition?". The Brights' Net. Retrieved 4 November 2006.
  14. ↑ "What is the Purpose of the Brights' Net?". The Brights' Net. Retrieved 4 November 2006.
  15. ↑ "Theistic Brights? – Not So!". The Brights' Net. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  16. 1 2 Dennett, Daniel C. (2006). Breaking the Spell. London: Penguin. p. 21.
  17. 1 2 "Brights Symbology". The Brights Net. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  18. ↑ D'Souza, Dinesh (12 October 2003). "Not So 'Bright'". The Wall Street Journal . Dow Jones . Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  19. ↑ Mooney, Chris (15 October 2003). "Brights: Not Too 'Bright'". Committee for Skeptical Inquiry . Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  20. ↑ Hitchens, Christopher (25 April 2007). "Religion Poisons Everything (Exclusive Excerpts from Christopher Hitchens' God Is Not Great)". Slate . Retrieved 14 November 2018.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.