Cultural genocide in the United States

Last updated January 06, 2025

Cultural genocide in the United States has manifested through the physical and cultural disintegration of the indigenous people by forcing them to attend boarding schools along with the discrimination against them due to the instrumental use of the law. Cultural genocide comprises the dismantling of a culture and the de-socializing of a people.

Against the indigenous people

In reference to colonialism in the United States, Raphael Lemkin stated that the "colonial enslavement of American Indians was a cultural genocide."^[1] He also stated that colonialism in the United States comprised an "effective and thorough method of destroying a culture and de-socializing human beings." Lemkin drew a distinction between "cultural change and cultural genocide."^[1] He defined the former as a slow and gradual process of transition to new situations, and he saw the latter as the result of a radical and violent change that necessitated "the pre-meditated goal of those committing cultural genocide." Lemkin believed that cultural genocide occurs only when there are "surgical operations on cultures and deliberate assassinations of civilizations."^[1]

According to Vincent Schilling, who spoke to BBC Trending, many people are aware of historical atrocities that were committed against his people, but there is an "extensive amount of misunderstanding about Native American and First Nations people's history." He added that Native Americans have also suffered a "cultural genocide" because of colonization's residual effects.^[2]

Law and cultural genocide

The American-Indian experience in North America is defined as comprising physical and cultural disintegration. That fact becomes clear when one examines how law and colonialism were used as tools of genocide, both physically and culturally.^[1] According to Luana Ross the assumption that law (a Euro-American construct) and its administration are prejudiced against particular groups of individuals is critical for understanding Native American criminality and the experiences of Natives imprisoned.^[3] For instance, in Georgia, the 1789 act permitted indiscriminate massacre of Creek Indians by proclaiming them to be outside the state's protection. Apart from physical annihilation, the State promoted acculturation by introducing legislation limiting land entitlements to Indians who had abandoned tribal citizenship.^[1]

Throughout the writing of the Genocide Convention, the United States was adamantly opposed to the addition of cultural genocide, even threatening to block the treaty's approval if cultural genocide was included in the final text.^[4]^{[ page needed ]}

Boarding schools

According to Schilling, there are still a large number of adult Native people who have been forcibly removed from their families and shipped off to Native residential schools, where they were beaten for speaking their native languages, were sexually assaulted by school officials, or were left to die in the cases they contracted diseases.^[2] Throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the United States had approximately 350 government-funded and frequently church-run Indigenous boarding schools.^[5]

According to the U.S. Interior Department, the Indian boarding schools was meant "to culturally assimilate Indigenous children" through forcible removal from their families and communities and placement in remote "residential facilities where their American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian identities, languages, and beliefs" would be suppressed. Hundreds of thousands of Indigenous children have been removed from their communities for over 150 years. Between 1869 and the 1970s, hundreds of thousands of Indigenous children "passed through or died" at these schools until the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 gave Native American parents the legal ability to object to their children's enrollment in these institutions.^[5]

Separation of children from their families with the goal "to destroy the identity of a group," partially or completely, is specifically included in the 1948 Genocide Convention's definition of genocide. The boarding schools' assimilationist goals were explicitly genocidal to the extent that these schools were intentionally designed to "kill the Indian, save the man."^[5]

Related Research Articles

Genocide is violence that targets individuals because of their membership of a group and aims at the destruction of a people.

Cultural genocide or culturicide is a concept first described by Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin in 1944, in the same book that coined the term genocide. The destruction of culture was a central component in Lemkin's formulation of genocide. Though the precise definition of cultural genocide remains contested, the United Nations does not include it in the definition of genocide used in the 1948 Genocide Convention. The Armenian Genocide Museum defines culturicide as "acts and measures undertaken to destroy nations' or ethnic groups' culture through spiritual, national, and cultural destruction", which appears to be essentially the same as ethnocide. Some ethnologists, such as Robert Jaulin, use the term ethnocide as a substitute for cultural genocide, although this usage has been criticized as risking the confusion between ethnicity and culture. Cultural genocide and ethnocide have in the past been utilized in distinct contexts. Cultural genocide without ethnocide is conceivable when a distinct ethnic identity is kept, but distinct cultural elements are eliminated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trail of Tears</span> Forced relocation and ethnic cleansing of the southeastern Native American tribes

The Trail of Tears was the forced displacement of approximately 60,000 people of the "Five Civilized Tribes" between 1830 and 1850, and the additional thousands of Native Americans and their enslaved African Americans within that were ethnically cleansed by the United States government.

