David Malament

Last updated
David B. Malament
Born (1947-12-21) 21 December 1947 (age 74) [1]
Alma mater Columbia College, Columbia University
Rockefeller University
Era Contemporary philosophy
Region Western philosophy
School Analytic philosophy
Thesis Does the causal structure of space-time determine its geometry (1975)
Doctoral advisor Donald A. Martin
Doctoral students Jeremy Butterfield
Main interests
Philosophy of physics

David B. Malament (born 21 December 1947) is an American philosopher of science, specializing in the philosophy of physics.

Contents

Biography

Malament attended Stuyvesant High School and received a B.A. in mathematics 1968 at Columbia College, Columbia University, and Ph.D. in philosophy 1975 at Rockefeller University. After teaching for nearly a quarter-century at the University of Chicago, Malament left to become Distinguished Professor of Logic and Philosophy of Science at the University of California, Irvine, where he is now emeritus. His book Topics in the Foundations of General Relativity and Newtonian Gravitation Theory (Chicago, 2012) was awarded the 2014 Lakatos Award.

Malament's work focuses the conceptual foundations of the special and general theories of relativity. [2] [3] Regarding whether simultaneity in special relativity, the Einstein synchronisation is conventional, Malament argues against conventionalism and is regarded by some as having refuted Adolf Grünbaum's argument for conventionalism. [4] Grünbaum, [5] as well as Sahotra Sarkar and John Stachel, [6] don't agree, whereas Robert Rynasiewicz sides with Malament. [7] [8]

During the Vietnam War Malament was a conscientious objector to the draft, spending time in jail for refusing induction into the military. [9] He published an article on the subject of selective conscientious objection in an early issue of the journal Philosophy and Public Affairs . [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eternalism (philosophy of time)</span> Philosophical view that there is no correct way of perceiving the passage of time

In the philosophy of space and time, eternalism is an approach to the ontological nature of time, which takes the view that all existence in time is equally real, as opposed to presentism or the growing block universe theory of time, in which at least the future is not the same as any other time. Some forms of eternalism give time a similar ontology to that of space, as a dimension, with different times being as real as different places, and future events are "already there" in the same sense other places are already there, and that there is no objective flow of time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philosophy of physics</span> Truths and principles of the study of matter, space, time and energy

In philosophy, philosophy of physics deals with conceptual and interpretational issues in modern physics, many of which overlap with research done by certain kinds of theoretical physicists. Philosophy of physics can be broadly divided into three areas:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vienna Circle</span> 1924–1936 group of philosophers and scientists

The Vienna Circle of Logical Empiricism was a group of elite philosophers and scientists drawn from the natural and social sciences, logic and mathematics who met regularly from 1924 to 1936 at the University of Vienna, chaired by Moritz Schlick. The Vienna Circle's influence on 20th-century philosophy, especially philosophy of science and analytic philosophy, is immense up to the present day.

Background independence is a condition in theoretical physics that requires the defining equations of a theory to be independent of the actual shape of the spacetime and the value of various fields within the spacetime. In particular this means that it must be possible not to refer to a specific coordinate system—the theory must be coordinate-free. In addition, the different spacetime configurations should be obtained as different solutions of the underlying equations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Absolute space and time</span> Theoretical foundation of Newtonian mechanics

Absolute space and time is a concept in physics and philosophy about the properties of the universe. In physics, absolute space and time may be a preferred frame.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hans Reichenbach</span> American philosopher

Hans Reichenbach was a leading philosopher of science, educator, and proponent of logical empiricism. He was influential in the areas of science, education, and of logical empiricism. He founded the Gesellschaft für empirische Philosophie in Berlin in 1928, also known as the “Berlin Circle”. Carl Gustav Hempel, Richard von Mises, David Hilbert and Kurt Grelling all became members of the Berlin Circle.

The history of special relativity consists of many theoretical results and empirical findings obtained by Albert A. Michelson, Hendrik Lorentz, Henri Poincaré and others. It culminated in the theory of special relativity proposed by Albert Einstein and subsequent work of Max Planck, Hermann Minkowski and others.

Einstein synchronisation is a convention for synchronising clocks at different places by means of signal exchanges. This synchronisation method was used by telegraphers in the middle 19th century, but was popularized by Henri Poincaré and Albert Einstein, who applied it to light signals and recognized its fundamental role in relativity theory. Its principal value is for clocks within a single inertial frame.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Relativity of simultaneity</span> Concept that distant simultaneity is not absolute, but depends on the observers reference frame

In physics, the relativity of simultaneity is the concept that distant simultaneity – whether two spatially separated events occur at the same time – is not absolute, but depends on the observer's reference frame. This possibility was raised by mathematician Henri Poincaré in 1900, and thereafter became a central idea in the special theory of relativity.

Albert Einstein presented the theories of special relativity and general relativity in publications that either contained no formal references to previous literature, or referred only to a small number of his predecessors for fundamental results on which he based his theories, most notably to the work of Henri Poincaré and Hendrik Lorentz for special relativity, and to the work of David Hilbert, Carl F. Gauss, Bernhard Riemann, and Ernst Mach for general relativity. Subsequently, claims have been put forward about both theories, asserting that they were formulated, either wholly or in part, by others before Einstein. At issue is the extent to which Einstein and various other individuals should be credited for the formulation of these theories, based on priority considerations.

Abner Eliezer Shimony was an American physicist and philosopher. He specialized in quantum theory and philosophy of science. As a physicist, he concentrated on the interaction between relativity theory and quantum mechanics. He authored many works and research on complementarity in quantum entanglement as well as multiparticle quantum interferometry, both relating to quantum coherence. He authored research articles and books on the foundations of quantum mechanics. He received the 1996 Lakatos Prize for his work in philosophy of science.

