Chinese settlements in Tibet

Last updated

Tibetan independence groups have alleged that the influx of Han Chinese people to Tibet, sometimes sponsored by the Chinese government, is an attempt to sinicize the region. Some academics have described it as a form of Han settler colonialism. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

Context

Tibet came under the control of the Qing dynasty in the 18th century. [4] It gained de facto independence after China's 1911 Revolution. The People's Republic of China (PRC) annexed Tibet between 1950 and 1951. After the 14th Dalai Lama fled to India in 1959, the PRC established the Tibet Autonomous Region in 1965. [5]

The influx of Chinese migrants goes back centuries, as the neighboring regions have had conflicts other than the current tensions. [6] Another modern assimilation attempt of Tibet from China was during the Cultural Revolution movement. [6] Another submovement of modern Tibetan immigration was through the Cadre Transfer Policy in the 1980s by the "Tibetan Party Committee". [7]

Motives

In 1991 the Dalai Lama declared:

The new Chinese settlers have created an alternate society: a Chinese apartheid which, denying Tibetans equal social and economic status in our own land, threatens to finally overwhelm and absorb us. [8] [9]

Another potential motive of Chinese settlements is to gain access to the once-protected Indian-Chinese border. [10]

Chinese migrants are incentivized with major personal economic benefits. [7] Publications report salary increases averaging at 71.8% of the migrant's previous salary. [7] Monthly allowances are also provided, the amount fluctuating according to the migrant's residence "hardship level". [7] Children of the Cadre Transfer Policy migrants are given priority job assignments. [7]

This policy itself created an influx of Han Chinese migrants as well, but this more focused approach was described as an attempt to promote economic development. [7]

Economic incentives

After China enacted a policy to develop Tibet economically in the 1980s, the majority of migrants entering Tibet came from the neighboring Sichuan province, dwarfing the number of Chinese Communist Party cadres. They were mostly men who had left Sichuan due to overpopulation and poverty. Because of the Hukou residency system in China, migrants do not automatically obtain new legal residency. In addition, due to the perceived lower quality of education in Tibet, many of them intend to return to Sichuan to marry and have children after making money. [11]

Migration statistics

In 1999 Lobsang Sangay, a leader of the Tibetan Youth Congress, alleged in the Harvard Asia Quarterly that 60-70% of the population in Lhasa now is Chinese and, outside of the traditional Tibetan "Barkhor" market, Tibetans own only 400-450 of the 3,500 to 4,000 shops. [12] Han Chinese also occupy most government-related employment with 95 percent of official Chinese immigrants employed in state owned enterprises.[ citation needed ]

Although reports are highly censored and misrepresented, [10] [13] some statistics have been obtained. The Office of Tibet claims that misrepresentation currently is affected by a lack of residence permits held by migrants. [10] The Office of Tibet also claims that militant occupation consists of "at least a quarter million", focused in the city of Lhasa. [10] They claim that Tibetans in urban Eastern areas are outnumbered at least 2 to 1, however there are very few Chinese in rural areas. [10]

Some migrants are more accurately described as drifters because they feel alienated in their home provinces yet are not attached enough to stay in Tibet permanently. They are attracted to a less modern, slower-paced lifestyle but still have to work for a living, setting them apart from more affluent lifestyle migrants. [14]

Impact on local communities

The influx of migrant workers have caused resentment among Tibetans and longtime Han residents. Almost all small businesses, such as shops and restaurants, were started and run by Sichuanese. They also tend to have a larger guanxi network to government and business resources outside Tibet. [11]

Neutrality

Some publications claim that every Chinese immigration influx isn't with mal intent. [7] [6] The Cadre Transfer Policy wasn't an assimilation attempt because the number of Chinese immigrants was minimal compared to other periods; instead it was an attempt to promote economic development of the newly annexed region. [7] Professionals were sent to the area in "low quantity but high quality". [7] There are also claims that earlier Chinese migration was a natural phenomenon caused by the natural passing of time causing the replacing of their "barbarian" culture. [6]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tibet</span> Ethno-cultural region in Asia

Tibet, or Greater Tibet, is a region in the western part of East Asia, covering much of the Tibetan Plateau and spanning about 2,500,000 km2 (970,000 sq mi). It is the homeland of the Tibetan people. Also resident on the plateau are other ethnic groups such as Mongols, Monpa, Tamang, Qiang, Sherpa, Lhoba, and since the 20th century Han Chinese and Hui. After the annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China in 1951, the entire plateau has been under the administration of the People's Republic of China. Tibet is divided administratively into the Tibet Autonomous Region and parts of the Qinghai, Gansu, Yunnan and Sichuan provinces. Tibet is also constitutionally claimed by the Republic of China as the Tibet Area since 1912. Tibet is the highest region on Earth, with an average elevation of 4,380 m (14,000 ft). Located in the Himalayas, the highest elevation in Tibet is Mount Everest, Earth's highest mountain, rising 8,848 m (29,000 ft) above sea level.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Tibet</span>

