Deceased Wife's Sister's Marriage Act 1907

Last updated

Deceased Wife's Sister's Marriage Act 1907
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Variant 1, 2022).svg
Long title An Act to amend the Law relating to Marriage with a Deceased Wife's Sister.
(The short title is authorised by section 6 of the Act.)
Citation 7 Edw. 7. c. 47
Introduced by William Brampton Gurdon [1]
Territorial extent United Kingdom
Dates
Royal assent 28 August 1907
Commencement 28 August 1907
Repealed24 November 1949
Other legislation
Amended by
Repealed by
Relates to Colonial Marriages (Deceased Wife's Sister) Act 1906
Status
England and WalesRepealed [2]
ScotlandRepealed [3]
Republic of IrelandAmended [4]
Northern IrelandRepealed [5]
History of passage through Parliament
Text of statute as originally enacted

The Deceased Wife's Sister's Marriage Act 1907 (7 Edw. 7. c. 47) was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, allowing a man to marry his dead wife's sister, which had previously been forbidden. This prohibition had derived from a doctrine of canon law whereby those who were connected by marriage were regarded as being related to each other in a way which made marriage between them improper.

Contents

Prohibited degree of kinship for marriage included relatives by blood (consanguinity) to prevent incest, and extended to relatives by marriage (affinity) apparently reflecting an analogous taboo, or the idea that a married couple were "one flesh". [6] Originally, marriage was a matter of canon law in the United Kingdom and its predecessor kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland. Before the Reformation, the affinity rules of Catholic canon law applied, which since the Council of Elvira had regarded a deceased wife's sister as within the prohibited degrees, which could be exempted only by matrimonial dispensation from the pope. [7] The Reformation saw all three kingdoms replace the Catholic prohibitions with ones based on the incest prohibitions of Leviticus 18: in England by the Marriage Act 1540 and Matthew Parker's 1563 "Table of Kindred and Affinity", [8] both later adopted in Ireland, [9] and in Scotland by the Marriage Act 1567, [10] the Scots Confession 1560 and the Westminster Confession of Faith 1646. [11]

In Scotland, while the Confession absolutely prohibited marrying one's deceased wife's sister, the 1567 Act did not, causing some uncertainty. In 1889 Arthur Elliot introduced a bill to clarify this but it was defeated as superfluous, since the Confession had been adopted by statute. [11]

In the Church of England and Church of Ireland, a marriage within the prohibited degrees was not absolutely void ab initio but it was voidable at the suit in ecclesiastical court of any interested party. Matthew Boulton married his deceased wife's sister in 1760. He advised silence, secrecy and Scotland , although they married in London; the marriage was opposed by her brother. Similarly Charles Austen, the younger brother of Jane Austen, married his deceased wife's sister in 1820 and remained married to her until he died in 1852.

1830s changes

As long as both spouses of a voidable marriage lived, their children had the uncertain prospect of being made bastards by the voiding of the marriage. This prompted John Copley, 1st Baron Lyndhurst to introduce "Lord Lyndhurst's Act" (later the Marriage Act 1835 [12] ), which hardened the English and Irish law into an absolute prohibition, so that from then on such marriages could no longer take place in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and colonies at all. However, such marriages which had already taken place were validated.

After 1835 a marriage between a widower and his late wife's sister was still recognised in the United Kingdom if it took place abroad where it was lawful. For example, the painters William Holman Hunt and John Collier married the sisters of their deceased wives in, respectively, Switzerland and Norway. However, this was only possible for those who could afford to travel abroad; moreover, in 1861 the House of Lords ruled in Brook v. Brook that one spouse had to be domiciled in the jurisdiction of the wedding. [13] [14] While the Marriage Act 1836 allowed for civil marriage in a register office, the prohibitions of affinity remained unaffected.

