Centre of Indian Communists

Last updated

Centre of Indian Communists
Founded1974
Split from Communist Party of India (Marxist)
Ideology Marxism–Leninism
Political position Far-left
Active region(s) Kerala, India
StatusBanned

The Centre of Indian Communists (CIC) was a minor Maoist group in the Indian state of Kerala. The organisation was founded at a convention in Ernakulam in 1974. It included elements that had broken away from Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)).

Contents

Kerala, Vanguardism, and the CIC

Kerala, an Introduction

The Center of Indian Communist (CIC) did not gain popularity within a vacuum, their platform manifested within the context of the greater population of Kerala, a district known for employing leftist values in their political decisions. [1] In the elections of 1957, the people of Kerala gave the Communist Party of India thirty-five present of the vote, demonstrating strong communist values among the people. [2]

Vanguardism in Kerala and the CPI

The Center of Indian Communist (CIC) distanced themselves from the Communist Party of India (CPI) largely because they saw the peasantry as being the appropriate vehicle for revolution as opposed to the proletariat. [3] This contrast is analogous to that of Maoism and Marxism, Mao focuses his literature on the peasantry while Marx stresses the importance of the proletariat. [4] While both Revolutionary Vanguards utilize the ethos of class struggle as their main rhetorical strategy, the areas where they depart are consequential. The proletariat encompasses all of the working class, while the peasant is one who is under direct control of an individual, thus accentuating the dominance hierarchy on an interpersonal level. [5] Naturally, a multi-varied equation would be necessary to plot the requisite conditions from which communist sympathies emerge, however, some political-scientist attribute communist acceptance in Kerala as being the result of a high population of agricultural workers and peasants. [6] This analysis is important when examining the Center of Indian Communist in contrast to the Communist Party of India.

Demographic Kinship between Kerala and Mao's China

The Center of Indian Communist (CIC) saw their propagation strategy as superior given the prominence of agricultural peasantry within the Keralan people. The (CIC) was a Maoist organization, one which developed under similar demographic conditions to that of Mao’s China. [7] Maoism seemed like the perfect fit for the (CIC) because of the strong emphasis on what Mao described as the “declassed intellectual elite” as the appropriate mechanism for revolution. [8] Similar to Mao's description of China, the vast majority of the people in Kerala were very well educated, they enjoyed some of the highest literacy rates in all of India. [9] Despite this, they also suffered from unemployment, and high levels of poverty. [10] As a result of the demographic Kinship shared with pre-revolutionary China, the Center of Indian Communist aimed to propagate a revolutionary Maoist political ideology to the people of Kerala.

A Struggle for Traction: How Marxist Ideology Became the Primary Mediator of Revolutionary Discourse in India

Fundamentals of Marxism

In his work, Karl Marx was deliberate in establishing the requisite industrial conditions under which his theory becomes applicable. [11] These conditions included a normative class structure predicated on achievement, such as capitalism. [12] It also necessitated a high level of career mobility, a precursor for industrial development. [13] Marx cites that Western industrialized society often sees and increases in demand for a product without increasing production, thus leading to price inflation instead of industrial development. [14] Under this model goods become the tools of ostentation, the possession of land, technology, and even food become emblematic of economic achievement. [15] Marx argues that this system is only able to prevail under the lie of autonomy, an equation in which the only variable relative to fiscal success is the conscientiousness of the individual. [16] For Marx, a communist revolution of the people can only be achieved when the proletariat actualize the erroneous nature of this analysis, allowing the poor and middle class majority to rise up against the rich and powerful minority. [17] This model of revolution is widely applicable given the prominence of industrial workers throughout the world, and particularly within India. [18]

