De Lackner HZ-1 Aerocycle

Last updated
HZ-1 Aerocycle
HZ-1 Aerocycle flown by soldier.png
Role Experimental rotorcraft
National originUnited States
Manufacturer de Lackner Helicopters
DesignerLewis C. McCarty Jr.
First flight22 November 1954
Primary user United States Army
Number built12

The HZ-1 Aerocycle, also known as the YHO-2 and by the manufacturer's designation DH-5 Aerocycle, was an American one-man "personal helicopter" developed by de Lackner Helicopters in the mid-1950s. Intended to be operated by inexperienced pilots with a minimum of 20 minutes of instruction, [1] the HZ-1 was expected to become a standard reconnaissance machine with the United States Army. Although early testing showed that the craft had promise for providing mobility on the atomic battlefield, more extensive evaluation proved that the aircraft was in fact too difficult to control for operation by untrained infantrymen, and after a pair of crashes the project was abandoned. A single model of the craft was put on display.

Contents

Design and development

During the early 1950s, Charles H. Zimmerman of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) developed a system for control of a rotorcraft in which, with the rotors mounted on the underside of the aircraft, the machine could be steered by the pilot through the simple shifting of his weight, [2] and kept stable through the actions of his natural reflexes. [3] Known as kinesthetic control, and similar in principle to the mechanics of riding a bicycle or a surfboard, [3] it was hoped that the concept would allow for pilots to operate an aircraft with little to no training time. [4] NACA testing proved that the idea had merit, and several companies, including Bensen Aircraft, Hiller Aircraft, and de Lackner Helicopters, began development of rotorcraft using the concept. [2]

The concept proposed by de Lackner Helicopters was a one-man flying platform, and it received the company designation "DH-4". The DH-4 was expected to be able to carry up to 120 pounds (54 kg) of cargo [4] or an auxiliary 5-US-gallon (19 L; 4.2 imp gal) fuel tank to extend its range up to 50 miles (80 km) [5] in addition to its pilot. A cargo lifting line could be threaded through the rotor shaft for the carrying of slung loads underneath the craft. [5]

The machine was a simple, cross-shaped frame, with the pilot standing on a platform, secured by a safety harness. The harness also secured the aircraft's engine, which was an outboard motor manufactured by Mercury Marine. [5] The engine was controlled by a twist-grip motorcycle-style throttle [6] and transferred power to the 15-foot (4.6 m) diameter, contra-rotating rotors via belt drive [2] with a chain reduction unit. [7] The aircraft's landing gear consisted of airbags at the end of each arm of the frame along with a large rubber float in the middle, allowing for amphibious capability, [5] although this arrangement was later replaced by a pair of conventional helicopter-type skids. [8]

Testing

Captain Sundby test-flies the HZ-1 De Lackner HZ-1 test flown by Captain Sundby.png
Captain Sundby test-flies the HZ-1

Originally designated YHO-2 by the U.S. Army, then later re-designated HZ-1 and named "Aerocycle", the prototype made its first tethered flight on 22 November 1954, [9] with its first free flight taking place in January 1955 at the Brooklyn Army Terminal. [2] Over 160 flights totaling more than 15 hours of flight time were conducted, [9] and the results of this early test flight program were considered promising enough that a dozen examples of the type were ordered [2] (serial numbers 56-6928 to 56-6939). [10] Predictions were made that the craft could provide transport to a modern version of the old horse cavalry, providing airborne "eyes and ears" for the Army. [11]

In 1956, the test program was transferred to Fort Eustis, Virginia, where Captain Selmer Sundby took over test-flying duties. [2] The HZ-1 had been designed to be very easy to fly, and early testing indicated that untrained soldiers could learn to operate the craft in less than 20 minutes, [6] and some claiming that only five minutes of instruction were required. [12] In addition, the HZ-1 proved to be faster than other flying platform designs evaluated by the Army. [2] Sundby, however, quickly determined that the craft was much more difficult to fly than had been expected, [2] and would not be safe in the hands of an inexperienced pilot. [2] In addition, the low-mounted rotors proved to be prone to kicking up small rocks and other debris. [4]

