Daniel Nexon

Last updated

Nexon, Daniel H. (April 20, 2009). The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN   9780691137933.
  • Nexon, Daniel H.; Neumann, Iver B., eds. (May 2006). Harry Potter and International Relations. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield. ISBN   978-0-7425-3959-4.
  • Journal articles

    Related Research Articles

    Neorealism or structural realism is a theory of international relations that emphasizes the role of power politics in international relations, sees competition and conflict as enduring features and sees limited potential for cooperation. The anarchic state of the international system means that states cannot be certain of other states' intentions and their security, thus prompting them to engage in power politics.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">International relations</span> Study of relationships between two or more states

    International relations (IR) are the interactions among sovereign states. The scientific study of those interactions is also referred to as international studies, international politics, or international affairs. In a broader sense, the study of IR, in addition to multilateral relations, concerns all activities among states—such as war, diplomacy, trade, and foreign policy—as well as relations with and among other international actors, such as intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs), international legal bodies, and multinational corporations (MNCs). There are several schools of thought within IR, of which the most prominent are realism, liberalism, and constructivism.

    International relations theory is the study of international relations (IR) from a theoretical perspective. It seeks to explain behaviors and outcomes in international politics. The four most prominent schools of thought are realism, liberalism, constructivism, and rational choice. Whereas realism and liberalism make broad and specific predictions about international relations, constructivism and rational choice are methodological approaches that focus on certain types of social explanation for phenomena.

    Social constructivism is a sociological theory of knowledge according to which human development is socially situated, and knowledge is constructed through interaction with others. Like social constructionism, social constructivism states that people work together to actively construct artifacts. But while social constructivism focuses on cognition, social constructionism focuses on the making of social reality.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Constructivism (philosophy of science)</span> Branch in philosophy of science

    Constructivism is a view in the philosophy of science that maintains that scientific knowledge is constructed by the scientific community, which seeks to measure and construct models of the natural world. According to constructivists, natural science consists of mental constructs that aim to explain sensory experiences and measurements, and that there is no single valid methodology in science but rather a diversity of useful methods. They also hold that the world is independent of human minds, but knowledge of the world is always a human and social construction. Constructivism opposes the philosophy of objectivism, embracing the belief that human beings can come to know the truth about the natural world not mediated by scientific approximations with different degrees of validity and accuracy.

    Alexander Wendt is an American political scientist who is one of the core social constructivist researchers in the field of international relations, and a key contributor to quantum social science. Wendt and academics such as Nicholas Onuf, Peter J. Katzenstein, Emanuel Adler, Michael Barnett, Kathryn Sikkink, John Ruggie, Martha Finnemore, and others have, within a relatively short period, established constructivism as one of the major schools of thought in the field.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Realism (international relations)</span> School of thought

    Realism, a school of thought in international relations theory, is a theoretical framework that views world politics as an enduring competition among self-interested states vying for power and positioning within an anarchic global system devoid of a centralized authority. It centers on states as rational primary actors navigating a system shaped by power politics, national interest, and a pursuit of security and self-preservation.

    In international relations (IR), constructivism is a social theory that asserts that significant aspects of international relations are shaped by ideational factors. The most important ideational factors are those that are collectively held; these collectively held beliefs construct the interests and identities of actors.

    In international relations theory, the concept of anarchy is the idea that the world lacks any supreme authority or sovereignty. In an anarchic state, there is no hierarchically superior, coercive power that can resolve disputes, enforce law, or order the system of international politics. In international relations, anarchy is widely accepted as the starting point for international relations theory.

    The English School of international relations theory maintains that there is a 'society of states' at the international level, despite the condition of anarchy. The English school stands for the conviction that ideas, rather than simply material capabilities, shape the conduct of international politics, and therefore deserve analysis and critique. In this sense it is similar to constructivism, though the English School has its roots more in world history, international law and political theory, and is more open to normative approaches than is generally the case with constructivism.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Sevin Okyay</span>

    Sevin Okyay is a Turkish literary critic, journalist, author, regular columnist and a prolific translator. Sevin had been a radio host and a teacher as well.

    Christian Reus-Smit is Professor of International Relations (IR) at the University of Melbourne, Australia. He is an internationally renowned scholar in the field of IR. Reus-Smit's research focuses on the institutional nature and evolution of international orders, and he has published on widely on issues of international relations theory, international law, multilateralism, human rights, American power, and most recently, cultural diversity and international order. He is long-time editor of the Cambridge Studies in International Relations book series, and was a Founding Editor with Duncan Snidal and Alexander Wendt of the leading journal International Theory. His publications have been awarded many prizes, including the Susan Strange Best Book Prize (2014), the BISA Best Article Prize (2002), and the Northedge Prize (1992). In 2013-14 Professor Reus-Smit served as a Vice-President of the International Studies Association.