British Imperialism, the Proletariat, and Massive Competition

The broad appeal of Marxism in large part could explain why the Center of Indian Communist (CIC) were never able to create a substantial impact on a national scale. [19] Their Maoist appeal to the peasantry and agricultural laborers was not as broad as the Marxist proletariat within the greater context of India. [20] Ashutosh Kumar cites British imperialism as being formative in the development of the Indian proletariat, potently serving as a catalyst for the uprising of Marxist political ideology throughout the country. [21] The British government obliged India to start producing goods for import such as cotton, wool, hemp, and indigo. [22] The strong and conscious proletariat left by the ashes of British imperialism almost universally lent support to the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)). [23] As a result of their prominence on the national scale the (CPI(M)) was able to reach their influence to practically every corner of India including Kerala. [24] Given the demographic framework of Kerala juxtaposed with the Communist Center of India’s peasant tailored rhetoric, one could assume their local influence would be vast, however, British rule left India with a massive industrial proletariat, one that eventually precipitated the ideological dominance enjoyed by the Communist Party of India (Marxist).

Emergency in India, and the Downfall of the Center of Indian Communist

Indira Gandhi and Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed

The Center of Indian Communist (CIC) was able to exist peacefully up until what is now known as The Emergency took place in 1975. Indira Gandhi was the prime minister of India at the time, she recommended that president Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed declare a state of emergency caused by fear of growing communist sentiments. [25] This effectively halted the democracy, suspending elections and imprisoning much of Ahmed’s political opposition. [26] Emergency rule also meant that any authority as high as the District Magistrate could detain any individual that they suspect as being hostile to the Indian government. [27] The proclamation of emergency also entailed widespread censorship of Indian news outlets and entertainment. [28] During this period in India there was virtually no standard for individual freedoms from the government, not only would executive powers have free rein over the fate of the democracy, the public were not allowed to challenge their decisions in court. [29]

Article 352

Gandhi and Ahmed were able to change India’s political landscape within their legal bounds as a result of Article 352 of the Constitution of India. [30] This article describes the process by with an emergency of national security is declared, a proclamation of emergency is to be used in order to protect Indian rule throughout their territory. [31]

Backlash

Gandhi and Ahmed claimed that the emergence of various resistance movements across India were indicative of a threat to national security and eventually used article 352 as a means to eradicate dissenting thought. [32] However, many scholars argue that this was not a matter of national security, rather they cite high oil prices and deteriorating living conditions under Ahmed’s administration as being formative in changing India’s political landscape. [33] Naturally Ahmed grew fearful that he would lose his control over India, both Gandhi and Ahmed agreed that it would be beneficial to ban his political opponents, leaving himself as the only legal option for support. [34] Indira Gandhi and Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed soured their reputation with much of the public considerably. [35] On October 31, 1984 Indira Gandhi was assassinated by her own security team, afterward, her son Rajiv Gandhi took over her position as prime minister. [36] These events came to pass well after the conclusion of the emergency in India, however, they demonstrate the level of political instability from which the Communist Center of India emerged, eventually culminating in the assassination of their prime minister.

The Downfall of the CIC

Despite their best efforts to halt the spread of Communism across India, the very early stages of the emergency saw many resistance groups gain popularity as a result of growing fears surrounding the future of Indian democracy. [37] However, this growth was extremely short, Ahmed introduced the prohibition of several individual resistance groups throughout India, one of which was the CIC. [38] While this marked the end of the Center of Indian Communist it certainly did not stop the prominence of revolutionary discourse within the people of Kerala and the rest of India. [39] The Center of Indian Communist and other analogous resistance groups are emblematic of the widespread inequality and government corruption that plagued India during the 70s. [40]

Related Research Articles

Maoism, officially called Mao Zedong Thought by the Chinese Communist Party, is a variety of Marxism–Leninism that Mao Zedong developed for realising a socialist revolution in the agricultural, pre-industrial society of the Republic of China and later the People's Republic of China. The philosophical difference between Maoism and traditional Marxism–Leninism is that the peasantry are the revolutionary vanguard in pre-industrial societies rather than the proletariat. This updating and adaptation of Marxism–Leninism to Chinese conditions in which revolutionary praxis is primary and ideological orthodoxy is secondary represents urban Marxism–Leninism adapted to pre-industrial China. The claim that Mao Zedong had adapted Marxism–Leninism to Chinese conditions evolved into the idea that he had updated it in a fundamental way applying to the world as a whole.