Over a series of tethered and free-flying test flights lasting up to 43 minutes, the HZ-1 suffered a pair of accidents. Both crashes occurred under similar conditions – the contra-rotating rotors intermeshed and collided, the blades shattering, causing an immediate loss of control resulting in a crash. [2] Aerodynamic testing was conducted in the full-scale wind tunnel at the Langley Research Center, and it was discovered that the Aerocycle's forwards speed was limited by an uncontrollable pitching motion, but rotor-tip clearance was always sufficient. [13] The inability to determine the precise cause of the intermeshing, combined with the fact that the "personal lifting device" concept was failing to live up to its expectations, led to the decision to terminate the project. [2]

Sundby was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for his test-flying work with the HZ-1, [2] going on to test-fly the H-21 and H-34 helicopters, as well as seeing combat in the Vietnam War before retiring with the rank of colonel. [14]

Parachute development

A HZ-1 following a crash HZ-1 Aerocycle following crash.png
A HZ-1 following a crash

An entirely new type of parachute with extremely fast opening characteristics, the "Ultra-Fast Opening Personnel Parachute Type XMP-2", was developed for use in testing of the HZ-1 and Hiller VZ-1 flying platforms. Designed for use from 0 to 50 miles per hour (0–80 km/h) and at altitudes as low as 25 feet (7.6 m), the XMP-2 proved to have insufficient reliability for use as a personnel parachute. [15]

Variants

DH-4 Heli-Vector
Initial prototype of the Aerocycle design; one built. [16]
DH-5 Aerocycle
Company designation for the development prototype of the HZ-1.
HZ-1 Aerocycle
the limited production aircraft delivered to the US Army; 12 built.
HO-2 Aerocycle
Designation in the US Army HO series

Aircraft on display

Of the dozen examples of the type ordered by the U.S. Army, only a single example of the HZ-1 has survived, and this aircraft is currently on display in the U.S. Army Transportation Museum at Fort Eustis, Newport News, Virginia. [2]

Specifications (HZ-1 Aerocycle)

Data from [5] [8]

General characteristics

Performance

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bell UH-1 Iroquois</span> Family of American military utility helicopters

The Bell UH-1 Iroquois is a utility military helicopter designed and produced by the American aerospace company Bell Helicopter. It is the first member of the prolific Huey family, as well as the first turbine-powered helicopter in service with the United States military.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sikorsky CH-37 Mojave</span> 1953 airlift helicopter series by Sikorsky

The Sikorsky CH-37 Mojave is an American large heavy-lift military helicopter of the 1950s. It entered service as the HR2S-1 Deuce with USMC in 1956, and as the H-37A Mojave with the U.S. Army that same year. In the early 1960s the designation was standardized to CH-37 for both services, with the HR2S-1 redesignated as CH-37C specifically.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piasecki H-21</span> American military transport helicopter family

The Piasecki H-21 Workhorse/Shawnee is an American helicopter, the fourth of a line of tandem rotor helicopters designed and built by Piasecki Helicopter. Commonly called "the flying banana", it was a multi-mission helicopter, capable of being fitted with wheels, skis or floats.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hiller YH-32 Hornet</span> American ultralight helicopter

The Hiller YH-32 Hornet was an American ultralight helicopter built by Hiller Aircraft in the early 1950s. It was a small and unique design because it was powered by two Hiller 8RJ2B ramjet engines mounted on the rotor blade tips which weigh 13 lb (5.9 kg) each and deliver an equivalent of 45 hp (34 kW) for a total of 90 hp (67 kW). Versions of the HJ-1 Hornet were built for the United States Army and the United States Navy in the early 1950s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hiller VZ-1 Pawnee</span> Type of aircraft

The Hiller VZ-1 Pawnee was a unique direct-lift rotor aircraft, using contra-rotating ducted fans for lift inside a platform upon which the single pilot shifted body weight for directional control. The platform was developed starting in 1953 under an Office of Naval Research (ONR) contract to Hiller Aircraft, and flew successfully beginning in 1955.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avro Canada VZ-9 Avrocar</span> 1959 experimental VTOL aircraft model