While the Tibetan plateau has been inhabited since pre-historic times, most of Tibet's history went unrecorded until the creation of Tibetan script in the 7th century. Tibetan texts refer to the kingdom of Zhangzhung as the precursor of later Tibetan kingdoms and the originators of the Bon religion. While mythical accounts of early rulers of the Yarlung dynasty exist, historical accounts begin with the introduction of Tibetan script from the unified Tibetan Empire in the 7th century. Following the dissolution of the empire and a period of fragmentation in the 9th-10th centuries, a Buddhist revival in the 10th–12th centuries saw the development of three of the four major schools of Tibetan Buddhism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amdo</span> Traditional region of Tibet

Amdo or Domey is one of the three traditional Tibetan regions, the others being Ü-Tsang in the west and Kham in the east. Amdo encompasses a large area from the Machu to the Drichu (Yangtze). It is mostly coterminous with China's present-day Qinghai province, but also includes small portions of Sichuan and Gansu provinces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tibetan independence movement</span> Independence movement in East Asia

The Tibetan independence movement is the political movement advocating for the reversal of the 1950 annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China, and the separation and independence of Greater Tibet from China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Choekyi Gyaltsen, 10th Panchen Lama</span> 10th Panchen Lama of the Gelug School of Tibetan Buddhism (1938–1989)

Lobsang Trinley Lhündrub Chökyi Gyaltsen was the tenth Panchen Lama, officially the 10th Panchen Erdeni, of the Gelug school of Tibetan Buddhism. According to Tibetan Buddhism, Panchen Lamas are living emanations of the buddha Amitabha. He was often referred to simply as Choekyi Gyaltsen.

The Tibetan sovereignty debate concerns two political debates regarding the relationship between Tibet and China. The first debate concerns whether Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) and parts of neighboring provinces are within the People's Republic of China (PRC) that are claimed as political Tibet should separate themselves from China and re-establish themselves as they were prior to 1959. Many of the points in this political debate rest on the points which are within the second debate, about whether Tibet was independent or subordinate to China during certain periods of its history. China has claimed control over Tibet since the 13th century, though this has been contested. All countries officially recognize Tibet as part of the People’s Republic of China and do not acknowledge it as an independent state. While Tibetan independence advocates argue Tibet had periods of de facto independence, Chinese control was solidified in the 1950s. Today, Tibet has limited autonomy under Beijing’s oversight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zhao Erfeng</span> Chinese official and bannerman (1845–1911)

Zhao Erfeng (1845–1911), courtesy name Jihe, was a late Qing Dynasty official and Han Chinese bannerman who belonged to the Plain Blue Banner. He was an assistant amban in Tibet at Chamdo in Kham. He was appointed in March 1908 under Lien Yu, the main amban in Lhasa. Formerly Director-General of the Sichuan-Hubei Railway and acting viceroy of Sichuan province, Zhao was a much-maligned Chinese general of the late imperial era who led military campaigns throughout Kham, earning himself the nickname "the Butcher of Kham" and "Zhao the Butcher".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Tibet (1950–present)</span>

The history of Tibet from 1950 to the present includes the Chinese annexation of Tibet, during which Tibetan representatives signed the controversial Seventeen Point Agreement following the Battle of Chamdo and establishing an autonomous administration led by the 14th Dalai Lama under Chinese sovereignty. Subsequent socialist reforms and other unpopular policies of the Chinese Communist Party led to armed uprisings, eventually assisted by the CIA, and their violent suppression. During the 1959 Tibetan uprising, the 14th Dalai Lama escaped to northern India for fear of being captured by Chinese forces. He formed the Central Tibetan Administration and rescinded the Seventeen Point Agreement. In 1965, the majority of Tibet's land mass, including all of U-Tsang and parts of Kham and Amdo, was established as the Tibet Autonomous Region. Tibetans suffered along with the rest of China during the Great Chinese Famine and the Cultural Revolution under episodes of starvation, religious repression, destruction of cultural sites, forced labour, and political persecution. US-China rapprochement in the 1970s saw an end to Washington's support for Tibetan guerillas. Amid broader reforms across the country, China adopted policies to improve conditions in Tibet. Since the 2000s, it has invested heavily in the region but generated controversies due to the sinicization of Tibet. Human rights abuses remain a concern especially where it comes to freedom of religion and political prisoners.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies</span>

The Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, formerly called Central University for Tibetan Studies (CUTS), is a Deemed University founded in Sarnath, Varanasi, India, in 1967, as an autonomous organisation under Union Ministry of Culture. The CIHTS was founded by Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru in consultation with Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama, with the aim of educating Tibetan youths in exile and Himalayan border students as well as with the aim of retranslating lost Indo-Buddhist Sanskrit texts that now existed only in Tibetan, into Sanskrit, to Hindi, and other modern Indian languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1959 Tibetan uprising</span> Uprising in Lhasa, Tibet, against the Peoples Republic of China

The 1959 Tibetan uprising began on 10 March 1959, when a revolt erupted in Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, which had been under the effective control of the People's Republic of China (PRC) since the Seventeen Point Agreement was reached in 1951. The initial uprising occurred amid general Chinese-Tibetan tensions and a context of confusion, because Tibetan protesters feared that the Chinese government might arrest the 14th Dalai Lama. The protests were also fueled by anti-Chinese sentiment and separatism. At first, the uprising mostly consisted of peaceful protests, but clashes quickly erupted and the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) eventually used force to quell the protests. Some of the protesters had captured arms. The last stages of the uprising included heavy fighting, with high civilian and military losses. The 14th Dalai Lama escaped from Lhasa, while the city was fully retaken by Chinese security forces on 23 March 1959. Thousands of Tibetans were killed during the 1959 uprising, but the exact number of deaths is disputed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China</span> 1950–51 annexation of territory in Asia

Tibet came under the control of People's Republic of China (PRC) after the Government of Tibet signed the Seventeen Point Agreement which the 14th Dalai Lama ratified on 24 October 1951, but later repudiated on the grounds that he had rendered his approval for the agreement under duress. This occurred after attempts by the Tibetan Government to gain international recognition, efforts to modernize its military, negotiations between the Government of Tibet and the PRC, and a military conflict in the Chamdo area of western Kham in October 1950. The series of events came to be called the "Peaceful Liberation of Tibet" by the Chinese government, and the "Chinese invasion of Tibet" by the Central Tibetan Administration and the Tibetan diaspora.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ming–Tibet relations</span> Relations between Ming-dynasty China and Tibet

The Ming dynasty considered Tibet to be part of the Western Regions. While the Ming dynasty at its height had some degree of influence in Tibet, the exact nature of their relations is under dispute by modern scholars. Analysis of the relationship is further complicated by modern political conflicts and the application of Westphalian sovereignty to a time when the concept did not exist. The Historical Status of China's Tibet, a book published by the People's Republic of China, asserts that the Ming dynasty had unquestioned sovereignty over Tibet by pointing to the Ming court's issuing of various titles to Tibetan leaders, Tibetans' full acceptance of the titles, and a renewal process for successors of these titles that involved traveling to the Ming capital. Scholars in China also argue that Tibet has been an integral part of China since the 13th century and so it was a part of the Ming Empire. However, most scholars outside China, such as Turrell V. Wylie, Melvyn C. Goldstein, and Helmut Hoffman, say that the relationship was one of suzerainty, Ming titles were only nominal, Tibet remained an independent region outside Ming control, and it simply paid tribute until the Jiajing Emperor, who ceased relations with Tibet.

There is a prolonged public disagreement over the extent and nature of serfdom in Tibet prior to the annexation of Tibet into the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1951. The debate is political in nature, with some arguing that the ultimate goal on the Chinese side is to legitimize Chinese control of the territory now known as the Tibet Autonomous Region or Xizang Autonomous Region, and others arguing that the ultimate goal on the Western side is to weaken or undermine the Chinese state. The argument is that Tibetan culture, government, and society were feudal in nature prior to the PRC takeover of Tibet and that this only changed due to PRC policy in the region. The pro-Tibetan independence movement argument is that this is a misrepresentation of history created as a political tool in order to justify the Sinicization of Tibet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sinicization of Tibet</span> Forced assimilation by China

The sinicization of Tibet includes the programs and laws of the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to force cultural assimilation in Tibetan areas of China, including the Tibet Autonomous Region and the surrounding Tibetan-designated autonomous areas. The efforts are undertaken by China in order to remake Tibetan culture into mainstream Chinese culture.

Human rights in Tibet has been a subject of intense international scrutiny and debate, particularly since the annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China. Before the 1950s, Tibet's social structure was marked by inequality and described as a caste-like system or, controversially, as serfdom. Severe punishments, including permanent mutilation of body parts, were common, although capital punishment was banned in 1913. Muslim warlord Ma Bufang caused widespread destruction and deaths in Amdo, which is located northeast of Central Tibet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protests and uprisings in Tibet since 1950</span>

Protests and uprisings against the government of the People's Republic of China have occurred in Tibet since 1950, and include the 1959 uprising, the 2008 uprising, and the subsequent self-immolation protests.

Worried about its national interests after a 1903 British expedition, Qing China in 1910 sent a military force of 2,000 troops to Tibet, then its protectorate, to increase its authority in the region. This led to turmoil in Tibet, causing the Dalai Lama to flee to British India and a rupture in Sino-Tibetan relations.

