Commissions of sewers

Last updated

The "old sea bank", built in the medieval era to protect part of The Fens from flooding Old 'Sea Bank' near Fosdyke Bridge - geograph.org.uk - 237729.jpg
The "old sea bank", built in the medieval era to protect part of The Fens from flooding
A medieval ditch and bank, constructed for flood defence in West Sussex Drainage Ditch near Ford - geograph.org.uk - 733817.jpg
A medieval ditch and bank, constructed for flood defence in West Sussex

Commissions of sewers, originally known as commissions de wallis et fossatis (Law Latin: "commissions of walls and ditches [or dikes]") [1] were English public bodies, established by Royal decree, that investigated matters of land drainage and flood defence. The commissions developed from commissions of oyer and terminer in the 13th century and had powers to compel labourers to work on flood defences and extract funding for repairs from landowners. The commissions were placed on a statutory basis in 1427 by an act of parliament and were strengthened by later acts such as the 1531 Statute of Sewers and the Commissions of Sewers Act 1708. The commissions were abolished by the 1930 Land Drainage Act, though some survived until after the Second World War. Their duties were assumed by internal drainage boards and river authorities.

Contents

Records have not survived from commissions before the early modern era but later commissions sat in sessions similar to the judicial Quarter Sessions. Commissioners, appointed by royal order, were sometimes known as "justices of sewers". Key officers included the clerk, expenditor (treasurer) and bailiffs (elected by each parish). Other local officers were also sometimes appointed to enforce orders of the commission.

13th century origins

The commissions de wallis et fossatis had their origins in the 13th century. It appears that previously drainage issues had been dealt with by commissions of oyer and terminer, sittings of judges of assizes to resolve disputes. Henry of Bath sat on such a commission in 1257 to decide a dispute between landowners over the maintenance of ditches and flood defences on Romney Marsh. After passing judgement he was appointed to another commission of oyer and terminer the following year that looked into the matter of flood defences in the area. This was a commission de wallis et fossatis in all but name. [2]

Commissions de wallis et fossatis were established by the later part of the century, the first on the River Thames (at West Ham) was convened in August 1280. [1] The commissions drew their members from the local landowners, supplemented with a small number of civil servants and court officials. They were largely reactive in nature, being formed in response to petitions from landowners concerned over the state of flood defences or in response to actual flooding events. [1] Their remit extended to embankments and drainage ditches (often referred to as sewers, though not in the modern sense) and the commissions had powers to exact funds for repairs from landowners they deemed to be negligent. [3] [4] The jurisdiction of 13th century commissions was often wide-ranging, covering entire counties. [5]

14th century

Climatic conditions in the early 14th century led to worse flooding and the need for additional defences in the East of England and Somerset. Many landowners refused to take responsibility for the works and commissions de wallis et fossatis had to be formed in order to compel defences to be built. [6] The number of commissions rose in the early part of the century, reaching a minor peak in the 1320s. There was a slow rise in number to a significant peak in 1380, after which the number of commissions dropped off rapidly. [1] The increase in number of commissions was partly due to them becoming more local in nature but also due to increased numbers of flooding events, such as the damaging storm surges in 1374 and 1375. [5] [7]

The increase in number of commissions may also be a result of the Black Death, with plague deaths in 1348–49 affecting labour availability. The increased cost of labour led to less flood defence work being carried out by landowners. Some commissions in this period had powers to compel labourers to work and to arrest and imprison those refusing to do so. Such measures were resented by the peasantry and the 1381 Peasants' Revolt may have led to a reduction in commissions to placate the workers. [5]

Flooding events increased in the late part of the century and flood defences, such as those implemented by repeated commissions at Southwark, became less effective. [8] [5] Investment in flood defences also reduced markedly, possibly as a pragmatic decision that change in land use was inevitable in some locations. Such an area was the farmland at Barking Abbey, which was allowed to be inundated and devolve into salt marshes. [9] Continued increase in labour costs and a drop in grain and livestock prices made farmland less valuable so there was likely a reduction in the number of petitions sent to the crown. [5]

