Contract Law of Saudi Arabia | |
---|---|
Legal System | |
Hanbali School of Sharia Law, Sunni | |
Sources of Law | |
Quran Sunna Ijma Qiyas | |
Sharia Principles of Contract Law | |
Riba Gharar | |
World Bank Enforcing Contracts Data (2010) [1] | |
Enforcing Contracts Ranking: 140th out of 183 economies Average Number of Procedures: 43 Average Time Taken: 635 days Average Cost: 27.5% of claim, (20% attorney cost, 7.5% court cost) | |
Contract law in Saudi Arabia is governed by the conservative Hanbali school of Sharia law, which adopts a fundamentalist and literal interpretation of the Quran. [2] Any contract that is not specifically prohibited under Sharia law is legally binding, with no discrimination against foreigners or non-Muslims.
The Hanbali school is the most liberal among the four Sunni schools with respect to the freedom of persons to contract. [3] However, the degree of freedom of contract is governed by the prohibitions in the Quran, and two distinctive doctrines in Sharia law: riba (usury) and gharar (speculation).
Unlike other Sharia law jurisdictions, Sharia law remains uncodified in Saudi Arabia due to the strong literalist view of the Hanbali school. There is also no established case reporting in the courts. This has led to much uncertainty and variation in court decisions. Despite being the world's 11th easiest economy to do business in, Saudi Arabia ranks 140th out of 183 economies in terms of enforcement of contracts. (see below: Appendix)
In 2007, King Abdullah initiated legal reforms to modernise the courts and codify Sharia law in Saudi Arabia. The ulama, the religious body, approved a codification of Sharia law in 2010, and a sourcebook of legal principles and precedents was published on January 3, 2018. (see below: Legal Reform)
Saudi Arabia is principally governed by Sharia Law, with royal decrees playing a complementary role.
The Hanbali school of law acknowledges the following sources of law:
Both ijmas and qiyas constitute fiqh , Islamic jurisprudence based upon scholar opinions amassed over the years. [6]
Ordinances (nizam), consisting of royal decrees which address modern legal issues and bureaucratic matters, is another source of law. [6] These royal decrees by the King supplement fiqh. [6] Royal decrees are considered subordinate to Sharia law as only religious law is considered "law" under Sharia law. [7] The courts will apply fiqh over nizam if the legal issue is already considered in Sharia law, or if nizam conflicts with Sharia law. [7]
Other forms of regulations (lai'hah) including Royal Orders, Council of Ministers Resolutions, Ministerial Resolutions and, Ministerial Circulars, [8] are likewise subordinate to Sharia law. [8] While contract law is generally governed under Sharia law, many areas of modern business and commercial activities are not considered under Sharia law and are hence governed by the applicable regulations. [9]
Saudi Arabia also abides by international treaties, which are approved by royal decree. One such example is Royal Decree No.11, dated 16 Rajab 1414, corresponding to 30 December 1993, which declared Saudi Arabia's ascension to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. [10]
A contract of sale (bay’) can be concluded for the exchange of anything regarded as a commodity or property (mal). [12] However, there are certain things that are not included as mal under Sharia and therefore cannot be the subject of a sale. [13] These include: pigs, alcohol, and animals not ritually slaughtered. In accordance to the Quran, there are two exceptions to contract formation: the taking of interest (riba), and the use of speculative contracts. [14]
The rules on conclusion of the contract of sale are stricter than the rules in most modern legal systems. Conclusion of the contract must take place at the same transaction as offer and acceptance. [13] Furthermore, there is a right of withdrawal of the offer even after acceptance. [13]
At common law, auctions, advertisements, displays of goods on shelves, tenders and the like are treated as mere invitations to create an offer. In contrast, Sharia law recognises these as valid offers (Ijab) which, upon being accepted (Qabul), will become binding by law upon the parties involved in the transaction. [15]
Generally, a statement with the description and price of goods constitutes an offer, and a display of goods with the price similarly is an offer. [16] However, advertisers can specify that the advertisement is only an invitation to treat. [17]
Like the common law, offer and acceptance are among the vital ingredients of a contract in Islamic law. An offer is a proposal, which leads to an agreement when there is an acceptance of the offer. If there is an acceptance, the offeror is bound by law to perform his promise. The offeror has no right to revoke his offer after its acceptance and he must be prepared to complete his promised accordingly. [19]
A statement of an offer has to be made in the past tense (Sighatul-Madhi) to be constituted as a valid offer in Sharia law. [20] Making the statement in past tense signifies the seller's intention of making a valid offer which is capable of being accepted by the buyer. Once the offer has been accepted, the seller has no right to revoke his offer. If he does revoke his offer, it will be considered a breach of promise on his behalf, which is a great sin in Islam as it encourages rivalry and mischief among the people. [21]
Unlike common law, Saudi Arabian law requires acceptance to be made before the parties attempting to contract physically part. [22]
Certain terms must also be stated for a Saudi Arabian contract to be enforceable. These include: the items involved, quantity, price, parties and how payment will be made. [23]
The concept of consideration implies the bargain, or value given in return for value received. Islamic law, unlike common law, does not require consideration. [7] A contract in Saudi Arabia is a bond between the parties and God, hence, the element of consideration is deemed superfluous.