E. M. S. Namboodiripad Indian politician (1909–1998)

Elamkulam Manakkal Sankaran Namboodiripad, popularly known as EMS, was an Indian communist politician and theorist, who served as the first Chief Minister of Kerala in 1957–1959 and then again in 1967–1969. As a member of the Communist Party of India (CPI), he became the first non-Congress Chief Minister in the Indian republic. In 1964, he led a faction of the CPI that broke away to form the Communist Party of India (Marxist). He completed his graduation from St. Thomas College, Thrissur Kerala.

Communist Party of India (Marxist) Political party in India

The Communist Party of India (Marxist) is a communist political party in India. It is the largest communist party of India in terms of membership and electoral seats and one of the national parties of India. The party emerged from a split in the Communist Party of India (CPI) on 7 November 1964. As of 2022, CPI(M) is a part of ruling alliances in two states — the Left Democratic Front in Kerala and the Secular Progressive Alliance in Tamil Nadu. CPIM has representation in the legislative assemblies of 9 states.

Revolutionary Socialist Party (India) Political party in India

Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP) is a communist party in India. The party was founded on 19 March 1940 by Tridib Chaudhuri and has its roots in the Bengali liberation movement Anushilan Samiti and the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army.

New Democracy, or the New Democratic Revolution, is a concept based on Mao Zedong's Bloc of Four Social Classes theory in post-revolutionary China which argued originally that democracy in China would take a path that was decisively distinct from that in any other country. He also said every colonial or semi-colonial country would have its own unique path to democracy, given that particular country's own social and material conditions. Mao labeled representative democracy in the Western nations as Old Democracy, characterizing parliamentarianism as just an instrument to promote the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie/land-owning class through manufacturing consent. He also found his concept of New Democracy in contrast with the Soviet-style dictatorship of the proletariat which he assumed would be the dominant political structure of a post-capitalist world. Mao spoke about how he wanted to create a New China, a country freed from the feudal and semi-feudal aspects of its old culture as well as Japanese imperialism.

Communism is a far-left philosophical, social, political, and economic ideology and movement whose goal is the establishment of a communist society, namely a socioeconomic order based on the idea of common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange—allocating products to everyone in the society. It involves the absence of social classes, money, and the state. Communism, while sometimes used as a synonym of socialism, is mainly a specific, yet distinct, form of socialism. Communists often seek a voluntary state of self-governance, but disagree on the means to this end. This reflects a distinction between a more libertarian approach of communization, revolutionary spontaneity, and workers' self-management, and a more vanguardist or communist party-driven approach through the development of a constitutional socialist state followed by Friedrich Engels' withering away of the state.

Shripad Amrit Dange Indian Politician

Shripad Amrut Dange was an Indian Politician who was a founding member of the Communist Party of India (CPI) and a stalwart of Indian trade union movement. During the 20th century, Dange was arrested by the authorities for communist and trade union activities and was jailed for an overall period of 13 years.

Socialism in India is a political movement founded early in the 20th century, as a part of the broader movement to gain Indian independence from colonial rule. The movement grew quickly in popularity as it espoused the causes of India's farmers and labourers against the zamindars, princely class and landed gentry. Socialism shaped the principal economic and social policies of the Indian government but mostly followed Dirigisme after independence until the early 1990s, when India moved towards a more market-based economy. However, it remains a potent influence on Indian politics, with many national and regional political parties espousing democratic socialism.

Communism in India (1925–1964) has existed as a social or political ideology as well as a political movement since at least as early as the 1920s. In its early years, communist ideology was harshly suppressed through legal prohibitions and criminal prosecutions. Eventually, communist parties became ensconced in national party politics, sprouting several political offshoots.