15th century and later

There was a modest revival in the use of the commissions in the first decade of the 15th century. Most of these commissions were focussed on tidal river areas. [1] The commissions were first placed on a statutory basis in 1427 under an act of parliament (6 Henry VI. c. 5.). [5] The statute seems to have simply codified existing practice, for example the powers it provided to commissions to appoint local officers were already used by commissions in the 13th century and had been specified in the orders appointing the commissions by 1377. The purpose of the statute may have been to encourage the wider adoption of best practices in use at Romney Marsh, where flood defences were supervised continuously by local officials. [10] The 1427 statute was challenged legally and parliament had to pass an amended act in 1429, to confirm the powers of the commissions. [11]

The powers of the commissions were strengthened by the 1531 Statute of Sewers and later legislation, such as the Commissions of Sewers Act 1708, was based on this. In later years the commissions of sewers sat in a court, similar to that of the Quarter Sessions. The commissions were similar to justices of the peace, and were sometimes referred to as "justices of sewers". The commission might have jurisdiction over a locality, a whole county or parts of two counties. Where a whole county was covered commissions often established subsidiary courts to control localities. Procedure, though modelled after the "ancient custom of Romney Marsh", were often amended to suit local conditions. The principal officers were the clerk (who kept records), the expenditor (treasurer) and the bailiff (sometimes, such as in Lincolnshire, known as dikereeves). The latter were elected by parishes (two bailiffs each) and played a similar role to the constables of the Quarter Sessions. [12] Sometimes additional local officers were appointed such as a pinder who was appointed in Skegness in 1574 to enforce an order from the commission prohibiting the grazing of cattle on flood defences and marshes. [13]

A jury presented evidence to the court of the state of drainage and flood defences and suggested persons who should be liable to pay for their upkeep. This was often charged as a rate (sometimes known as a scot) based on the acreage of each landowner that would benefit from the works. The commissions relied increasingly on reports from professional surveyors and engineers and less on the juries from the late 18th century. [12] Where land was reclaimed from the sea the responsibility for drainage often fell to enclosure commissioners rather than the sewer commissioners. [14]

The commissions were abolished by the Land Drainage Act of 1930, though some survived until after the Second World War. [13] Their work was continued by the internal drainage boards and river authorities. [12] No records survive from commissions held before the mid 16th century but later records have survived and include detailed land maps. [12] [13] The records normally devolved to the successor internal drainage board or river authority, but sometimes were kept by the last clerks, often local solicitors or were deposited in local record offices or parish chest. [14]

Related Research Articles

Special districts are independent, special-purpose governmental units that exist separately from local governments such as county, municipal, and township governments, with substantial administrative and fiscal independence. They are formed to perform a single function or a set of related functions. The term special district governments as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau excludes school districts. In 2017, the U.S. had more than 51,296 special district governments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">River Rother, East Sussex</span> River in East Sussex and Kent, England

The River Rother flows for 35 miles (56 km) through the English counties of East Sussex and Kent. Its source is near Rotherfield in East Sussex, and its mouth is on Rye Bay, part of the English Channel. Prior to 1287, its mouth was further to the east at New Romney, but it changed its course after a great storm blocked its exit to the sea. It was known as the Limen until the sixteenth century. For the final 14 miles (23 km), the river bed is below the high tide level, and Scots Float sluice is used to control levels. It prevents salt water entering the river system at high tides, and retains water in the river during the summer months to ensure the health of the surrounding marsh habitat. Below the sluice, the river is tidal for 3.7 miles (6.0 km).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shire court</span> Anglo-Saxon legal institution

A Shire court, or moot was an Anglo-Saxon government institution, used to maintain law and order at a local level, and perform various administrative functions, including the collection of taxes for the central government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caldicot and Wentloog Levels</span> Coastal plain and wetlands in Monmouthshire, Wales

The Caldicot and Wentloog Levels are two areas of low-lying estuarine alluvial wetland and intertidal mudflats adjoining the north bank of the Severn Estuary, either side of the River Usk estuary near Newport in south east Wales. They are also known collectively as the Monmouthshire Levels or Gwent Levels, and the name Wentloog is sometimes spelled Wentlooge in official publications.

River boards were authorities who controlled land drainage, fisheries and river pollution and had other functions relating to rivers, streams and inland waters in England and Wales between 1950 and 1965.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drainage law</span> Area of water law related to drainage of surface water

Drainage law is a specific area of water law related to drainage of surface water on real property. It is particularly important in areas where freshwater is scarce, flooding is common, or water is in high demand for agricultural or commercial purposes.

