Business improvement districts in the United States

Last updated

Business improvement districts in the United States (BIDs), also known as local improvement districts (LIDs), are United States special districts [1] within a city that are overseen by a nonprofit entity. In the United States, business improvement districts are typically funded by an additional tax assessment, [2] with the tax increase going toward improvements of the area.

Contents

By 2010, BIDs had been used in nearly 1,000 major cities and small towns throughout the United States, including most major U.S. cities that have multiple BIDs. New York City alone has 76 BIDs.

Business improvement districts are private sector initiatives to improve the environment of a business district. Services financed by a BID are intended to enhance existing city services, not replace public works or economic development departments. [3]

History

The International Downtown Association (IDA) 2011 BID census report states that all US states except Wyoming, including the District of Columbia, have at least one BID. The 2011 IDA report states that, at the time, there were 1,002 BIDs in the United States. [4] As of 2010, North Dakota passed senate bill 2356 to appeal section 40-22.1-01 of the North Dakota Century Code to allow special tax assessment districts in the state. [5]

In Rochester, NY, a proposed Business Improvement District (BID) faced significant community opposition that ultimately led to the abandonment of the effort in March of 2024. [6] Critics, including local artists, community advocates, and working-class residents, raised concerns about the potential for BIDs to prioritize the interests of wealthy property owners over those of the broader community. Key issues cited included concerns of increased gentrification, displacement of low-income residents, and the allocation of resources to projects not aligned with community needs. Pushback from community members and activists highlighted a strong desire for more inclusive, equitable development practices. This case illustrates the complexities and local resistance that can arise with BID proposals, underscoring the importance of community planning efforts that originate from the communities they are meant to serve.

Operations

The districts are areas within a municipality where some form of revenue generation is legally enforced to provide services for area, beyond those offered by the municipal and county services. BID formation varies on a state-by-state level, and are also referred to as neighborhood improvement districts, special improvement districts, [7] or local improvement districts. [8] [2]

Depending on state statute, business improvement districts can be funded a variety of ways, including through a tax assessment or mill levy or Tax Increment Financing on property tax, and then managed by a nonprofit agency. BIDs provide an array of services to keep districts clean and managed to improve mix of activities, transportation, and aesthetics of public places. [9] Business Improvement Districts became widely noted after their success in transforming Times Square and Union Square in New York City from places abandoned and filled with crime into dynamic neighborhoods. They are based on the premise that making attractive commercial districts will attract shoppers and make an environment conducive to thriving businesses. [10]

Often, BIDs are formed as a result of property owners in a defined district who seek funding for a variety of services, including governmental services such as cleaning and maintenance, non-governmental services such as marketing and promotion or beautification, and the implementation of capital investments. Most states rule that a BID must be governed by a board of directors that are composed of a certain percentage of property owners, business owners, and residents that are in the district, as well as public officials. [11]

Benefits

Crime reduction

Studies have shown a reduction in crime within the district boundaries. One study found that there was a 12% reduction in robbery and an 8% total crime reduction within the boundaries of the BID in Los Angeles. [12] There is no agreed upon standard for accountability for BID management organizations, but they are held accountable due to the limitations of what the budget can be appropriated to, making the abuse of power less likely. The small amount of stakeholders also limits the risk of corruption, with more individuals keeping watch of the activities managed by the BID [13]

Increased property values

A Study of New York BIDs revealed that commercial properties within the defined areas of a business improvement district sold for 30.7 percent more than comparable properties in the same area but outside of the district boundaries. This study implies that the positive effects are exacerbated in larger BIDs, made of mostly office space, with larger budgets. [14]

Criticisms

Accountability

Critics of Business Improvement Districts are concerned that there are few restrictions as to what the revenues going toward the BID will fund. With the limited restrictions, property owners within the district may be required to fund services that they do not particularly want or need. In many places, BIDs are independent organizations and are not required to report extensively to their local government and stakeholders. This lack of accountability can be concerning to residents and property owners paying the additional tax. [15]

Crime spillover

Critics are also concerned about the spillover of crime that may be diverted, and then concentrated outside of the BID districts, particularly in larger cities with BIDs that focus on security and crime prevention. [15]

One Person One Vote

In Kessler Vs. Grand Central District Management Association, residents within the Manhattan BID argued that the election of board members were not completed fairly in accordance with the one person one vote principle. The ruling opposed the resident's claim, stating that a BID can have different voting classes because the results are disproportionate among property owners. [13]