Similar to common law, defects of consent will prevent the formation of a valid agreement. [7] Vitiating factors include mistake, misrepresentation, duress [24] and undue influence...
Not all contractual arrangements are condoned in Sharia law. Unless a term is positively allowed by revelation ("in the book of God"), it is invalid. [25]
Classical Sharia law rarely discusses the idea of contractual freedom outside the standard contract types. [26] Instead, it provides for situation where standard contracts can be altered or combined. There are specific prohibitions raised by other hadiths, some important ones prohibiting a loan and a sale, two sales in one, and a sale of what one does not have. [27]
Stipulations are divided into three types: [28]
Condition (ta’liq) | conditioning of contract on a future event |
Concomitance (iqtiran) | varying the terms of the contract |
Extension (idafa) | delaying the beginning of a contract until a future time |
If the court finds stipulation a void, the contract itself may or may not be void- results vary casuistically. [29] In particular, concomitant stipulations that coincide with or contradict an entailment of the contract, [30] such as a stipulation that a buyer must never resell the object, are forbidden. [31]
Combinations of contracts conditioned on each other are open to many objections, because they confuse the price of the individual contracts and obstruct meting out fair remedies for breach, thereby opening a door to riba and gharar. There are two major types of contracts that are prohibited in Islamic law: contracts involving usury or uncertainty.
The Quran forbids riba in the strongest terms. [32] Riba is an unjustified enrichment and the principle encompasses a total ban on the charging of interest. [33]
Usurious transactions were classified into three classes: [34]
ribaal-fadl | unlawful excess in exchange of counter values in a contemporaneous transaction |
riba al-nasi'a | unlawful gain by deferring the completion of exchange of counter values |
ribaal-jahilya | exemplified by the lender asking the borrower at maturity date if he will settle the debt or increase it by charging interest |
Riba al-fadl and riba al-nasi'a apply to the exchange of two precious metals (gold or silver) and four commodities (wheat, barley, dates and salt), based on Muhammad's tradition. It was further extended by analogy to the products of these six articles if their present or future exchange could have the smell or taint of riba. Islamic law did not permit exchange of unequal values of these articles and by analogy to a variety of their products. These articles happened to be the basic necessities of life and were a convenient means of exploitation. [35] Promises for future performance were forbidden if goods comprised these articles as the transactions were suspected to contain riba. [36]
The interpretation of riba has continued to be revised under the changing economic setting. By the turn of the century, the leading Islamic scholars Abduh and Rida held the view that riba al-Jahilya was forbidden but it could be deemed lawful under extreme necessity, and that riba al-fadl and riba al nasi'a are under a rebuttable presumption of prohibition. [37]
The ban against interest rates has been circumvented by both parties pretending that a greater amount was lent or that the difference between loan and debt is actually a commission rate. [38]
Gambling is another type of transaction condemned in the Quran.