An ordinary watercourse is one of the two types of watercourse in statutory language in England and Wales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Middle Level Commissioners</span>

The Middle Level Commissioners are a land drainage authority in eastern England. The body was formed in 1862, undertaking the main water level management function within the Middle Level following the breakup of the former Bedford Level Corporation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assizes</span> Periodic courts held around England and Wales until replaced by the Crown Court in 1972

The courts of assize, or assizes, were periodic courts held around England and Wales until 1972, when together with the quarter sessions they were abolished by the Courts Act 1971 and replaced by a single permanent Crown Court. The assizes exercised both civil and criminal jurisdiction, though most of their work was on the criminal side. The assizes heard the most serious cases, most notably those subject to capital punishment or, later, life imprisonment. Other serious cases were dealt with by the quarter sessions, while the more minor offences were dealt with summarily by justices of the peace in petty sessions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hornchurch Marshes</span> Human settlement in England

Hornchurch Marshes is an area of the London Borough of Havering, adjacent to the north bank of the River Thames in London, England. Susceptible to flooding from three adjacent rivers, it was the southernmost marshland section of the ancient parish of Hornchurch. It was used for cattle grazing from the 16th to the 19th century and became industrialised by the 20th century. The eastern part of the Ford Dagenham estate extended into the Hornchurch Marshes and it is now an area of regeneration that includes Beam Reach and part of Beam Park. Two of the Dagenham wind turbines are located there and the Centre for Engineering and Manufacturing Excellence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commissions of Sewers Act 1708</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Commissions of Sewers Act 1708, sometimes called the Commissioners of Sewers Act 1708, was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain. It concerned the duties of boards of commissioners with responsibility for the maintenance of sea banks and other defences, which protected low-lying areas from inundation by the sea, and the removal of obstructions in streams and rivers caused by mills, weirs and gates. The word sewer had a much broader meaning than in modern usage, and referred generally to streams and watercourses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Land Drainage Act 1930</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Land Drainage Act 1930 was an Act of Parliament passed by the United Kingdom Government which provided a new set of administrative structures to ensure that drainage of low-lying land could be managed effectively. It followed the proposals of a royal commission which sat during 1927.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South Holland IDB</span> Human settlement in England

South Holland IDB is an English internal drainage board set up under the terms of the Land Drainage Act 1930. It has responsibility for the land drainage of 148.43 square miles (384.4 km2) of low-lying land in South Lincolnshire. It is unusual as its catchment area is the same as the area of the drainage district, and so it does not have to deal with water flowing into the area from surrounding higher ground. No major rivers flow through the area, although the district is bounded by the River Welland to the west and the River Nene to the east.

Adventurers were groups of English engineers and wealthy landowners, who funded large-scale land drainage projects in the seventeenth century, in return for rights to some of the land reclaimed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Land Drainage Act 1961</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Land Drainage Act 1961 was an Act of Parliament passed by the United Kingdom Government which provided mechanisms for river boards to raise additional finance to fund their obligations. It built upon the provisions of the Land Drainage Act 1930 and the River Boards Act 1948.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beverley and Barmston Drain</span> Drainage canal in East Riding of Yorkshire, England

The Beverley and Barmston Drain is the main feature of a land drainage scheme authorised in 1798 to the west of the River Hull in the East Riding of Yorkshire, England. The area consisted of salt marshes to the south and carrs to the north, fed with water from the higher wolds which lay to the north, and from inundation by tidal water passing up the river from the Humber. Some attempts to reduce the flooding by building embankments had been made by the fourteenth century, and windpumps appeared in the seventeenth century. The Holderness Drainage scheme, which protected the area to the east of the river, was completed in 1772, and attention was then given to resolving flooding of the carrs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">River Till, Lincolnshire</span> River in Lincolnshire, England

The River Till is a river in the county of Lincolnshire in England and is ultimately a tributary of the River Witham. Its upper reaches drain the land east of Gainsborough. The middle section is embanked, as the water level is higher than that of the surrounding land, and pumping stations pump water from low level drainage ditches into the river. Its lower reaches from the hamlet of Odder near Saxilby into the city of Lincoln were canalised, possibly as early as Roman times, as part of the Foss Dyke.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hedon Haven</span> River and port in the East Riding of Yorkshire, England