Private control of public space

Property owners and people within the district who oppose a BID may see it as an attempt to delegate control of public space to the private sector. Without government accountability (elections), it is difficult for the public to make a change in the actions that the BID managing organization controls. [13]

Other Improvement Districts or authorities

By state

North Carolina

City Market in Raleigh, North Carolina Raleigh-City-Market-20080321.jpeg
City Market in Raleigh, North Carolina

North Carolina State Statute names Business Improvement Districts, or other taxing districts Municipal Services Districts (MSD). [17] Municipal Services Districts or BIDs in North Carolina can only be funded by an ad valorem tax, meaning the city can levy an additional tax on all property within the designated district. [18] The process for which MSDs, or Business Improvement Districts, are formed, begins with defining the service area. The report must first express the need for why the proposed area requires the benefits of a special district, as opposed to the remainder of the city. A report must be prepared with a map of district boundaries, statement of purpose for the district, and a plan for how the district is formed. The report is then open for public hearing, prior to adopting the plan. [19]

Types of Municipal Service Districts in North Carolina

Downtown Revitalization is defined in terms of the North Carolina State Statute as projects that include, but are not limited to improvements in water, gas, storm, and sanitary sewer mains, power lines, improved lighting, streets and sidewalks (including easements and right of way), construction of walkways, pedestrian-friendly areas or malls, bike paths, parking facilities and traffic congestion relief. Intangible improvements include reduction of crime, public health, safety and welfare improvements, promoting the economic vitality of the district. Downtown revitalization can also include sponsoring of events, marketing or promotions to promote the district internally and externally. [19]

California

Union Square in San Francisco, California Union Square - San Francisco.jpg
Union Square in San Francisco, California

In California, there are 3 primary types of BIDs all of which have their own standards for assessments and require different legal actions. [1] In California, the payments made by the businesses and property owners within the districts are technically "fees" and not "taxes." Due to Proposition 13, adopted by the voters in 1978, California State statute no longer allows for ad valorem assessment (i.e., based on property value). [1] As a result of Proposition 218 (1996), BIDs may no longer assess their participating businesses and property owners for general governmental services, but are limited to assessing fees for provision of special benefits to the affected properties over and above those conferred to the public at large, and the properties may only be assessed an amount proportional to the special benefit it receives. [20]

Legislation in California

  • The Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1965 was California's first effort. This version of the enabling legislation allowed ad valorem taxation of the businesses within the district. Following adoption of Proposition 13, other methods of allocating the assessment among participating businesses were required.
  • Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 followed the 1965 statute, and is the first known tourism improvement district enabling law. This act allows for a municipality to initiate the process to form the district, and requires the municipality to have a public hearing to form the district. It must also be renewed every year and overseen by an advisory board. [16]
  • Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 gives greater flexibility to the lodging business owners. This law allows for Tourism Improvement Districts to form in an initial term of 5 years with possibility of a 10-year renewal. To form the district, businesses that will pay 50% of the assessment are required to submit a petition, and three council hearings with option for public protest are required. The law also allows for a nonprofit organization to manage funds in cooperation with the municipality. [16]

Colorado

Pearl Street Mall in Boulder, Colorado Pearl Street Mall Boulder Colorado USA.jpg
Pearl Street Mall in Boulder, Colorado

Colorado’s Business Improvement District Law of 1988 includes key provisions that allow BIDs to provide a wide variety of services, including public safety, planning, events, and parking management, those services are provided by private sector organizations. The law holds BIDs accountable to all payees into the district through a board of directors that is composed of business and property owners located within the district. All property owners, lessees and residents within the district are given the opportunity to vote for the tax in their district. [21]

Michigan

By result of Public Act 120 of 1961, cities and townships in Michigan can establish a BID within a defined area. The municipality is allowed to fund the district by tax assessments and bonds to cover additional maintenance, security, and management of the district. Chapter 2 of the Act allows private property owners within a Business Improvement Zone (BIZ) to levy special assessments to finance programs that are established in a zone plan, over a period of seven years. [22]

New York

Fulton Street Mall in Brooklyn, New York Fulton Street Mall by David Shankbone crop.jpg
Fulton Street Mall in Brooklyn, New York