An 1848 parliamentary inquiry concluded that the 1835 Act had not appreciably diminished the number of putative marriages within the prohibited degrees. [15] Its survey of part of England found 1364 such marriages since 1835 — more than 90% with a deceased wife's sister — compared with only 88 planned marriages prevented by the Act, of whom 32 couples remained in "open cohabitation". [16]

Campaigns

In 1842 a Marriage to a Deceased Wife's Sister Bill was introduced, and defeated by strong opposition. "Although seemingly a minor skirmish, [it] had far-ranging implications and was fought on the political scene almost annually for most of the Victorian period". [17] Peter Ferriday observed in his biography of Edmund Beckett, 1st Baron Grimthorpe: "Was there a single eminent Victorian who did not at some time or other announce his views on the 'deceased wife's sister'? She was the teething ring of all Victorian controversialists...". [18]

The topic was a main point in several novels: Felicia Skene's 1849 The Inheritance of Evil; or, the Consequences of Marrying a Deceased Wife's Sister opposed change, [19] while Dinah Craik's Hannah (1871) [20] and William Clark Russell's The Deceased Wife's Sister (1874, published anonymously) supported change. [21] Craik had accompanied Edith Waugh to her Swiss wedding with her sister Fanny's widower William Holman Hunt.

Widowers' desires to marry their sisters-in-law became the subject of particular agitation from the 1860s onward, and strong feelings were roused on both sides. However, it was to be nearly 50 years before the campaign for a change in the law was successful, despite the introduction of draft legislation in Parliament on many occasions. The lengthy nature of the campaign was referred to in the Gilbert and Sullivan opera Iolanthe (1882), in which the Queen of the Fairies sings "He shall prick that annual blister, marriage with deceased wife's sister". [22]

Near the end of Thomas Hardy's novel Tess of the d'Urbervilles (1891), Tess suggests that after her death, her husband Angel should marry her younger sister Liza-Lu; at the time the novel was set and published, such a marriage would have been illegal in England. [23]

In 1855, a year after resigning as Lieutenant-Governor of Victoria, Charles La Trobe married his deceased Swiss wife's sister in Neuchâtel. This ended his prospects of further public office, although he was made Companion of the Order of the Bath in 1858. [24] After Stella Duckworth's 1897 death, her husband John Hills courted her half-sister Vanessa Stephen [later Bell], but Stella's brother George Herbert Duckworth pressed them to break up, given that the 1835 Act prohibited their marrying. [25]

Edward Marjoribanks, 2nd Baron Tweedmouth, told the House of Lords in 1907: [26]

Between 1851 and 1889 you rejected the Deceased Wife's Sister Bill thirteen times. In 1883 you read it a second time, and in 1896, on the Motion of Lord Dunraven, it was read a second time by a majority of 38, the figures being 142 to 104; and the Bill was in that year passed through your Lordships' House to suffer extinction in the other House. In the House of Commons, during the fifty-eight years between 1849 and this year, the Deceased Wife's Sister Bill was carried by large majorities nineteen times.

Colonies

Although the 1835 Act applied throughout the British Empire, it was among the class of laws which the Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865 allowed colonies with responsible government to amend. Deceased Wife's Sister's Marriage Acts were passed by the Australian colonies in the 1870s, and by the Dominion of Canada in 1882. Although British law recognised foreign marriages, it was unclear, until the passage of the Colonial Marriages (Deceased Wife's Sister) Act 1906, whether such colonial marriages would be recognised within the United Kingdom. [27]

1907 act

The Deceased Wife's Sister's Marriage Act 1907 (7 Edw. 7. c. 47) removed the prohibition while providing savers for various existing laws, some to placate opposition of the Lords Spiritual (Church of England bishops). [28] The Bill was introduced as a private member's bill by William Brampton Gurdon, a backbencher of the Liberal Party, which was then in government. The government belatedly decided to support the Bill, which David G. Barrie sees as evidence of its commitment to social reform and willingness to take on the Lords, foreshadowing the Parliament Act 1911. [29]

Provisions

Section 1 of the act removed the affinity between a man and his deceased wife's sister as grounds for annulment of a past or future marriage. It allowed a Church of England clergyman to refuse to officiate at such a wedding, and to nominate a substitute clergyman of the same diocese to officiate in his stead. Past marriages of such affinity would remain null, notwithstanding the change in law, if they had already been annulled or either spouse had subsequently married someone else.

Section 2 provided that inheritance rights and obligations would not be changed by the validation of past marriages under the Act.

Section 3 provided that the Matrimonial Causes Act 1857 would be unaffected; adultery with one's wife's sister remained grounds for divorce proceedings, and a man was still forbidden from marrying his divorced wife's sister.

Section 4 retained the liability to ecclesiastical censure of a Church of England clergyman who married his deceased wife's sister.

Section 5 provided that the provisions applied to half-sisters.

Section 6 assigned the Act's short title.