    Thomas Risse is a Berlin-based international relations scholar. He currently acts as chair of the Center for Transnational Relations, Foreign and Security Policy at the Otto Suhr Institute for Political Science of Freie Universität Berlin. Furthermore, he has several engagements in German and international research networks, and heads the PhD program of the Hertie School of Governance in Berlin.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Jennifer Sterling-Folker</span> American political scientist

    Jennifer Sterling-Folker is a Professor of Political Science at the University of Connecticut. She was the Alan R. Bennett Honors Professor of Political Science. She is a specialist in International Relations theory.

    Feminist constructivism is an international relations theory which builds upon the theory of constructivism. Feminist constructivism focuses upon the study of how ideas about gender influence global politics. It is the communication between two postcolonial theories; feminism and constructivism, and how they both share similar key ideas in creating gender equality globally.

    <i>Social Theory of International Politics</i> Book by Alexander Wendt

    Social Theory of International Politics is a book by Alexander Wendt. It expresses a constructivist approach to the study of international relations and is one of the leading texts within the constructivist approach to international relations scholarship.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Iver B. Neumann</span> Norwegian political scientist

    Iver Brynild Neumann is a Norwegian political scientist and social anthropologist. He is Director of the Fridtjof Nansen Institute at Polhøgda, Lysaker, a position he has held since December 2019. From 2012-2017 he was the Montague Burton Professor of International Relations at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He has also served as Research Director and Director at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) and Adjunct Professor in International Relations at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences.

    Theodore Hopf is an American academic and a leading figure in constructivism in international relations theory. He was a Provost Chair Professor in the Department of Political Science at the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore (NUS). He was also jointly appointed as Research Cluster Leader on Identities at the Asia Research Institute (ARI) at the National University of Singapore (NUS).

    Richard K. Ashley is a postmodernist scholar of International relations. He is an associate professor at the Arizona State University's School of Politics and Global Studies.

    J. Samuel Barkin is a Canadian political scientist and a professor of global governance and human security at the University of Massachusetts Boston.

    References

    1. Nexon, Daniel H. (April 20, 2009). The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN   9780691137933.
    2. "IISS Book Awards". Archived from the original on February 8, 2013. Retrieved September 21, 2012..
    3. "Daniel H. Nexon. International Affairs Fellow". Archived from the original on July 9, 2011. Retrieved September 21, 2012.
    4. Donnelly, Jack. "New Voices: Dan Nexon". Archived from the original on January 11, 2013. Retrieved September 21, 2012.
    5. "Editorial Board". Oxford Academic. Retrieved July 27, 2020.
    6. "Dan Nexon Articles". Harvard International Review. Archived from the original on April 29, 2014. Retrieved September 25, 2012.
    7. "Patrick Jackson | International Relations Online". AU-MIR. Retrieved February 24, 2022.
    8. Jackson, Patrick T.; Nexon, Daniel H. (June 2004). "Constructivist Realism or Realist-Constructivism?". International Studies Review . 6 (2): 337–341. doi:10.1111/j.1521-9488.2004.419_2.x.
    9. Jackson, Patrick T.; Nexon, Daniel H. (Spring 2002). "Whence Causal Mechanisms? A Comment on Legro". Dialogue IO. 1 (1): 81–101. doi: 10.1017/S7777777702000079 .
    10. Jackson, Patrick T.; Nexon, Daniel H. (September 1999). "Relations before States: Substance, Process, and the Study of World Politics". European Journal of International Relations . 5 (3). doi:10.1177/1354066199005003002. S2CID   145359449.
    11. 1 2 Nexon, Daniel H. (April 20, 2009). The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN   9780691137933.
    12. Bethune, Brian (July 9, 2007). "Will Harry die?". Maclean's . Archived from the original on July 26, 2010. Retrieved September 27, 2012.
    13. Miller, David L. (September 22, 2009). "Harry Potter and Magical Realism". CBS News Opinion. Retrieved September 27, 2012.
    14. Gibbs, Nancy (December 19, 2007). "Person of the Year 2007: Runner Up: J.K. Rowling". Time . Archived from the original on September 30, 2012. Retrieved September 27, 2012.
    15. Nexon, Daniel H.; Neumann, Iver B., eds. (May 2006). Harry Potter and International Relations. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield. ISBN   978-0-7425-3959-4.
    16. "The Duck of Minerva: About". Duckofminerva.blogspot.com. Archived from the original on July 17, 2012. Retrieved September 28, 2012.
    17. Nexon, Daniel H.; Neumann, Iver B. (July 4, 2017). "Hegemonic-order theory: A field-theoretic account". European Journal of International Relations. 24 (3): 662–686. doi:10.1177/1354066117716524. hdl: 11250/2480540 . ISSN   1354-0661. S2CID   149193754.
    Daniel Nexon
    Born(1973-04-07)April 7, 1973
    NationalityAmerican
    Academic background
    Education