The Avro Canada VZ-9 Avrocar was a VTOL aircraft developed by Avro Canada as part of a secret U.S. military project carried out in the early years of the Cold War. The Avrocar intended to exploit the Coandă effect to provide lift and thrust from a single "turborotor" blowing exhaust out of the rim of the disk-shaped aircraft. In the air, it would have resembled a flying saucer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sikorsky R-4</span> Two-seat military helicopter of the 1940s

The Sikorsky R-4 is a two-seat helicopter that was designed by Igor Sikorsky with a single, three-bladed main rotor and powered by a radial engine. The R-4 was the world's first large-scale mass-produced helicopter and the first helicopter used by the United States Army Air Forces, the United States Navy, the United States Coast Guard and the United Kingdom's Royal Air Force and Royal Navy. In U.S. Navy and U.S. Coast Guard service, the helicopter was known as the Sikorsky HNS-1. In British service it was known as the Hoverfly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tip jet</span> Jet nozzle at the tip of some helicopter rotor blades

A tip jet is a jet nozzle at the tip of some helicopter rotor blades, used to spin the rotor, much like a Catherine wheel firework. Tip jets replace the normal shaft drive and have the advantage of placing no torque on the airframe, thus not requiring the presence of a tail rotor. Some simple monocopters are composed of nothing but a single blade with a tip rocket.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bell XV-3</span> Experimental tiltrotor aircraft to explore convertiplane technologies

The Bell XV-3 is an American tiltrotor aircraft developed by Bell Helicopter for a joint research program between the United States Air Force and the United States Army in order to explore convertiplane technologies. The XV-3 featured an engine mounted in the fuselage with driveshafts transferring power to two-bladed rotor assemblies mounted on the wingtips. The wingtip rotor assemblies were mounted to tilt 90 degrees from vertical to horizontal, designed to allow the XV-3 to take off and land like a helicopter but fly at faster airspeeds, similar to a conventional fixed-wing aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bell YOH-4</span> Type of aircraft

The Bell YOH-4 was a single-engine, single-rotor light helicopter, developed for the United States Army's Light Observation Helicopter program. While the YOH-4A was unsuccessful in the original LOH competition, Bell redesigned it as the sleek Bell 206A JetRanger for the commercial market, and enjoyed instant and lasting success. In 1967, the Army reopened the LOH competition, and the 206A-based OH-58 Kiowa was selected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piasecki VZ-8 Airgeep</span> VTOL aircraft prototype by Piasecki Aircraft

The Piasecki VZ-8 Airgeep was a prototype vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) aircraft developed by Piasecki Aircraft. The Airgeep was developed to fulfill a U.S. Army Transportation Research Command contract for a flying jeep in 1957. The flying jeep was envisioned to be smaller and easier to fly than a helicopter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Platt-LePage XR-1</span> 1941 American experimental helicopter

The Platt-LePage XR-1, also known by the company designation PL-3, was an early American transverse rotors helicopter, built by the Platt-LePage Aircraft Company of Eddystone, Pennsylvania. The winner of a United States Army Air Corps design competition held in early 1940, the XR-1 was the first helicopter tested by the USAAF, flying in 1941. The flight testing of the XR-1 proved troublesome, and although continued testing showed that the design had promise, other, improved helicopters were becoming available before the XR-1 was ready for service. As a result, the development of the aircraft was terminated in 1945.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Doman LZ-5</span> Utility helicopter prototype

The Doman LZ-5 was a utility helicopter developed in the United States in the early 1950s by Doman Helicopters Inc. of Danbury, Connecticut. Despite the procurement of international manufacturing agreements, no series production of the aircraft ever occurred, and only three prototypes were built. Two of these were purchased by the United States Army as the YH-31, but eventually becoming VH-31.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SNCASO SO.1221 Djinn</span> Type of aircraft