Case law

The 1907 refusal of Holy Communion by the vicar of Eaton, Norfolk, to a parishioner legally married to his deceased wife's sister was overruled in 1908 by the statement of the Arches Court (a ruling upheld in 1912 by the House of Lords) that section 1 of the 1907 Act meant the Sacrament Act 1547 no longer applied to such spouses. [30]

The will of a man who died in 1902 specified that income from his investments would be paid to his widow until her remarriage. The income continued after her invalid 1904 remarriage to her deceased sister's widower. In 1911, Robert Parker ruled that, although s. 1 of the 1907 Act validated the 1904 marriage, s. 2 prevented termination of the 1902 income. [31]

A putative widow died shortly after the 1907 enactment. A son from her late husband's first marriage to her sister died intestate in 1911. Later that year, Thomas Warrington ruled that the widow's children were entitled to the same share of their half-brother's estate as his full siblings. [32]

If one was forbidden from marrying someone even after one's current spouse died, then sex with them while one's current spouse lived was considered to constitute the crime of incest under the Scottish Marriage Act 1567, and considered grounds for divorce under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1857. As regards sex with one's living wife's sister, the Deceased Wife's Sister's Marriage Act 1907 explicitly preserved the 1857 position [33] but was silent on the 1567 position. [34] A 1913 decision of the High Court of Justiciary held that such sex, though still adulterous, was no longer incestuous under the 1907 act. [34]

Where settlement funds were to be held in trust for the children of A as well by B as by every and any future wife he might marry, and A, after the death of B, by whom he had three children who all attained 21 in his lifetime, went through the form of marriage with the sister of his dead wife and had three children by her, and subsequently s. 1 of the 1907 Act legalized that marriage. In 1922, Frank Russell held that the effect of s. 2 was to provide that rights of property existing at the date of that marriage were not to be altered or interfered with, and that accordingly the children of the second marriage took no share of the settlement funds. [35]

Subsequent legislation

The 1907 Act did exactly what it said and no more. It was amended by the Deceased Brother's Widow's Marriage Act 1921 to allow a widow to marry her deceased husband's brother. [36] [37] This was a response to First World War deaths to encourage remarriages, reducing war widows' pensions and increasing the birth rate. [37]

In Great Britain, section 3 of the 1907 Act was repealed by the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925. [38] The Marriage (Prohibited Degrees) Relationship Act 1931 extended the operation of the 1907 Act to allow the marriages of nieces and nephews by marriage as well. [39] Section 4 of the 1907 Act was rendered moot in 1944, when the Convocations of Canterbury and York voted to align the Church of England prohibited degrees with the civil law. [40] In England and Wales the 1907, 1921, and 1931 Acts were repealed and consolidated by the Marriage Act 1949. [2] In Scotland they were repealed the Marriage (Enabling) Act 1960 (8 & 9 Eliz. 2. c. 29), which also permitted marriage in Great Britain with a relative of a former spouse who was divorced rather than deceased. [3] The prohibition on marriage with a divorced wife's sister is the crux of the plot of Cyril Hare's 1949 novel When the Wind Blows. In 1947 the House of Lords personal bill committee rejected a petition from a couple for a private act of Parliament exempting them from this prohibition. [41]

In Northern Ireland, the Parliament of Northern Ireland passed the Deceased Brother's Widow's Marriage Act (Northern Ireland) 1924 to remove doubts as to the application of the 1921 act there. [42] [43] Section 3 of the 1907 Act was repealed by the Matrimonial Causes Act (Northern Ireland) 1939. [44] The provisions of the 1931 and 1960 Acts regarding nieces and nephews in Great Britain were replicated for Northern Ireland in 1949 [45] and 1978 [46] respectively. The 1978 statute repealed the 1939 Act and replaced the others. [46] A 1984 statute replaced the 1978 statute, and repealed it and the earlier unrepealed ones. [5]

In Republic of Ireland law the 1907 Act has not been amended since 1921, [4] amendments made by Westminster subsequent to the coming into force of the Constitution of the Irish Free State being held not to apply. [47] In 1984, the Law Reform Commission recommended abolishing all restrictions based on affinity as opposed to consanguinity. [48] [49] In 2006, ruling in favour of a woman wishing to marry her divorced husband's brother, the High Court found section 3(2) of the 1907 Act as amended by the 1921 Act was incompatible with the Constitution of Ireland since the 1996 legalisation of divorce. [50] [49] Other degrees of affinity remain prohibited in law, [51] although jurist Maebh Harding suggests a case similar to 2006 would find them unconstitutional. [52]