New York City has the largest network of Business Improvement Districts in the United States, with 76 BIDs within the city. New York City's BIDs invest over $158 million in programs and services in their respective districts. [23] New York's BID movement began in the 1960s when business owners and residents realized public resources were limited to improve commercial areas. [24] In 1976, the first Special Assessment District legislation was passed, noting that the city would make capital improvements for an area under the condition that property owners would maintain them, the first Special Assessment District was Fulton Mall in Brooklyn. [24] In 1981-1982, legislation was passed for property owners to levy taxes in self-funding Business Improvement Districts. [24]

Oregon

In Portland, Oregon, local improvement districts are typically used to pave streets. [25]

Washington

Local improvement districts are codified in the Revised Code of Washington; the term "local improvement district" appeared in 1981 legislation. [26] In Seattle, Washington, LIDs authorized by state law have been applied for a variety of large projects. The South Lake Union Streetcar was funded through $25 million in LID funds derived from a local property tax. [27] The redevelopment of the city's waterfront is expected to be funded using a $200 million property tax through a LID created in 2018. [28]

Wisconsin

Downtown Milwaukee, Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin 8320.jpg
Downtown Milwaukee, Wisconsin

The following steps are required to establish a BID in Wisconsin:

  1. Form a BID committee that adequately represents all stakeholders within the district
  2. BID Committee must draft initial plan that identifies the goals and objectives, highlights its relationship with a comprehensive or master plan, and how the assessment will be calculated and collected.
  3. The committee petitions the local government for permission to establish the district
  4. Local government creates notice of proposal and hosts a public hearing
  5. Public hearing is held with proposed plan. The plan may be rejected if a petition is signed by over 40% of property owners within the district
  6. Council votes to adopt or reject the plan to establish a BID
  7. Mayor or city's CEO appoints BID board members, 5 of which have to be property owners within the district. [29]

Other States' BID laws and precedents

Related Research Articles

A homeowner association, or a homeowner community, is a private association-like entity in the United States, Canada, the Philippines and certain other countries often formed either ipso jure in a building with multiple owner-occupancies, or by a real estate developer for the purpose of marketing, managing, and selling homes and lots in a residential subdivision. The developer will typically transfer control of the association to the homeowners after selling a predetermined number of lots.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1978 California Proposition 13</span> Ballot initiative which capped property tax at 1% and yearly increases at 2%

Proposition 13 is an amendment of the Constitution of California enacted during 1978, by means of the initiative process. The initiative was approved by California voters on June 6, 1978 by a nearly two to one margin. It was upheld as constitutional by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 (1992). Proposition 13 is embodied in Article XIII A of the Constitution of the State of California.

A property tax is an ad valorem tax on the value of a property.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tax increment financing</span> Public financing method

Tax increment financing (TIF) is a public financing method that is used as a subsidy for redevelopment, infrastructure, and other community-improvement projects in many countries, including the United States. The original intent of a TIF program is to stimulate private investment in a blighted area that has been designated to be in need of economic revitalization. Similar or related value capture strategies are used around the world.

Massachusetts shares with the five other New England states a governmental structure known as the New England town. Only the southeastern third of the state has functioning county governments; in western, central, and northeastern Massachusetts, traditional county-level government was eliminated in the late 1990s. Generally speaking, there are four kinds of public school districts in Massachusetts: local schools, regional schools, vocational/technical schools, and charter schools.

A local service district (LSD) was a provincial administrative unit for the provision of local services in the Canadian province of New Brunswick. LSDs originally covered areas of the province that maintained some services but were not made municipalities when the province's former county municipalities were dissolved at the start of 1967; eventually all of rural New Brunswick was covered by the LSD system. They were defined in law by the Local Service Districts Regulation of the Municipalities Act. In 2017, the Municipalities Act was replaced by the Local Governance Act, which continued the Local Service Districts Regulation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1996 California Proposition 218</span> Adopted initiative constitutional amendment

Proposition 218 is an adopted initiative constitutional amendment which revolutionized local and regional government finance and taxation in California. Named the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," it was sponsored by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association as a constitutional follow-up to the landmark property tax reduction initiative constitutional amendment, Proposition 13, approved in June 1978. Proposition 218 was approved and adopted by California voters during the November 5, 1996, statewide general election.

In the United States, a special assessment is a charge that public authorities can assess against real estate parcels for certain public projects. This charge is levied in a specific geographic area known as a special assessment district (SAD). A special assessment may only be levied against parcels of real estate which have been identified as having received a direct and unique "benefit" from the public project.