The Sud-Ouest SO.1221 Djinn is a French two-seat light helicopter designed and manufactured by aircraft manufacturer Sud-Ouest (SNCASO), which was later merged into Sud Aviation. It was the first production French helicopter, as well as being one of the first practical European helicopters to be produced. The Djinn was also the first rotorcraft to harness tip-jet propulsion to enter production, and the first production turbine powered helicopter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piasecki HRP Rescuer</span> Type of aircraft

The Piasecki HRP Rescuer is a United States tandem-rotor transport or rescue helicopter designed by Frank Piasecki and built by Piasecki Helicopter. The Piasecki PV-3 was adopted as the HRP-1 Rescuer by the United States Navy, United States Marine Corps, and United States Coast Guard. An improved PV-17 variant was later produced as the HRP-2. As one of the first transport helicopters in military service, the HRP-1 was capable of carrying two crewmen and 8–10 passengers or 2,000 lb. (907 kg) of cargo.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rotor kite</span> Unpowered rotary wing aircraft or kite

A rotor kite or gyrokite is an unpowered, rotary-wing aircraft. Like an autogyro or helicopter, it relies on lift created by one or more sets of rotors in order to fly. Unlike a helicopter, gyrokites and rotor kites do not have an engine powering their rotors, but while an autogyro has an engine providing forward thrust that keeps the rotor turning, a rotor kite has no engine at all, and relies on either being carried aloft and dropped from another aircraft, or by being towed into the air behind a car or boat or by use of ambient winds for the kiting. As of 2009, no country in the world requires a license to pilot such a craft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piasecki H-16 Transporter</span> Type of aircraft

The Piasecki H-16 Transporter was a tandem-rotor transport or rescue helicopter designed by Frank Piasecki and built by Piasecki Helicopter. The prototypes were evaluated by the United States Air Force and Army, but the crash of the second test aircraft led to cancelling the project.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss-Wright VZ-7</span> Type of aircraft

The Curtiss-Wright VZ-7 was a VTOL quadrotor helicopter aircraft designed by the Curtiss-Wright company for the US Army. Like the Chrysler VZ-6 and the VZ-8 Airgeep it was to be a "flying jeep".

de Bothezat helicopter Type of aircraft

The de Bothezat helicopter, also known as the Jerome-de Bothezat Flying Octopus, was an experimental quadrotor helicopter built for the United States Army Air Service by George de Bothezat in the early 1920s, and was said at the time to be the first successful helicopter. Although its four massive six-bladed rotors allowed the craft to fly successfully, it suffered from complexity, control difficulties, and high pilot workload, and was reportedly only capable of forward flight in a favorable wind. The Army canceled the program in 1924, and the aircraft was scrapped.

The 1956 United States Army designation system was introduced by the United States Army to replace the designation system used by the United States Army Air Corps which had become the United States Air Force in 1948. It was used until the unified tri-service designation system for all services came into effect.

References

Notes
  1. ↑ Hearst Magazines (April 1956). "Aerocycle Lifts Soldier". Popular Mechanics. Hearst Magazines. p. 88.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 U.S. Army Transportation Museum
  3. 1 2 Hiller Aviation Museum
  4. 1 2 3 Goebel 2011
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Mechanix Illustrated 1955
  6. 1 2 Flight and Aircraft Engineer, 2 November 1956, p. 724.
  7. ↑ Champlin 1953
  8. 1 2 Harding 1997, p. 112.
  9. 1 2 The Aeroplane, v. 88, 1955. p. 443.
  10. ↑ Heyman and Parsch 2004
  11. ↑ Corn and Horrigan 1996, p. 127.
  12. ↑ The AOPA Pilot, v. 15, 1955.
  13. ↑ Coleman 1997, p. 4.
  14. ↑ "Selmer A. Sundby" Archived 6 July 2010 at the Wayback Machine . U.S. Army Aviation Museum website. Accessed 27 May 2010.
  15. ↑ "Ultra-fast Opening Personnel Parachute Type XMP-2". Defense Technical Information Center. Accessed 27 May 2010.
  16. ↑ Bridgman, Leonard, ed. (1956). Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1956-57. London: Sampson Low, Marston & Company, Ltd. pp. 263–264.
Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.