See also

Sources

Primary
Secondary

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bigamy</span> Act of having two concurrent marriages

In a culture where only monogamous relationships are legally recognized, bigamy is the act of entering into a marriage with one person while still legally married to another. A legal or de facto separation of the couple does not alter their marital status as married persons. In the case of a person in the process of divorcing their spouse, that person is taken to be legally married until such time as the divorce becomes final or absolute under the law of the relevant jurisdiction. Bigamy laws do not apply to couples in a de facto or cohabitation relationship, or that enter such relationships when one is legally married. If the prior marriage is for any reason void, the couple is not married, and hence each party is free to marry another without falling foul of the bigamy laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Consanguinity</span> Property of being from the same kinship as another person

Consanguinity is the characteristic of having a kinship with a relative who is descended from a common ancestor.

Yibbum is the form of levirate marriage found in Judaism. As specified by Deuteronomy 25:5–10, the brother of a man who died without children is permitted and encouraged to marry the widow. However, if either of the parties refuses to go through with the marriage, both are required to go through a ceremony known as halizah, involving a symbolic act of renunciation of their right to perform this marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Affinity (Catholic canon law)</span> Concept in impediments to marriage

In Catholic canon law, affinity is an impediment to marriage of a couple due to the relationship which either party has as a result of a kinship relationship created by another marriage or as a result of extramarital intercourse. The relationships that give rise to the impediment have varied over time. Marriages and sexual relations between people in an affinity relationship are regarded as incest.

Marriage Act may refer to a number of pieces of legislation:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Popery Act</span> United Kingdom legislation

An Act to prevent the further Growth of Popery was an Act of the Parliament of Ireland that was passed in 1704 designed to suppress Roman Catholicism in Ireland ("Popery"). William Edward Hartpole Lecky called it the most notorious of the Irish Penal Laws.

Jewish views on incest deal with the sexual relationships which are prohibited by Judaism and rabbinic authorities on account of a close family relationship that exists between persons. Such prohibited relationships are commonly referred to as incest or incestuous, though that term does not appear in the biblical and rabbinic sources. The term mostly used by rabbinic sources is "forbidden relationships in Judaism".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dower</span> Assets reserved for a wife in case her husband dies

Dower is a provision accorded traditionally by a husband or his family, to a wife for her support should she become widowed. It was settled on the bride by agreement at the time of the wedding, or as provided by law.

In law and in cultural anthropology, affinity is the kinship relationship created or that exists between two people as a result of someone's marriage. It is the relationship each party in the marriage has to the family of the other party in the marriage. It does not cover the marital relationship itself. Laws, traditions and customs relating to affinity vary considerably, sometimes ceasing with the death of one of the marriage partners through whom affinity is traced, and sometimes with the divorce of the marriage partners. In addition to kinship by marriage, "affinity" can sometimes also include kinship by adoption or a step relationship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marriage in England and Wales</span> United Kingdom legislation

Marriage is available in England and Wales to both opposite-sex and same-sex couples and is legally recognised in the forms of both civil and religious marriage. Marriage laws have historically evolved separately from marriage laws in other jurisdictions in the United Kingdom. There is a distinction between religious marriages, conducted by an authorised religious celebrant, and civil marriages, conducted by a state registrar. The legal minimum age to enter into a marriage in England and Wales is 18 since 27 February 2023. Previously the minimum age of marriage was 16, with parental permission. This also applies to civil partnerships.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marriage law</span> Overview of marriage law worldwide

Marriage law is the legal requirements, an aspect of family law, that determine the validity of a marriage, and which vary considerably among countries.

In law, a prohibited degree of kinship refers to a degree of consanguinity, or sometimes affinity between persons that makes sex or marriage between them illegal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage law in the United States by state</span>

This article summarizes the same-sex marriage laws of states in the United States. Via the case Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States legalized same-sex marriage in a decision that applies nationwide, with the exception of American Samoa and sovereign tribal nations.