Community Facilities Districts (CFDs), more commonly known as Mello-Roos, are special districts established by local governments in California as a means of obtaining additional public funding. Counties, cities, special districts, joint powers authority, and school districts in California use these financing districts to pay for public works and some public services.

The Grand Central Partnership manages the Grand Central Business Improvement District, one of the largest business improvement districts in the world. It comprises 76,000,000 square feet (7,100,000 m2) of commercial space in a 70-block area of Midtown Manhattan, New York City, around Grand Central Terminal. Its irregular borders reach from East 35th Street to East 54th Street and from Second Avenue to Fifth Avenue.

A business improvement district (BID) is a defined area within which businesses elect to pay an additional fee in order to fund projects within the district's boundaries. A BID is not a tax, as taxes fund the government. BID funds are collected and used for the exclusive benefit of the industry that pays the assessment.

PACE financing is a means used in the United States of America of financing energy efficiency upgrades, disaster resiliency improvements, water conservation measures, or renewable energy installations in existing or new construction of residential, commercial, and industrial property owners. Depending on state legislation, PACE financing can be used to finance water efficiency products, seismic retrofits, resiliency, and other measures with social benefits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Property tax in the United States</span>

Most local governments in the United States impose a property tax, also known as a millage rate, as a principal source of revenue. This tax may be imposed on real estate or personal property. The tax is nearly always computed as the fair market value of the property, multiplied by an assessment ratio, multiplied by a tax rate, and is generally an obligation of the owner of the property. Values are determined by local officials, and may be disputed by property owners. For the taxing authority, one advantage of the property tax over the sales tax or income tax is that the revenue always equals the tax levy, unlike the other types of taxes. The property tax typically produces the required revenue for municipalities' tax levies. One disadvantage to the taxpayer is that the tax liability is fixed, while the taxpayer's income is not.

Tourism Improvement Districts (TIDs) are a type of business improvement district in the United States. The aim of TIDs is increasing the number of overnight visitors using business and services in that area. TIDs are formed through a public–private partnership between the local government and the businesses in a district. TID funds are usually managed by a nonprofit corporation, generally a Convention and Visitors' Bureau, hotel association, or similar destination marketing organization. Typical TID services include marketing programs to raise awareness of the destination, sponsorship of special events that attract overnight visitors, and sales programs to bring in large-group business. Synonymous terms for TIDs include: tourism marketing district, hotel improvement district, and tourism business improvement district.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Local government in California</span>

The government of California has an extensive system of local government that manages public functions throughout the state. Like most states, California is divided into counties, of which there are 58 covering the entire state. Most urbanized areas are incorporated as cities, though not all of California is within the boundaries of a city. School districts, which are independent of cities and counties, handle public education. Many other functions, especially in unincorporated areas, are handled by special districts, which include municipal utility districts, transit districts, health care districts, vector control districts, and geologic hazard abatement districts.

The parcel tax is a form of real estate tax. Unlike most real estate taxes or a land value tax, it is not directly based on property value. It funds K–12 public education and community facilities districts, which are usually known as "Mello-Roos" districts. The California parcel tax, in its typical form as a flat tax, is regressive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Jay Pastoriza</span> American entrepreneur, Georgist, and mayor of Houston, Texas

Joseph Jay "J. J." Pastoriza was a printer, real estate investor, and politician in Houston, Texas. He served both as Houston's Tax Commissioner and Mayor. Pastoriza was the first Hispanic mayor of the city of Houston. Pastoriza was orphaned and adopted as a young child in Houston. He started working in the printing business at about age twenty before establishing his own stationery and print shop.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 San Diego elections</span>

Municipal elections were held in San Diego in 2016 for mayor, city attorney, city council, and ballot measures. The primary election was held on Tuesday, June 7, 2016, and the general election was held on Tuesday, November 8, 2016. Five of the nine council seats were contested. Two city council incumbents ran for reelection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Municipal Property Owners' Improvement Districts of Shannon Hills Arkansas</span> Special-purpose district in Arkansas, United States

Municipal Property Owners' Improvement Districts No. 10, 53, and 54 are independent municipal governments formed under Arkansas Code §14.94-101 and located within the City of Shannon Hills, Arkansas. Arkansas Code gives the Board of Commissioners of the Improvement Districts broad powers, including powers to use eminent domain, to issue bonds, to assess and levy taxes, to sell or lease any improvements, to hire employees, and to sue. Unlike other local municipal governments, until reporting year 2012, Arkansas Code did not require the Municipal Property Owners' Improvement Districts to record or publicly disclose any financial information including total property tax income, spending, expenses, or debt.