The Sunna takes this prohibition much further; it not only condemns gambling but also sales of gharar (peril, risk or hazard). [40]
Besides this, other transactions that are conditioned on uncertain events are also prohibited. Lack of knowledge about the existence or nonexistence of the subject matter, or concerning its quality, quantity, or date of performance, was held to trigger gharar. [41] The ongoing refinement of the doctrine has been narrowed down to the presence or absence of uncertainty about future performance and not to the existence or non-existence of the subject matter at the time of contract. If the nonexistent article or subject matter is certain to be delivered or performed at a future date the prohibition of gharar does not apply. [42]
Rescission is allowed under specific circumstances, such as when the seller fails to perform; the merchandise is defective or the quantity incorrect; the quality of service inferior; or when unforeseen circumstances prevent the completion of the contract. [43]
In accordance with Islamic law, remedies for contract are restricted to direct and actual damages. [6] The courts will not recognize economic loss of chance, interest, potential profits and other speculative awards that normally might be given. Specific performance and injunctive relief are likewise generally unavailable. [44]
Saudi Courts also preclude consequential damages based on anticipated profits. [45] As such, contracts involving relationships over time such as continuous supply of goods will not attract full liability if wrongfully terminated. [45] Courts would only award reparations for immediate damages. [45]
Islamic law fixes the relationship of contracting parties to any object involved in the contract as to liability for loss or damage. A party holds the object either as a 'trustee' (amin) or as a 'guarantor' (damin). A trustee is not liable at all for injury to the object, unless shown to be in breach of trust. A damin, however, bears the same risk of loss as an owner. If an object is destroyed through an act of God or force majeure, the guarantor has no recourse. [46]
Enforcing of a contract consists of three main stages:
The plaintiff is to ask the defendant for compliance with the contract before filing his summons with the court. Before admitting a plaintiff's summons, a judge will examine it for formal requirements. The summons will be then delivered to a summoning officer for service of process on defendant. [1]
The defendant files a written defense in answer to the plaintiff's claim. The judge will then set a deadline for the plaintiff to answer the defendant's answer with a written pleading. A pre-trial conference will be held where the judge will discuss procedural issues with the parties. At trial, merits of the case will be argued, and cross examination of witnesses, if any, will take place. After receiving the judgment, the plaintiff is to formally notify the defendant of the judgment. The defendant will then be given a choice to appeal before a certain deadline. [1]
The plaintiff approaches a court enforcement office or private bailiff to request for an enforcement order. The defendant will be requested to voluntarily comply with the judgment. For contracted debt, the judge will call for a public auction for the property to be sold after the attachment of the defendant's movable goods. The proceeds of the public auction are distributed to various creditors according to rules of priority. [1]
Foreign law contracts are generally enforceable so long as they conform to Sharia law. [47] Thus contracts deemed to be usury [48] or dealing with gambling or risk [49] would not be enforceable. Courts and judicial committees in Saudi Arabia also do not recognise the doctrine of conflict of laws. [47] Hence any action based on a foreign law contract can be submitted to the courts even if there are express choice of law provisions. [47]
The Board of Grievances, a statutory tribunal [50] separate from the Sharia courts, is empowered to hear requests for the enforcement of foreign judgments [51] and arbitral awards. [50] Article 6 of the Rules of Pleadings and Procedures of the Grievances Board provides that an applicant seeking to enforce foreign judgments or arbitral awards must prove that: [52]
Firstly, the judgment or award must not be contrary to Sharia law or public policy; it must not offend the Sharia principles of riba and gharar. Judgments or awards involving conventional insurance, speculative loss of chance, interest and potential profits would not be recognized. [52]
The applicant must also show that a judgment or award by the Saudi Courts would be reciprocally enforced in the applicant's country. In the past, the Board has declined to accept a legal opinion by a foreign lawyer or a letter from the UK government stating that foreign judgments would generally be enforced in the UK. [52] This second requirement applies in the absence of any bilateral or multilateral agreement relating to the reciprocal enforcement of decisions. [8] Despite being a signatory to regional reciprocity agreements [53] and an international convention on the enforcement of arbitral awards, [54] the decision to enforce such foreign judgements or awards is subject to compliance with Sharia law and public policy.