A void marriage is a marriage that is unlawful or invalid under the laws of the jurisdiction where it is entered. A void marriage is invalid from its beginning, and is generally treated under the law as if it never existed and requires no formal action to terminate. In some jurisdictions a void marriage must still be terminated by annulment, or an annulment may be required to remove any legal impediment to a subsequent marriage. A marriage that is entered into in good faith, but that is later found to be void, may be recognized as a putative marriage and the spouses as putative spouses, with certain rights granted by statute or common law, notwithstanding that the marriage itself is void.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Regency Act 1830</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Regency Act 1830 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed to provide for the event that King William IV died while the next person in line to the throne was not yet aged 18. It provided for a regency until the new monarch reached the age of 18, and also would have enabled a posthumous child of King William IV to replace Queen Victoria on the throne. However, the Act never came into force, because William was not survived by a legitimate child, and Victoria became queen in 1837 a few weeks after turning 18.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian family law</span>

Family law in Canada concerns the body of Canadian law dealing with domestic partnerships, marriage, and divorce.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polygamy in the United Kingdom</span>

Polygamous marriages may not be performed in the United Kingdom, and if a polygamous marriage is performed, the already-married person may be guilty of the crime of bigamy under section 11 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marriage Act 1949</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Marriage Act 1949 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom regulating marriages in England and Wales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marriage in New Zealand</span>

Marriage in New Zealand is governed by an Act of Parliament. The minimum marriage age is 18 years, or 16 years with consent of the Family Court. Polygamous marriages are not permitted in New Zealand. There are prohibitions of marriages between some relatives and some who are already in a civil union.

In English law, restitution of conjugal rights was an action in the ecclesiastical courts and later in the Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes. It was one of the actions relating to marriage, over which the ecclesiastical courts formerly had jurisdiction.