Naxalite–Maoist insurgency Armed conflict in India between the state and Maoists

The Naxalite–Maoist insurgency, officially referred to as the Left Wing Extremism (LWE), is an ongoing conflict between Maoist groups known as Naxalites or Naxals and the Indian government. The influence zone of LWE is called the Red corridor, which has been steadily declining in terms of geographical coverage and number of violent incidents, and in 2021 it was confined to the 25 "most affected" locations and 70 "total affected" districts across 10 states in two coal-rich, remote, forested hilly clusters in and around the Dandakaranya-Chhattisgarh-Odisha region and the tri-junction area of Jharkhand-Bihar and-West Bengal. The Naxalites have frequently targeted tribal, police and government workers in what they say is a fight for improved land rights and more jobs for neglected agricultural labourers and the poor.

Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) People's War, usually called People's War Group (PWG), was an underground communist party in India. It merged with the Maoist Communist Centre of India to form the Communist Party of India (Maoist) in 2004. Muppala Lakshmana Rao ('Ganapathi') was the general secretary of the party. The ideology of the party was Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.

Marxist schools of thought Group perspectives regarding Marxism

Marxism is a method of socioeconomic analysis that originates in the works of 19th century German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism analyzes and critiques the development of class society and especially of capitalism as well as the role of class struggles in systemic, economic, social and political change. It frames capitalism through a paradigm of exploitation and analyzes class relations and social conflict using a materialist interpretation of historical development – materialist in the sense that the politics and ideas of an epoch are determined by the way in which material production is carried on.

Hare Krishna Konar Indian revolutionary and politician (1915–1974)

Hare Krishna Konar was an Indian Marxist revolutionary, radical activist and Communist politician. Konar was a founding member of Communist Party of India (Marxist), and the leader to start the first land reforms and agrarian reforms in India as well as the chief architect of the West Bengal land and property distribution. In 1930s for making arms and bombs for the Jugantar group, he was deported to the Cellular Jail for 6 years at the age of 18 and there he took part in the first hunger strike and in 1935 he founded the Communist Consolidation and led the historical second hunger strike. Konar was the mentor of freedom fighters like Batukeshwar Dutt, Shiv Verma, Sachindra Nath Sanyal, Ganesh Ghosh, etc.

Satyanarayan Singh was an Indian communist politician. Singh was one of the early leaders of the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist), being its secretary in Bihar.

Anti-revisionism is a position within Marxism–Leninism which emerged in the 1950s in opposition to the reforms of Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev. Where Khrushchev pursued an interpretation that differed from his predecessor Joseph Stalin, the anti-revisionists within the international communist movement remained dedicated to Stalin's ideological legacy and criticized the Soviet Union under Khrushchev and his successors as state capitalist and social imperialist.

Marxism–Leninism–Maoism (MLM) is a political philosophy that synthesizes and builds upon Marxism–Leninism and Maoism. Its proponents refer to Marxism–Leninism–Maoism as Maoism and Maoism as Mao Zedong Thought (MZT) or Marxism–Leninism–Mao Zedong Thought. Marxism–Leninism–Maoism was first formalized by the Shining Path in 1982.

The Revolutionary Internationalist Movement (RIM) was an international communist organization founded in France in March 1984 by 17 various Maoist organisations around the world. It sought to "struggle for the formation of a Communist International of a new type, based on Marxism–Leninism–Maoism". The RIM appears to be defunct as are many of the founding organisations and many changed their names over the years, or have dropped active armed struggle.

Outline of Marxism Overview of and topical guide to Marxism

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to Marxism:

<i>Continuity and Rupture</i> 2016 book by J. Moufawad-Paul

Continuity and Rupture: Philosophy in the Maoist Terrain is a 2016 book written by J. Moufawad-Paul. The book provides a philosophical analysis of the theoretical foundation of the Marxist school of thought developed by Chinese revolutionary Mao Zedong, Maoism. Moufawad-Paul argues that the political ideology of Maoism, despite being formulated in the 1960s, only achieved full theoretical maturity in 1988 in Peru.