King Abdullah succeeded to the throne in 2005 and since then has implemented various reforms in Saudi Arabia with the aim of modernizing the legal system to improve investor confidence. [55]
The King enacted the Law of Judiciary in 2007 to restructure the judicial system [56] and proposed a codification of unwritten Sharia regulations and principles to ensure certainty and uniformity of judicial decisions. [55] In 2009, the King removed the chairman of the Supreme Judicial Council as the ultraconservative cleric was impeding the king's proposed restructuring of the court system. [55] The unseated cleric was also known to oppose codification of Sharia law. [57]
In 2010, the top religious body in Saudi Arabia gave the green light for codification of Sharia law. [58] Nonetheless, it has been commented that such legal reforms will take a considerable period of time to be fully implemented due to lack of well-trained judges and lawyers and the ulama's resistance to modernisation and change. [59]
Ease of enforcing contracts among the world's top 15 "easiest to doing business" economies compared (2010 World Bank Data) [1]
Economy | Ease of Doing Business Rank [60] | Enforcing Contracts Rank [61] | Procedures (number) [1] | Time (days) [1] | Cost (% of claim) [1] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Singapore | 1 | 13 | 21 | 150 | 25.8 |
Hong Kong | 2 | 2 | 24 | 280 | 19.5 |
New Zealand | 3 | 9 | 30 | 216 | 22.4 |
United Kingdom | 4 | 23 | 28 | 339 | 23.4 |
United States | 5 | 8 | 32 | 300 | 14.4 |
Denmark | 6 | 30 | 35 | 410 | 23.3 |
Canada | 7 | 58 | 36 | 570 | 23.3 |
Norway | 8 | 4 | 33 | 280 | 9.9 |
Ireland | 9 | 37 | 20 | 515 | 26.9 |
Australia | 10 | 16 | 28 | 395 | 20.7 |
Saudi Arabia | 11 | 140 | 43 | 635 | 27.5 |
Georgia | 12 | 41 | 36 | 285 | 29.9 |
Finland | 13 | 11 | 32 | 375 | 13.3 |
Sweden | 14 | 52 | 30 | 508 | 31.2 |
Iceland | 15 | 3 | 27 | 417 | 8.2 |
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).Sharia,Sharī'ah, Shari'a, Shariah or Syariah is a body of religious law that forms a part of the Islamic tradition based on scriptures of Islam, particularly the Qur'an and hadith. In Arabic, the term sharīʿah refers to Allah's immutable divine law and this is contrasted with fiqh, which refers to its interpretations by Islamic scholars. Fiqh, in a sense the practical application side of sharia, was manipulated over the centuries by illegal opinions issued by qualified jurists and sharia has never been the sole valid legal system in Islam historically; it has always been used alongside customary law from the beginning, and applied in courts by ruler-appointed judges, integrated with various economic, criminal and administrative laws issued by Muslim rulers.
Islamic banking, Islamic finance, or Sharia-compliant finance is banking or financing activity that complies with Sharia and its practical application through the development of Islamic economics. Some of the modes of Islamic finance include mudarabah, wadiah (safekeeping), musharaka, murabahah (cost-plus), and ijarah (leasing).
Riba is an Arabic word used in Islamic law and roughly translated as "usury": unjust, exploitative gains made in trade or business. Riba is mentioned and condemned in several different verses in the Qur'an. It is also mentioned in many hadith.
A faqīh is an Islamic jurist, an expert in fiqh, or Islamic jurisprudence and Islamic Law.
Hudud is an Arabic word meaning "borders, boundaries, limits". In the religion of Islam, it refers to punishments that under Islamic law (sharīʿah) are believed to be mandated and fixed by God, i.e. prescribed punishments, as opposed to Ta'zeer. These punishments were applied in pre-modern Islam, and their use in some modern states has been a source of controversy.
The Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice is a government religious authority in Saudi Arabia that is charged with implementing the Islamic doctrine of hisbah in the country. Established in 1940, the body gained extensive powers in the 1980s and continued to function as a semi-independent civilian law enforcement agency for almost 35 years until 2016, when societal reforms driven by then-deputy crown prince Mohammed bin Salman led to limiting some of its authority through a royal decree by King Salman bin Abdulaziz, including the rights of pursuing, questioning, detaining, and interrogating suspects.
Takaful is a co-operative system of reimbursement or repayment in case of loss, organized as an Islamic or sharia-compliant alternative to conventional insurance, which contains riba (usury) and gharar.
The judicial system of Egypt is an independent branch of the Egyptian government which includes both secular and religious courts.
Qisas or Qiṣāṣ is an Islamic term interpreted to mean "retaliation in kind", "eye for an eye", or retributive justice.