Hedon Haven is a waterway that connected the Humber Estuary with the port of Hedon, in Holderness, East Riding of Yorkshire, England. The waterway allowed ships to unload at the port in Hedon, which was also known as Hedon Haven and had, at its peak, three canalised arms that stretched into the town. The port at Hedon was the main port for south Holderness between the 12th and 13th centuries, and was the busiest port in Holderness before the docks at Hull were built.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Embanking of the tidal Thames</span> Historical process by which the shallow, natural River Thames was turned into a tidal canal

The Embanking of the tidal Thames is the historical process by which the lower River Thames, at one time a broad, shallow waterway winding through malarious marshlands, has been transformed by human intervention into a deep, narrow tidal canal flowing between solid artificial walls, and restrained by these at high tide. The Victorian civil engineering works in central London, usually called "the Embankment", are just a small part of the process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sarah Pearsall</span> American historian

Sarah Marjorie Savage Pearsall is an American historian specialized in the history of North America between c. 1500 and c. 1800. She is a professor and director of undergraduate studies at the Johns Hopkins University Zanvyl Krieger School of Arts and Sciences.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Galloway, James A.; Potts, Jonathan S. (2007). "Marine Flooding in the Thames Estuary and Tidal River C. 1250–1450: Impact and Response". Area. 39 (3): 376. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00753.x. ISSN   0004-0894. JSTOR   40346052.
  2. ↑ Richardson, H. G. (1919). "The Early History of Commissions of Sewers". The English Historical Review. 34 (135): 389. ISSN   0013-8266. JSTOR   551072.
  3. ↑ Carlin, Martha (1996). Medieval Southwark. Hambledon Press. p. 232. ISBN   978-1-85285-116-3.
  4. ↑ Hicks, Michael (2019). Richard III: The Self-Made King. Yale University Press. p. 159. ISBN   978-0-300-25304-7.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Galloway, James A.; Potts, Jonathan S. (2007). "Marine Flooding in the Thames Estuary and Tidal River C. 1250–1450: Impact and Response". Area. 39 (3): 377. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00753.x. ISSN   0004-0894. JSTOR   40346052.
  6. ↑ Housley, Norman (2007). Knighthoods of Christ: Essays on the History of the Crusades and the Knights Templar, Presented to Malcolm Barber. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 205. ISBN   978-0-7546-5527-5.
  7. ↑ Soens, Tim (2011). "Floods and money: funding drainage and flood control in coastal Flanders from the thirteenth to the sixteenth centuries". Continuity and Change. 26 (3): 345. doi:10.1017/S0268416011000221. hdl: 10067/930200151162165141 . ISSN   1469-218X. S2CID   144626426.
  8. ↑ Johnson, David J. (1960). Southwark and the City. Corporation of London. p. 78. ISBN   978-0-19-711630-2.
  9. ↑ Soens, Tim (1 November 2018). "Resilient Societies, Vulnerable People: Coping with North Sea Floods Before 1800*". Past & Present. 241 (1): 157. doi: 10.1093/pastj/gty018 . hdl: 10067/1521310151162165141 . ISSN   0031-2746.
  10. ↑ Richardson, H. G. (1919). "The Early History of Commissions of Sewers". The English Historical Review. 34 (135): 391. ISSN   0013-8266. JSTOR   551072.
  11. ↑ Richardson, H. G. (1919). "The Early History of Commissions of Sewers". The English Historical Review. 34 (135): 392. ISSN   0013-8266. JSTOR   551072.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Owen, A. E. B. (1967). "15. Records of Commissions of Sewers". History. 52 (174): 36. doi:10.1111/j.1468-229X.1967.tb01189.x. ISSN   0018-2648. JSTOR   24406262.
  13. 1 2 3 Owen, A. E. B. (1967). "15. Records of Commissions of Sewers". History. 52 (174): 37. doi:10.1111/j.1468-229X.1967.tb01189.x. ISSN   0018-2648. JSTOR   24406262.
  14. 1 2 Owen, A. E. B. (1967). "15. Records of Commissions of Sewers". History. 52 (174): 38. doi:10.1111/j.1468-229X.1967.tb01189.x. ISSN   0018-2648. JSTOR   24406262.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.