Prostitution in Tibet is thought to have existed for centuries. Testimonies of its existence were provided by outside visitors in the first half of the twentieth century. According to the British writer Christopher Hale, due to the practice of polyandry in Tibet, many women were unable to find a husband and moved to villages and towns, where they fell into prostitution. Their clients came from the caravans crossing the Tibetan plateau, and also from the monasteries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tibet under Qing rule</span> Tibetan history from 1720 to 1912

Tibet under Qing rule refers to the Qing dynasty's rule over Tibet from 1720 to 1912. The Qing rulers incorporated Tibet into the empire along with other Inner Asia territories, although the actual extent of the Qing dynasty's control over Tibet during this period has been the subject of political debate. The Qing called Tibet a fanbu, fanbang or fanshu, which has usually been translated as "vassal", "vassal state", or "borderlands", along with areas like Xinjiang and Mongolia. Like the preceding Yuan dynasty, the Manchus of the Qing dynasty exerted military and administrative control over Tibet, while granting it a degree of political autonomy.

Han chauvinism is an ideology that speaks out for the ethnic Han Chinese people and its uniqueness throughout human history. Han chauvinists believe that the current influence from the West has downgraded the development of China's own cultural customs, and in response, it has become instrumental in leading the increasingly traditionalist movement, which was launched in 2001. Participants come together both online and in person in cities across China to revitalize their vision of the authentic "Great Han" and corresponding "real China" through traditional ethnic dress and Confucian ritual.

References

  1. ↑ McGranahan, Carole (2019-12-17). "Chinese Settler Colonialism: Empire and Life in the Tibetan Borderlands". In Gros, Stéphane (ed.). Frontier Tibet: Patterns of Change in the Sino-Tibetan Borderlands. Amsterdam University Press. pp. 517–540. doi: 10.2307/j.ctvt1sgw7.22 . ISBN   978-90-485-4490-5. JSTOR   j.ctvt1sgw7.22 .
  2. ↑ Ramanujan, Shaurir (2022-12-09). "Reclaiming the Land of the Snows: Analyzing Chinese Settler Colonialism in Tibet". The Columbia Journal of Asia. 1 (2): 29–36. doi: 10.52214/cja.v1i2.10012 . ISSN   2832-8558.
  3. ↑ Wang, Ju-Han Zoe; Roche, Gerald (March 16, 2021). "Urbanizing Minority Minzu in the PRC: Insights from the Literature on Settler Colonialism" . Modern China . 48 (3): 593–616. doi:10.1177/0097700421995135. ISSN   0097-7004. S2CID   233620981. Archived from the original on 15 June 2024. Retrieved 7 October 2023.
  4. ↑ Herman, John (June 2014). "Collaboration and Resistance on the Southwest Frontier: Early Eighteenth-Century Qing Expansion on Two Fronts". Late Imperial China . 35 (1): 77–112. doi:10.1353/late.2014.0001. ISSN   1086-3257.
  5. ↑ "The story of Dalai Lama' escape from Tibet". Salute . 2020-11-28. Archived from the original on 2021-01-13. Retrieved 2022-01-20.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Smith, Warren (2019-07-31). Tibetan Nation: A History Of Tibetan Nationalism And Sino-tibetan Relations. Routledge. ISBN   978-1-000-61228-8.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Yasheng Huang (April 1995). "China's Cadre Transfer Policy toward Tibet in the 1980s". Modern China. 21 (2): 184–204. doi:10.1177/009770049502100202. hdl: 2027.42/68381 . ISSN   0097-7004. S2CID   220737848.
  8. ↑ "Profile: The Dalai Lama", BBC News , April 25, 2006.
  9. ↑ United States Congressional Serial Set, United States Government Printing Office, 1993, p. 110.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Tibet, Office of. "Invasion & After" . Retrieved 2022-04-29.
  11. 1 2 Hessler, Peter (February 1999). "Tibet Through Chinese Eyes (Part Three)". The Atlantic . Retrieved 2024-11-27.
  12. ↑ "Harvard Asia Quarterly - China in Tibet: Forty Years of Liberation or Occupation?". August 24, 2007. Archived from the original on 24 August 2007.
  13. ↑ Crete-Nishihata, Masashi; Tsui, Lokman (2021-09-08). ""The truth of what's happening" How Tibetan exile media develop and maintain journalistic authority". Journalism. 24 (2): 295–312. doi: 10.1177/14648849211044899 . ISSN   1464-8849. S2CID   239413863.
  14. ↑ Zhang, Jinfu; Xiao, Honggen (2021-05-01). "Liquid identities: Han sojourners in Tibet". Annals of Tourism Research. 88: 103157. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2021.103157. ISSN   0160-7383.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.