Diya in Islamic law, is the financial compensation paid to the victim or heirs of a victim in the cases of murder, bodily harm or property damage by mistake. It is an alternative punishment to qisas. In Arabic, the word means both blood money and ransom, and it is spelled sometimes as diyah or diyeh.
Arbitration is a formal method of dispute resolution involving a third party neutral who makes a binding decision. The third party neutral renders the decision in the form of an 'arbitration award'. An arbitration decision or award is legally binding on both sides and enforceable in the courts, unless all parties stipulate that the arbitration process and decision are non-binding.
Saudi Arabia's laws are an amalgam of rules from Sharia, royal decrees, royal ordinances, other royal codes and bylaws, fatwas from the Council of Senior Scholars and custom and practice.
The legal system of Saudi Arabia is based on Sharia, Islamic law derived from the Quran and the Sunnah of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. The sources of Sharia also include Islamic scholarly consensus developed after Muhammad's death. Its interpretation by judges in Saudi Arabia is influenced by the medieval texts of the literalist Hanbali school of Fiqh. Uniquely in the Muslim world, Sharia has been adopted by Saudi Arabia in an uncodified form. This, and the lack of judicial precedent, has resulted in considerable uncertainty in the scope and content of the country's laws. The government therefore announced its intention to codify Sharia in 2010, and, in 2018, a sourcebook of legal principles and precedents was published by the Saudi government. Sharia has also been supplemented by regulations issued by royal decree covering modern issues such as intellectual property and corporate law. Nevertheless, Sharia remains the primary source of law, especially in areas such as criminal, family, commercial and contract law, and the Qur'an and the Sunnah are declared to be the country's constitution. In the areas of land and energy law the extensive proprietorial rights of the Saudi state constitute a significant feature.
Sharia means Islamic law based on Islamic concepts based from Quran and Hadith. Since the early Islamic states of the eighth and ninth centuries, Sharia always existed alongside other normative systems.
Rape in Saudi Arabia is regulated by Saudi Arabia's interpretation of Sharia law, under which someone convicted of the criminal offense of rape can be sentenced to a variety of punishments, ranging from flogging to execution. In 2019, eight executions took place in Saudi Arabia for rape.
The judiciary of Saudi Arabia is a branch of the government of Saudi Arabia that interprets and applies the laws of Saudi Arabia. The legal system is based on the Islamic code of Sharia, with its judges and lawyers forming part of the country's religious leadership or ulama. There are also non-Sharia government tribunals which handle disputes relating to specific royal decrees. Final appeal from both Sharia courts and government tribunals is to the King of Saudi Arabia and all courts and tribunals follow Sharia rules of evidence and procedure.
Capital punishment in Islam is traditionally regulated by the Islamic law (sharīʿa), which derived from the Quran, ḥadīth literature, and sunnah. Crimes according to the sharīʿa law which could result in capital punishment include apostasy from Islam, murder, rape, adultery, homosexuality, etc. Death penalty is in use in many Muslim-majority countries, where it is utilised as sharīʿa-prescribed punishment for crimes such as apostasy from Islam, adultery, witchcraft, murder, rape, and publishing pornography.
Gharar literally means uncertainty, hazard, chance or risk. It is a negative element in mu'amalatfiqh, like riba (usury) and maysir (gambling). One Islamic dictionary describes it as "the sale of what is not present" — such as fish not yet caught, crops not yet harvested. Similarly, author Muhammad Ayub says that "in the legal terminology of jurists", gharar is "the sale of a thing which is not present at hand, or the sale of a thing whose aqibah (consequence) is not known, or a sale involving hazard in which one does not know whether it will come to be or not".
Sharia and securities trading is the impact of conventional financial markets activity for those following the islamic religion and particularly sharia law. Sharia practices ban riba and involvement in haram. It also forbids gambling (maisir) and excessive risk. This, however has not stopped some in Islamic finance industry from using some of these instruments and activities, but their permissibility is a subject of "heated debate" within the religion.
Dr. Walid bin Mohammed al-Samaani is a jurist and administrator who serves as the Justice Minister in the Government of Saudi Arabia. He was appointed in the first cabinet formed by King Salman bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud after he assumed the throne on January 23, 2015.