In philosophy, the Rietdijk–Putnam argument, named after C. Wim Rietdijk and Hilary Putnam, uses 20th-century findings in physics – specifically in special relativity – to support the philosophical position known as four-dimensionalism.

Jerzy Giedymin was a philosopher and historian of mathematics and science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sahotra Sarkar</span> Indian-American biologist

Sahotra Sarkar is an Indian-American professor at the University of Texas at Austin.

When using the term 'the speed of light' it is sometimes necessary to make the distinction between its one-way speed and its two-way speed. The "one-way" speed of light, from a source to a detector, cannot be measured independently of a convention as to how to synchronize the clocks at the source and the detector. What can however be experimentally measured is the round-trip speed from the source to a mirror and back again to detector. Albert Einstein chose a synchronization convention that made the one-way speed equal to the two-way speed. The constancy of the one-way speed in any given inertial frame is the basis of his special theory of relativity, although all experimentally verifiable predictions of this theory do not depend on that convention.

Criticism of the theory of relativity of Albert Einstein was mainly expressed in the early years after its publication in the early twentieth century, on scientific, pseudoscientific, philosophical, or ideological bases. Though some of these criticisms had the support of reputable scientists, Einstein's theory of relativity is now accepted by the scientific community.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Simon Saunders</span> Physicist

Simon Wolfe Saunders is a British philosopher of physics. He is noted for his work on quantum mechanics, on identity and indiscernibility in physics, and on structural realism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leo Corry</span> Israeli historian of mathematics

Leo Corry is an Israeli historian of mathematics.

<i>A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity</i> Series of three books by E. T. Whittaker on the history of electromagnetic theory

A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity is any of three books written by British mathematician Sir Edmund Taylor Whittaker FRS FRSE on the history of electromagnetic theory, covering the development of classical electromagnetism, optics, and aether theories. The book's first edition, subtitled from the Age of Descartes to the Close of the Nineteenth Century, was published in 1910 by Longmans, Green. The book covers the history of aether theories and the development of electromagnetic theory up to the 20th century. A second, extended and revised, edition consisting of two volumes was released in the early 1950s by Thomas Nelson, expanding the book's scope to include the first quarter of the 20th century. The first volume, subtitled The Classical Theories, was published in 1951 and served as a revised and updated edition to the first book. The second volume, subtitled The Modern Theories (1900–1926), was published two years later in 1953, extended this work covering the years 1900 to 1926. Notwithstanding a notorious controversy on Whittaker's views on the history of special relativity, covered in volume two of the second edition, the books are considered authoritative references on the history of electricity and magnetism as well as classics in the history of physics.

<i>Subtle is the Lord</i> Biography of Albert Einstein by Abraham Pais

Subtle is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein is a biography of Albert Einstein written by Abraham Pais. First published in 1982 by Oxford University Press, the book is one of the most acclaimed biographies of the scientist. This was not the first popular biography of Einstein, but it was the first to focus on his scientific research as opposed to his life as a popular figure. Pais, renowned for his work in theoretical particle physics, was a friend of Einstein's at the Institute for Advanced Study in his early career. Originally published in English in the United States and the United Kingdom, the book has translations in over a dozen languages. Pais later released a sequel to the book in 1994 titled Einstein Lived Here and, after his death in 2000, the University Press released a posthumous reprint of the biography in 2005, with a new foreword by Roger Penrose. Considered very popular for a science book, the biography sold tens of thousands of copies of both paperback and hardcover versions in its first year. The book has received many reviews and, the year after its initial publication, it won both the 1983 National Book Award for Nonfiction, in Science (Hardcover), and the 1983 Science Writing Award.

References

  1. Virtual International Authority File
  2. Malament, D. B. (1977). "The class of continuous timelike curves determines the topology of spacetime" (PDF). Journal of Mathematical Physics. 18 (7): 1399. Bibcode:1977JMP....18.1399M. doi:10.1063/1.523436.
  3. D. Malament, 2005. "Classical General Relativity" (gr-qc/0506065, to appear in Handbook of the Philosophy of Physics, eds. J. Butterfield and J. Earman, Elsevier) online
  4. Malament, David (1977). "Causal Theories of Time and the Conventionality of Simultaneity". Noûs. Wiley. 11 (3): 293–300. doi:10.2307/2214766. JSTOR   2214766.
  5. A. Grünbaum. David Malament and the Conventionality of Simultaneity: A Reply, online
  6. Sarkar, Sahotra; Stachel, John (1999). "Did Malament Prove the Non-Conventionality of Simultaneity in the Special Theory of Relativity?". Philosophy of Science. The University of Chicago Press. 66 (2): 208–220. doi:10.1086/392684. JSTOR   188643. S2CID   120008810.
  7. Rynasiewicz, Robert (2001). "Definition, Convention, and Simultaneity: Malament's Result and Its Alleged Refutation by Sarkar and Stachel". Philosophy of Science (Proceedings of the 2000 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers). The University of Chicago Press. 68 (3): S345–S357. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.693.5891 . JSTOR   3080957.
  8. Ben-Yami, H. (2006). "Causality and Temporal Order in Special Relativity". The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 57 (3): 459–479. doi:10.1093/bjps/axl019.
  9. Rabinowitz, Victor (1996). Unrepentant Leftist: A Lawyer's Memoir . University of Illinois Press. p.  310. ISBN   0-252-02253-X. David Malament, Vietnam war.
  10. Malament, David B. (1972). "Selective Conscientious Objection and the 'Gillette' Decision". Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1: 1:363–386.