The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG), or the Genocide Convention, is an international treaty that criminalizes genocide and obligates state parties to pursue the enforcement of its prohibition. It was the first legal instrument to codify genocide as a crime, and the first human rights treaty unanimously adopted by the United Nations General Assembly, on 9 December 1948, during the third session of the United Nations General Assembly. The Convention entered into force on 12 January 1951 and has 153 state parties as of June 2024.

Ethnocide is the extermination or destruction of ethnic identities. Bartolomé Clavero differentiates ethnocide from genocide by stating that "Genocide kills people while ethnocide kills social cultures through the killing of individual souls". According to Martin Shaw, ethnocide is a core part of physically violent genocide. Some substitute cultural genocide for ethnocide, and other argue the distinction between ethnicity and culture. Cultural genocide and ethnocide have been used in different contexts. While the term "ethnocide" and "ethnic cleansing" are similar, the intentions of their use vary. The term "ethnic cleansing" has been criticized as a euphemism for genocide denial, while "ethnocide" tries to facilitate the opposite.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frybread</span> Variety of flatbread

Frybread is a dish of the indigenous people of North America that is a flat dough bread, fried or deep-fried in oil, shortening, or lard.

<i>Kill the Indian, Save the Man</i> 2004 book by American writer Ward Churchill

Kill the Indian, Save the Man: The Genocidal Impact of American Indian Residential Schools is a 2004 book by the American writer Ward Churchill, then a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder and an activist in Native American issues. Beginning in the late 19th century, it traces the history of the United States and Canadian governments establishing Indian boarding schools or residential schools, respectively, where Native American children were required to attend, to encourage their study of English, conversion to Christianity, and assimilation to the majority culture. The boarding schools were operated into the 1980s. Because the schools often prohibited students from using their Native languages and practicing their own cultures, Churchill considers them to have been genocidal in intent.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada was a truth and reconciliation commission active in Canada from 2008 to 2015, organized by the parties of the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement.

<i>A Little Matter of Genocide</i> Book written by Ward Churchill

A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492 to the Present (1997) is a book which was written by Ward Churchill. A Little Matter of Genocide surveys ethnic cleansing from 1492 to the present. Churchill compares the treatment of North American Indians to historical instances of genocide by communists in Cambodia, Turks against Armenians, and Europeans against the Gypsies, as well as Nazis against the Poles and Jews.

The Indian Relocation Act of 1956 was a United States law intended to create a "a program of vocational training" for Native Americans in the United States. Critics characterize the law as an attempt to encourage Native Americans to leave Indian reservations and their traditional lands, to assimilate into the general population in urban areas, and to weaken community and tribal ties. Critics also characterize the law as part of the Indian termination policy between 1940 and 1960, which terminated the tribal status of numerous groups and cut off previous assistance to tribal citizens. The Indian Relocation Act encouraged and forced Native Americans to move to cities for job opportunities. It also played a significant role in increasing the population of urban Native Americans in succeeding decades.

Historical trauma or collective trauma refers to the cumulative emotional harm of an individual or generation caused by a traumatic experience or event.

Indigenous peoples of California, commonly known as Indigenous Californians or Native Californians, are a diverse group of nations and peoples that are indigenous to the geographic area within the current boundaries of California before and after European colonization. There are currently 109 federally recognized tribes in the state and over forty self-identified tribes or tribal bands that have applied for federal recognition. California has the second-largest Native American population in the United States.

The genocide of indigenous peoples, colonial genocide, or settler genocide is the elimination of indigenous peoples as a part of the process of colonialism.

Settler colonialism is a logic and structure of displacement by settlers, using colonial rule, over an environment for replacing it and its indigenous peoples with settlements and the society of the settlers.

The effects of genocide on youth include psychological and demographic effects that affect the transition into adulthood. These effects are also seen in future generations of youth.