References

  1. "Marriage with a Deceased Wife's Sister Bill". Hansard. Vol. HC Deb 169. 15 February 1907. c. 417. Retrieved 15 September 2022 via api.parliament.uk.
  2. 1 2 12, 13 & 14 Geo. 6 c. 76 ss. 79 and 80, Schedules 5 and 6
  3. 1 2 1960 c. 29
  4. 1 2 "British Public Statutes Affected: 1907". electronic Irish Statute Book . 28 August 2022. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
  5. 1 2 Family Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Northern Ireland) Order 1984 [SI 1984 No. 1984 (N.I. 14)] Art. 21 Sch. 3
  6. Bennett 1998, pp. 678, 679
  7. Burtsell, R. (1907). "Affinity (In Canon Law)". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton. Retrieved 19 September 2022.
  8. "Articles of Religion; A Table of Kindred and Affinity, wherein whosoever are related, are forbidden in Scripture, and our Laws, to marry together". The Book of common prayer : and administration of the sacraments, and other rites and ceremonies of the church, according to the use of the Church of England : together with the Psalter or Psalms of David, pointed as they are to be sung or said in churches. Cambridge: J. Baskerville. 1762 [1662].
  9. Marriage Act 1542 (33 Hen. 8 c. 6 [Ir.]) and Church of Ireland Canon XLVII 1634
  10. A1567/12/15
  11. 1 2 "Marriage with a Deceased Wife's Sister (Scotland) Bill. (No. 13.)". Hansard. Vol. HC 334. 3 April 1889. cc1511–1532. Retrieved 19 September 2022.
  12. 5 & 6 Will. 4 c. 54
  13. Brook v. Brook (1861) 9 HLC 193, 11 E.R. 703; (1857) 27 Law J. Rep. 401
  14. O'Brien, John (30 April 1999). Conflict of Laws. Routledge. p. 447. ISBN   978-1-135-34995-0.
  15. Royal Commission on the State and Operation of the Law of Marriage (1848) p. xii
  16. Royal Commission on the State and Operation of the Law of Marriage (1848) pp. viii–ix
  17. Chambers, Diane M. (1996), "Triangular Desire and the Sororal Bond: The "Deceased Wife's Sister Bill."", Mosaic (Winnipeg), 29
  18. Ferriday, Peter (1957), Lord Grimthorpe, 1816–1905, London: John Murray Ltd., p. 9, OCLC   250668435
  19. Gruner 1999, p. 430; The Inheritance Of Evil; Or, The Consequences Of Marrying A Deceased Wife's Sister. London: R. Clay for Joseph Masters. 1849. Retrieved 19 September 2022 via Victorian Women Writers Project.
  20. Gruner 1999, p. 435; Craik, Dinah Maria Mulock (1872). Hannah. New York: Harper.
  21. Gruner 1999, p. 437; The deceased wife's sister, and My beautiful neighbour, in three volumes. London: Richard Bentley. 1874. Vol. I Vol. II
  22. Bradley, pp. 406–408
  23. Reilly, Dianne (Autumn 2003). "La Trobe's Marriage with his 'Deceased Wife's Sister'". La Trobe Journal (71). State Library Victoria Foundation: 147–148. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
  24. Bell, Quentin (1972). Virginia Woolf; a biography . New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. pp. 70–72. ISBN   978-0-15-193765-3 via Internet Archive.
  25. Tweedmouth, Edward Marjoribanks, 2nd Baron (20 August 1907). "Marriage with a Deceased Wife's Sister Bill. Second Reading". Hansard. api.parliament.uk. cc348–419. Retrieved 19 September 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  26. Nagai, Kaori (December 2002). "'A Harem in the Home: The Deceased Wife's Sister Bill and the Colonisation of the English Hearth'". Australasian Victorian Studies Journal. 8 (1): 45–59. Retrieved 4 September 2022.
  27. Bennett 1998, p. 669
  28. Barrie, David G. (1 December 2021). "The Forgotten Liberal Social Reform? Marriage with a Deceased Wife's Sister, Political Nonconformity and the New Liberalism in Edwardian Britain". The English Historical Review. 136 (583): 1477–1512. doi:10.1093/ehr/ceab357.
  29. Banister v. Thompson [1908] Probate 362; Thompson v. Dibdin 1912 AC 533, 56 SJ 647; Bennett 1998, pp. 670–677
  30. In re Whitfield, Hill v. Mathie; [1911] 1 Ch 310; 80 LJCh 263; 130 LT 878; 55 SJ 237; 27 TLR 203
  31. In re Green, Green v. Meinall; [1911] 2 Ch 275; 131 LT 360; 46 LJ 381
  32. Deceased Wife's Sister's Marriage Act 1907 sec. 3(1)
  33. 1 2 Solicitor-General v AB 1914 SC(J) 38
  34. In re Springfield's Settlement; Davies v. Springfield; 66 SJ 268
  35. 11 & 12 Geo.5 c.24
  36. 1 2 Durbach, Nadja (January 2022). ""Why Cant 2 Brothers"? World War I and Britain's Deceased Brother's Widow Act of 1921". Journal of Family History. 47 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1177/0363199020988326. S2CID   234193561.
  37. 15 & 16 Geo. 5. c.49 s.226 sch.6
  38. 21 & 22 Geo. 5 c.31
  39. Bennett 1998, p. 679
  40. Group appointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury 1984 p. 17 § 38
  41. 14 & 15 Geo. 5 c. 22 (NI)
  42. The Statutes Revised, Northern Ireland. Vol. D (2nd ed.). Belfast: H.M. Stationery Office. 1982. p. 493.
  43. 1939 c.13 (NI) s.31 sch
  44. 1949 c. 17 (NI); "Recent Legislation in Northern Ireland". Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly. 8 (4): 215–216. May 1950.
  45. 1 2 Matrimonial Causes (Northern Ireland) Order 1978 [SI 1984 No. 1045 (N.I. 15)] Art. 61 Sch. 5
  46. Mohr, Thomas (8 April 2011). "British Imperial Statutes and Irish Sovereignty: Statutes Passed After the Creation of the Irish Free State". Journal of Legal History. 32 (1): 61–85. doi:10.1080/01440365.2011.559120. hdl: 10197/6058 . ISSN   0144-0365. S2CID   144062978.
  47. Report on Nullity of marriage (PDF). LRC Reports. Vol. LRC 9-1984. Dublin: Law Reform Commission. October 1984. p. 141. Retrieved 22 September 2022.{{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  48. 1 2 "Constitutional right to marry restricted by 1907 Act". The Irish Times. 6 November 2006. Retrieved 22 September 2022.
  49. O'Shea v Ireland [2006] IEHC 305; [2007] 2 I.R. 313
  50. "Legal requirements for marriage". Citizens Information. 14 January 2022.
  51. Harding, Maebh (March 2012). "The curious incident of the Marriage Act (no 2) 1537 and the Irish statute book". Legal Studies. 32 (1): 78–108. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00217.x. S2CID   146384787. SSRN   1742858.

Further reading