References

  1. ↑ Schoenfeld, Benjamin N. "Kerala in Crisis." Pacific Affairs 32, no. 3 (1959): 235-48.
  2. ↑ Ibid. 235
  3. ↑ Friedman, Edward. "Maoism and the Liberation of the Poor." World Politics 39, no. 3 (1987): 408-28
  4. ↑ Gregor, A. James, and Maria Hsia Chang. "Maoism and Marxism in Comparative Perspective." The Review of Politics 40, no. 3 (1978). 313.
  5. ↑ Roberts, B. R. "Peasants and Proletarians." Annual Review of Sociology 16 (1990): 353-77
  6. ↑ Zagoria, Donald S. "The Ecology of Peasant Communism in India." The American Political Science Review 65, no. 1
  7. ↑ Roberts, B. R. "Peasants and Proletarians." Annual Review of Sociology
  8. ↑ Gregor, A. James, and Maria Hsia Chang. "Maoism and Marxism in Comparative Perspective." The Review of Politics 40, no. 3 (1978): 318
  9. ↑ Zagoria, Donald S. "The Ecology of Peasant Communism in India." The American Political Science Review 65, no. 1 (1971): 145
  10. ↑ Schoenfeld, Benjamin N. "Kerala in Crisis." Pacific Affairs, 236.
  11. ↑ Avineri, Shlomo. "Marx and Modernization." The Review of Politics 31, no. 2 (1969): 172
  12. ↑ Ibid 176
  13. ↑ Ibid 176
  14. ↑ Ibid 177
  15. ↑ Laski, Harold J. "Introduction to the Communist Manifesto." Social Scientist 27, no. 1/4 (1999): 52
  16. ↑ Ibid 51
  17. ↑ Ibid 51
  18. ↑ Nizami, Taufiq Ahmad. "Marxism and the Communist Party of India." The Indian Journal of Political Science 29, no. 2 (1968): 113.
  19. ↑ http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/arc/INDIA_1977_E.PDF [ bare URL PDF ]
  20. ↑ Kumar, Ashutosh. "Marx and Engles on India." The Indian Journal of Political Science 53, no. 4 (1992): 499.
  21. ↑ Ibid 499
  22. ↑ Ibid 499
  23. ↑ Nizami, Taufiq Ahmad. "Marxism and the Communist Party of India." The Indian Journal of Political Science (1968): 110.
  24. ↑ M. Thomas Isaac. "Communist Movement in Kerala: In the Electoral Mirror." Economic and Political Weekly 19, no. 5 (1984): 201
  25. ↑ Schoenfeld, Benjamin N. "Emergency Rule in India." Pacific Affairs 36, no. 3 (1963): 221-37.
  26. ↑ Ibid 221
  27. ↑ Ibid 225
  28. ↑ Morris-Jones, W. H. "Whose Emergency — India's or Indira's?" The World Today 31, no. 11 (1975): 451
  29. ↑ Schoenfeld, Benjamin N. "Emergency Rule in India." (1963), 227
  30. ↑ Ibid, 452
  31. ↑ “The Constitution of India”. Article 352, (1-9)
  32. ↑ Frank, Andre Gunder. "Emergence of Permanent Emergency in India." Economic and Political Weekly 12, no. 11 (1977): 463-75.
  33. ↑ Morris-Jones, W.H, (1975), 454.
  34. ↑ Ibid, 454
  35. ↑ Morris-Jones (1975), 460.
  36. ↑ Bryjak, George J. "The Economics of Assassination: The Punjab Crisis and the Death of Indira Gandhi." (1985): 32-34.
  37. ↑ Dash, Satya Prakash. “Naxal Movement and State Power” Sarup & Sons, 2006. 24
  38. ↑ Ibid 24.
  39. ↑ Kozicki, Richard J. "The Demise of Indian Democracy." Asian Affairs 2, no. 6 (1975), 355.
  40. ↑ Zagoria, Donald S. "The Ecology of Peasant Communism in India." The American Political Science Review (1971). 145
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.