The California genocide was a series of genocidal massacres of the indigenous peoples of California by United States soldiers and settlers during the 19th century. It began following the American conquest of California in the Mexican–American War and the subsequent influx of American settlers to the region as a result of the California gold rush. Between 1846 and 1873, it is estimated that settlers killed between 9,492 and 16,094 indigenous Californians; up to several thousand were also starved or worked to death. Forced labor, kidnapping, rape, child separation and forced displacement were widespread during the genocide, and were encouraged, tolerated, and even carried out by American officials and military commanders.

Settler colonialism in Canada refers to the process and effects of colonization on the Indigenous peoples of Canada. As colonization progressed, Indigenous peoples were subject to policies of forced assimilation and cultural genocide. Governments in Canada in many cases ignored or chose to deny the aboriginal title of First Nations. The traditional governance of many of the First Nations was replaced with government-imposed structures. Many Indigenous cultural practices were banned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Denial of genocides of Indigenous peoples</span>

Denial of genocides of Indigenous peoples consists of a claim that has denied any of the multiple genocides and atrocity crimes, which have been committed against Indigenous peoples. The denialism claim contradicts the academic consensus, which acknowledges that genocide was committed. The claim is a form of denialism, genocide denial, historical negationism and historical revisionism. The atrocity crimes include genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and ethnic cleansing.

The destruction of Native American peoples, cultures, and languages has been characterized as genocide. Debates are ongoing as to whether the entire process or only specific periods or events meet the definitions of genocide. Many of these definitions focus on intent, while others focus on outcomes. Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term "genocide", considered the displacement of Native Americans by European settlers as a historical example of genocide. Others, like historian Gary Anderson, contend that genocide does not accurately characterize any aspect of American history, suggesting instead that ethnic cleansing is a more appropriate term.

Throughout the history of Canada, the Canadian government have been accused of many atrocities variously described as ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity, ethnocide and genocide, against the Indigenous peoples in Canada. The term cultural genocide began to be utilized in the 1990s when researchers and Indigenous leaders started to declare the actions of churches and the government regarding residential schools were genocidal. There is debate among scholars about the designation used and if the term genocide legally applies to Canada's experience.

References

1 2 3 4 5 Mako, Shamiran (June 18, 2012). "Cultural Genocide and Key International Instruments: Framing the Indigenous Experience". International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. 19 (2). Social Science Research Network: 175–194. doi:10.1163/157181112X639078. SSRN 2087175 . Retrieved February 25, 2022.
1 2 "'Still experiencing a cultural genocide'". BBC News . May 12, 2016. Archived from the original on October 12, 2019. Retrieved February 25, 2022.
↑ Ross, Luana (1996). "Resistance and Survivance: Cultural Genocide and Imprisoned Native Women". Race, Gender & Class . 3 (2): 125–141. ISSN 1082-8354. JSTOR 41674793 . Retrieved February 25, 2022.
↑ Bachman, Jeffrey S. (November 22, 2017). The United States and Genocide: (Re)Defining the Relationship. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-351-69216-8 . Retrieved March 3, 2022.
1 2 3 Ibrahim, Azeem; Prey, Emily (October 11, 2021). "The United States Must Reckon With Its Own Genocides". Foreign Policy . Archived from the original on February 26, 2022. Retrieved February 25, 2022.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[Mako-1] 1 2 3 4 5 Mako, Shamiran (June 18, 2012). "Cultural Genocide and Key International Instruments: Framing the Indigenous Experience". International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. 19 (2). Social Science Research Network: 175–194. doi:10.1163/157181112X639078. SSRN 2087175 . Retrieved February 25, 2022.

[BBC-2] 1 2 "'Still experiencing a cultural genocide'". BBC News . May 12, 2016. Archived from the original on October 12, 2019. Retrieved February 25, 2022.

[3] Ross, Luana (1996). "Resistance and Survivance: Cultural Genocide and Imprisoned Native Women". Race, Gender & Class . 3 (2): 125–141. ISSN 1082-8354. JSTOR 41674793 . Retrieved February 25, 2022.

[4] Bachman, Jeffrey S. (November 22, 2017). The United States and Genocide: (Re)Defining the Relationship. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-351-69216-8 . Retrieved March 3, 2022.

[FP-5] 1 2 3 Ibrahim, Azeem; Prey, Emily (October 11, 2021). "The United States Must Reckon With Its Own Genocides". Foreign Policy . Archived from the original on February 26, 2022. Retrieved February 25, 2022.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]