The Los Angeles Downtown Industrial District (LADID) is manufacturing and wholesale district of downtown Los Angeles, California, that was established as a property-based business improvement district (BID) in 1998 by the Central City East Association (CCEA). The district spans 46 blocks, covers 600 properties, and is the historic home of seafood, produce, flowers, and a variety of products daily shipped in and out of Los Angeles by air, rail, and sea. The LADID hosts the Los Angeles Wholesale Produce Market, the second largest produce market in the United States.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 The ABCs of California BIDs. California Downtown Association. 2005. pp. 1–13.
  2. 1 2 "Local Improvement Districts". Municipal Research and Services Center . Retrieved February 27, 2019.
  3. ↑ "BID Fact Sheet" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-10-12. Retrieved 2013-04-16.
  4. ↑ "An Economic Benefit Study to Establish an Asheville Downtown Business Improvement District" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-10-23. Retrieved 2013-02-11.
  5. ↑ "Senate Bill 2356, 2011-2012".
  6. ↑ Smriti, Jacob. "Effort to establish downtown BID ends". Rochester Beacon Inc. Retrieved 26 March 2024. The decision to suspend the BID formation process is the result of sustained community pushback. A coalition of ordinary residents, small businesses, community organizations, and artists came together to oppose RDDC's push to turn Downtown Rochester into a Business Improvement District that would benefit the largest developers and property owners.
  7. ↑ "The Business Improvement District Model: A Balanced Review of Contemporary Debates" (PDF).
  8. ↑ "Local Improvement Districts". City of Marysville . Retrieved February 27, 2019.
  9. ↑ Mallett, William J. (September 1994). "Managing the Post-Industrial City: Business Improvement Districts in the United States". Royal Geographical Society. 26 (3): 276–287. JSTOR   20003458.
  10. ↑ "MAYOR BLOOMBERG DISCUSSES HOW BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS, INCLUDING TWO NEWLY CREATED THIS WEEK, WILL HELP CREATE JOBS IN NEW YORK CITY IN WEEKLY RADIO ADDRESS". October 2011.
  11. ↑ "Business Improvement Districts: Issues in Alternative Local Public Service". Cornell University. Archived from the original on 26 September 2018. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  12. ↑ "The effect of business improvement districts on the incidence of violent crimes".
  13. 1 2 3 "BIDs Fare Well: The Democratic Accountability of Business Improvement Districts". NYU Law Review. 78 (1): 374–404. April 2003.
  14. ↑ "The Impact of Business Improvement Districts on Property Values: Evidence from New York City". Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs (8): 1–31. 2007.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Morcol, Goktug (November 2010). "Understanding Business Improvement Districts: A New Governance Framework". Public Administration Review. 70 (6): 906–913. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02222.x.
  16. 1 2 3 "Laws: Tourism District Resource Center". Archived from the original on 2016-12-06. Retrieved 2013-04-24.
  17. ↑ "What is a Business Improvement District?" (PDF).[ permanent dead link ]
  18. ↑ "Levying the Property Tax: Earmarking Tax Revenue for Specific Purposes".
  19. 1 2 3 "Article 23 Municipal Services Districts (North Carolina)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-10-23. Retrieved 2013-02-11.
  20. ↑ Olson, Rebecca J.; Keys, Lacey (Fall 2008). "Business Improvement Districts and Proposition 218 After Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority" (PDF). The Public Law Journal. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2015-01-08.
  21. ↑ "Colorado BID Fact Sheet" (PDF).
  22. ↑ "Business Improvement Districts Fact Sheet" (PDF).
  23. ↑ "Help For Neighborhoods: Business Improvement Districts".
  24. 1 2 3 "11 Step BID Formation Guide" (PDF).
  25. ↑ "Local Improvement Districts (LIDs)". Portland Bureau of Transportation . Retrieved February 27, 2019.
  26. ↑ RCW 36.94.220, Revised Code of Washington Washington State Legislature official website
  27. ↑ "Project Profile: South Lake Union Streetcar". Federal Highway Administration . Retrieved February 27, 2019.
  28. ↑ Beekman, Daniel (May 22, 2018). "Those grand plans for Seattle waterfront? Time for property owners to pay up, city says". The Seattle Times . Retrieved February 27, 2019.
  29. ↑ "BID Creation Process" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-06-05. Retrieved 2013-04-28.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.